What Is A Social Justice Warrior (SJW)?

[Wilikon]

Do you think the concept of sjw was hijacked by reddit zombies and you represent the true nature of being a real sjw?

This question is moot, there is no such thing as a "real" SJW. https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/no-true-scotsman

Neither SJWs nor Redditors are a monolith. Reddit is the fourth most popular site on the web for fuck's sake. By the way, *gasp* I also read and comment on Reddit. TEH HORRORZ!

Is doxxing someone or have him fired through a relentless attack campaign justified if that person does not share your viewpoint?

No, and I would never do that. Once again, redditors are not a monolith, there are millions of different users on Reddit with millions of different worldviews.

[SJW] is more of an ironic label that's sprung up, basically, these people 'think' they're fighting for social justice, but in reality they're deliberately searching around for the most tiny insignificant things to complain about and want to micro-manage every aspect of our lives and what we say or do.

Yeah, tiny insignificant things like human rights, pandemic rape, sex slavery, worker exploitation, child exploitation, privacy, consumer protection, government corruption and hypocrisy, and mass corporate deception.  

The words you're looking for, my conservative white male american comrade, aren't

tiny insignificant things

they're "if it doesn't affect me, it doesn't matter!" Only two types of entities have this logic. Infants and narcissists.





What you call "tiny insignificant things", I call suffering, compassion, and solidarity, the three pillars of all social progress. And all revolution.

Everyone has an ego. Everyone. Everyone.

[Beliathon]

Everyone has an ego. Everyone. Everyone.

Part of our responsibility as adult members of society is tempering our ego with consideration for others. This is how we mature, both as individuals and collectively as a civilization.

[Wilikon]

Everyone has an ego. Everyone. Everyone.

Part of our responsibility as adult members of society is tempering our ego with consideration for others. This is how we mature, both as individuals and collectively as a civilization.

 

[Lethn]

How I wish communists and socialists were.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sk_SE4YqA8Q

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUig0lFHDDw

What communists and socialists are actually like in real life

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvYyGTmcP80


where did all the real communists go?

[Beliathon]

where did all the real communists go?

Murdered or sent to gulag/prisons/concentration camps by Germany, USSR, and USA in the 40s and 50s.

The angry ghosts of those countless millions murdered by fascists for thoughtcrime seen to have come back with a vengeance,  haven't they?

Soon it will be our turn to face the gulags, my fellow capitalist scums. Deep down you know this to be true. There is no escaping the coming economic retribution.

[TECSHARE]

What topic are we discussing again?

Have you never participated in a debate before? They often meander. When they don't wander, arguments tend to quickly devolve into folks arguing the same points and counterpoints in circles with one another.

I guess you are just so many light years evolved from us "conversatards" that you no longer have a need any longer to follow the same premise

More fascistic ignorance, what a surprise. This is an internet forum, as such no one is required to accept anyone else's premises, we are each free to dispute or reject any premise of our choosing. Actually that's sort of the point. I note that you've failed to dispute a single one of my premises in your post, only attacked me personally. Weak.

I'm no more evolved than anyone else here, but at least I understand how argument works.

"If you lead, they will follow"

Are you sure you are having a debate? Because to me it looks like you are simply using this discussion as a venue to push your own belief systems rather than discuss the actual topic everyone else is discussing. That's how debates work, there is a premise and the validity of it is debated. If you aren't following the premise, then you are simply just talking at everyone while completely ignoring what anyone else is talking about. Debates go both ways, you are just ignoring the topic of discussion and dictating to everyone else what you think is a better premise to discuss because it supports your own ideals. This isn't an exchange, this is you dictating the topic of discussion to everyone else while claiming I am doing the same by pointing out you aren't even following the topic of discussion.

where did all the real communists go?

Murdered or sent to gulag/prisons/concentration camps by Germany, USSR, and USA in the 40s and 50s.

 Yeah but mostly in communist Russia.

[BLKBITZ]

where did all the real communists go?

Murdered or sent to gulag/prisons/concentration camps by Germany, USSR, and USA in the 40s and 50s.

The angry ghosts of those countless millions murdered by fascists for thoughtcrime seen to have come back with a vengeance,  haven't they?

Soon it will be our turn to face the gulags, my fellow capitalist scums. Deep down you know this to be true. There is no escaping the coming economic retribution.

if you mean collapse of the economic system then I don't think we have to wait much longer.

[BADecker]

Social justice warriors believe in an extreme left-wing ideology that combines feminism, progressivism, and political correctness into a totalitarian system that attempts to censor speech and promote fringe lifestyles while actively discriminating against men, particularly white men. They are the internet activist arm of Western progressivism that acts as a vigilante group to ensure compliance and homogeny of far left thought.

Anyone who takes away freedom from people in a wrong way is a danger to himself and all others. Anyone who does it by force is a criminal.

The only right way to take freedom from others is to convince them truthfully that giving up freedom in a certain instance will be beneficial for them. It takes a real statesman to know the truth and how to convince others of it properly.

