Bitcoin Forum
November 01, 2024, 09:51:36 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 91 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy?  (Read 234757 times)
techgeek
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 20, 2015, 03:03:10 AM
 #181






Newly Released Documents Indicate Key Hillary Clinton Claim on Emails Was Not True









Emails published by the New York Times Monday indicate that Hillary Clinton used more than one private email address during her time as secretary of state, contradicting previous claims from the Democratic presidential contender’s office.

Multiple emails show Clinton used account “hrod17@clintonemail.com” while serving in the Obama administration as secretary of state.

Clinton’s attorney, David Kendall, had previously told Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) that that particular address had not “existed during Secretary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State.”

Another statement from Clinton’s office said she only used one address during her time as secretary of state.

“Secretary Clinton used one email account during her tenure at State (with the exception of her first weeks in office while transitioning from an email account she had previously used),” it said. “In March 2013, Gawker published the email address she used while Secretary, and so she had to change the address on her account.”

Clinton served as secretary of state from Jan. 2009 to Feb. 2013. The emails she sent with the “hrod17@clintonemail.com” were sent in 2011 and 2012, according to the documents released by the Times.

A representative for Clinton’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment from TheBlaze.

Republican National Chairman Reince Priebus tweeted Monday evening that the news proved Clinton “misled public about the use of only one secret email address.”

Earlier this year, it was reported Clinton may have violated federal rules by exclusively using a personal email address to conduct all official government business while serving as secretary of state.


http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/05/18/newly-released-documents-indicate-key-hillary-clinton-claim-on-emails-was-not-true/


http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/05/19/us/politics/libya-related-messages-hillary-clinton-email-account.html?action=click&contentCollection=Politics&module=RelatedCoverage&region=Marginalia&pgtype=article&_r=0




Shes been in the game for so long, shes just working the system.

Give the ability to have someone in power, they eventually do it for their own personal favors to increase reletionship ties for person benefits.

This email alone is absurd how she handles the libya situation.

Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
May 20, 2015, 06:40:00 PM
 #182




Iowa Dems. Can’t Name An Accomplishment By Hillary Clinton As Sec. Of State



During the 2008 election, a local Democratic official got stuck for an answer during a Hardball interview when asked to name Barack Obama’s accomplishments. Seven years later, a roomful of Iowa Democrats gets stumped by Mark Halperin when asking the same question about Hillary Clinton and her years at the White House. One respondent, clearly embarrassed, laughs and asks Halperin, “You want to give me a minute?” She then adds, “Give me two minutes”:

The only substantive response comes from a young man who basically argues that at least she’s not Scott Walker. He argues that Democrats have no choice but to vote for her. “She’s not perfect,” he finally sighs, even though that wasn’t actually the question.

So what, some might ask; Obama won, didn’t he? Yes he did, but Obama was a candidate that was both aspirational and inspirational for voters, not just the only choice they had. When challenged on that point in 2008, voters — and not just Democrats — argued that the system needed a shake-up, a change from the establishment, and that accomplishment wasn’t really a key value in their decision.

This time, though, Hillary is the establishment, and she’s almost spookily unaccomplished at the same time. Even her defender notes that Hillary has been around an awfully long time, and he still can’t name any specific accomplishment. These Democrats will still vote for Hillary, if they vote at all, but don’t expect to see the kind of dynamic that produced outside-the-box turnouts and support for Obama in either 2008 or 2012. Hillary can’t provide that kind of excitement, not even with the “first woman” meme voiced at full volume.

By the way, Halperin was a bit unfair to these people. It’s a trick question; Hillary had no accomplishments at State, with the singular exception of enriching herself and her husband through the power of her office.



http://hotair.com/archives/2015/05/20/video-iowa-dems-cant-name-a-hillary-accomplishment-either/



https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=32&v=GhZxDrJi9UE





Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
May 20, 2015, 11:14:13 PM
 #183




Dan Joseph Interviews Hillary Clinton


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ol6IkuV24A


Bit_Happy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2114
Merit: 1040


A Great Time to Start Something!


View Profile
May 20, 2015, 11:32:48 PM
 #184

Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy?



