I may be wrong, but I recall seeing someone (maybe even a mod) saying that you can report again and write "disconsider my last report" or similar.
I did that once and one was marked as bad (it would have been marked as bad or unhandled either way) and I can't remember what happened to the other. And in all cases, having it market as bad does nothing to your account, as others have mentioned above.
I know, but it waste mod's time  It was just a thought. |
|
|
|
He deleted the last post and made a new post then he deleted the 2nd last post which I got in this archive.
Actually, first two posts are merged:  I have no clue why off topic post is merged with "on" topic post, game-protect's topic is not about me Last post might be removed by moderator and posted by GP again or GP deleted it and posted again, in both cases they bumped thread second time today. |
|
|
|
It would be good if users could "cancel" their reports, for example this post was reported because it was off topic:  After editing, it is not off topic any more:  ...and report will probably be marked as bad. |
|
|
|
When and how did GP violate the rules?
Quote written contract between GP and forum that he/she/it is not allowed to break not existing rules. Believing that GP violated rules is not knowing, and removing posts after not knowing is possible only in fantasy world!  |
|
|
|
So clearly we are seeing breaking rules?
I've been reporting multiposts for some time now, it is like whack a mole game - moderator remove post and after that GP do his multicraping again. GP's latest post (archived: http://archive.is/dpDYN#selection-3331.0-3330.9) not only it is multiposting, it has nothing to do with thread. I've seen people getting ban for less offenses so I am not really sure why is GP allowed to do this. In cases like this where the disruptive intent of the user is quite obvious and they break the rules blatantly and repeatedly - I really don't understand why they're allowed to continue.
Quote applicable law that GP is not allowed to post in forum  |
|
|
|
@blurryeyed I have read your PM. I don't see dkbit98 as one of yobit's shill accounts, I don't know what he posted in their thread but this certainly doesn't sound like he is one of "them" or that he created account to shill for yobit (although he maybe posted something in their thread, I don't know, there is no reference):  It would be best if you both remove trust ratings you left to each other and forget about the whole thing.
Regarding feedback - it is neutral, I am not going to remove it, if that is what you have asked. |
|
|
|
Skuzio sam da se ovdje ponekad trazi dlaka u jajetu, pogotovo ako se zakacis sa nekim, onda se kopa po starim postovima a ne treba mi da popijem ban zbog takve neke gluposti koja se lako moze izbjeci.
I šta će te prijaviti i reći "vidi, stavio je sliku koju je našo negdje na internetu"? Čini mi se da je sve ovo počelo kad se jedan poznati troll rekao da je netko plagijator jer je stavio sliku bez izvora ili tako nešto žalio nešto oko plagiarizma i bananja (tema je negdje u meti) a korisnik xtraelv je to sve jako dobro negdje objasnio, baš mu budem poslao poruku jer nemam pojma gdje je taj post, pa ću ga podijeliti ovdje. Vjerojatno upravo zbog te "dlake u jajetu" sve više ljudi na forumu stavlja izvor slike. Ja nisam mislio isključivo na forum. Pristojno je i poželjno navesti izvor kad bilo gdje koristiš tuđi rad. Jer ako sliku staviš bez navođenja izvora, ispada sa si ti autor.
Kao što rekoh, neznam za nijedan slučaj dobijanja bana zbog toga, da se to pravilo provodi i vrijedi velika većina članova foruma bi davnih dana dobila ban: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=77535.0https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.0https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5194262.0Vjerovatno najbolji primjer: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5124947.msg50401283#msg50401283  |
|
|
|
I propose a toast with virtual šljivovica Thanks satoshi for making our lives easier, admins and moderators for hard work, mum, dad, brother, sister, daughter, son, neighbours, friends, dog, cat... Happy anniversary! |
|
|
|
Upravo tako. Inače bi uvijek trebalo navesti izvor ako koristiš nečiji tuđi rad. Nije važno koristiš li ga ovdje na forumu ili negdje drugdje. Nije u redu da koristiš tuđi rad, a da ljudi misle da si ti autor.
Evo tu sam već skoro 4 godine i do sad još nisam čuo da je netko dobio ban zato što je zalijepio nekakvu sliku bez da je naveo izvor, premda u zadnje vrijeme često vidim da se stavlja izvor ispod slike(evo i ja sam nedavno, u daniel91-ovoj temi o pošti stavio, ono, source: pošta ). Jedna tema puna slika bez izvora... Što se tiče "meme": even memes may soon constitute copyright theft Only in the EUSSR.  Mislim da ako uzmeš nečiju sliku, uploadaš ju na ImgUr (ili neki drugi servis) i onda staviš link na forum, ne bi trebao biti problem dodati tekst "Autor: XYZ".
Mislim da bi ovo trebalo biti dovoljno: https://help.imgur.com/hc/en-us/articles/202062328-Can-I-use-images-I-find-here-on-my-TV-show-blog-news-article-etc- Koristiš sliku koja se nalazi na imguru a link je "ispod slike" pa ne bih baš rekao da je to plagiarizam. |
|
|
|
Cool game I especially liked "It says administrator under my name not president" and if I remember correctly there was something like "scammers are often stupid". GameKyuubi punching bankers, reptiles and other people who are against bitcoin, well, that was epic. |
|
|
|
Sve mi se cini da i nema neke logike oko tog Legendary activity, jednostavno treba imati srece, mislim da je to cisto random. Sto znaci da 2 accounta koja su napravljena u isto vrijeme i oba skupe 1000 merita u isto vrijeme mogu imati cak godinu dana razlike izmedju Legendary ranka.