The true definition of SJW is up for debate, but most generally it has become a catch-all term that describes feminists and liberals who actively try to solve the perceived social injustices of modern society by organizing in online communities to disseminate propaganda, censor speech, and punish individuals by getting them terminated from their employment. They have also been successful at positioning themselves in the upper echelons of universities, media organizations, and tech companies.


SJW’s do not view all humans as equal

Human beings are not all equal. You can see it simply by looking at people. People may have been created equal, our souls may be equal from the standpoint that each of us is our own identity, but that is the only equality that there is among people.

Anyone who manipulates himself into power for the purpose of taking away freedom from others is a criminal.

Using a “privilege” hierarchy, SJW’s calculate the worth of a human being based on perceived injustices or wrongs that group has suffered since the time of ancestral man, using selective and narrow interpretations of history. SJW’s elevate groups that they believe have received the least amount of “privilege” in the past, and then use internet activism in the form of mobs and community purges to target those who are determined to have greater amounts of privilege. The idea of privilege is so essential to SJW ideology that a common debate tactic they use is to say “check your privilege,” which roughly translates to, “you must immediately halt or change your speech because your ancestors may or may not have done bad things to women or minority races.”

For example, if a notable white American male makes a joke about a lesbian black woman who practices Islam, SJW’s will coordinate using a combination of blogs, Youtube, and social networking to dox him (publish his personal information, including where he works). They will then pressure the man’s company by flooding it with calls and messages with the goal to remove his source of income while engaging in a mass reporting campaign to get his online accounts suspended.

Their ultimate goal is to silence all speech that they don’t like and which they find offensive while also punishing the speech offender by removing his source of income. As they grow in power, the acceptable range of speech that would trigger an SJW witch hunt is becoming more narrow, and those who are high up on the privilege hierarchy (white men) have to speak through a careful filter if they don’t want to be subject to an SJW attack.

Fortunately for all of us, anyone who criminally attempts to remove freedom from other people, is promoting similar destruction of freedom for himself from others like him. The criminal mind in power ultimately won't make friends. When he is opposed by others like himself, he ultimately will fall.

http://www.rooshv.com/what-is-a-social-justice-warrior-sjw


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle.

- Sun Tzu

If you do not know your enemies, but do know yourself, you better hope that the the first battle is your winner. If it isn't, you may not survive to have a winner.

[stallion]

Ye olde race card, how original.

This is what not having any valid argument looks like. I didn't play any cards, I merely laid out some demographic facts you didn't like. Or rather, you were upset by the obvious implications of these demographics, such as the fact that libertarians are mostly a bunch of privileged conservative white 'murican dudes on the internet.

i know it was not your intend but the whole argument did seem a little bit racially biased to me i mean can you even verify the credibility of all the demographics in the post.

[Beliathon]

Ye olde race card, how original.

This is what not having any valid argument looks like. I didn't play any cards, I merely laid out some demographic facts you didn't like. Or rather, you were upset by the obvious implications of these demographics, such as the fact that libertarians are mostly a bunch of privileged conservative white 'murican dudes on the internet.

i know it was not your intend but the whole argument did seem a little bit racially biased to me i mean can you even verify the credibility of all the demographics in the post.

This is the source, http://publicreligion.org/about/, you are free to dispute their credibility if that's your prerogative.

[TECSHARE]

Ye olde race card, how original.

This is what not having any valid argument looks like. I didn't play any cards, I merely laid out some demographic facts you didn't like. Or rather, you were upset by the obvious implications of these demographics, such as the fact that libertarians are mostly a bunch of privileged conservative white 'murican dudes on the internet.

i know it was not your intend but the whole argument did seem a little bit racially biased to me i mean can you even verify the credibility of all the demographics in the post.

This is the source, http://publicreligion.org/about/, you are free to dispute their credibility if that's your prerogative.

"Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to research at the intersection of religion, values, and public life." I don't see anything about race there, nor do I see anything referencing any actual studies. Without a source to a study, in effect what you are saying is "This group said some thing, and I am repeating it as fact without actually even verifying the data, because I agree with the conclusions." If you don't even know how to source your ideas, or verify the validity of them, why exactly should we take anything you say seriously?

[Beliathon]

Ye olde race card, how original.

This is what not having any valid argument looks like. I didn't play any cards, I merely laid out some demographic facts you didn't like. Or rather, you were upset by the obvious implications of these demographics, such as the fact that libertarians are mostly a bunch of privileged conservative white 'murican dudes on the internet.

i know it was not your intend but the whole argument did seem a little bit racially biased to me i mean can you even verify the credibility of all the demographics in the post.

This is the source, http://publicreligion.org/about/, you are free to dispute their credibility if that's your prerogative.

"Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to research at the intersection of religion, values, and public life." I don't see anything about race there, nor do I see anything referencing any actual studies. Without a source to a study, in effect what you are saying is "This group said some thing, and I am repeating it as fact without actually even verifying the data, because I agree with the conclusions." If you don't even know how to source your ideas, or verify the validity of them, why exactly should we take anything you say seriously?

