-

[Dron Pelya]

Oh, Decent was my first ICO, I've paticipated in. I invested 1 btc in this project. And now, when I realized that I had invested 50k dollars in Decent, and lost it, it makes me crazy. Who could know?

[1714309970]

1714309970

[1714309970]

1714309970

[thehihoguy]

Oh, Decent was my first ICO, I've paticipated in. I invested 1 btc in this project. And now, when I realized that I had invested 50k dollars in Decent, and lost it, it makes me crazy. Who could know?

You paid 50k for a non working Website and some Hackathons with 10 participants
sadly 90% of cryptospace is exitscams and lies, drags down the other serious Projects...

[Dron Pelya]

Oh, Decent was my first ICO, I've paticipated in. I invested 1 btc in this project. And now, when I realized that I had invested 50k dollars in Decent, and lost it, it makes me crazy. Who could know?

You paid 50k for a non working Website and some Hackathons with 10 participants
sadly 90% of cryptospace is exitscams and lies, drags down the other serious Projects...

Yes, it looks realy funny. There is only one thing soothes me: at that time price of BTC was about 600$. And it was one of the first ICO ever, but tokens had been locking for 1 year after ICO. And, when their coins were abble for selling, it's market price wasn't interesting for selling.

[cryptoperkele]

Why an earth this didn't ever took off? Fundamentals looked solid to me. Is there something wrong with the code? Wasn't this original enough to compete with others? Maybe "nomen est omen" effect was affecting people and this stayed "decent" as a literal sense.

[Iyeman]

Why an earth this didn't ever took off? Fundamentals looked solid to me.

It's caused by this is a scam project and this will never take off.

Is there something wrong with the code?

There's no something wrong with the code but the team was creating a useless product and they were wasting thousands of bitcoin for nothing.

Wasn't this original enough to compete with others? Maybe "nomen est omen" effect was affecting people and this stayed "decent" as a literal sense

It was not but the idea is good enough, it's very sad to see that the decent team has no competence to make the idea becomes the true story

[cryptoperkele]

Delisting now because of the poor volume. Please do something that will make the volume better.

I have my last tokens now ready for selling before delisting.🙁

What delisting are you talking about? They delisted from Bittrex ages ago.

It's caused by this is a scam project and this will never take off.

Just calling it a scam doesn't answer to any question. How is it a scam exactly? And don't tell me that they "didn't protect the price" or something like that i've seen in here. Legit projects should avoid the price talk anyway and they shouldn't try to manipulate the price. What i am interested in is the fact there wasn't any adoption from anywhere. That makes me think that there's something wrong with the platform code. Because if the code would be superior compared to other solutions, there would be devs lining up to write dapps on this platform.

There's no something wrong with the code but the team was creating a useless product and they were wasting thousands of bitcoin for nothing.

If the product is useless, i would say there's a LOT wrong with the code then.

It was not but the idea is good enough, it's very sad to see that the decent team has no competence to make the idea becomes the true story

I thought that you just said that the product is useless, how is it useless and a good idea at the same time? And what more do you want the team to do then write the code for the software exactly?

I seriously think that there's something wrong with the game theory of coinomics and the whole economy plan in here. Miner incentives should be high enough to keep the chain safe. Something is seriously wrong in here.

[thehihoguy]

The code is fine. The team is working hard. Now they are working on the DEFI side and we will have DEX soon. Very soon there will be a big update that will remove the FUD completely.

The project is more alive than ever 

DEFI does not magically improve DECENT....there will be still no Business use case for decent to be valuable in DEFI environment...

Now they are working on the DEFI side. Tomorrow they will be working on other popular things, which could make money... I think you understand what I mean.

hahaha xD are you serious? where do you get the hopium after all those years of delivering absolute nothing

[mishax1]

Bravo for raising $1.5m with only a Whitepaper! 