10 Scandals Involving Hillary Clinton You May Have Forgotten

Hillary Clinton has been involved in scandals before. Here are some notable ones you may have forgotten.

Chinagate - The Clinton-Gore campaign in 1996 allegedly took bribes from Chinese banks and their government to help their dwindling poll numbers. The Chinese embassy in D.C. helped siphon funds into the DNC. Secretary of Commerce Ron Brown (who was killed in a plane crash), and at Hillary’s instruction reportedly sold seats on department trade missions to China. Joint congressional hearings were canceled after Democrats threatened to bring up Republican campaign issues and then Monica Lewinsky actually saved this scandal from media attention.

Travelgate Scandal - Catherine Cornelius, a 25-year-old cousin of Bill's was allegedly promised the position of director of the travel office. Hillary Clinton then (indirectly) fired seven employees from the United States travel office and replaced them with associates from Arkansas. Records were either nowhere to be found or incorrectly filed. And, there's a reported attempt to give a White House airline contract to friend. Hillary had the FBI investigate Billy Dale, the head of the travel office, ruining his career who was found to do nothing wrong, but was then audited by the IRS for three years after.

    "Billy Dale and his family went through hell thanks to the Clintons, Attorney General Janet Reno, the FBI and the IRS," Irvine wrote. "Hillary's greatest crime was not perjury, it was trying to send an innocent man to prison to justify having fired him and his staff without cause."

    “A memorandum by a former Presidential aide depicts Hillary Rodham Clinton as the central figure in the 1993 travel office dismissals, a politically damaging episode that the aide said had resulted from a climate of fear in which officials did not dare question Mrs. Clinton's wishes," wrote the NYT in 1996.

Whitewater Scandal - Hillary and her husband were partners in a shady real estate development firm called Whitewater Development Corp in Arkansas. Accusations of impropriety against the Clintons and others soon surfaced, regarding improper campaign contributions, political and financial favors, and tax benefits. Clinton’s friends and majority owners,  James and Susan McDougal were jailed for fraud, Clinton's successor, Governor Jim Tucker, was jailed for fraud along with municipal judges David Hale and Eugene Fitzhugh who worked with James McDougal. The Clintons walked away unscathed, having apparently done nothing wrong.

See Whitewater Timeline.

Vince Foster Jr. Mystery - Questions cloud the suicide of Vince Foster, former colleague, friend, and White House aid  of Hillary’s who had connections to Travelgate, and the Whitewater scandals. Read the link above entitled "The Man Who Knew too Much. . ."

Filegate Scandal - Craig Livingstone, director of the White House's Office of Personnel Security "improperly" accessed FBI files on several hundred individuals.

Mrs. Clinton called it a, "completely honest bureaucratic snafu."

Many of these files were on people from previous Republican administrations. Hillary Clinton hired Livingston and is alleged to have looked at the files and requested this move. She was accused by Republicans of  violating privacy rights of individuals she viewed as political adversaries.

Cattle-Futures Miracle - Hillary’s first commodity trade was in cattle futures where she ordered 10 futures contracts which normally cost $12,000 dollars with only $1,000 dollars in her account. This turned into $6,300 dollars by the next morning and after 10 months totaled $100,000, with trading help from James B. Blair.

    “Blair, who at the time was outside counsel to Tyson Foods Inc., Arkansas' largest employer, says he was advising Clinton out of friendship, not to seek political gain. . ."  reports The WashingtonPost.

Robert L. "Red" Bone ran the Springdale, AK financial services company REFCO allowed the trades and later, after investigation, had to pay the largest fine at the time in the exchanges history and was suspended for three years. Hillary Clinton said she was able to make the successful trading because she read the Wall Street Journal for research.

Lootergate - Bill and especially Hillary started to ship White House furniture to their personal home in Chappaqua, N.Y.. The Clintons claimed they were donated, but at only some were proven to be donated and meant to stay in the White House after contacting the manufacturers. The Clintons returned some of the furniture after pressure was put on them to do so.

