Flat Earth

[notbatman]

"We"

Hang yourself.

[Vod]

It took a few minuets to brew the coffee. Did you know that monkeys giving birth to humans only happens on a globe Earth?

The only place that would happen would be in a fairy tale - like the bible.  Monkeys give birth to monkeys....

So you not going to push the Moon bounce LASER test, smart move considering they were bouncing LASERs off the Moon before Apollo 11. I'm not sure how you were going prove their LIDAR isn't fucking pwned with the latest Intel Management Engine 0-day exploit straight outta Israel. Also it's not like just anybody can afford to get a giant LASER.

Bounce it off what?  Do you understand what light is and how it reflects?

OK, so a selenelion eclipse or so-called horizontal eclipse with the Sun and Moon both visible in the sky above the viewer is evidence the Earth is flat and motionless. I suspect atmospheric refraction on a globe can't fully explain the documented position of the eclipsed Moon together with the Sun in the sky.

According to what you've posted many times, the sun cannot be seen at night because of the atmospheric density.  So if you can see the dimmer moon during the day, you were lying about the density, weren't you?  This simple fact proves your flat earth map is impossible.

In regards to the Solar eclipse there's nothing about it that excludes a flat Earth, the Sun is a projected object and is being obscured by something.

So you haven't made up magic yet for why that happens?

Hang yourself.

Sorry - don't be mad up me for calling you a liar.  At least think of some believable lies...

I have won the argument liar.  Give it up.

 

[exemplaar]

Haha vod, your "attempts" are futile.

There is no single proof for a spinning ball earth flying through imaginary space with ridiculous speeds. Heliocentric model is a lie. Earth is flat motionless realm covered by a dome-firmament, The Handywork of God.  

Bonus video for vod - nasa's creepy disused factory with Canadian astronot: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kmLC7siBt4&t

Bottom line, nasa lies:

[Vod]

Haha vod, your "attempts" are futile.

There is no single proof for a spinning ball earth flying through imaginary space with ridiculous speeds. Heliocentric model is a lie. Earth is flat motionless realm covered by a dome-firmament, The Handywork of God.  

Futile? What I said can be proven over and over, and I keep winning every conversation.

I can't help you if you believe in magical sky fairy.  You can just explain anything away as "god did it".  That's imagination - not proof.

Thank goodness people like you are dropping in numbers due to the internet and the easy spread of knowledge.  Your copy/paste "no thought needed" memes are boring.

 

[notbatman]

"... The only place that would happen would be in a fairy tale - like the bible.  Monkeys give birth to monkeys.... ..."

A glimmer of hope, a partial application of logic?

"... Bounce it off what?  Do you understand what light is and how it reflects? ..."

How many times have I explained the Moon is an object holographically projected off of a concave mirrored dome? Your memory is so short it's almost non-existent, the keyword here is "mirror".

"... According to what you've posted many times, the sun cannot be seen at night because of the atmospheric density.  So if you can see the dimmer moon during the day, you were lying about the density, weren't you?  This simple fact proves your flat earth map is impossible. ..."

Wow selective memory, awesome. My answer is the same as the last time you tried frame my statement by omitting perspective and convergence. If you've accounted for those two effects via altitude and magnification only then will the atmosphere be your limiting factor. There's a lot more atmosphere to look through when viewing objects on the horizon then there is looking up in regards to your dim Moon hypothesis.

"... So you haven't made up magic yet for why that happens? ..."

The Black Sun isn't mystical enough for you?

[Vod]

How many times have I explained the Moon is an object holographically projected off of a concave mirrored dome? Your memory is so short it's almost non-existent, the keyword here is "mirror".

How many times have I explained we know the moon orbits a sphere earth at 240,000 miles?  Is your memory that short?  The keyword is "gravity".

How many experiments do I have to suggest to you before you get curious enough to investigate yourself?

Next you will claim the moon is made of green cheese, because you read that somewhere.

 

[BADecker]

How many times have I explained the Moon is an object holographically projected off of a concave mirrored dome? Your memory is so short it's almost non-existent, the keyword here is "mirror".

How many times have I explained we know the moon orbits a sphere earth at 240,000 miles?  Is your memory that short?  The keyword is "gravity".

How many experiments do I have to suggest to you before you get curious enough to investigate yourself?

Next you will claim the moon is made of green cheese, because you read that somewhere.

 

Now Vod. It was his grandfather who started the green cheese theory. Then the green mold turned brown, and it wouldn't work anymore. The whole FE idea is there to get around the idea that the moon isn't moldy cheese after all.

[notbatman]

How many times have I explained the Moon is an object holographically projected off of a concave mirrored dome? Your memory is so short it's almost non-existent, the keyword here is "mirror".

How many times have I explained we know the moon orbits a sphere earth at 240,000 miles?  Is your memory that short?  The keyword is "gravity".

How many experiments do I have to suggest to you before you get curious enough to investigate yourself?

Next you will claim the moon is made of green cheese, because you read that somewhere.

 

Can you guess the distance to the Moon when you bust out the sextant and measure it? Gravity is an unproven theory like the big bang, outer space, heliocentrism, the globe, dinosaurs, evolution and historical time-frames greater than 10,000 years.

