jalmari
|
|
May 03, 2016, 03:23:11 PM |
|
Btw, if I would circulate all my coins thru another wallet e.g. an exchange, would it increase the probability to mint?
Hello jalmari, If you mean you want to combine all your coins, you don't need to use an exchange at all. You can create a new address inside your EnergyCoin client, and then send all your coins to that address in one go, generally using "Send coins" in GUI or the command "sendtoaddress" in console. Remember to backup your wallet everytime you create any new address. There is a even better way. You can custom your stake size using our new "sendsplit" function. Similar to what Brian has done: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/enrg/tx.dws?4238637.htmFor example, if you want to make your stake size 9888 x 10 (just an example) and you have more than 98880 ENRG in your wallet, run in console: sendsplit eXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX '{"count":10,"amount":9888}' where eXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX is your new ENRG address. Then if you don't want to split too often, run in console: Peter Thanks for the advice, I have to test these... Ok, I have no applied these instructions. Interesting to see what happens!
|
|
|
|
EnergyCoinDev
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 100
The EnergyCoin and Energyparty Developer
|
|
May 05, 2016, 06:25:36 AM |
|
Btw, if I would circulate all my coins thru another wallet e.g. an exchange, would it increase the probability to mint?
Hello jalmari, If you mean you want to combine all your coins, you don't need to use an exchange at all. You can create a new address inside your EnergyCoin client, and then send all your coins to that address in one go, generally using "Send coins" in GUI or the command "sendtoaddress" in console. Remember to backup your wallet everytime you create any new address. There is a even better way. You can custom your stake size using our new "sendsplit" function. Similar to what Brian has done: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/enrg/tx.dws?4238637.htmFor example, if you want to make your stake size 9888 x 10 (just an example) and you have more than 98880 ENRG in your wallet, run in console: sendsplit eXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX '{"count":10,"amount":9888}' where eXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX is your new ENRG address. Then if you don't want to split too often, run in console: Peter Thanks for the advice, I have to test these... Ok, I have no applied these instructions. Interesting to see what happens! Hello jalmari, Not sure what advice you have applied (or not applied). Just hope you can find a way to put your wallet online more often. Because our rule is clear and simple now: everyone needs to be online more to get more PoS rewards. Peter
|
|
|
|
jalmari
|
|
May 06, 2016, 03:36:55 PM |
|
Btw, if I would circulate all my coins thru another wallet e.g. an exchange, would it increase the probability to mint?
Hello jalmari, If you mean you want to combine all your coins, you don't need to use an exchange at all. You can create a new address inside your EnergyCoin client, and then send all your coins to that address in one go, generally using "Send coins" in GUI or the command "sendtoaddress" in console. Remember to backup your wallet everytime you create any new address. There is a even better way. You can custom your stake size using our new "sendsplit" function. Similar to what Brian has done: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/enrg/tx.dws?4238637.htmFor example, if you want to make your stake size 9888 x 10 (just an example) and you have more than 98880 ENRG in your wallet, run in console: sendsplit eXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX '{"count":10,"amount":9888}' where eXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX is your new ENRG address. Then if you don't want to split too often, run in console: Peter Thanks for the advice, I have to test these... Ok, I have no applied these instructions. Interesting to see what happens! Hello jalmari, Not sure what advice you have applied (or not applied). Just hope you can find a way to put your wallet online more often. Because our rule is clear and simple now: everyone needs to be online more to get more PoS rewards. Peter I applied those in the quote, i.e. sendsplit and stakesplitthreshold and they worked as you told. And as I have said previously I understand your points but don't agree with them Without coin ageing it is extremely difficult to mint if you don't hold a lot of coins and thus it does not encourage us with smaller amounts. However I am still doing it everyday for a few hours.
|
|
|
|
EnergyCoinDev
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 100
The EnergyCoin and Energyparty Developer
|
|
May 07, 2016, 08:27:17 AM |
|
Btw, if I would circulate all my coins thru another wallet e.g. an exchange, would it increase the probability to mint?
