Just saying investing in ico in general is not worth it. capital gets blocked and price usually falls below ico levels after release, why participate in ico when you can buy from the market later at almost or even cheaper upon release. Decent is the last ico I bought, I hope it's worth the wait. Right now it sucks to have capital tied up when alt market is booming, lots of opportunities. How is decent different from lbr credits ? They seem similar. Hope I made myself clear this time  Decent is not going to fall. Decent will be going up from the day of its launch until reaching a minimum of 2K-20K M $ ($ 40- $ 350 per DCT). Do you really think it's a lot?  Do not think it will fall. If you do not want to see it fall, keep buying. It thinks that the annual emission will be little (only 1M DCT per year) and only will be in circulation 51 M DCT It is a great project. It will rise and rise. Why? Because it will be used a lot and will be scarce. Its manifest destiny is the moon  I believe this coin will definitely be big. But from $40 to $350, that's quite a lot. What makes you so confident? There are many things that can not be described with 4 lines and I will only leave brush strokes… The annual Ethereum coin issuance has been about 18M ETH per year and will continue to grow until the end of this year when it enters the Casper algorithm. Decent mining is going to take almost 20 years to do the same as Ethereum in 1.5 years and the total sale of DCT coins has been much lower than that of Ethereum. In Ethereum 60 M of ETH were sold and in Decent 51 M of DCT. Ethereum is becoming increasingly used and will be very scarce later this year. It is a fast currency in transactions and cheaper than Bitcoin. The emission of Ethereums will be of more than 100 M of ETH and its inflation will tend to 0. In Decent is going to happen something similar, it will be able to build in its chain multitude of applications, its currency Decent is scarce because they are already all their circulating currencies and its mining will be incentivated to protect the network.It is widely used by all , There is much to do and build in Decent. Communication between peers of buying and selling digital files is very broad (software, games, music, video, books, photos ...). Millions of people are going to want to publish in Decent, free of spam, free of intermediaries, censorship-free and filtering information .... It is and will be a great revolution in file sharing. Your software is a wonder and anger in constant evolution. A great team behind. We are many people on the planet wanting to publish on this platform and is not even known by many. When Decent goes out into the world and people realize their full potential many companies will want to participate in their data distribution technology. We have only seen the tip of the Iceberg. Decent will be worth billions of dollars in little more than 5 years and if you are smart you will not sell. Do not recognize a big project of a bad one? Do not sell your coins for pennies. Its manifest destiny has been from its ICO the moon. The true human spirit flies free away from political ideals, social conventions, doctrines, religions, moralizing and outdated ethics. All these constraints are mere distractions, generated with the sole aim of keeping captive nature that belongs to us and that transcends intangible walls. The only limit that holds us and keeps us from flying is that we are able to imagine. Regards Thanks a lot for the support and your belief in the future of decentralized content distribution! We are focusing on the development to deliver a fully functioning product in June and start the revolution of online distribution industry. We are glad to know that people see a real potential of DECENT and we ask you, as a future DECENT user, share any suggestion or ideas you may have about what could be a perfect addition to DECENT Network. Please, let us know  A service on the Decent platform: Decentralized real estate portal. The name I already have it: DECENT Real Estate or DECENTRE-S (decentralization real estate). The authors (individuals or real estate agencies) upload the contents of their homes (photos, videos, pdf. plans, observations...) and are charged a small percentage for the custody of the contents in the blockchain. In the Decent website, you will put a tab that will take you directly to a world map where anyone on the planet could offer your home for rent or sale. I can live in Spain but have a property in New York that I want to rent without middleman. With a view to a future .... Once all this has been developed, Decent could market an automatic QR code lock that the landlord will put into the hands of the tenant once he pays the accommodation in advance. The code will give access to housing through a smart contract between the parties and will lock the lock just at the end of the contract by changing the QR by a different one. A sensor will notify the owner if the door is open or closed at all times. It could create an agreement with Slock.it for the development of the lock with smart contract and DECENTRE promote the rent and sale between individuals. These are just ideas that can be done on this platform, just to mention one. Slock.it? No! Stephan Tual? No! Leave Decent alone from the DAO mess! Don't listen to him. Michael79, please bring another idea! Decent has a good potential and could grow in applications indeed. |
|
|
|
The problem here is the 950 million total supply, which is a big burden even if the product is delivered.
