The way you describe is just being vague and expecting luck to come to you randomly.

I don't have specific data or evidence, but if only 1% are rich, their assets are probably not less than $1B and there are many underground forces who still don't want to reveal their identities, so you can know who they really are. Maybe they use money as a means to control society, and those who think of making money to achieve that success are just pawns in their plan. And the story is the opposite with people who have no income and can't even pay for life services themselves, what should they do? They are not able to access work or create jobs that support them and their families. So don't talk about the idea of becoming super rich, or another way you can prove to yourself that you've done it.

The delusional theory of self-deception seems to be the way some individuals console themselves that they are wise to the rest, seeing themselves as just ants on a planet in the infinite universe.

The excitement of the bull season with its hyped terms accompanies the influencers this game will continue until the greed and ignorance of the newbies, but the process is the same time brings access but in an unhealthy way.

I also know some people who have gone into hiding from the old cycles and have not shown any signs of returning (maybe captured, killed, or enjoyed....) and in the next time perhaps other new forms will continue to be distributed. In general, even influencers are willing to create plays to deceive trust, and with the current stage of social media development, there is always an organizational system that helps someone become an influencer fame + some AI tools make them seen as a financial expert actor.

My portfolio no longer holds too much of it, but I still like shib because it brought me a lot of profit in the previous bull cycle. Although for me, I always consider these things to be more risky than investment opportunities, because from the beginning I always determine that the amount of money invested in them will be lost with risk.

Memecoin always has many potential risks and until it gains a large position in the space, there will be a process of adjustment and strong fluctuations, so no matter which one you choose, it must be determined by your targets can be expected with them because the state they are in is on a completely different scale compared to the stage of their emergence.

A free thought

I was quite impressed with something I once saw somewhere "life has two big challenges, 1 is that we try to find a certain goal, 2 is to complete that goal."

But basically each person's perception is different, but the journey to completion is the same. With every perspective on life, there will be people who consider it more important than life, but there are people who realize that it is just the things around us to help us complete life's lessons.

So anyone can do whatever they want because arguing about what is right seems unnecessary, and everyone is right with their experience, it's just that the consensus of opinions may not have appeared yet.

I'm not sure, but it probably depends on the policy where you live and your needs to decide.

As I know in some countries real estate is very difficult to access, and a job designed as a desirable home will also use up most of the main financial budget even at an average income level.

But the problem will easily happen if you are really rich enough to have many choices, after all we always assume that everything we own will be ours forever But it has to be like that wrong that the seller wants to limit the mode of telling everyone. Renting a house is also a unit that I think would be suitable, but the paperwork surrounding settlement will also have some things that we have to measure. Anyway, it is everyone's need, so depending on your financial ability, you must decide accordingly.

I know of a number of stories about people taking advantage of trust by creating a flashy appearance or pretending to be someone knowledgeable about investments to deceive and take advantage of people around them.

Such a story is not too strange, especially in the crypto space where there are also large-scale scams, but it also reflects the reality that people's greedy mentality is easily swept up in opportunities considered easy.

Anyway, it's a dark corner in any field where stories like this appear. The lesson I always remember is not to rush to believe everything, but check with your own experiences, right away. Even relatives can treat you badly, as long as you are not in that situation.

It's an incongruent comparison because essentially they are all cryptocurrencies with different uses, but when it comes to price, we should look at the actual capitalization value of PEPE to compare with Bitcoin, Ethereum,...

The lower the value something gets, the greater the volatility, and I suspect the OP is playing on a short-term play and at a time when the attention is on memecoin some FOMO types increase the hype about it. But when it comes to the level of attractiveness in an investment portfolio, each person will have their own approach, let's simply say that it is just a gamble where everything around is manipulated and attracts new people as well as greed, but the game sees more risk than opportunity, because few smile and most are trapped.

I have another situation that reflects some of the similarities in epidemics like before the advent of anti-disease drugs, before that our lives had to be through illness to the point where we couldn't bear it stand up and find a way to fix it. And I also know that sooner or later, diseases like cancer will find a cure. Returning to the social problem of oppression, tolerance will also reach its limits, some lessons from the struggles against evil in society to achieve peace and independence, but before still having to go through oppression.
It is a common sense that balance exists just that each different moment in society shows us the perspective in which we live.

You are alive and afraid of death, if not war then there are billions of reasons why you have to die. Traffic problems, sudden illness, natural disasters, assassinations,... it can really happen but remember that the more you fear, the closer it will bring you to those things. .

I think maybe just a little more positive attitude towards life is needed, instead of avoiding it, face it and adapt. But the nuclear disaster in Japan included innocent people and they did not understand what happened and they no longer existed.