Hello jalmari, If you mean you want to combine all your coins, you don't need to use an exchange at all. You can create a new address inside your EnergyCoin client, and then send all your coins to that address in one go, generally using "Send coins" in GUI or the command "sendtoaddress" in console. Remember to backup your wallet everytime you create any new address. There is a even better way. You can custom your stake size using our new "sendsplit" function. Similar to what Brian has done: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/enrg/tx.dws?4238637.htmFor example, if you want to make your stake size 9888 x 10 (just an example) and you have more than 98880 ENRG in your wallet, run in console: sendsplit eXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX '{"count":10,"amount":9888}' where eXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX is your new ENRG address. Then if you don't want to split too often, run in console: Peter Thanks for the advice, I have to test these... Ok, I have no applied these instructions. Interesting to see what happens! Hello jalmari, Not sure what advice you have applied (or not applied). Just hope you can find a way to put your wallet online more often. Because our rule is clear and simple now: everyone needs to be online more to get more PoS rewards. Peter I applied those in the quote, i.e. sendsplit and stakesplitthreshold and they worked as you told. And as I have said previously I understand your points but don't agree with them Without coin ageing it is extremely difficult to mint if you don't hold a lot of coins and thus it does not encourage us with smaller amounts. However I am still doing it everyday for a few hours. Hello jalmari, I do welcome your feedback even you don't 100% agree. As a responsible dev, I shall only tell you the facts. The fact is that if we had coin ageing, not only smaller holders would have it, larger holders would also have. So it's actually not the coinage hurting you, as long as you can put your wallet online more often. Now if people want to stake more, they need to invest their money buying more coins, or invest their effort putting their wallets online often, or both. You can actually see from our blockchain explorer that a few smaller holders have outperformed some other larger holders. That's something couldn't happen before v.1.5.0. Those smaller holders are likely staking 24/7. If you can tell why you can't invest more effort putting your wallet online often, I may give you some more advice, unless your problem is about lacking of electricity. Other community members already proposed using tablet, raspberry PI with ROKOS, or trying Staisybit. By the way, you may continue with customizing your stake size as per my previous advice. You may still need some more trials before you can find out the stake size that fits best for you. Peter
|
|
|
|
|
MyLucky7
Member
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
|
|
May 09, 2016, 05:43:30 PM |
|
Without coin ageing it is extremely difficult to mint if you don't hold a lot of coins and thus it does not encourage us with smaller amounts.
Why don't you just buy a bit more coins? After you accumulate more stake rewards you can then go selling some extra coins to compensate your investment. I'am doing the same and keep staking, and have made some profits already by this method.
|
|
|
|
jalmari
|
|
May 11, 2016, 02:45:20 PM |
|
Without coin ageing it is extremely difficult to mint if you don't hold a lot of coins and thus it does not encourage us with smaller amounts.
Why don't you just buy a bit more coins? After you accumulate more stake rewards you can then go selling some extra coins to compensate your investment. I'am doing the same and keep staking, and have made some profits already by this method. Yep, I have been buying, but that was not the point. The point was to discuss if the current PoS strategy is encouraging to stake or not. I have now adjusted my coins in different way and it already looks better!
|
|
|
|
EnergyCoinDev
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 100
The EnergyCoin and Energyparty Developer
|
|
May 12, 2016, 10:34:44 AM |
|
Without coin ageing it is extremely difficult to mint if you don't hold a lot of coins and thus it does not encourage us with smaller amounts.