As the number of experiments you suggest approaches infinity, the possibility of a globe approaches zero. Also you seem to conflate researching documented information and facts with stories written by hacks, quacks and crackpot scientists. You keep repeating these same stories that are beamed into your head via TV, can't you understand everything on TV is fake news and the government is in on it? Can you tell me the official 911 narrative resembles anything that looks like a fact? Do you think that corporations put fluoride and roundup in your beer because it helps increase your testosterone level?

[joerogers8]

How many times have I explained the Moon is an object holographically projected off of a concave mirrored dome? Your memory is so short it's almost non-existent, the keyword here is "mirror".

How many times have I explained we know the moon orbits a sphere earth at 240,000 miles?  Is your memory that short?  The keyword is "gravity".

How many experiments do I have to suggest to you before you get curious enough to investigate yourself?

Next you will claim the moon is made of green cheese, because you read that somewhere.

 

Can you guess the distance to the Moon when you bust out the sextant and measure it? Gravity is an unproven theory like the big bang, outer space, heliocentrism, the globe, dinosaurs, evolution and historical time-frames greater than 10,000 years.

As the number of experiments you suggest approaches infinity, the possibility of a globe approaches zero. Also you seem to conflate researching documented information and facts with stories written by hacks, quacks and crackpot scientists. You keep repeating these same stories that are beamed into your head via TV, can't you understand everything on TV is fake news and the government is in on it? Can you tell me the official 911 narrative resembles anything that looks like a fact? Do you think that corporations put fluoride and roundup in your beer because it helps increase your testosterone level?

Shit.  I have my crash helmet on for when Vod tells us 9/11 was done by Arab Hijackers and we are complete lunatics for not believing the government on that one.  

So far badecker is in the lead with the claim that water in a glass is on the exterior of the interior of my glass.  Thus proving liquids take the form of the exterior of a shape.  

Vod you can do it!!  Get back in the lead.  

Somehow Suchmoon is looking to be the smartest in all of this by proving a globe earth because he is able to see ships disappear behind the water curve while standing at sea level.  Even though we all know they can be brought back into view with binoculars or a zoom camera.  In the world of globe earth just being wrong by the least amount can put you in 1st place.  Well done Suchmoon!

[Vod]

Can you guess the distance to the Moon when you bust out the sextant and measure it? Gravity is an unproven theory like the big bang, outer space, heliocentrism, the globe, dinosaurs, evolution and historical time-frames greater than 10,000 years.

I don't need to guess.  The sextant tells me the distance is 240,000 miles. 

 

[notbatman]

Can you guess the distance to the Moon when you bust out the sextant and measure it? Gravity is an unproven theory like the big bang, outer space, heliocentrism, the globe, dinosaurs, evolution and historical time-frames greater than 10,000 years.

I don't need to guess.  The sextant tells me the distance is 240,000 miles.  

 

Can you show me documented evidence of this?







It's Vod's word vs. the angle read off of a sextant, who has more credibility? Vod has the irrefutable word of NASA to call upon, the ultimate proof from the most credible source in all of existence that's vetted by every scientific authority on earth. The sextant reading on the other hand is clearly observational error on the part of the operator, amirite?

[joerogers8]

Can you guess the distance to the Moon when you bust out the sextant and measure it? Gravity is an unproven theory like the big bang, outer space, heliocentrism, the globe, dinosaurs, evolution and historical time-frames greater than 10,000 years.

I don't need to guess.  The sextant tells me the distance is 240,000 miles.  

 

Can you show me documented evidence of this?




It's Vod's word vs. the angle read off of a sextant, who has more credibility? Vod has the irrefutable word of NASA to call upon, the ultimate proof from the most credible source in all of existence that's vetted by every scientific authority on earth. The sextant reading on the other hand is clearly observational error on the part of the operator, amirite?

It appears the gimp Vod who tells us to just believe the scientists because they know better is now an expert in sextants.  I would love to see that dumb ass attempt to use one.  No Vod it doesn't go up your ass.  Funny as hell is attempting to claim sextants don't work now or at least work differently than all previous navigators claims.  Funny that he just won't believe them.  For a man that doesn't like religion he sure loves scientism.  Just blindly believing in all sorts of amazing stories with absolutely no proof.  Complete nut job. 

Its easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.

[notbatman]

^^^ The path of a fool is a wide one.

Narrow: 32 arcminutes
Wide: 1876 arcminutes

To put this into perspective, Vod's observation of the angle displayed by the sextant is off by 5862.5% when measuring the size of the Moon.

[abhibtccc]

Of course Earth is flat. How can you say otherwise?

Only the Sun and Mo_On revolves around the Earth.

You need to see a doctor. And you need it right away!

[exemplaar]

Can you guess the distance to the Moon when you bust out the sextant and measure it? Gravity is an unproven theory like the big bang, outer space, heliocentrism, the globe, dinosaurs, evolution and historical time-frames greater than 10,000 years.

I don't need to guess.  The sextant tells me the distance is 240,000 miles.  

 

Can you show me documented evidence of this?




