let's recap.
India more than a billion people.
Depopulationist want less than 500'000'000
Depopulationists try to manipulate India to be hostile to China (2 bird 1 stone theory).
However if Indian Armed and Intelligence services launched an all out covert war against American and European Depopulationists...
I will need more pop corn !
(and I guess chinese forces, if they see that India is really serious about wiping the euro/western threat... let's not spoil the show of war to come).
Modi still seems to be a good laptop of the uno/wef/guidestone agendas... seems.
depopulationists are not a euro or western movment they also exist in china and india, these people want in general a less urbanised world, they are classical environmentalists, they terrorise in the west much more the population because they are not being silenced. and furthermore, standing armies are completely worthless fighting a mutating virus, and also whats the point fighting depopulationists if they might have a divine legitimisation to do that? you believe in god? you know the story with the egyptian plagues? you can't do anything about that. |
|
|
|
Alik Bakhshi
Katyn as a symbol of Russia's crimes
........which is a symbol of Russia's shameful past.
Many countries pointing the finger at Russia have a shameful past too but was it not the USSR/soviet communist regime under Uncle Joe who ordered this butchery? How can the current generation of Russian citizens be held responsible for these crimes without holding many other nations leaders and citizens to account for past crimes for example through colonial expansion? What happened to the Polish officers was a war crime but the soviets denied it and blamed the Germans. The fact is that the Russians did not confess to their crime. Moreover, they wanted to blame the Germans for this. thats logical but first of all soviet crimes and soviet thoughts are different from russian orthodox thought russian orthodoxy recognises nations as god designed, soviet thought seeks to remove the lingual barriers and unite the peopple under a common council to free the people from the nationalistic burgoise, and the nationalistic hate mongering. not much different to islam. |
|
|
|
Alik Bakhshi
Katyn as a symbol of Russia's crimes
........which is a symbol of Russia's shameful past.
Many countries pointing the finger at Russia have a shameful past too but was it not the USSR/soviet communist regime under Uncle Joe who ordered this butchery? How can the current generation of Russian citizens be held responsible for these crimes without holding many other nations leaders and citizens to account for past crimes for example through colonial expansion? What happened to the Polish officers was a war crime but the soviets denied it and blamed the Germans. The fact is that the Russians did not confess to their crime. Moreover, they wanted to blame the Germans for this. Yes,if there is irrefutable shown evidence that the soviets carried out the slaughter then it would be reasonable for the Russian gov to acknowledge these crimes. A fully independent scientific and historical investigation should be allowed unhidnered by political interests but I would be doubtful such evidence would be available after the soviets made it "disappear". how are russians responsible for the crimes of a multinational government that ruled overthem? soviet crimes are soviet crimes and russian crimes are russian crimes. |
|
|
|
People seemed all too willing in my opinion to give up their freedoms based on their government's wishes surrounding this Covid flu. At what point would you as a citizen decide enough is enough and you are not willing to comply with their guidance any longer? Maybe you were ok with masks, willing to get a shot, think others should before going outside, don't mind a 'jab' every 6 months, but don't think people should be jailed for not doing so... I'd like to see the results of where you as a citizen would draw the line, and feel free to post comments about what you would do once that line is crossed by your government.
all Covid measures are useless and pointless and a waste of ressources and Money. |
|
|
|
how can someone vote for the democrats in america this party is evil
the playbook used by what are normally thought of as 'Communists' calls out plays which tend to result in a much higher body-count. Starts with the significant political threats, but then tends to moves on deeper into the general population often enough.
Well, I suppose we can agree on this part. Stalin and Mao are two of the worst mass-murderers in human history. But I'd argue that communism or general 'leftism' isn't the cause. I think it's simply that communism doesn't have the inbuilt defences of capitalist democracies, and so often (always?) descends quite rapidly into brutal authoritarianism. It's authoritarianism that's the problem here, a lack of accountability and, as covered recently in another thread, suppression of press freedom. Communism is simply a very effective enabler, and this is one of the main reasons that it's such a terrible system. Command-control of the economy is simply not possible without 'authority' which naturally and inevitably turns into 'authoritarianism' pretty much in real-time. Looks to me as though 'they' ('international bankers' and such) use a round of 'communism' mostly to nullify title to resources in a region. Then in the next phase of the cycle, an implosion and in come the 'oligarchs' to take what used to be someone else's. Russia is a good example of a place which went through this cycle. so why did the braindead democrats cry about trump, did he had the wrong skin color? he left them a secured border. and a stable country. the democrats are a racist party get rid of it and america will flourish again
the playbook used by what are normally thought of as 'Communists' calls out plays which tend to result in a much higher body-count. Starts with the significant political threats, but then tends to moves on deeper into the general population often enough.