Why don't you just buy a bit more coins? After you accumulate more stake rewards you can then go selling some extra coins to compensate your investment. I'am doing the same and keep staking, and have made some profits already by this method. Yep, I have been buying, but that was not the point. The point was to discuss if the current PoS strategy is encouraging to stake or not. I have now adjusted my coins in different way and it already looks better! Glad to hear that you already get better by re-adjusting your coins. The current PoS strategy is definitely encouraging people staking. Before block height 2.1m, with coin ageing, people who staked more often couldn't outperform those even staked only once a year. It was not fair to active stakers. After block height 2.1m, active stakers can easily outperform inactive stakers. From our blockchain explorer, now only 27% total coins are staking. It represents that PoS rewards for the 73% inactive stakers now get shared by those active 27% stakers. That's why we now have more than 2x active nodes than before to compete for available PoS rewards, and at the same time we can achieve a lower overall inflation rate. Peter
|
|
|
|
EnergyCoinDev
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 100
The EnergyCoin and Energyparty Developer
|
|
May 13, 2016, 02:42:16 AM |
|
Guys, New client v1.5.1 will be ready in a few days... This release will also update checkpoints, and include the CoinControl fixes. Stay tuned. Peter
|
|
|
|
cryptonit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
|
|
May 14, 2016, 11:54:37 AM |
|
nice i see u take feedback serious and improve
|
|
|
|
cryptonit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1053
bit.diamonds | uNiq.diamonds
|
|
May 15, 2016, 12:31:27 AM |
|
It would be nice to include 64bits build And maybe have a "how to" discribing how to compile from source. only if they keep 32bit builds in their release too 32 bit wallets are aimportant for low power useage windows 10 tablets they mostly have a 32bit windows installed a crypto wallet based only a bitcoin codebase as ENRG use it have not much to gain from 64bit anyway
|
|
|
|
EnergyCoinDev
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 100
The EnergyCoin and Energyparty Developer
|
|
May 15, 2016, 06:44:44 AM |
|
It would be nice to include 64bits build And maybe have a "how to" discribing how to compile from source. only if they keep 32bit builds in their release too 32 bit wallets are aimportant for low power useage windows 10 tablets they mostly have a 32bit windows installed a crypto wallet based only a bitcoin codebase as ENRG use it have not much to gain from 64bit anyway We won't change the default builds for ENRG. 32bit builds are (and should still be ) our default for every future release. Cryptonit is right, your ENRG wallet won't get performance gain from 64bit builds. But 64bit build will consume more memory in integers and pointers. It will leave you less memory resource if you want to run multiple wallets or other apps on top of the 64bit ENRG wallet. As a crypto focusing on less energy wastes, ENRG dev team doesn't recommend using 64bit build. In fact, our official 32bit builds can run smoothly on BOTH 32bit and 64bit systems. And running 32bit ENRG clients on 64bit systems can save you memory resource. If people still want to try 64bit build on their own, there is a simple "how to" guide already: https://github.com/EnergyCoinProject/energycoin/blob/master/doc/readme-qt.rst, which is actually a common compile guide for all original bitcoin codebase cryptos. Peter
|
|
|
|
EnergyCoinDev
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 100
The EnergyCoin and Energyparty Developer
|
|
May 15, 2016, 06:49:51 AM |
|
nice i see u take feedback serious and improve
Yes, thanks, and that's because EnergyCoin is a serious project. Peter
|
|
|
|
EnergyCoinDev
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 100
The EnergyCoin and Energyparty Developer
|
|
May 16, 2016, 06:12:27 AM Last edit: May 16, 2016, 03:09:01 PM by EnergyCoinDev |
|
Hello all, Just got a PM from a nice user asking for EnergyCoin.conf with available nodes for download. Now I have uploaded a copy of EnergyCoin.conf with that information and everyone can download it from our Energycoin Bootstrap Server. Peter
|
|
|
|
|
MyLucky7
Member
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
|
|
May 19, 2016, 05:54:33 AM |
|
Awesome new client and is running smooth. Well done.
|
|
|
|
Attack.of.the.Clones
|
|
May 19, 2016, 10:43:20 AM |
|
Well done! Great to see ENRG still going strong after two years
|
|
|
|
EnergyCoinDev
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 100
The EnergyCoin and Energyparty Developer
|
|
May 19, 2016, 03:43:26 PM |
|
Awesome new client and is running smooth. Well done. Well done! Great to see ENRG still going strong after two years
Thanks both for your kind words. Two years sound like a long time for crypto. But for EnergyCoin, it's just like a new beginning since we have just switched to a fixed PoS reward recently. And now we also have more new core members and have a much stronger team than two years ago. Peter
|
|
|
|
Attack.of.the.Clones
|
|
May 20, 2016, 10:49:44 PM |
|
Awesome new client and is running smooth. Well done. Well done! Great to see ENRG still going strong after two years
Thanks both for your kind words. Two years sound like a long time for crypto. But for EnergyCoin, it's just like a new beginning since we have just switched to a fixed PoS reward recently. And now we also have more new core members and have a much stronger team than two years ago. Peter Two years is a long time for a coin to survive, and that longevity is a great selling point, as is the new core members! I think the upside for ENRG is very positive, so it's a great investment, plus it actually has a real world use that most humans are concerned with.
|
|
|
|
josecauy
|
|
May 20, 2016, 10:54:35 PM |
|
Done, Thanks for release!!
|
|
|
|
|