    “GOP lawmakers and others criticized Hillary Rodham Clinton in particular for accepting many presents just before she joined the Senate and became covered by strict ethics rules that prohibit accepting gifts worth more than $50.”

Drug Dealer Donor Scandal - Convicted drug trafficker Jorge Cabrera apparently made such a big donation to the Clinton’s campaign that he was invited to the White house without Secret Service present.

Ponzi Scheme and Political Favor Scandal - Norman Yung Yuen Hsu was a convicted pyramid investment promoter, and major Democratic donor. He contributed an undisclosed amount to Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign.

    “He was sentenced to more than 24 years in prison in 2009 by a judge who accused him of funding his fraud by manipulating the political process in a way that 'strikes at the very core of our democracy.”

Here is an article posted in the New York Times in 1996 entitled “Blizzard of Lies” about Hillary Clinton.

The mega Clinton Foundation is also rife with cronyism and political favors.

For a larger list of scandals associated with the Clintons, check out The Clinton Crime Library.

http://www.mrctv.org/blog/10-scandals-involving-hillary-clinton-you-may-have-forgotten

Hillary belongs in jail, so she is a "perfect" candidate, since she is easily threatened if she doesn't "obey her handlers".

Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
May 25, 2015, 06:20:58 PM
 #185




The Curiously Redacted Sentence From Hillary Email...





Among the emails released by the State Department today was one sent by Hillary Clinton to Jake Sullivan on April 8, 2011. Clinton was forwarding a private intelligence report that Sidney Blumenthal had sent her with the subject line: “UK game playing; new rebel strategists; Egypt moves in.”

In the State Department release today, Clinton responds with “FYI” and a sentence that is redacted.

But the New York Times posted its versions of the emails earlier this week and the sentence is not redacted. In the Times’s version the redacted sentence reads: “FYI. The idea of using private security experts to arm the opposition should be considered.”

The redaction in the State Department version is labeled a “B5″ Freedom of Information Act exception, which provides for a “deliberative privilege” in keeping the information from the public.

The obvious question: Why did the State Department redact that sentence?


http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/state-dept-makes-curious-redaction-hillary-email_953420.html




BLKBITZ
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 161
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 25, 2015, 07:11:18 PM
 #186

anyone that votes for her simply because she is a women is a idiot.
Will.i.am Shakespeare
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 25, 2015, 07:13:56 PM
 #187

anyone that votes for her simply because she is a women is a idiot.

Like people who voted for Obama because he was black? Part of me thinks it would be nice to have a female president... just as long as it's not Hilary. Looks like it'll be either another Bush or Clinton in the White House again, though.
Chef Ramsay
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
May 26, 2015, 10:47:46 PM
 #188

Bill Clinton (shell) company shows complexity of family finances

WASHINGTON (AP) — The newly released financial files on Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton's growing fortune omit a company with no apparent employees or assets that the former president has legally used to provide consulting and other services, but which demonstrates the complexity of the family's finances.

Because the company, WJC, LLC, has no financial assets, Hillary Clinton's campaign was not obligated to report its existence in her recent financial disclosure report, officials with Bill Clinton's private office and the Clinton campaign said. They were responding to questions by The Associated Press, which reviewed corporate documents.

The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to provide private details of the former president's finances on the record, said the entity was a "pass-through" company designed to channel payments to the former president.

Under federal ethics disclosure rules, declared candidates do not have to report assets worth less than $1,000. But the company's existence demonstrates the complexity of tracking the Clintons' finances as Hillary Clinton ramps up her presidential bid.

While Bill Clinton's lucrative speeches have provided the bulk of the couple's income, earning as much as $50 million during his wife's four-year term as secretary of state in the Obama administration, the former president has also sought to branch out into other business activities in recent years. Little is known about the exact nature and financial worth of Bill Clinton's non-speech business interests.

The identities of several U.S and foreign-based companies and foundations that Bill Clinton worked for have been disclosed in Hillary Clinton's recent financial report as well as in earlier reports during her stint as secretary of state.

Under federal disclosure rules for spouses' earned income, Hillary Clinton was only obligated to identify the source of her spouse's income and confirm that he received more than $1,000. As a result, the precise amounts of Bill Clinton's earned income from consulting have not been disclosed, and it's not known how much was routed through WJC, LLC.