Well, I suppose we can agree on this part. Stalin and Mao are two of the worst mass-murderers in human history. But I'd argue that communism or general 'leftism' isn't the cause. I think it's simply that communism doesn't have the inbuilt defences of capitalist democracies, and so often (always?) descends quite rapidly into brutal authoritarianism. It's authoritarianism that's the problem here, a lack of accountability and, as covered recently in another thread, suppression of press freedom. Communism is simply a very effective enabler, and this is one of the main reasons that it's such a terrible system. can you explain me this one: how the dem democrats an antiracist party became a racist neonazi party teaching critical race theory to small children? they are even defending their racism now. what kind of antiracist principle do they hold dear? or do they use just "antiracism" to push racist and neonazi goals. i think the later [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged] |
|
|
|
Democracy in Africa is not practice as expected.most of democratic nations in Africa adopt presidential system of government.
But the problem arises when there is fusion of power,in which the president exercises veto power without checks.
Democracy in Africa is government of the leaders not of the masses which violate the tenant of democracy.
there are people that literally want a king that is illegal to be criticised at all these are typical right wingers end goal. at the same time there are lefties that want the same but with some kind of soviet republic and soviet president, however, the soviet leadership will then also be banned to criticise. when there are checks and powers some interpret it as corruption, limiting the empowered president (trump, zuma) others consider the neverending issues as annyoing. |
|
|
|
The problem is not with the democracy but the leaders and the officials are running the government so they decide which one is over, in Africa the leaders are rich enough to live a good life for centuries but those people are living with nothing. Democracy is important though or else your country also will be like North Korea under the rule of Kim where people are dying due to starving but the leader don't care about it.
The US is a pure democratic country and that is difficult for other democratic countries to imitate... my country is a democracy but the direction of government is more authoritarian and it seems difficult to criticize, but we are still lucky not like the people in Africa whose countries have severe democratic defects. the us is not democratic it is being run by racist mobs and race baiters, the democrats are absolutely not less racist than the republicans defending a ciminral drug addict that tried to corrupt the financial system of the usa, while attacking a policeman just because he is white, that never acted racist but in the end led to the racist left accusing america of being racist. its time to ignore these disgusting left wing racists. they are absolutely unacceptable. there is always authoritarianism democracies can and are also be authoritarian. there is always authoritarianism if there is capitalism there is also authoritarianism in anarchy, nationalism etc. there is no way that live is without any authoritarianism except if you are god. and then live becomes like a video game in which you know how to use all cheat commands, no one like to play those. so stop whining about authoritarianism. its unavoidable, the democrats in america are not less authoritarian than the republicans. |
|
|
|
 socialist distancing plutocratic stylz ..one rule for we (NEVER break rank) but endless rules for thee ;-) ;-) Adolf Hitler is conspicuously missing. He was the figurehead of the National Socialists party in Germany, and it is absolutely true that he organized and exploited German _social_ apparatus for the benefit of the nation as he and his party (and a plurality of the population) saw it. In Germany's case the socialism was fascist. It was ' fascist' insofar as it represented the merger of state and corporate power. Today we would call this something like a ' public/private partnership.' The 'efficiency' of 'Private industry' was leveraged, but the state harnessed it in the name of 'socialism.' And IMHO, it certainly was. In some ways Germany's National Socialism worked to well and had to be killed off, but the controllers just moved it to a different continent and did some narrative management to label it more 'kinder and gentler'. And for a long time it kind of was, but that's rather faint praise. the democrats in america have more to do with hitler than with stalin. |
|
|
|
Democracy can only develop where the media can operate independently just as journalists protect our democracy we must protect them. We must protect the freedom of the media as a fundamental human right for the benefit of citizens all over the world autocracy is better than democracy in developing democracy for corruption. In the same way democracy does not create obstacles in the way of development.
thats actually not true, the media is never truly united, it is fragmented and biased according to their viewership and funderst interest and narrative. like CNN (white people are always racist) or Al jazeera (muslims good Critical Race Theory right) etc. thats why RT or CCTV was never considered free Media according to american and western Politicians, but only as propaganda tools. in the future this will turn arround. |
|
|
|
I hope they are able to overthrow their government, but I have serious doubts. The communists control access to things like food and electricity and the people have little access to weapons.