And maybe I want to recommend you a movie "The Fountain- Hugh Jackman" to try to feel if everything you are afraid of is really scary anymore.

My short answer to all the questions you need is to ask Elon Musk.

For dogecoin to gain its current status is something truly extraordinary, but it is also probably one of the categories that many people put a lot of trust in to make quick profits because of the volatility of the coin. It's really big in the top crypto space.

Don't worry too much about the story you mentioned, as long as it is legal in that territory, players will feel quite normal when the government issues a stop order for any activity related to service.

Although I don't care too much about how to play gambling, through a number of different channels, people share about the evils that occur behind gambling behavior such as loopholes in management causing many bad guys to abuse it and increase crime. So in that situation, I will support preventing gambling, but it is also necessary to recognize the problem from the players because they are the source of all problems, not necessarily through the means, so we also need to raise people's awareness of its use.

So why not mention that bitcoin has the lowest price until now, and that SOL is just an altcoin that has appeared in recent years. Opportunities are different from each other as far as profit is concerned, it seems that not all of us will approach it the same way.

For me, the money received from signature campaigns is moved to places that I feel are safer than storing it on the personal wallet used to participate in the campaign (which is just personal behavior). And as you mentioned, I also use part of it to spend, hold, and switch to some altcoins.

There are people who really don't know about the existence of the internet and its applications in life, so bitcoin is not too special for them.

If you have heard of a poor place, an ethnic minority area, or a land of monks,... they don't know or don't bother to see what social life is going on. It's a matter of social conditioning, or perhaps control, that makes accessing something seem unfavorable.

Even in my family the grandmother is now almost 80 years old but they don't want to use the internet and don't care about some devices like smartphones, there is no pressure on anyone to know about bitcoin.

This category only has RON as the crypto I am currently researching, the rest are things that are in the past and things that I don't pay attention to.

With some research, I'm pretty confident the team behind RON will lead it to the same success they created with Axie Infinity. And there's a little bit of what I see as a risk but also a solidification of what they're approaching and where they're engaging with blockchain, there's a little bit of an advantage in that the community already knows about it. Due to their success, there is also some expectation that the gamefi environment will develop and they are also potential factors.

Yep, but it's just one factor among many, and its influence depends on many specific situations. Even the conversion of USD to local fiat has fluctuated and stories about international trade and money printing, but perhaps it is inflation that we need to learn to adapt to.

Or in situations where those who want to find a dedraline solution, it is still tied to fiat. We are not yet in a time where every country agrees on how to operate their economies (or will be), there are no common goods paid for in a common currency, there are only a few small situations where we try to regulate but still rely on the value of fiat.

There is an influence but not a cause that makes us afraid of the development of bitcoin, because in the journey of bitcoin's development to the present, there are sometimes stories of early wallets going back to the past- there are many reasons for that.

And we should also consider the fact that the number of active bitcoins accounts for the majority, so there is no need to panic/panic is what people choose. I also find this as humorous as the way we talk about the tragedy of WW3+, solar storms, quantum computers,... and there are tons of reasons why others question it, but back to the reality is that we need to own bitcoin before a bad situation arises to feel how it affects us.

I think it will be the same as the Bitcoin ETF being approved but it will have different rejections creating volatility in the market, but eventually the ETH ETF will be approved. It reminds me of the gold ETF phase followed by the silver ETF phase, actually maybe in the crypto space adoption is more important because we have gone through so many different challenges, and especially in the crypto space. During the period where the market is currently in an uptrend, large funds will also benefit from that, it's just that the specific time for acceptance is still at the speculative level.

I didn't know about famous people at the stage when I first learned about bitcoin, mainly through some colleagues who worked together in the field of information technology. And through the process of many different challenges it built my belief that bitcoin is bitcoin and it's great.

I know about some influencers in recent years to attract new people and prey on people's greed, but basically it is also a way for people to learn about bitcoin goes through challenging processes so that they also realize bitcoin is great.

I came across some of the content you posted on your forum and it led to the product you're trying to spread.

Do you honestly feel that the product is good, and are you willing to guide your relatives including father, mother, brother, sister,... to participate in it?

I don't have faith in your product that's the first thing.

And the next answer is no why?

Some things have been snapshotted and some things are in the process of being tested in the final stages to reward users, and these projects are all large projects in terms of scale, so there are risks in terms of capacity the possibility of fraud is low.

It didn't make all the participants happy though, the previous FOMO also had too many participants so a small portion of the winners would have a big reward. But I also agree that these services are benefiting a lot from capturing participants' interactions and spending, a game in which own always wins.