History

Since our founding in 2009, PRRI research has become a standard source of trusted information among journalists, scholars, policy makers, clergy, and the general public. PRRI research has been cited in thousands of media stories and academic publications, and plays a leading role in deepening public understanding of the changing religious landscape and its role in shaping American politics. In addition to our monthly PRRI/RNS Religion News Survey conducted in partnership with Religion News Service and our annual flagship American Values Survey, PRRI conducts a number of major national surveys focused on a range of issues at the intersection of religion, values, and public life. Each year, the PRRI research team also publishes peer review articles based on our research in leading academic journals and books.

http://publicreligion.org/about/

As I said, you are free to make a fool of yourself slandering this organization's legitimacy.

[TECSHARE]

Ye olde race card, how original.

This is what not having any valid argument looks like. I didn't play any cards, I merely laid out some demographic facts you didn't like. Or rather, you were upset by the obvious implications of these demographics, such as the fact that libertarians are mostly a bunch of privileged conservative white 'murican dudes on the internet.

i know it was not your intend but the whole argument did seem a little bit racially biased to me i mean can you even verify the credibility of all the demographics in the post.

This is the source, http://publicreligion.org/about/, you are free to dispute their credibility if that's your prerogative.

"Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to research at the intersection of religion, values, and public life." I don't see anything about race there, nor do I see anything referencing any actual studies. Without a source to a study, in effect what you are saying is "This group said some thing, and I am repeating it as fact without actually even verifying the data, because I agree with the conclusions." If you don't even know how to source your ideas, or verify the validity of them, why exactly should we take anything you say seriously?

History

Since our founding in 2009, PRRI research has become a standard source of trusted information among journalists, scholars, policy makers, clergy, and the general public. PRRI research has been cited in thousands of media stories and academic publications, and plays a leading role in deepening public understanding of the changing religious landscape and its role in shaping American politics. In addition to our monthly PRRI/RNS Religion News Survey conducted in partnership with Religion News Service and our annual flagship American Values Survey, PRRI conducts a number of major national surveys focused on a range of issues at the intersection of religion, values, and public life. Each year, the PRRI research team also publishes peer review articles based on our research in leading academic journals and books.

http://publicreligion.org/about/

As I said, you are free to make a fool of yourself slandering this organization's legitimacy.

I didn't once claim the organization was illegitimate. I stated the fact that you are not sourcing your information with studies. Simply linking the publisher of the information tells us NOTHING.

Again:

Without a source to a study, in effect what you are saying is "This group said some thing, and I am repeating it as fact without actually even verifying the data, because I agree with the conclusions." If you don't even know how to source your ideas, or verify the validity of them, why exactly should we take anything you say seriously?

[Wilikon]

Anita Sarkeesian Attacks Fallout 4 and DOOM 4



If you want an example of a type of disease sjw is check out that on the point viewpoint video. Sadly this metastatic cancer is not just spreading in the gaming industry... There is zero need to play or love games to get what they are after.

A couple of attack vectors are testing bitcointalk.org

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6brJwqjd4xc

[Beliathon]

If you want an example of a type of disease sjw is check out that on the point viewpoint video.

There's a difference between SJWs and stupid, brainwashed, misguided, puritanical religious SJWs! As an adult gamer I despise this type of shit.

"Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it."
-Robert Heinlein

[Wilikon]

Voat.co servers shut down by provider hosteurope.de over 'political incorrectness'



Here is another example of a full frontal sjw attack and war.


Long story short: Some reddit subs got nuked. The people migrated out of reddit and recreated a reddit clone. They felt they were safe, away from the reddit sjw. Nope. Their whole server got nuked too.. From complaints.


The sjw is a very serious and dangerous bunch. Just like cancer.

https://archive.is/O7QIn

[Beliathon]

Voat.co servers shut down by provider hosteurope.de over 'political incorrectness'

The sjw is a very serious and dangerous bunch. Just like cancer.

Social justice is the view that everyone deserves equal economic, political and social rights and opportunities. Social workers aim to open the doors of access and opportunity for everyone, particularly those in greatest need.

Political Correctness is the avoidance, often considered as taken to extremes, of forms of expression or action that are perceived to exclude, marginalize, or insult groups of people who are socially disadvantaged or discriminated against.

Notice how these are two different things?

[TECSHARE]

Voat.co servers shut down by provider hosteurope.de over 'political incorrectness'

The sjw is a very serious and dangerous bunch. Just like cancer.

Social justice is the view that everyone deserves equal economic, political and social rights and opportunities. Social workers aim to open the doors of access and opportunity for everyone, particularly those in greatest need.

Political Correctness is the avoidance, often considered as taken to extremes, of forms of expression or action that are perceived to exclude, marginalize, or insult groups of people who are socially disadvantaged or discriminated against.

Notice how these are two different things?

You aren't convincing anyone cancer.

[Beliathon]

You aren't convincing anyone cancer.

Of what, that words have meanings?

[TECSHARE]

I would tell you to duck but that one already went right over your head.