It’s too bad this didn’t happen last October. Trump might have intervened and defeated socialism in Cuba. The imagery would have been overwhelming and we might have been more mean tweets but we wouldn’t have racist and other evil policies. Plus there would be one less communist country.
these are not "the cubans" these are more like the american teachers union or the democrats that want ton install a corrupt regime, like in many third world countries |
|
|
|
 With the prediction by the India Meteorological Department that more severe thunderstorms are on the way with the potential to harm people and livestock after the ugly incident that took place in the Indian state of Rajasthan while some tourist visited Amer Fort, built in the late 1500s, in the capital city of Jaipur when lightning struck a nearby watchtower stricking 11 dead while taking a selfie For some years now lightening has been a big treat to the lives of Indian citizen recording over a 1,700 death caused by lightning strike between April 1, 2019 and March 31, 2020 and if lightning strikes has killed more people in India than cyclones, stated the India Meteorological Department (IMD), thereby warning of more casualties from the natural phenomenon in the years to come then people in India aren't save at all and needs urgent help. My major concern is if the 82 lightning detectors, apps that deliver alert notifications for upcoming lightning incidents in India is ineffective? This should be a major concern to the world at large because lives are at risk. https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2021/07/12/lightning-india-selfie-monsoon/lol when a lightening kills or destroyes something its an omen that god(s) hate that. like it happened with george floyed mural |
|
|
|
you are a fool
Well, I'd agree that it looks like one of us is. means of production? you want a society where there is no private property?
No, I certainly don't want that. I don't like Marxism or communism. However, in case you've forgotten, you are saying: racial justice is a mad and marxist concept
Why would anyone think that racial justice is Marxist? The only reason I can think of is that they don't understand what Marxism means, and are lazily using it as a synonym for 'bad'. Instead of, you know, trying to build a reasoned argument. its not just marxist its also racist, you are trying to basically put people into racial kategories and based on that you want to define how much they are allowed to own, or how many positions of power they are allowed to hold, thats especially in that casee mad, because you would create mad behavior incentives. what will you do if more and more people will try to define themselves as new racial groups you will get total madness. this is pure stupidity, and it will not work. its not even classical marxism which only defines according to workers and nonworkers. it is especially in that case impossible to do because you have to define races and thats what people have refused to do historically its even difficult to keep up defined geograhic states as kapital holders and financially define zones. and you want to be even as mad to define races. not possible because people mix or dye their hair and do in the future even more stuff etc. this is complete third world nonsense of the uneducated. the only thing that works is citizenship, education, and certificates of education and worker contracts. nothing else works. and judging people individually based on their character, like martin luther king dreamed about. but in that world you will have citizenships, worker contracts etc. then there will be multiracial states in which people are being judged on their character alone and third world states that will not be very diverse. |
|
|
|
there is an incentive to become a racial minority if the tax paying community is being generalised as "one ethnic group" and you then frame demonise and accuse them of being racist.
I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. I can't see that this makes any sense at all, so I'm unable to respond. racial justice is a mad and marxist concept
But attempting to conflate 1) non-discrimination due to skin colour / ethnicity with 2) state ownership of the means of production... is just desperate. you are a fool means of production? you want a society where there is no private property? there will not be a successful thing like that, communism is just the overlay of tte western left the core of the western left is an antiwhite racism. with the goal to demand from the western tax payers more and more welfare aid etc. channeling away of public services away from the taxpayers to hateful racist and completely uninvolved foreigners. |
|
|
|
Big Bang theory explains how this universe was born and the evolution defines how living things emerged from a single cell organization.And this world is not only for human which we forgot thousands of years ago.  thats not true the universe is indeed subject to a higher intelligence, atheists can't see that because they are to confused with side facts. |
|
|
|
This is yet another instance of the absurd scare-tactic whereby the right label anything that is even marginally to the left of their preferred position "marxist" or "communist". There's a thread about it here. Give it a rest. Please. Use constructive criticism rather than ridiculous labels that are patently untrue and serve only to undermine your own credibility. Do you genuinely believe that the US Democratic party are closet Soviets? Of Course i don't believe the democrats to be communist humanists and soviets, only stupid right wing backward americans believe that, in truth the democrats are neonazis. targeting the law abiding catholics. taxes and workforce. they promote something called "racial justice" but true justice can only be achieved if people are being judged and rewarded by their individual character, not by their skincolor.