WJC, LLC was set up in Delaware in 2008 and again in 2013 and in New York in 2009, according to documents obtained by The AP. The company did not appear among holdings in the Clintons' financial disclosure released last week or in previous Hillary Clinton disclosure reports between 2008 and 2013, when she resigned as secretary of state. Bill Clinton signed a document as its "authorizing person" in a corporate filing in Delaware in 2013.

A limited liability company is a commonly used business structure that provides tax advantages and limited legal protection for the assets of company owners and partners.

The purpose of Bill Clinton's U.S.-based company was not disclosed in any of the corporate filings in Delaware and New York, but State Department files recently reviewed by the AP show that WJC, LLC surfaced in emails from Bill Clinton's aides to the department's ethics officials.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20150526/us-dem-2016-clinton-company-c60b86a6d2.html
EternalWingsofGod
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 27, 2015, 01:31:21 AM
 #189

I can't say i'm a fan of Hillary Clinton
Her ties with monsanto bother me and I for one do not want more GMO's in my food to many risks with to little surveilance and that would only get worse if she becomes the President due to her backers who have a vested interested in that industry.

Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
May 27, 2015, 02:43:39 AM
 #190




Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton’s State Department…


Even by the standards of arms deals between the United States and Saudi Arabia, this one was enormous. A consortium of American defense contractors led by Boeing would deliver $29 billion worth of advanced fighter jets to the United States’ oil-rich ally in the Middle East.

Israeli officials were agitated, reportedly complaining to the Obama administration that this substantial enhancement to Saudi air power risked disrupting the region’s fragile balance of power. The deal appeared to collide with the State Department’s documented concerns about the repressive policies of the Saudi royal family.

But now, in late 2011, Hillary Clinton’s State Department was formally clearing the sale, asserting that it was in the national interest. At a press conference in Washington to announce the department’s approval, an assistant secretary of state, Andrew Shapiro, declared that the deal had been “a top priority” for Clinton personally. Shapiro, a longtime aide to Clinton since her Senate days, added that the “U.S. Air Force and U.S. Army have excellent relationships in Saudi Arabia.”

These were not the only relationships bridging leaders of the two nations. In the years before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia contributed at least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation, the philanthropic enterprise she has overseen with her husband, former president Bill Clinton. Just two months before the deal was finalized, Boeing — the defense contractor that manufactures one of the fighter jets the Saudis were especially keen to acquire, the F-15 — contributed $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation, according to a company press release.


http://www.ibtimes.com/clinton-foundation-donors-got-weapons-deals-hillary-clintons-state-department-1934187


Chef Ramsay
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
May 27, 2015, 03:04:07 AM
 #191

anyone that votes for her simply because she is a women is a idiot.
That should go without saying but sadly there'll be so many female tools that will pull the lever for her if she runs that it will be sickening. This is why we Rand as the GOP nominee to provide a plethora of substance to at least put the issues of freedom and the status of this country out there for everyone to consider.
tvbcof
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4732
Merit: 1277


View Profile
May 27, 2015, 06:18:46 AM
 #192

anyone that votes for her simply because she is a women is a idiot.

That should go without saying but sadly there'll be so many female tools that will pull the lever for her if she runs that it will be sickening. This is why we Rand as the GOP nominee to provide a plethora of substance to at least put the issues of freedom and the status of this country out there for everyone to consider.

Many male tools also.  I know the left fairly well.

Another person who knows the left is Glen Greenwald.  I got a kick out of his prediction that after Hillary the Liberals will probably run a faggot.  This is particularly amusing since Greenwald himself is a homosexual.  Needless to say this prediction got under the skin of a lot of Liberals and caused significant discomfort.


sig spam anywhere and self-moderated threads on the pol&soc board are for losers.
iCEBREAKER
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072


Crypto is the separation of Power and State.


View Profile WWW
May 27, 2015, 09:46:33 AM
 #193

anyone that votes for her simply because she is a women is a idiot.

