lordoliver
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1020
expect(brain).toHaveBeenUsed()
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:10:39 PM Last edit: May 29, 2016, 12:30:44 PM by lordoliver |
|
1. so the tangles are final now? no reset any more? Or why should we donate otherwise? 2. i get a nullpointerexception, if I claim iotas (0.9.15 Macos 10.10.5 Java 1.8.0_92) java.lang.NullPointerException at iri.API$Request.process(API.java:201) at iri.API$Request$1.completed(API.java:100) at iri.API$Request$1.completed(API.java:82) at sun.nio.ch.Invoker.invokeUnchecked(Invoker.java:126) at sun.nio.ch.Invoker.invokeDirect(Invoker.java:157) at sun.nio.ch.UnixAsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.implRead(UnixAsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.java:553) at sun.nio.ch.AsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.read(AsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.java:276) at sun.nio.ch.AsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.read(AsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.java:297) at java.nio.channels.AsynchronousSocketChannel.read(AsynchronousSocketChannel.java:420) at iri.API$Request.<init>(API.java:82) at iri.API$1.completed(API.java:31) at iri.API$1.completed(API.java:24) at sun.nio.ch.Invoker.invokeUnchecked(Invoker.java:126) at sun.nio.ch.Invoker$2.run(Invoker.java:218) at sun.nio.ch.AsynchronousChannelGroupImpl$1.run(AsynchronousChannelGroupImpl.java:112) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
BTW: What about doing some unit tests?
|
|
|
|
yassin54
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 29, 2016, 12:52:48 PM Last edit: May 29, 2016, 02:01:50 PM by yassin54 |
|
1. so the tangles are final now? no reset any more? Or why should we donate otherwise? 2. i get a nullpointerexception, if I claim iotas (0.9.15 Macos 10.10.5 Java 1.8.0_92) java.lang.NullPointerException at iri.API$Request.process(API.java:201) at iri.API$Request$1.completed(API.java:100) at iri.API$Request$1.completed(API.java:82) at sun.nio.ch.Invoker.invokeUnchecked(Invoker.java:126) at sun.nio.ch.Invoker.invokeDirect(Invoker.java:157) at sun.nio.ch.UnixAsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.implRead(UnixAsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.java:553) at sun.nio.ch.AsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.read(AsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.java:276) at sun.nio.ch.AsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.read(AsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.java:297) at java.nio.channels.AsynchronousSocketChannel.read(AsynchronousSocketChannel.java:420) at iri.API$Request.<init>(API.java:82) at iri.API$1.completed(API.java:31) at iri.API$1.completed(API.java:24) at sun.nio.ch.Invoker.invokeUnchecked(Invoker.java:126) at sun.nio.ch.Invoker$2.run(Invoker.java:218) at sun.nio.ch.AsynchronousChannelGroupImpl$1.run(AsynchronousChannelGroupImpl.java:112) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
BTW: What about doing some unit tests? maybe not good Java? and mac is very for me, i use windows please my friend best for resolved your problem come here http://chat.iotatoken.com/channel/iotatesting people will help you!!
|
|
|
|
megges
|
|
May 29, 2016, 01:29:34 PM |
|
between 1 and 33 percent? is that right? do i have to donate at least 1%? - if i have to it's not a donation but a tax ! I know we are in the internet and so on, but for real i bought IOTAs in the ICO and now 1% of them got taxed away? - if that is right, i'm pretty disappointed!! just my view of this, i know most would not agree with me here, but i find it scandalous that i bought something, and now that something is TAXed afterwards ....
|
tip me! XtSrWch1U3BsTBFBHj7acTTzxFo1fy5BMa
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
|
May 29, 2016, 01:39:55 PM |
|
between 1 and 33 percent? is that right? do i have to donate at least 1%? - if i have to it's not a donation but a tax ! I know we are in the internet and so on, but for real i bought IOTAs in the ICO and now 1% of them got taxed away? - if that is right, i'm pretty disappointed!! just my view of this, i know most would not agree with me here, but i find it scandalous that i bought something, and now that something is TAXed afterwards .... nope, afaik you are not obliged to donate. that would be indeed a breach of contract.
|
|
|
|
Vicodin
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 226
Merit: 100
Power the World for FREE
|
|
May 29, 2016, 01:43:49 PM |
|
between 1 and 33 percent? is that right? do i have to donate at least 1%? - if i have to it's not a donation but a tax ! I know we are in the internet and so on, but for real i bought IOTAs in the ICO and now 1% of them got taxed away? - if that is right, i'm pretty disappointed!! just my view of this, i know most would not agree with me here, but i find it scandalous that i bought something, and now that something is TAXed afterwards .... I guess they were wrong when they thought that no person could be stupid enough go below 5% Not sure why 1 - 4 are there... Do you understand that by not donating 5% at least. You are taking the Iotas you have left and making them somewhere between worth 1000% less to 0 in value. So ah yea, we don't agree Are you some kind of freak or something?
