Hope you guys find an solution on monday!
What's the plan for monday. I missed it. There's a shareholder's meeting on Monday to decide what steps to take next. You can learn more about the possible outcomes of the meeting in Smith + Crown's summary of the controversy Read on: https://www.smithandcrown.com/summary-of-synereo-controversy/Saying the refund would be up to 33% less than what was funded is wrong. The 600+ BTC frozen by Yunbi must be considered at both the 3.1 million and the 4.7 million figures! They would not receive any money back (they already possess their money). The correct estimate would be a refund of 3.1 million over the 4.3 million invested and transferred to Synereo. |
|
|
|
wah looks nice decent project
what price 1 decent?
and how all decent supply ?
Here is the ICO overview, where you can see the overall number of DCT that will be ever issues, how many of DCT were sold during ICO etc: https://decent.ch/decent-ico-overview/More information coming soon, stay tuned  It's not showing up. That link works for me. Try again now, maybe... |
|
|
|
wah looks nice decent project
what price 1 decent?
and how all decent supply ?
Some were calculating if the price of each decent will worth 12,5k satoshi. The investors were buying the DCT token at the 50% bonus. The decent supply 86 million DCT. Decent supply will be 51.3 million DCT. Then some DCTs will be mined, but the maximum overall amount is set at 73.29 million (considering 21.99 DCT to be mined for decades to come). |
|
|
|
|
I believe ATM will only be massive once the scalability problem is solved.
|
|
|
|
Regardless of Greg's behavior, I believe Synereo should not behave inappropriate as well. In consideration to all second crowdsale investors who decided to invest based on all documentation provided by Synereo at that time, the company should open the possibility of a refund. It means only for those who request it, based on the impossibility of targeting RChain development as stated in the crowdsale documentation.
If necessary, Synereo could do a crowdfund based on this new scenario (and new commitments) and see what happens.
Much fairer with all 2nd crowdsale investors. Otherwise, it would look like a scam (sale of AMPs for a purpose no longer targeted).
no way - enough people bought paralel to the 2nd ico on open markets as it seemed cheaper than the ico price - how will u refund them ? - NO MORE FUNDRAISERs !! - the 2nd was already a bad idea - start burning the coins u promised you will - reduce that crazy coin count to something legit and take it from there another 'fundraiser' will break this project (at least for me) Whoever bought parallel to the 2nd crowdsale bought from a seller who did not promise him/her anything. On the other hand, who bought directly from Synereo was promised something. That's why Synereo is legally responsible for crowdsale investors only. If Synereo is not going to deliver what was promised to the crowdsale investors, Synereo must give them the option for a refund. This is plain and simple. We can discuss it all day long, but it will not change Synereo's legal responsibility at all. If Greg is considered responsible for all this pain, it is up to Synereo to request indemnity from him. |
|
|
|
|
Regardless of Greg's behavior, I believe Synereo should not behave inappropriate as well. In consideration to all second crowdsale investors who decided to invest based on all documentation provided by Synereo at that time, the company should open the possibility of a refund. It means only for those who request it, based on the impossibility of targeting RChain development as stated in the crowdsale documentation.
If necessary, Synereo could do a crowdfund based on this new scenario (and new commitments) and see what happens.
Much fairer with all 2nd crowdsale investors. Otherwise, it would look like a scam (sale of AMPs for a purpose no longer targeted).
|
|
|
|
How many here are going to "Mine" this coin? I have few Gigabytes available. And a very low power 5w PC.
I got hundreds of GB available. If it shows profitable enough, I will consider buying a 2TB HD and have it paid by tokens. |
|
|
|
|
But the chinese people were smart enough and did not hand over their promised BTC. Why buying AMPs at 30k up to 40k satoshi instead of 6k? Very unfair to the other crowdfunders...
|
|
|
|
|
Where is the signature displayed if someone does not post? Old posts only? Old posts are rarely seen. How can that benefit DECENT? Weird. But whatever...
|
|
|
|
Synereo did not hold to the commitment of burning 2nd crowdsale unsold AMPs, did they?
They will be burned shortly. Ok. Thanks for the info. I know much important things are on the table at the moment, but we must always hold to our promises whatsoever. |
|
|
|
|
Synereo did not hold to the commitment of burning 2nd crowdsale unsold AMPs, did they?
|
|
|
|
Have you ever paid $$$$ for something and received another thing? If the company was unable to deliver what they announced, you have the right to a refund.
If the original purpose of the 2nd fundraising will not be delivered, as per documentation provided, all those investors should have the right to a refund.
I myself have claimed numerous times that a drop in price is no reason for a refund. This is market risk. However, if the original purpose will (unfortunately) not be aimed from start, this is time to think about giving those resources back to people who trusted that project, which is no longer on the table.
Why don't you go ask Greg for refund since it is Greg who clearly wanted to leave Synereo and doesn't want AMP holders to be the main beneficiaries of his vaporware RChain, but wants us all to fund his ass. Why don't you broach the subject with him the next time he states that "AMPs will be one of many different currencies on RChain". He's having one of his goddamn Hangout sessions with his druggie buddy and his other bitches this coming Sunday at 9:30AM PST. Go ask the lying sack of shit. I want to see what type of bullshit response he gives you. Because I did not fund Greg! Impossible! It was Synereo. Greg doesn't even have the ability to withdraw those bitcoins (and I am not saying he should!) It was and has always been Synereo who promised and got funded, as per documentation provided. All those investors should have the right to a refund if the purpose is no longer to be aimed, regardless of whose fault it is. |
|
|
|
|
Have you ever paid $$$$ for something and received another thing? If the company was unable to deliver what they announced, you have the right to a refund.
If the original purpose of the 2nd fundraising will not be delivered, as per documentation provided, all those investors should have the right to a refund.
I myself have claimed numerous times that a drop in price is no reason for a refund. This is market risk. However, if the original purpose will (unfortunately) not be aimed from start, this is time to think about giving those resources back to people who trusted that project, which is no longer on the table.
|
|
|
|
This scheme brings into mind Synerio AMPs where Dor Konforty ran with the same "donation" scam and fucked over all his "donators" when they lost more than 70% of what they put in before they even got their coins.
I'm sorry, what? You gave me my coins, after that as the price dropped by 50%. I could not to stop loss somehow. I demand compensation to me losses. As you made me the hostage. Otherwise, you continue communication with my lawyer. Didn't you read the rules? Clearly you would not be able to stop loss. And yet you decided to donate (invest). Instead of a lawyer, talk with an economist before closing such deals |
|
|
|
|
Still waiting for the promised burn of all unsold AMPS...
|
|
|
|
|
Checking in. 3rd week for me.
|
|
|
|
|
When are you going to burn the unsold AMP, as promised?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