That should go without saying but sadly there'll be so many female tools that will pull the lever for her if she runs that it will be sickening. This is why we Rand as the GOP nominee to provide a plethora of substance to at least put the issues of freedom and the status of this country out there for everyone to consider.

Many male tools also.  I know the left fairly well.

Another person who knows the left is Glen Greenwald.  I got a kick out of his prediction that after Hillary the Liberals will probably run a faggot.  This is particularly amusing since Greenwald himself is a homosexual.  Needless to say this prediction got under the skin of a lot of Liberals and caused significant discomfort.

Great quip by Glen.  I love it when he makes Rachel Madcow and her fellow travelers have a big sad.   Grin

Many on the honorable-but-misled left are (now) (also) sick and tired of their radical Marxist/feminist wings' unrelenting identity politics.

The backlash began when even Good Progressives couldn't criticize Obama for his Dubya-like warmongering without being called racist.

It intensified when even Good Progressives couldn't criticize Hilldog for her Dubya-like warmongering without being called sexist.

Few things anger people more than having their sincere informed individual opinions pre-judged, invalidated, and brushed off as mere 'Mansplaining' and/or 'Whitesplaining.'


██████████
█████████████████
██████████████████████
█████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
████
████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
███████████████████████████
██████
██████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
█████████████
██████████████
████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
██████████████████████
█████████████████
██████████

Monero
"The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine
whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy." 
David Chaum 1996
"Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect."  Adam Back 2014
Buy and sell XMR near you
P2P Exchange Network
Buy XMR with fiat
Is Dash a scam?
Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
May 27, 2015, 01:57:47 PM
 #194

anyone that votes for her simply because she is a women is a idiot.

That should go without saying but sadly there'll be so many female tools that will pull the lever for her if she runs that it will be sickening. This is why we Rand as the GOP nominee to provide a plethora of substance to at least put the issues of freedom and the status of this country out there for everyone to consider.

Many male tools also.  I know the left fairly well.

Another person who knows the left is Glen Greenwald.  I got a kick out of his prediction that after Hillary the Liberals will probably run a faggot.  This is particularly amusing since Greenwald himself is a homosexual.  Needless to say this prediction got under the skin of a lot of Liberals and caused significant discomfort.

Great quip by Glen.  I love it when he makes Rachel Madcow and her fellow travelers have a big sad.   Grin

Many on the honorable-but-misled left are (now) (also) sick and tired of their radical Marxist/feminist wings' unrelenting identity politics.

The backlash began when even Good Progressives couldn't criticize Obama for his Dubya-like warmongering without being called racist.

It intensified when even Good Progressives couldn't criticize Hilldog for her Dubya-like warmongering without being called sexist.

Few things anger people more than having their sincere informed individual opinions pre-judged, invalidated, and brushed off as mere 'Mansplaining' and/or 'Whitesplaining.'


Yes. Progressives have been replaced by borgs. Accepting anything, as long as the dude doing it has a D next the name. Critical thinking for them is an unknown construct now.


 
Pentax
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 27, 2015, 02:55:20 PM
 #195

anyone that votes for her simply because she is a women is a idiot.

That should go without saying but sadly there'll be so many female tools that will pull the lever for her if she runs that it will be sickening. This is why we Rand as the GOP nominee to provide a plethora of substance to at least put the issues of freedom and the status of this country out there for everyone to consider.

Many male tools also.  I know the left fairly well.

Another person who knows the left is Glen Greenwald.  I got a kick out of his prediction that after Hillary the Liberals will probably run a faggot.  This is particularly amusing since Greenwald himself is a homosexual.  Needless to say this prediction got under the skin of a lot of Liberals and caused significant discomfort.

Great quip by Glen.  I love it when he makes Rachel Madcow and her fellow travelers have a big sad.   Grin

Many on the honorable-but-misled left are (now) (also) sick and tired of their radical Marxist/feminist wings' unrelenting identity politics.

The backlash began when even Good Progressives couldn't criticize Obama for his Dubya-like warmongering without being called racist.

It intensified when even Good Progressives couldn't criticize Hilldog for her Dubya-like warmongering without being called sexist.

