Yes indeed, Stuttgart in the past also at least had a good record in the Bundesliga but ya, if to get the trophy this seasons it still seems difficult for Stuttgart. But, if Stuttgart only targeting to be able to finish in the top four, then Stuttgart seems to have a good chance too this season. But indeed, although Stuttgart managed to beat Dortmund in their last match, but in reality they still have a close points gap. Therefore, although Stuttgart at this moment is in third place and Dortmund is only in fifth place, but it seems that Stuttgart position is also still not completely safe.

No brother pakistan team performance wasn't that kind of poor in the beginning of this world cup. In the beginning they constantly on to match after that they loss 4 match in a row. After that they were trying to come back. But in the previous match it's true that they are bowling performance wasn't that good. Not only just there bowling performance they are batting performance was also pore against England that's why I think their loss the match. Anyway, Pakistan's loss is good for England.  Otherwise, their ranking would have remained at the bottom, now at least they are number seven in the points table.

Manchester city have what it takes to get many goals from this match, because Chelsea don't have the squads that can stop them not to perform very well to embrace victory. Manchester city are good in using home advantage to play any strong teams to ensure they make their fans feel comfortable through out the match which they will definitely apply those strategies to defeat Chelsea 4-1 to take over the first position from Tottenham Hotspur in the premier league table. Despite Chelsea is not too strong to withstand Manchester city  in this match, I believe Chelsea will definitely find their way to achieve a goal from Manchester city but Manchester city will be the one to achieve victory at the end of the match to alert other teams that they can still make it happen again in this season.

I think now we should discuss only the semi-final matches. Pakistan had a poor performance in the last match due to which they were defeated by England by a big margin. When we were dreaming of Pakistan going to the semi-finals, we should have thought earlier that no matter how much we tried to fix the equation, Pakistan would have to win against England first. Where Pakistan failed to win against England, we failed to match all the equations.  

The matches between the four teams that have qualified for the semi-finals have already been decided, with India taking on New Zealand and Australia taking on South Africa. It is sure to be a tough battle between these four teams but India will definitely be ahead against New Zealand and Australia will be ahead against South Africa.

Tottenham suffered their first defeat at home against Chelsea, I think maybe because Tottenham found it difficult to organize a strategy because they were forced to play with 9 players because 2 of their players received red cards after that Chelsea bombarded Tottenham by breaking into their goal defense with 4 goals.

Chelsea's next match will host Manchester City. This will be quite an interesting match and maybe Chelsea will put up more resistance because Chelsea will have the advantage of playing at home, but you have to remember that Manchester City is not an easy opponent for Chelsea.

Chelsea got a very important win in this match against the team that is leading the table. I didn't expect that Tottenham is going to have the first loss against Chelsea. The score was exactly the opposite of what I expected. I thought Tottenham would win without any issues. They also started well. Was able to break the deadlock at 6th minute of the match. But after that, they lost composure. And they had to pay for it. It doesn't matter how good a team is. It is almost impossible for any team to win under such circumstances. That's what happened here with Tottenham.

There are no better hopes for Manchester United in their current condition in the Champions League, because Galatasaray will continue to exert their abilities to get second place in the group standings to ensure they qualify for the next round. Moreover, Galatasaray is also quite aware that Manchester United's condition is not in good condition so Galatasaray will continue to take advantage of this in the next match because Galatasaray has the same number of points as Copenhagen in the current group standings.

Bangladesh vs Australia match is more important for Bangladesh. The equation that Bangladesh needs to match to play the championship. If Australia wins the toss and bats first. If Australia can score 360 runs, Bangladesh must bat later and score at least 200 runs. If Bangladesh bats first, they will be all out within 200 runs. Then Australia will have to play till 24 overs. I definitely want tomorrow's match if Bangladesh can't win at least I know they can score at least 250 runs. As a Bangladeshi cricket fan, I would like Bangladesh to win the match tomorrow. Best wishes for Bangladesh team. Let them batting and bowling very well in tomorrow's match.  Bangladesh can finally play the championship. This is the demand of crores of cricket fans in Bangladesh.

I am also interested in learning your reason for saying that Bitcoin is a risky asset. If you buy gold today or stock, you will not sell the next day, you will probably hold for years or until you see considerable profits. Can you do the same for Bitcoin and not make profit? People tend to use double standard for Bitcoin, they want quick profits from Bitcoin but when it come to other asset or investment instruments, they are patient.

I have checked the historic data of Bitcoin, within every five years, Bitcoin always give huge profits irrespective of the entry price. This is not what I consider as risky because the only risk is when sold at the wrong time. Those who bought at the peak of 2021 might still be in loss in terms of dollars but the Bitcoin quantity is still intact and hopefully before 2026, price might surpass their entry price and give them good profits. Even this is not guaranteed but the chances are high. I don't really see Bitcoin as too risky.