If people are being discriminated against or treated as second class citizens because of their skin colour — which they are — then this needs to be addressed. Simply ignoring it and pretending it's not an issue is not a solution. so just because someone looks different or has no ID or is a foreigner he has the right to litterally invade rob and corrupt the racially diverse communities tax income and work revenue? this is complete garbage only a vicious hatefu and racistl person would stand behind this nonsense. the state has the full right to defend his taxes from "discrimination" accusing scumbacks that invent new ethnic groups and races just in order to corrupt the state's financial system. if there is a fixed number of races defined. like for example 30
then there is an incentive to create more and new races, people will define themselves as new races so they can become nr. 31 and as nr. 31 they have right to same racial equity than the other 30.
This is silly. If you are being discriminated against because of your skin colour or your ethnic origin, there is no need to prove yourself by slotting into a specifically defined sub-category. And there's no "incentive" to become a racial minority, as if it's a choice. [/quote] jes there is an incentive to become a racial minority if the tax paying community is being generalised as "one ethnic group" and you then frame demonise and accuse them of being racist. |
|
|
|
|
the democratic party is under full controll of marxism with all its negative side effects.
they promote something called "racial justice" but true justice can only be achieved if people are being judged and rewarded by their individual character, not by their skincolor.
judging people according to their race will open up a box of pandora, of which more and more issues will come out.
one issue is that it needs races to be defined.
if there is a fixed number of races defined. like for example 30
then there is an incentive to create more and new races, people will define themselves as new races so they can become nr. 31 and as nr. 31 they have right to same racial equity than the other 30.
this will create a mad world environment that will be massively racist and crazy, the democrats are to stupid to understand that.
regards
|
|
|
|
Because Africa is full of corrupt leaders, because they do not depend on themselves but on other Continents. See the giant of Africa (Nigeria) that is lacking a lot behind, see the white Africans (North Africa) not capable of latest technologies again. All Africa people know is themselves and their families (nepotism), they do not careful about others (whites and many other countries do care about others). Our leaders that were there when Colonial Masters left the countries that became independent caused what is happening. The so called South Africa is better because the Apartheid makes the whites to mix with blacks, leading the nations to a greater level, that is why they still have the best economy in Africa.
The Continent (Africa) has good agricultural products, plenty mineral resources, what left is for them to use brain to set up countries that will be standard, but they are not capable. This has just being the beggining, if care is not taken, Africa will remain like this and become even more worse.
Africa countries are not capable to make phone products, computer, automobiles and the likes, they lack in technology. Can you even point out any successful coin made by Africa? For any of the Africa country to even get a local board on this forum is a problem. We need to think about the future, correct the mistakes of the past, depends more on our effort, then we will rise.
In Africa, their presidents and governors or anyone on official governmental seat will go abroad (outside Africa) for medical treatment, is that happening in other Continents? No. They are making their homes shit for their generations to come, the rich ones have their children green card abroad, some were even given birth to in abroad, and come back to Africa. These mentalities we are having in Africa has made Africa like this.
I see the work rested on the governments, but governments that its official sick and fly him abroad for treatment, is that the governments that are ready to help? They are just the governments that depends on importation because all they are using are imported, making life miserable for the citizens. With what I am seeing, I do not think any solution is coming soon, unless the young Africans do not be like their father that are there presently, but do you think they will not be like their father and yet make Africa not going forward.
all leaders where corrupt throughout human history kingdomes where often like private corporations fighting each other over income capacities (gold etc.) and even if you have a corruption free regime (like Ivan the terrible) it still will suffer from inefficiencies, ill decisions, but worst of all, corruptionfreedom will result in a cruel absolutistic ruler. |
|
|
|
India being the next super power isn't a joke, you know (it may seem like it, but think of the bigger picture). What's Pakistan got to offer? They don't have oil, so the US won't be bringing the tanks any time soon.
how is india going to become a superpower, it is polytheistic and massively corrupt full of racists. its neither an example nor an economic powerhouse it doesn't even produce valuable and loyal labour. and last but not least, it doesn't add anything good to the world, the EU has a lot of potential and the Eurasian union lead by russia if they can free themselves from leftoretardation and the us too but leftoretardation is very advanced there |
|
|
|
it would have been smarter he would have invested into a robot army, to deal with the taliban, or the woke racism |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
