The actual experience is completely different from your imagination, I also bought bitcoin at prices around $200 -$300 but keeping it to $69000 was impossible for me, and that was after two cycles The price increase has happened, and even if it only reaches $1000 I can't hold it. But frankly speaking, my own limited understanding of the market is the main reason, and up until now, even if I accepted to buy bitcoin at this price, it would always be a bargain. In investing, our ultimate goal is to aim for profit to be able to spend and develop for life. With the crypto market, I can only feel that it will grow over time and that there will also be ups and downs related to the macroeconomy. So don't just think that the starting position/or timing make you feel comfortable with the market.

I'm still imagining that there are actually many of them who will still pay attention to investing. Of course, there will be only a few. At that age, life experience will make them knowledgeable enough to make appropriate decisions. Rather, we are just speculating about things about which the object we are talking does not exist at this issue.

- ww3 hopefully won't happen, but I think this is inevitable in terms of conflicts that have no way to be resolved, and will likely spread globally. It can be speculated that it will take place this century, which is everything I don't want.

- Every ongoing conflict and even places where there are sparks of war have their own problems, conflicts of interest will only end when one side wins. Those who are lucky enough not to belong to this area will probably only partly understand the fierce feeling of war.
I lived in Vietnam for a long time, so hearing about certain wars always makes me feel creepy. Maybe in this day and age, information is difficult to access, but in historical wars, then the gloomy death brings fear to the next generations for a long time, and it also takes a lot of time to restore stability.

This issue has similarities, but remember the fact that the flag industry has also been accepted and licensed to operate easily in many places. Regarding money laundering, there is no one tool to blame. Because, even when it is prohibited, people can still find different ways to use it. Do mixers deserve to be abolished? This has been clearly stated, so please respect the decisions of the operators. As for gambling, I think that will not happen because if you only look at small aspects to conclude, that is not the way to play operating silver. Let's just consider that this is a small part of the activity here, and we are the people who gamble to relax, make money, etc. in very large numbers. It doesn't mean that this environment is only gambling, so think openly.

Perhaps OP also has his own research with GALA, so let everything go according to the plan you expect with this crypto. To me, GALA has its own special things, but it also comes with a fair amount of hype. Looking back at the previous price increase, the ATH level is a threshold where I don't expect similar things to repeat, but with this market, anything can happen. And all speculation is just a hypothesis until everything happens. Sometimes that trust is only based on unclear buying behavior, ask yourself,  What made you buy it since the beginning of 2022? And in fact, you have gone through a long period of market decline. In this market, patience is always rewarded, but that does not mean that rule will make you satisfied

There will be hype associated with it when TGE, I know that project, but honestly, I don't play it or look for airdrops.

But it must be admitted that P2E is still having a lot of potential, but basically it needs to break out of the hype with intrinsically better quality products, not simply being labeled with crypto (blockchain) to create new products.

In the previous bull season, many things died, because they only strengthened and made profits in the short term. Although this field still has a lot to exploit and develop, we still have a lot of time for it to have an independent foothold in the market without being completely dependent on fluctuations.

Similar to some opinions, I agree that CZ's admission of error is a new beginning for the crypto market, if some parties cannot control the market, they (larger scale ones) will not be able to control the market. Really ready for a new start with the market. And after the recent FUD, we are having an atmosphere of excitement and joy from many people when we see Bitcoin increasingly achieving its goals in 2023, a period of no more than 30 days will end 2023. I'm still expecting a higher price. Regardless of the news surrounding this market, I still remember to be patient with Bitcoin because I understand one thing and we will talk about big targets (new ATH) soon.

For what?

Anyone's excitement about the bull market is inevitable, but the problem here is that we are seeing things revolve around it so that the price goes to specific targets. With Bitcoin, if it is not the current price increase, people will also have the perception that its future will be great, so sometimes certain conspiracy theories are just to manipulate the psychology of weak and FOMO prone people.

But recently, many financial markets have had a very exciting atmosphere. Because I am not a beginner, the current problem can only be seen as the gloom returning at some point. The return will not affect the investment plan.

Banning the use of bitcoin in some countries is illegal, but it does not constitute a crime. As far as I understand, it's just a limitation on legal issues, but banning someone from using bitcoin seems useless.
And going back to the issue of individuals feeling violated, I think that's not true. For me, trusting the government's management is not always perfect because there will still be things that cause harm and conflict among the people. And control will foster a violation of it, violating the law with what kind of behavior? I have heard of some stories of money laundering criminals, but that is a different threshold because if it weren't for bitcoin, they would still be criminals.

It may be that the loophole in freedom causes many ungodly men to abuse it and use this advantage to argue, I respect all those rights, but that doesn't mean they are always discussed openly. The fact that anyone can say that it is a personal right means that our obligations and responsibilities towards that right have never been easy.

Everyone wants freedom, but they don't understand that no one gives them that freedom that they themselves create, and their obligation to use and contribute to life is always not enough. I always like to be realistic and fair, anyone's thoughts can be created with ignorance, and if that thought is not limited, then chaos is obvious.

For example: If a rebel declares that he wants to destroy the earth, in some ways it is freedom of speech, but we know clearly that it is wrong, so they must be held accountable for those words.

I can feel happy when Bitcoin is increasing in price, but to say FOMO follows it, I don't think so because right now my strategy is still clear with it, the accumulation has been planned in advance. That and my goal with this market are always long-term, not relying too much on short-term things to optimize, and sometimes, for me, it is also a risk.

Now that the excitement is ramping up, and it is also attracting many new people to pay attention to bitcoin (crypto), we can fully expect the bull cycle to be in its starting phase. Many people have their doubts, but they also have their own opinions. So investing is not a general category, but each individual has their own plan.