|
|
|
|
rage1337
|
|
May 29, 2016, 01:45:29 PM |
|
2. i get a nullpointerexception, if I claim iotas (0.9.15 Macos 10.10.5 Java 1.8.0_92) java.lang.NullPointerException at iri.API$Request.process(API.java:201) at iri.API$Request$1.completed(API.java:100) at iri.API$Request$1.completed(API.java:82) at sun.nio.ch.Invoker.invokeUnchecked(Invoker.java:126) at sun.nio.ch.Invoker.invokeDirect(Invoker.java:157) at sun.nio.ch.UnixAsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.implRead(UnixAsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.java:553) at sun.nio.ch.AsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.read(AsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.java:276) at sun.nio.ch.AsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.read(AsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.java:297) at java.nio.channels.AsynchronousSocketChannel.read(AsynchronousSocketChannel.java:420) at iri.API$Request.<init>(API.java:82) at iri.API$1.completed(API.java:31) at iri.API$1.completed(API.java:24) at sun.nio.ch.Invoker.invokeUnchecked(Invoker.java:126) at sun.nio.ch.Invoker$2.run(Invoker.java:218) at sun.nio.ch.AsynchronousChannelGroupImpl$1.run(AsynchronousChannelGroupImpl.java:112) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
try this nostalgia: http://188.138.57.93/nostalgia.html
|
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
|
May 29, 2016, 01:46:34 PM |
|
between 1 and 33 percent? is that right? do i have to donate at least 1%? - if i have to it's not a donation but a tax ! I know we are in the internet and so on, but for real i bought IOTAs in the ICO and now 1% of them got taxed away? - if that is right, i'm pretty disappointed!! just my view of this, i know most would not agree with me here, but i find it scandalous that i bought something, and now that something is TAXed afterwards .... I guess they were wrong when they thought that no person could be stupid enough go below 5% Not sure why 1 - 4 are there... Do you understand that by not donating 5% at least. You are taking the Iotas you have left and making them somewhere between worth 1000% less to 0 in value. So ah yea, we don't agree Are you some kind of freak or something? no reason to get offending here. he has all rights not to donate anything.
|
|
|
|
bubbletea789
|
|
May 29, 2016, 01:47:45 PM |
|
apparently, the weighted average donation is now at 3.2% (8.6% of total target amount), so you will be surprised lol. let them be stingy and we all get burnt yay!
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
May 29, 2016, 01:50:22 PM |
|
between 1 and 33 percent?
No, between 0 and 33.
|
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
|
May 29, 2016, 01:50:23 PM |
|
i will donate. how much on the other hand will depend on how good you can convince me of the foundations doings. i have the bitcoin foundation still in my mind, they used millions for fancy imacs and that was basically it.
edit: also there should be a way to donate using BTC. i am sure there would be much greater willingness to donate in BTC instead as IOTA.
|
|
|
|
oldisoft
|
|
May 29, 2016, 01:56:55 PM |
|
@yassin54: My Dear Friend!
Thank You very much for PM! I have already donate to the Foundation and hope that other people from our Great Community will donate as well!
With Kindest Regards!
Cheers.
|
|
|
|
yassin54
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 29, 2016, 01:57:31 PM |
|
between 1 and 33 percent?
No, between 0 and 33. Sorry edited my post!!
|
|
|
|
yassin54
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 29, 2016, 02:05:28 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
banqueiro
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 150
Merit: 100
cryptoPag.com
|
|
May 29, 2016, 02:10:11 PM |
|
Great news! Thank you, CfB! Thank you also, yassin, for your great support to the community! And don't worry about your English, it's great!
|
|
|
|
bubbletea789
|
|
May 29, 2016, 02:12:24 PM |
|
to all the iota holders who have not donated or donated less than 5%,
you do realise that all of us who have donated much more and want to see iota progress as a great technological advancement can have a forking solution right?
david and cfb have fulfilled their responsibility by delivering the product you purchased with launching 1.0. then we (david and cfb and us generous souls who want to see iota becoming the backbone of the iot economy) can have "another iota" where we have another community project less the pure speculators .
tldr; do you want a nxt future or another lisk-crypti kind of parting?
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
May 29, 2016, 02:55:41 PM |
|
to all the iota holders who have not donated or donated less than 5%,
you do realise that all of us who have donated much more and want to see iota progress as a great technological advancement can have a forking solution right?
david and cfb have fulfilled their responsibility by delivering the product you purchased with launching 1.0. then we (david and cfb and us generous souls who want to see iota becoming the backbone of the iot economy) can have "another iota" where we have another community project less the pure speculators .
tldr; do you want a nxt future or another lisk-crypti kind of parting?
Sounds as a blackmailing.
|
|
|
|
bubbletea789
|
|
May 29, 2016, 02:57:35 PM |
|
nope nope. no blackmailing please. i am just stating the truth. and that is just one of the strategies. game theories at work you know.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
May 29, 2016, 03:17:52 PM |
|
nope nope. no blackmailing please. i am just stating the truth. and that is just one of the strategies. game theories at work you know.
I think those who own iotas should decide themselves what they need. Some may be completely comfortable with quiting Iota once its tokens can be sold on exchanges, as long as the price is above the purchase price they lose nothing. I don't think that those who are interested in long-term success of Iota should donate more to cover donations not made by the others. I suggest to do the following: - Release Iota right before Bitcoin pump caused by the halving - In the first hand support those exchanges that will enable shorting of iotas - Withhold announcements until most of the speculators sell Looks like a good plan, doesn't it?
|
|
|
|
rdanneskjoldr
|
|
May 29, 2016, 03:26:51 PM |
|
I think there is no need to be upset, YET. People just had one day, a saturday,and the wallet is not user friendly.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
May 29, 2016, 03:28:04 PM |
|
I think there is no need to be upset, YET. People just had one day, a saturday,and the wallet is not user friendly.
Weighted average donation % is 3.2 (not 5), this means that funding goal won't be reached.
|
|
|
|
|