Few things anger people more than having their sincere informed individual opinions pre-judged, invalidated, and brushed off as mere 'Mansplaining' and/or 'Whitesplaining.'


Yes. Progressives have been replaced by borgs. Accepting anything, as long as the dude doing it has a D next the name. Critical thinking for them is an unknown construct now.


 

Yep, it's the race card, or the gender card, or the rich card, or the old angry white man card, whatever it takes to brush an opposing viewpoint aside without actually answering to it.  Their minions suck it up like manna, and then spew it wherever they can.

Logical fallacy run amok.

It's not as if both/all parties don't do it, although I'll agree that the Dems have it down to an art form.  My personal theory is that it is because their party is cobbled together largely by special interest groups, all of which think they're victims of one sort or another, so this speaks to what they themselves truly believe in the first place, which is that "it" is always someone else's fault and "they" do what they do out of some prejudice or desire "to keep us down". 

That is not to say there aren't smart Dems also with which we simply have differing viewpoints.  It's more about the larger populace that both sides do their best to manipulate with these sorts of labeling schemes.  It's easy and it works, largely because of the 'stupidity of the American voter' as pointed out by that asshole Gruber.
iCEBREAKER
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072


Crypto is the separation of Power and State.


View Profile WWW
May 27, 2015, 08:26:54 PM
 #196

Progressives have been replaced by borgs. Accepting anything, as long as the dude doing it has a D next the name. Critical thinking for them is an unknown construct now.

Not all of them have been replaced.  It does the cause a disservice to write them off, just when they are ripe for re-education and possible conversion.

Plenty of them are raising hell about Hilldog's coronation, and supporting the old socialist guy and the hawt younger dude's insurgent primary campaigns.  Plus they mostly love Snowden as much as they hate the Totalitarian Surveillance State (AKA 'The Man').

Some of them have even left the Democrat plantation for the Green Party!   Shocked



██████████
█████████████████
██████████████████████
█████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
████
████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
████████████████████████████
██████
███████████████████████████
██████
██████████████████████████
█████
███████████████████████████
█████████████
██████████████
████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
██████████████████████
█████████████████
██████████

Monero
"The difference between bad and well-developed digital cash will determine
whether we have a dictatorship or a real democracy." 
David Chaum 1996
"Fungibility provides privacy as a side effect."  Adam Back 2014
Buy and sell XMR near you
P2P Exchange Network
Buy XMR with fiat
Is Dash a scam?
Scream
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


U will never know the true answer, before you try


View Profile
May 28, 2015, 04:15:33 AM
 #197

That doesn't mean that people aren't actually considering her less trustworthy. It simply means that we shouldn't be surprised that they are doing so, based on past trends.
leveragedcoins
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 28, 2015, 04:31:43 AM
 #198

I think running her own email server was a huge blow to trust.   Was just not normal behavior.   

That being said I DO NOT think it will effect her running and winning majority of party.
ALToids
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 519
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 28, 2015, 11:21:53 AM
 #199

What does trust have to do with politics?  It flew the coop long ago...

Hillary's mouth just sound more soothing than soothing than GOP's offering... just like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo4cFViNLes
Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
May 28, 2015, 02:22:13 PM
 #200




Clinton Foundation paid Blumenthal $10K per month while he advised on Libya

Some officials at the charity grumbled that his hiring was a favor from the Clintons.



Sidney Blumenthal, a longtime confidant of Bill and Hillary Clinton, earned about $10,000 a month as a full-time employee of the Clinton Foundation while he was providing unsolicited intelligence on Libya to then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, according to multiple sources familiar with the arrangement.

Blumenthal was added to the payroll of the Clintons’ global philanthropy in 2009 — not long after advising Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign — at the behest of former president Bill Clinton, for whom he had worked in the White House, say the sources.

While Blumenthal’s foundation job focused on highlighting the legacy of Clinton’s presidency, some officials at the charity questioned his value and grumbled that his hiring was a favor from the Clintons, according to people familiar with the foundation. They say that, during a 2013 reform push, Blumenthal was moved to a consulting contract that came with a similar pay rate but without benefits — an arrangement that endured until March.

