|
I am participating of newsletter campaign.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm participating (newsletter, twitter, telegram). This post can be proof.
|
|
|
|
|
I am participating in the newsletter campaign
|
|
|
|
|
Proof of authentication - Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
This is my proof of authentication post link to participate in the Telegram campaign.
|
|
|
|
|
Joining telegram, newsletter and twitter. I already filled the forms (except newsletter because of the link).
|
|
|
|
|
I fulfilled the rules for the Twitter campaign, but I am marked in red. Can you check that out, please? Thank you very much.
|
|
|
|
I haven't been contacted on Facebook yet. How will I receive Facebook bounties?
Hello, send your encrypted alternate to our bounty-related Facebook page. All the instructions can be found in the pinned post. https://www.facebook.com/DECENTBounty/ Thank you! |
|
|
|
|
I haven't been contacted on Facebook yet. How will I receive Facebook bounties?
|
|
|
|
Why are innacurate* and 80 views only blog posts such as this ( https://steemit.com/paypie/@simonjones/paypie-the-future-of-credit-risk-assessment) ranked above average and receive 500 PPP? I read the whole whitepaper, studied how decentralized credit risk assessment works and how a decentralized accounting platform could generate value altogether, along with other opportunities that derive. My blog post was organized and had insightful views, credible and real-life examples to elucidate the power of PayPie platform. You cna check it here ( https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@jvper/what-you-need-to-know-about-paypie-s-whitepaper). Besides, around 20% more views (most of the audience is people who are not necessarily steem-powered steemit users and therefore cannot upvote, but anyway they can read). Why should I deserve 80% lower payment? This is ultrageous. I put hard work on it. I even draw images to show in clearer ways my examples on how PayPie may be valuable, and somehow it is rated worse than semicopy-paste articles with little effort and lower audience. No offense intended to author simonjones, since his article is good, but I don't understand PayPie's criteria. It should definitely be reviewed. *I say the article is innacurate because saying that "businesses can rest assured that their [accounting] data is 100% accurate" by using PayPie is not accurate. Most readers don't get it. The writer should provide an explanation to how PayPie can generate such accuracy and in what circumstances. Just copy-pasting sound sentences do not generate a good reaction on the readers and won't prompt them to participate of the ICO. For instance, the example I wrote makes it evident to the reader how PayPie can bring 100% accuracy in a transaction in opposition to current days centralized ledgers. After much effort, all I got here was indifference. |
|
|
|
Why are innacurate* and 80 views only blog posts such as this ( https://steemit.com/paypie/@simonjones/paypie-the-future-of-credit-risk-assessment) ranked above average and receive 500 PPP? I read the whole whitepaper, studied how decentralized credit risk assessment works and how a decentralized accounting platform could generate value altogether, along with other opportunities that derive. My blog post was organized and had insightful views, credible and real-life examples to elucidate the power of PayPie platform. You cna check it here ( https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@jvper/what-you-need-to-know-about-paypie-s-whitepaper). Besides, around 20% more views (most of the audience is people who are not necessarily steem-powered steemit users and therefore cannot upvote, but anyway they can read). Why should I deserve 80% lower payment? This is ultrageous. I put hard work on it. I even draw images to show in clearer ways my examples on how PayPie may be valuable, and somehow it is rated worse than semicopy-paste articles with little effort and lower audience. No offense intended to author simonjones, since his article is good, but I don't understand PayPie's criteria. It should definitely be reviewed. *I say the article is innacurate because saying that "businesses can rest assured that their [accounting] data is 100% accurate" by using PayPie is not accurate. Most readers don't get it. The writer should provide an explanation to how PayPie can generate such accuracy and in what circumstances. Just copy-pasting sound sentences do not generate a good reaction on the readers and won't prompt them to participate of the ICO. For instance, the example I wrote makes it evident to the reader how PayPie can bring 100% accuracy in a transaction in opposition to current days centralized ledgers. |
|
|
|
|
I haven't received any of my bounties (BTT and FB). When will you start contacting us on Facebook for Facebook bounties?
jvper
DECENT Witness and Day One ICO Investor
|
|
|
|
|
Payments ans tokenizarion are the best use cases. I believe UTRUST is in the right direction. We may see a multiplication of value here very soon.
|
|
|
|
|
I can't wait to see everything working fine here. If distribution goes smooth I may buy more tokens.
|
|
|
|
Hello Decent Team
Any news from translation bounty ? nothing received yet , waiting for confirmation from other members as well .
Thank you and good luck
Still nothing. Can we register for Translation Bounty ? Any official statement? Hello, we will contact you regarding individual translation rewards and agreements. Currently we are distributing social media bounties. I'm wondering how Facebook bounties will be paid. Will you contact users via Facebook Messenger? jvper DECENT Witness and Day One ICO Investor |
|
|
|
|
Very good team. They even sent me the gas I needed.
|
|
|
|
|
The partnership with SOMA is really great news. I'm proud to be carrying this signature!
|
|
|
|
|
Another ICO? They want to reinvent everything, including the concept of Initial Coin Offerings!
|
|
|
|
Still progressing, many bugs fixed, new features added and marketing hype is round the corner  glad to hear it's still being developed I wish fraudsters who collect money through ICO and do not deliver what they promised had only two alternatives: either refund investors or go to jail. As easy as that. They just ruin everything scamming out people... |
|
|
|
So the bounty payment will not start again this, Decent has been promising this will happen this month but from the recent comment days/weeks is ambiguous to me. I just hope they will put their act together and resolve the bounty issue
They said our bounties will be distributed within days/weeks, so it is alright. No need to worry. In addition to that, the price has been developing upwards, so no need to worry about it. jvper DECENT Witness and Day One ICO Investor |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