It's Vod's word vs. the angle read off of a sextant, who has more credibility? Vod has the irrefutable word of NASA to call upon, the ultimate proof from the most credible source in all of existence that's vetted by every scientific authority on earth. The sextant reading on the other hand is clearly observational error on the part of the operator, amirite?

It appears the gimp Vod who tells us to just believe the scientists because they know better is now an expert in sextants.  I would love to see that dumb ass attempt to use one.  No Vod it doesn't go up your ass.  Funny as hell is attempting to claim sextants don't work now or at least work differently than all previous navigators claims.  Funny that he just won't believe them.  For a man that doesn't like religion he sure loves scientism.  Just blindly believing in all sorts of amazing stories with absolutely no proof.  Complete nut job. 

Its easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.

Vod is blind guy in love with monkeyman science and suchmoon is a moron. You should only watch for badecker as he is a jesuit sellout. Those are the most sneaky.

[iHODL2]

#offtopic#
Initiative Q is an attempt by ex-PayPal guys to create a new payment system instead of credit cards that were designed in the 1950s. The system uses its own currency, the Q, and to get people to start using the system once it's ready they are allocating Qs for free to people that sign up now (the amount drops as more people join - so better to join early). Signing up is free and they only ask for your name and an email address. There's nothing to lose but if this payment system becomes a world leading payment method your Qs can be worth a lot. If you missed getting bitcoin seven years ago, you wouldn't want to miss this.

Instant verification

Invite link 1: https://initiativeq.com/invite/rBnn2zohm

Invite link 2: https://initiativeq.com/invite/BlCIXBjhm

Invite link 3: https://initiativeq.com/invite/H7IvWIo2X

invite link 4: https://initiativeq.com/invite/BU31PUo27

These link will stop working once I’m out of invites. Let me know after you registered, because I need to verify you on my end.

Is this even allowed, posting an actual "Off-topic" inside an "Off-topic" thread? Lol.

[notbatman]

"...Vod is blind guy in love with monkeyman science ..."

Vod is a special guy.

[—]

Anyone genuine interested in shape of earth
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5042249.msg47590502#msg47590502
much more to come

[BADecker]

How many times have I explained the Moon is an object holographically projected off of a concave mirrored dome? Your memory is so short it's almost non-existent, the keyword here is "mirror".

How many times have I explained we know the moon orbits a sphere earth at 240,000 miles?  Is your memory that short?  The keyword is "gravity".

How many experiments do I have to suggest to you before you get curious enough to investigate yourself?

Next you will claim the moon is made of green cheese, because you read that somewhere.

 

Can you guess the distance to the Moon when you bust out the sextant and measure it? Gravity is an unproven theory like the big bang, outer space, heliocentrism, the globe, dinosaurs, evolution and historical time-frames greater than 10,000 years.

As the number of experiments you suggest approaches infinity, the possibility of a globe approaches zero. Also you seem to conflate researching documented information and facts with stories written by hacks, quacks and crackpot scientists. You keep repeating these same stories that are beamed into your head via TV, can't you understand everything on TV is fake news and the government is in on it? Can you tell me the official 911 narrative resembles anything that looks like a fact? Do you think that corporations put fluoride and roundup in your beer because it helps increase your testosterone level?

Oh come on! Everybody knows that a sextant is for finding approximate relative distances between the heavenly bodies. A sextant is way too inaccurate for determining the size of heavenly objects. Why don't you come out of the ancient past by at least stepping up to modern transits and telescopes?

[joerogers8]

How many times have I explained the Moon is an object holographically projected off of a concave mirrored dome? Your memory is so short it's almost non-existent, the keyword here is "mirror".

How many times have I explained we know the moon orbits a sphere earth at 240,000 miles?  Is your memory that short?  The keyword is "gravity".

How many experiments do I have to suggest to you before you get curious enough to investigate yourself?

Next you will claim the moon is made of green cheese, because you read that somewhere.

 

Can you guess the distance to the Moon when you bust out the sextant and measure it? Gravity is an unproven theory like the big bang, outer space, heliocentrism, the globe, dinosaurs, evolution and historical time-frames greater than 10,000 years.

As the number of experiments you suggest approaches infinity, the possibility of a globe approaches zero. Also you seem to conflate researching documented information and facts with stories written by hacks, quacks and crackpot scientists. You keep repeating these same stories that are beamed into your head via TV, can't you understand everything on TV is fake news and the government is in on it? Can you tell me the official 911 narrative resembles anything that looks like a fact? Do you think that corporations put fluoride and roundup in your beer because it helps increase your testosterone level?

Oh come on! Everybody knows that a sextant is for finding approximate relative distances between the heavenly bodies. A sextant is way too inaccurate for determining the size of heavenly objects. Why don't you come out of the ancient past by at least stepping up to modern transits and telescopes?

You measured the suns size and distance with transits and a telescope?  Explain your set up, how you took your measurements and how you derived your conclusions.  

See if you can top your explanation of how a liquid can stick to the exterior of a shape.  For all who missed it water on the interior of a glass is proof of water sticking to the exterior of a shape (according to Badecker) because the liquid in the glass is on the exterior of the interior of the glass.