[JeffBrad12]

Bravo for raising $1.5m with only a Whitepaper! 

it should be more than it, i have been watching the decent ico in the past and it has raised a few thousand bitcoin. it could be more than 100 million USD at this time.  It's very sad to see the investors of decent didn't even wanna take legal action against the scammers who create garbage platform called decent.
I can't remember it but it should be around 2k BTC
The scammer sold WP for 2k bitcoin.

[cryptoperkele]

Welcome to the New Beginning

Introducing DCTDAO : The Next Evolution of Quantum Proof, Cross-Chain trading. Built on Polkadot, Moonbeam and DCore.

Too little too late, and from what i've understood, this is a response to non-issue because quantum computers that could be an issue for blockchain safety are expected to arrive in decades from now. And when this becomes a problem, it will be solved relatively fast and easily. Just like Decent did now.

[cryptoperkele]

another idea, probably can also be used to create spotify but in blockchain

okay while at it, netflix but on blockchain

how about a file sharing service on the blockchain using dcore

or maybe wish but on the blockchain, could be a good idea too

Make up your mind, these can be put into one message if you don't want to get kicked for spamming. Also, why would any of these need a distributed ledger? Because that's what the blockchain is. It's not something you put magically into everything. That doesn't make any sense. It's expensive and bulky solution and more then often impractical compared to any centralized solution.

[mishax1]

DCT is a 26BTC marketcap , that's 0.5% of the ICO . ahh ! 

[mishax1]

When you are going to listed in exchange?Is already listed where?Can I get link?

DECENT already on HitBTC and Bittrex exchnage.

DCT was removed from Bitrrex, and there are far too many complains about HitBTC on the web, nobody should use it.

[Dron Pelya]

Guys, you definetly don't need to buy DCT. Be sure, that crypto market is alive only when there is some hype. Today are more popular project which used NFT for example. Or projects which are working on Binance chain. In short, there are a lot of really interesting projects on market which can bring you money faster than it could DCT.

[JamalMF]

I saw decent have a wallet for Android. Can I have the link please?

Yes, Decent wallet was released on play store a long ago in 2018.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ch.decent.wallet.app

[maffo]

If you don’t make any announcements or give an update about the project then you will stay behind on this bullish market. Too bad Decent is not that active on the socials to inform the public. What about collaborations? Or listing on more exchanges? No news about that. Such a shame. It looks like they are failing on their project. I hope the team can prove us wrong.

[mishax1]

I saw decent have a wallet for Android. Can I have the link please?

Yes, Decent wallet was released on play store a long ago in 2018.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ch.decent.wallet.app

Last wallet update was more than a year ago, probably stopped development.

[mikhail163]

Any news, updates, or just posts by DCT team on Telegram?
Please share if you are connected to Telegram.

Many thanks in anticipation.

[JeffBrad12]

Yes, it was promissing project. One of the first, started on 2017, if I'm not wrong. But the things we saw after, couldn't satisfied investors. Team couldn't reach success.

And now it's strange, I think, that they haven't used hype theme about NFT, to make some money.

At this point value would be rather easy to fix especially in these market conditions. But it seems that their policy has been not to talk about money or gains. Because such talk could jeopardize DCT as a utility token and it could be seen as a security and after that they would be in danger to get huge fines from their ico.

The team has gone, the product never meets its success in the crypto space. The problem is none of the investors tried to take legal action against this one. As far as i know, this project was getting around 2k bitcoin on its crowdsale a few years ago and i was also watching the progress on the ico.

There was no financial report about the fund since the development has been running. Decent already dead and this will never alive again.

[cryptoperkele]

The team has gone, the product never meets its success in the crypto space. The problem is none of the investors tried to take legal action against this one. As far as i know, this project was getting around 2k bitcoin on its crowdsale a few years ago and i was also watching the progress on the ico.

There was no financial report about the fund since the development has been running. Decent already dead and this will never alive again.

On what grounds would they have sued them exactly? DECENT delivered ton of stuff, it just seems no one was interested on their approach. You can't really force adoption even though they tried it trough hackhatons and stuff like that there was just too much competition and no one was interested about DCT.