Who cares, I don't think the Synereo team will sell them. They are working hard on Synereo, and it will be probably worth a lot if they deliver it correctly. Why sell the 950 million now, then you can sell that in 10-20 years for potential billions of dollars? I believe most social media was also 80-90% in the hands of a few guys, so this is no different than investing in early Facebook or Google. I dont think people should be scared of the supply. If the price rises, they won't sell, because their assets would only grow in price, and who is that stupid to sell into a starting bull market? Who claimed they would sell? The issue here is: there is a huge amount of coins, which makes the valuation quite high, even for few cents per coin. I'm with PG on this one, there's still only 82 million coins in circulation - the total AMP supply doesn't matter. Synereo already burned half of them! Dor said earlier that they would use the remaining AMPS for development purposes. Development=more money brought into Synereo. It is contingent. Therefore it cannot be neglected... Although those coins are currently locked, one day they will be unlocked, so the real market cap will be 949 million times price per coin. Oh, sure, Synereo will sell ALL of their AMPs at the same time. You'd think that they would've done it sooner though, it's been 3 years. Hmm... Market capitalization is calculated regardless of the owners intention of selling or not. That's my point. Is the market cap of Bitcoin based on 21 million coins or what is now available in the market? Some websites consider 21 million. Others, like coinmarketcap, consider the current supply. If one considers the current supply, then the difference to 21 million must be considered a cost (paid through dillution) to run bitcoin blockchain. A cost that will be paid by current bitcoin owners in order to attract more miners, which is fundamental to the blockchain long term existence. Similarly, we can either consider the market cap to be 949 million * price per AMP (especially considering all those tokens already exist) or consider only the current supply, but then all the locked AMPs are a huge burden AMP holders will pay through dillution and must be considered beforehand. Different approaches, but either way it is the same thing at the end of the day. Again, it won't be a burden if the extra AMPs are being used to better the platform. I'm not sure how you can try to make close-to-accurate price predictions when you figure in the total AMP supply. Wanna sell me your AMPs? I don't understand the relationship between the discussion about market cap and my intention to sell AMPs or not. But anyway, let me answer by saying that I am willing to sell my AMPs for you for the acquisition price, no profit intended... A price considered and set by Synereo Team as fair. Deal? |
|
|
|
I really hope they get these bounties paid...
I'm getting tired of seeing this thread full of pissed off bounty hoes..
Advice for future icos... pay bounties off quickly, cause those free loaders will turn troll really fast
They simply need to stick to their word. They offered bounties because they wanted to. Nobody forced them to. Remember that. |
|
|
|
The problem here is the 950 million total supply, which is a big burden even if the product is delivered.
Who cares, I don't think the Synereo team will sell them. They are working hard on Synereo, and it will be probably worth a lot if they deliver it correctly. Why sell the 950 million now, then you can sell that in 10-20 years for potential billions of dollars? I believe most social media was also 80-90% in the hands of a few guys, so this is no different than investing in early Facebook or Google. I dont think people should be scared of the supply. If the price rises, they won't sell, because their assets would only grow in price, and who is that stupid to sell into a starting bull market? Who claimed they would sell? The issue here is: there is a huge amount of coins, which makes the valuation quite high, even for few cents per coin. I'm with PG on this one, there's still only 82 million coins in circulation - the total AMP supply doesn't matter. Synereo already burned half of them! Dor said earlier that they would use the remaining AMPS for development purposes. Development=more money brought into Synereo. It is contingent. Therefore it cannot be neglected... Although those coins are currently locked, one day they will be unlocked, so the real market cap will be 949 million times price per coin. Oh, sure, Synereo will sell ALL of their AMPs at the same time. You'd think that they would've done it sooner though, it's been 3 years. Hmm... Market capitalization is calculated regardless of the owners intention of selling or not. That's my point. Is the market cap of Bitcoin based on 21 million coins or what is now available in the market? Some websites consider 21 million. Others, like coinmarketcap, consider the current supply. If one considers the current supply, then the difference to 21 million must be considered a cost (paid through dillution) to run bitcoin blockchain. A cost that will be paid by current bitcoin owners in order to attract more miners, which is fundamental to the blockchain long term existence. Similarly, we can either consider the market cap to be 949 million * price per AMP (especially considering all those tokens already exist) or consider only the current supply, but then all the locked AMPs are a huge burden AMP holders will pay through dillution and must be considered beforehand. Different approaches, but either way it is the same thing at the end of the day. |
|
|
|
The problem here is the 950 million total supply, which is a big burden even if the product is delivered.