I think there is no way around finding a replacement player for Salah because it is not about the if, but about then when in regards to a Salah transfer. He will leave the club at some point, but there are rumors that a club from Saudi Arabia offered him a contract with an empty field, so to say he was supposed to tell them how much he wants. Who knows whether that is the truth, but I believe that Salah could be a high interest target for them because he is also Muslim and I think he could become an iconic figure for the league because of the high level of mutual identification. So either way Liverpool has to be prepared for some significant change.

Even today we are not getting good performance from England batsmen. Netherlands bowlers are not experienced enough. However, the performance of England's batsmen is poor. While Malan and Stokes can play some big innings, we haven't seen responsible innings from any other batsman in the squad. England collected 229 runs losing 6 wickets in 42 overs. England's collection is now less than 5.5 per over. If Stokes can bat well in the death overs then the England team can give a target of more than 300. But looking at the batting of Stokes and Woakes at the crease now, I don't think England will be able to collect more than 300.

I'm so thrilled with your response, and in fact, you are one of a few who say the truth as it is, not one of many who are painting Bitcoin what it is not. I love to be sincere and try as much as possible never to mislead people, Bitcoin is a risk-on asset, not a risk-off asset, this is obvious with the way it behaves and I simply don't know how those who are claiming it to be a safe-haven asset can't see this.

Maybe they are turning blind eyes, but how truly can an innovation of fewer than 2 decades suddenly become a safe haven, something many still fail to accept and governments treading carefully in dealing with? Bitcoin is good and I appreciate the innovation a lot, but it would take centuries before it can assume the role of what many think of it, that's if it would attain it at all. If you compare Bitcoin with other risk-on markets, you would understand this better as they behave the same. I wonder why some people can't see this as proof of fact.

The Australian team is now in trouble. I never imagined that Australia's  top order would  collapse like this. In the last 5  matches we have seen great performances from Australian players. Especially  the batsmen  played very well. But today they can't stay at the crease against the Afghanistan bowlers. At the end of 12 overs, Australia collected only 61 runs, losing 4 wickets. If Maxwell and Labuschagne can't play big innings then Australia has no chance of winning. Australia has a slim chance of winning if these two batsmen score a century. But the match is now completely under the control of the Afghanistan bowlers.

Can Afghanistan win against the Australian team today? Knowing Australia I think it is hard for them. Considering the overall performance today, it seems Australia has a upper edge against Afghanistan. They were able to restrict Afghans from going beyond 300 runs. For me that is a positive sign.

If Afganistan wants to win against Australia, they would have to get wickets before the first power play ends. The first 10 overs are critical as it helps the bowling side eliminate the top batters. The situation is similar as of Afghanistan are able to get a few wickets it would become a problem for the Australian batting.

That's right, OP. BTC is not a risky asset and just fluctuates whether it is slow or fast. We will be educated and have a basic understanding of how it works if we pay attention.

Well, if we look at the strong growth in Bitcoin prices, currently there may be many investors, institutions who have the argument that the traditional currency is ready to face disruption. At least BTC is seen as a psychological support level but I strongly believe this is because Bitcoin is much more stable than altcoins and there are many other trading influences on the price.

These are all important points because the market is not always predictable.

Bangladesh played really well and I think that kind of performance the fans want form Bangladesh from start of this ICC competition but unfortunately Bangladesh performance were not up to the mark and that why they really disappoint this supporter. Anyway they done a good job tonight so we should appreciate them because everyone taught that sirilanka has strong balance team which has ability to got victory but Bangladesh captain and shanto phenomenal performance help Bangladesh to come out of this difficult situation later tale under batter played little bit aggressive innings and thus they won the important match.

A blistering start by India went down the drain after Rohit's wicket. Indians were at 62 runs at just 5.5 overs when they lost Rohit and 90-ish when the power play ended but since then Gill-Rohit-Iyer added only 31 runs in the last 10 overs, some shitty anchor innings are going on from the Birthday boy Koach and Iyer.  

Yeah, Rabada and Maharaj did bowl some finest overs but both batters looking defensive, especially Iyer which is completely opposite of his own gameplay.

-----
Edit
They took their time but now back in business.

Bruno Fernandes has provided a temporary respite for Ten Hag, but this hard-fought victory doesn't change the bigger picture. While Ten Hag may still believe that his players are fully behind him, it's clear that their performance has been lackluster, with just a few fortunate wins to show. Competing for titles this season seems like an impossible task for Manchester United; a more realistic goal would be to maintain their current ranking and secure a spot in the Europa League for the next season.