Bas me zanima koliko activitya je trebalo nasim ovdje Legendary clanovima, jesu imali srece?
Sudeći po ovome https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2766177.0 legendary se postane između 775 i 1030 bodova, to je otprilike razlika od nekih 8-9 mjeseci plus naravno neke 2 godine da skupite 775 bodova, uzevši u obzir da uredno pišete 14 postova u periodu od 2 tjedna. Više od 14 bodova u tom periodu nećete dobiti. Naravno, ako počnete brisati stare postove i da vam se dogodi da zbog toga budete imali manje od tih 14 postova/2 tjedna, aktivnost će vam pasti. @dkbit98 ako sam dobro računao, mogao bi postati legendary negdje za 8 - 16 mjeseci.
Nisam pratio koliko sam imao bodova kad mi se digao rank na legendary, sjećam se samo da sam skupio tisućiti merit i postao legendary nekih tjedan dana nakon toga. |
|
|
|
why are the Cryptonians being banned on a Regular?
There are some very bad cryptonians who use their super powers to break forum rules and forum administration doesn't like that so it is best to ban most evil villains. |
|
|
|
My account is not actually hacked.
User skivrmt stopped posting on May 14, 2015:  Hack happened on May 22, 2015 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1067985.0 so unless you can prove that account is not hacked we can assume that it was hacked and later sold to you, but neither won't change the fact that you bought account. In addition, I do not violate neither forum rules, nor signature rules.
I don't think it is allowed to trade hacked accounts? |
|
|
|
Sad mene zanima da li BTC adresa koju bih koristio moze biti drugacija od one koju sam dao za signature kampanju (Ledger adresa).
Praksa je da napišeš addresu u temi koju je slacković linkao, u krajnjoj liniji ako dođe do toga da ti netko ukrade account ne vidim razlog zašto ga ne bi mogao vratiti sa bilo kojom adresom koju si negdje postao - ne znam da li admin prakticira ovo, pa ono, zalijepi adresu u temu. da ne bi bilo nismo znali te koji uopce wallet preferirate za potpisivanje?
Bilo koji wallet u koji imaš povjerenje i sa kojega možeš signati poruku. Također isprintaj private key ako se slučajno dogodi kakav EMP Da. Bolje je korisititi čistu BTC bez transakcija zbog anonimnosti ali nije obavezno To baš i nema previše smisla za ljude koji su u signature kampanjama, zar ne?
Edit: Samo da nadodam, signed message će vam trebati ne samo za vraćanje accounta nego i za na primjer posuđivanje novca na forumu, nekakvih trejdova, korištenje escrowa i slično. |
|
|
|
Explain why you sent me the below quote, or admit you enjoy looking at pictures of underage boys you fifty plus year old sick fuck. I have a lot more to lose than you do by exposing someone.
His info is known so when he expose someone they can use that info to hurt him, ripoff report is given to you as one example of someone "hurting" him (reputation), that is how I understood that message. Other than this, you should be aware that Ripoff Report is extortion site, anyone can anonymously submit report against someone - while Ripoff won't verify such reports, they will post them and you will have to pay them to investigate those claims and to remove them from site. |
|
|
|
Vod claimed I offered him NastyFans seats to sponsor his website. I say he is a liar. Your only comment on this thread needs to be telling Vod to post the quote or admit to lying.
Ok, master! Vod, I am telling you: post the quote! Now, your turn: And what was that you were saying about theymos suchmoon advertising illegal money laundering service, I didn't quite understand that post? Explain it to troll and member of circle of con artists! |
|
|
|
A shame that people like suchmoon and marlboroza can't seem to ever end up on the right side of these disputes. Look at the other troll minifrij even jumping in to leave some false feedback. That's how far this circle of con artists goes to protect each other.
But you are the one who keeps bumping this thread over and over again! You say something and people ask you something! And what was that you were saying about theymos suchmoon advertising illegal money laundering service, I didn't quite understand that post? Explain it to troll and member of circle of con artists! Vod posted this in response to Og twisting the same statement to his benefit.
But the statement is 100% to OGNasty's benefit... So their is no twist.. I think the context of that whole episode was deescalation It seems so: I was disgusted by the reckless and vicious doxing in this case, where:
- The evidence was very thin.
- Even if all of the allegations were true, it'd likely result only in civil penalties, not criminal.
- The whole thing was motivated merely by past arguments. OgNasty never caused Vod to even lose anything, as far as I know. An utterly ridiculous & disproportionate escalation.
- It's based on the premise that purely statutory crimes are directly unethical, which I don't agree with at all, though I'm willing to mostly look past this as subjective.
It's good that Vod came to his senses on this after the fact, though doing it at all certainly blemishes his reputation in my mind, and I added to my notes the fact that those users merited such a post. Meriting it is saying basically that we need more posts like this on the forum, and we do not need more posts like this on the forum.
Red-trusting Vod over this is an appropriate usage of red-trust, since his actions here are highly trust-relevant. But I tend to think that since he edited his post and seems to genuinely regret at least the public doxxing part, it'd be best to forgive.
For the meriters, I can understand the argument for red-trust, but I tend to think that it's at the wrong level. If the meriter was meriting it because they were actively thinking, "I want to make the forum really vicious, where everyone is constantly tearing each other apart for stupid things, and this post moves in that direction," even that's not really a trust-relevant motive, just a very unhelpful motive. And probably the meriters were thinking more innocent things than that.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