Who cares, I don't think the Synereo team will sell them. They are working hard on Synereo, and it will be probably worth a lot if they deliver it correctly. Why sell the 950 million now, then you can sell that in 10-20 years for potential billions of dollars? I believe most social media was also 80-90% in the hands of a few guys, so this is no different than investing in early Facebook or Google. I dont think people should be scared of the supply. If the price rises, they won't sell, because their assets would only grow in price, and who is that stupid to sell into a starting bull market? Who claimed they would sell? The issue here is: there is a huge amount of coins, which makes the valuation quite high, even for few cents per coin. I'm with PG on this one, there's still only 82 million coins in circulation - the total AMP supply doesn't matter. Synereo already burned half of them! Dor said earlier that they would use the remaining AMPS for development purposes. Development=more money brought into Synereo. It is contingent. Therefore it cannot be neglected... Although those coins are currently locked, one day they will be unlocked, so the real market cap will be 949 million times price per coin. Oh, sure, Synereo will sell ALL of their AMPs at the same time. You'd think that they would've done it sooner though, it's been 3 years. Hmm... Market capitalization is calculated regardless of the owners intention of selling or not. That's my point. |
|
|
|
The problem here is the 950 million total supply, which is a big burden even if the product is delivered.
Who cares, I don't think the Synereo team will sell them. They are working hard on Synereo, and it will be probably worth a lot if they deliver it correctly. Why sell the 950 million now, then you can sell that in 10-20 years for potential billions of dollars? I believe most social media was also 80-90% in the hands of a few guys, so this is no different than investing in early Facebook or Google. I dont think people should be scared of the supply. If the price rises, they won't sell, because their assets would only grow in price, and who is that stupid to sell into a starting bull market? Who claimed they would sell? The issue here is: there is a huge amount of coins, which makes the valuation quite high, even for few cents per coin. I'm with PG on this one, there's still only 82 million coins in circulation - the total AMP supply doesn't matter. Synereo already burned half of them! Dor said earlier that they would use the remaining AMPS for development purposes. Development=more money brought into Synereo. It is contingent. Therefore it cannot be neglected... Although those coins are currently locked, one day they will be unlocked, so the real market cap will be 949 million times price per coin. |
|
|
|
The problem here is the 950 million total supply, which is a big burden even if the product is delivered.
Who cares, I don't think the Synereo team will sell them. They are working hard on Synereo, and it will be probably worth a lot if they deliver it correctly. Why sell the 950 million now, then you can sell that in 10-20 years for potential billions of dollars? I believe most social media was also 80-90% in the hands of a few guys, so this is no different than investing in early Facebook or Google. I dont think people should be scared of the supply. If the price rises, they won't sell, because their assets would only grow in price, and who is that stupid to sell into a starting bull market? Who claimed they would sell? The issue here is: there is a huge amount of coins, which makes the valuation quite high, even for few cents per coin. |
|
|
|
I believe 30k is the next stop, small retracement here and there, but a new pump could happen pretty soon. The environment is very optimistic.
Please, elaborate more on why you believe so... Otherwise, this sounds just like a spam post. I have wrote many posts about AMP, you should read my blog (signature link). I don't think I need to repeat myself about the arguments that I have made months ago. I have always been positive on AMP since the time I bought it, and even before that I had an eye on AMP just waited for the best moment to buy in. The alpha will probably come out anytime now, and that is why I believe 30k is the next step, perhaps even more if investors will be satisfied. Maybe trolls need to take a break and recognize how hard the Synereo team has been working in the past 3 months, while the trolls do nothing but just spread fear and lies.
See his name, he just spread spam and wants noobs to buy his bags at 30k.
I don't think you get the picture. If Synereo comes out, in it's final form, it will be more like 0.01 BTC/AMP 30k is a teaser if perhaps the Alpha slowly starts to come out, but when the real thing comes out, only sky will be the limit. Think of it like being the early days of Facebook. It could be worth tens of billions later! It'll go down to the 3-5 cent range soon and then I'll just buy MORE! I'm actually considering focusing more on Synereo than Ethereum, I'll thank myself later. Also, it's not like people won't notice it anyway, it's in the top 50 on CoinMarketCap. The problem here is the 950 million total supply, which is a big burden even if the product is delivered. |
|
|
|
I hope that the distribution of bounties will be made over several weeks to avoid a dump.
totally agreed. - You mean that who earns TRST tokens through bounties shouldn't be allowed to dump them in the first weeks. - So that you can dump before them? - Then, what makes you any better than bounty hunters? You supported the project. Bounty hunters didn't? Wait! Bounties will be paid to people who supported the project somehow. All TRST tokens will be distributed to supporters, from founders to funders and marketers. What equalizes the amount of support is the amount (percentage) of tokens distributed. - Conclusion: if dumping quickly is perceived as a bad thing, claiming some people should not be allowed to do so, in favour of another group of dumpers, is not coherent. Only selfish. Whoever really supports the project in the long run doesn't care about near term price fluctuations, or who dumps in which of the first weeks after launch. |
|
|
|
Does this redemption have anything to do with the last surge in AMP price?