A Clinton loyalist who first earned the family’s trust as an aggressive combatant in the political battles of the 1990s, Blumenthal continues to work as a paid consultant to two groups supporting Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign — American Bridge and Media Matters — both of which are run by David Brock, a close ally of both Clinton and Blumenthal.


Yet Blumenthal’s financial and personal connections to the Clintons and their allies have emerged as subjects of intense scrutiny as Clinton seeks to gain momentum for her presidential campaign.

Blumenthal’s concurrent work for the foundation, the Brock groups and a pair of businesses seeking potentially lucrative contracts in Libya underscores the blurred lines between her State Department work and that of her family’s charitable and political enterprises.

Blumenthal has been subpoenaed by the U.S. House committee investigating the 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, and Clinton’s handling of it. He is expected to testify next week about a series of memos containing sometimes specious intelligence on the situation in Libya, which he sent to Hillary Clinton’s personal email account.

The committee is said to be interested in exploring Blumenthal’s connections to any entity that may have stood to benefit from Clinton’s decisions in Libya. Benghazi Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) also wants to probe how seriously the State Department took Blumenthal’s advice, which recently released emails show were met with skepticism at times.


Clinton, whose efforts to hire Blumenthal as an adviser at the State Department were rebuffed by top aides to President Barack Obama, last week defended her relationship with her old ally but also minimized his influence. Describing him as “a friend of mine for a long time,” Clinton, who also plans to testify before the committee, said “he sent me unsolicited emails which I passed on in some instances, and I say that that’s just part of the give and take.”

In his own statement last week, Blumenthal suggested that he did not write the memos on behalf of the foundation or any other entities with which he may have been associated, but rather as “a private citizen and friend” of Clinton’s.

His lawyer, former Deputy Attorney General James Cole, told POLITICO on Wednesday that Blumenthal did not have any financial interest in the efforts of the two companies pushing to win contracts in Libya — Osprey Global Solutions and Constellations Group.

“He never got any money from — and has no continuing relationship with — Osprey or Constellations,” said Cole.

The Clinton Foundation declined to comment.

Blumenthal’s move to a consulting contract came at about the time he signed a deal with Simon & Schuster to write a four-volume biography of Abraham Lincoln, the first installment of which is set for release in April.

The move from the foundation’s full-time staff roster exempted him from requirements that any outside work done be vetted and approved by the foundation. The shift also coincided with an effort to professionalize the foundation. More rigorous fiscal and organizational policies were implemented, while the portfolios of other longtime Clinton confidants were diminished, such as the president’s old Arkansas lawyer Bruce Lindsey, his former bodyman Doug Band and former White House policy adviser Ira Magaziner.

Media Matters spokesman Zac Petkanas wouldn’t provide details on Blumenthal’s relationship with the group. “We’ve worked with various consultants over the years,” he said. “As a matter of policy, we do not discuss the details of any of these arrangements.”


But Blumenthal’s work for American Bridge and Media Matters is described as ongoing, even as those groups come to Clinton’s defense by trying to neutralize attacks on her related to Benghazi and her use of a private email account and server for official business, while assailing the prospective Republican rivals leveling those attacks.

One source familiar with the work said Blumenthal regularly reaches out to suggest ways in which the groups can inject themselves into ongoing political fights.

“I’m not sure if his ideas are very helpful,” said the source, suggesting Blumenthal’s value comes more from his connection to the Clintons. “This is all about helping someone who is a friend of the Clintons.”

The super PAC arm of American Bridge reported paying Blumenthal $2,500 in June 2013 for “Strategic Consulting Services,” though payments also could be directed to him through a consulting firm. And it’s possible he’s paid by the nonprofit arm of the group, which, like Media Matters, is registered under a section of the tax code — 501(c) — that does not require detailed disclosure of expenditures.

Likewise, Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign did not disclose any payments made directly to Blumenthal.

Clinton’s campaign did not immediately respond to a question about whether Blumenthal would be involved this time around.


http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/clinton-foundation-sidney-blumenthal-salary-libya-118359.html


Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 91 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!