Do you know some waste warehouses in the world? Try going to Thailand, where today's waste problem is directly affecting the people here. Things that are superfluous, even unused, can be thrown away, but think about how to start creating products and talk about "product supply and demand", It is like a result that manufacturers or related parties (including users) must accept. In another aspect of real estate, when buildings are continuously produced, but people have no need to use them and some places become abandoned areas after many years, of course no one wants that. But still, accept it and find a solution. And for personal consumption, instead of blaming the products that appear, look at yourself to see if it is necessary to rebalance.

We're not here to listen purely to personal opinions, and the OP's point of view is just as similar to how Sun hates Ethereum. And we need to understand that it will still have its own features, even if many people's expectations are not met.
I am a neutral user, so I have to be fair in looking at both the good and bad aspects of any cryptocurrency. With TRON's position, even if many people complain, when the hype happens, people will come and express positive views . That's part of the way the market works.

I do not deny the potential of this field in the cryptocurrency market, but even when it had previous appearances from simple to complex, the scale and exploitability were always challenges. But in general, if you only care about the investment aspect and finding profits, then that hype is bound to appear, like in 2021, when we have hype for many products and up until now there has been no hype. Many products have the ability to grow. However, according to recent observations, there are also positive things about the product, as the quality improvement is getting better and better. Before that, I also played a lot of metaverse-related games on the WAX ​​system and felt that they also had great potential because some other famous games still do not have a combination with blockchain.

This is the first time I have witnessed an individual's opinion condemning and criticizing baseless things for the main subject "Banks". The problem is that whatever exists cannot satisfy everyone, either you have to prove your ability to influence and change things that you feel are wrong, or you should like to think that things that are wrong with you are.

The banking system has many limitations, but to be more frank, we are not completely opposed. Let's know the balance between traditional tools and new things. And don't overemphasize the issue of crypto investment by borrowing through banks, because the main bridge is the person using the service. So instead of blaming anything, consider your own mistakes, and in the crypto space, we also have negative/positive things that are all created by ourselves.

It's not unusual for newcomers to choose something that is hyped in this market without really understanding much about it themselves.

I sincerely advise the OP to stop taking this risk. Have you considered the risk and are willing to accept that decision? If you are ready, then you don't need to worry too much and just wait for that goal to happen, or it will never happen. I would also agree with many people who witnessed the Luna event that it is a product of the landfill, and it is only a place left for those who are still stuck or even those who want to create hype for profit.

IMO, if you buy USTC and wait for a recovery, it is not necessary to instead spend that investment on other safe cryptocurrencies. Furthermore, what does the OP expect from a product that has lost its community? Negative reviews are always a challenge for some sort of comeback plan. So don't talk about belief without a basis, it's just confusion with fomo from surrounding news.

Through Op's story, I think my best friend also learned lessons about himself
- control greed
- lack of knowledge about the field of participation
- Loose capital management
...
In cyberspace, we have tons of different things that can make us lose money or make money. We can look back at some easy forms for us to access. But the OP's story is that this is a very large asset and not rational enough to manage it. People will lose their sanity when continuous failure with gambling is a sign of an addiction. But if after this failure you do not see the lessons for yourself, this will easily repeat itself in another form, and the mistake will always belong to you.

How to use AI appropriately? Yep, I believe that's always a big question in any field, not just gambling. The abuse of a certain tool may bring immediate benefits, but in the long run, it can lead to dependence. With that tool, users gradually lose their analytical abilities.

I have also talked about the topic of using AI with those around us, whether one day we will abuse this tool and everything will need AI's help,
small example: What do you want to eat? You also have to ask AI, or if you choose to get married, you also have to go through AI customs,... there are many other things.

But in general, for gambling, the use of AI, I think, always comes with different positive/negative aspects, and especially just for personal gain, it also needs to be reconsidered because the platform developers are also smart enough to prevent these tools from working well, so the gambling skills here will not be the skills to use AI.

Similar to the way the OP is looking at the Bitcoin problem as the cause of all problems, this is also pointing the blame in one direction, seeking support for bitcoin. Please understand that the problem appears to have been created by humans. With bitcoin, let's be more realistic about how it has developed and is developing?, how it affects your life?... I think you can find some issues not worth considering, and don't try to talk to the next generation about the future, let things happen naturally, because this life has many other issues that we need to learn about, and the cryptocurrency field, personally, I need enough basic foundations for understanding life before analyzing it further. Returning to the topic, I consider the issue of human responsibility and ethics to be promoted at all ages, before talking about tools, fields, etc. in life so that we can adapt to them.

For me, gambling is never considered a goal in life. Although it is easy to systematize the playing history of 2023, I think it is not necessary because it is always defaulted to in the section. Spending money on other small things in life, as simple as it sounds, is like spending money to buy toiletries.

A few days ago I was talking to a friend about the roundup of gamblers (because offline gambling is not legal in the area where I live), and I can only express the opinion that that was the end result of giving them results for misconduct, and to sum up the year, the police are probably also achieving their own KPIs.

I will look at the trading volume of those products to talk about volatility and liquidity.

Because here the OP is talking about the nature of time, not comparing over a wide enough period, with large markets such as gold, forex,... it is almost a part of the economy, so it is almost calculated. Drill bars immediately regardless of when you have large volumes of trades, and when those trades are large, then forced volatility will occur.

Returning to crypto, the truth is that we also understand that this market still belongs to the field of venture capital in the eyes of even large funds, although its potential is also being accepted, but the journey to achieving large-scale statuses such as stocks, gold,... will take a lot of time. That's why we hear a lot about an organization being able to manipulate prices in this market, they can easily direct behavior through news that directly affects excitement/fear also market participants.