Probably. Clearly not. This project has become a fucking joke. Properly executed, it might have been considered the Ethereum killer. But you can't announce something that can be produced in hours and tested in days like a swap contract and not deliver for 3 months, for a highly complex project, and expect to be taken seriously in this space. The markets & expectations operate in real time, most projects deliver actual innovative code via hands on devs in 3 months as proof of legitimacy. Dor might be an ICO scammer, but in the context of what happened here he appears vindicated in his characterization of Greg Meredith as a laid back, lazy bullshit artist. Such a waste of potential, obviously a great intellect, but a consistent underachiever due to being completely clueless about how the real world operates, also exhibiting a complete lack of accountability for his communications and their consequences for others. In short, a complete cunt. BTW. I began as the only person defending this project on this forum. Out of all this emotional discussion, I believe this post best represents the big picture and an accurate (almost unbiased) opinion. Thanks! |
|
|
|
price going down everyday...
what happen ?
More people selling than people buying. As usual! Stop trying to "understand" the reasons. It only misleads you! Don't get me wrong, but this advice will save you money and help you avoid misjudgements and common sense. P.S.: this advice is useful for any investment. |
|
|
|
I believe 30k is the next stop, small retracement here and there, but a new pump could happen pretty soon. The environment is very optimistic.
Please, elaborate more on why you believe so... Otherwise, this sounds just like a spam post. |
|
|
|
|
Does this redemption have anything to do with the last surge in AMP price?
|
|
|
|
Can the chronobank change my eth address cos i accidentally deleted my eth wallet seed.
Please contact support@chronobank.io from the email you used to register a new Chronobank account. Why does it say "DO NOT USE a wallet address from crypto exchange! You can lose all your tokens FOREVER."  If it is an Ethereum transaction, why does a transfer to a crypto exchange mean any danger?? I do not get it at all! It was supposed to be as dangerous (or not dangerous) as any other wallet address. There's one situation only when you have a full control over your tokens - if you have a private key. You don't have a private key from the exchange address. Ok, I got it. So, if one intends to send the tokens to an exchange, he/she could do it right away from chronobank dashboard, since the ownership of the private key is an issue regardless of sending tokens to MyEtherWallet before sending to the exchange or not. Thanks. I will send the tokens of this second account directly to the exchange, because if I create a second Ethereum wallet (the first one is used for invested tokens) I will have to send fuel (ETH) to it as well, and it is a pain... |
|
|
|
Don't get caught again, folks! Last time we saw a big pump, they dumped on us through a crowdfund. Almost $6 million...
Ha. 9 cents. Surely, we must be buying at the top right now. At 10 cents, the overall valuation is around $95 million. OMG! I know Facebook is worth hundreds of billions, but a Google Chrome plugin be worth a tenth of a billion is really odd. Pure market manipulation. And where is the community backing this project ? I dont see that either. There is only a handful. It is difficult to back it when we are betrayed. I used to support it a lot, and even brought more people to invest on it during the crowdsale. I deeply regret it. Now all that is left for me is shame. |
|
|
|
|
Please, do not use e-mail, twitter bounties, as there are many multiple accounts there worth nothing for you. Focus your resources on btt, which is specific marketing.
|
|
|
|
|
How much was raised after all refunds (net) ?
|
|
|
|
Don't get caught again, folks! Last time we saw a big pump, they dumped on us through a crowdfund. Almost $6 million...
Ha. 9 cents. Surely, we must be buying at the top right now. At 10 cents, the overall valuation is around $95 million. OMG! I know Facebook is worth hundreds of billions, but a Google Chrome plugin be worth a tenth of a billion is really odd. Pure market manipulation. |
|
|
|
Why does it say "DO NOT USE a wallet address from crypto exchange! You can lose all your tokens FOREVER." If it is an Ethereum transaction, why does a transfer to a crypto exchange mean any danger?? I do not get it at all! It was supposed to be as dangerous (or not dangerous) as any other wallet address. |
|
|
|
|
Don't get caught again, folks! Last time we saw a big pump, they dumped on us through a crowdfund. Almost $6 million...
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
