[BTC-TC] Virtual Community Exchange [CLOSED]

[xchrisxsays]

Rant on NEOBEE!

Going to have to decline on that as ranting about them could cost me money.  Ask for the rant in a week's time and I'll deliver.

That's all I needed to hear.

[Deprived]

If there's anyone I haven't offended please feel free to post (detailing why you aren't offended) and I'll make a genuine effort to offend you.  Wouldn't want anyone feeling left out.

Not offended, but do you also have a rant about ICE.Drill?

What's to rant about with ICE.Drill?  They're buying hashing power and selling it on to 'investors' with only a 30-40% fee which is favourable compared to what other companies want you to pay for you to get ownership of a portion of losses.  And as DeadTerra is administrating it you likely get the benefit of not actually getting your losses delivered until a few weeks after you PM asking for them.  Can't see anything to rant about there.

Disclaimer : I've flipped ICE.drill shares for a profit a few times and am currently stuck with some I tried to flip but got the timing wrong and missed the boat on.  if anyone's feeling charitable and wants to overpay for them feel free to PM me.  You may make a profit (if I sell them cheap enough) but it won't justify tieing the cash up.  You can, however, feel proud that you supported a legitimate large-scale mining endeavour where the issuers aren't obviously taking anything up front - which may be worth something to you (it isn't to me).

In vino veritas!

Appreciate your input on this.

I always tell the truth.

Just when sober I'm more careful about which truths I tell.  And, of course, truth isn't actually an absolute thing.

[creativex]

How 'bout a fresh PETA-MINE rant. Haven't seen one of them in awhile. They need some lovin'.

[TsuyokuNaritai]

I'm a coward and tend to take free cash rather than cash with a risk attached : there's so much given away that there's no justification for taking on risk.

Care to elaborate?

[Deprived]

How 'bout a fresh PETA-MINE rant. Haven't seen one of them in awhile.

LOL - waste of good alcohol content to use it up on them

First time I've ever seen something where investors were required to cast votes they weren't entitled to in order to give themselves the right to vote (amongst other things).  If investors don't have the right to vote the contract should be inviolate.

[Deprived]

I'm a coward and tend to take free cash rather than cash with a risk attached : there's so much given away that there's no justification for taking on risk.

Care to elaborate?

Pretty simple - why 'invest' in things where the price movement is random when there's plenty of things where the price movement is obvious.  In fairness there's been a relative dearth of things where upward movement was obvious recently - which is where I tend towards "wait" rather than towards "guess" or "gamble".

[FloatesMcgoates]

Yo deprived eagles -3 over the chiefs good bet or bad bet

[Deprived]

Yo deprived eagles -3 over the chiefs good bet or bad bet

Sounds like some US thing - I only bet on actual sports.

[creativex]

You realize he's a brit right?

...ask a hockey question at least. lol

[xchrisxsays]

Yo deprived eagles -3 over the chiefs good bet or bad bet

Baddd Bet. KC's got a Defense and a competent QB. I wouldn't feel comfortable on that game at all. The Eagles just LOST by 3 at home to the *Chargers*

[FloatesMcgoates]

Yo deprived eagles -3 over the chiefs good bet or bad bet

Baddd Bet. KC's got a Defense and a competent QB. I wouldn't feel comfortable on that game at all. The Eagles just LOST by 3 at home to the *Chargers*

whaowhoahowhoahohohoohawhohaohaow

the chargers are a good team thanks

[Deprived]

You realize he's a brit right?

...ask a hockey question at least. lol

Right - and if you ask a question about something involving "world" in the name be aware that outside the US it tends to imply that more than one country participate in it.

[radiumsoup]

You realize he's a brit right?

...ask a hockey question at least. lol

Right - and if you ask a question about something involving "world" in the name be aware that outside the US it tends to imply that more than one country participate in it.

woah, woah, woah, woah there... back that horse up, now - there's a Canadian team in Baseball.

[pedrog]

Rant on NEOBEE!

Going to have to decline on that as ranting about them could cost me money.  Ask for the rant in a week's time and I'll deliver.

That's all I needed to hear.

+1 

[pedrog]

You realize he's a brit right?

...ask a hockey question at least. lol

Right - and if you ask a question about something involving "world" in the name be aware that outside the US it tends to imply that more than one country participate in it.

And football is football!

What they play with that egg thing across the pond it's american football, hehe!

[twentyseventy]

Plus, when drunk, I have an annoying habit of giving away free advice that (when sober) I know I should charge people to hear.

This is my top reason to read drunk Deprived posts!

If/when I make it out to the UK, I'm going to buy him a beer for the money I made off of SELLING. Then I'm going to get him hammered and get amazing BTC investing advice!

[Deprived]

Rant on NEOBEE!

Going to have to decline on that as ranting about them could cost me money.  Ask for the rant in a week's time and I'll deliver.

That's all I needed to hear.

+1 

Don't read too much into my (lack of) comment.  I expressed my concerns about it fairly clearly in the thread - you can judge for yourself the extent to which those were addressed.

It's definitely a better prospect than most - unfortunately that doesn't, of itself, say anything particularly useful.  I can honestly say that I haven't yet decided whether or not I'll be buying into the IPO - but put simply if it looks heavily over-subscribed I'll buy with the intent of flipping, if it doesn't look oversubscribed then I'll pass (but reconsider if it gets near selling out with heavy momentum).  My decision to act like that has next to nothing to do with its quality - that's just what I do on most IPOs. You can, however, conclude that I don't believe it to be obviously profitable enough (or likely to sustain price well enough before it reaches dividend point - which matters more) to justify buying now with the intention to hold.  

Put simply, if I want some I think I can get them at same price or cheaper later on - so no need to pay the cost of tied up capital.  If my view on that changes (due to order deptht) then I'll buy - but flip as same principle will apply just at a higher price (i.e. I believe I can sell shortly after IPO and buy back later for the same or less).  Shares around here just don't hold price if there's no obvious growth/dividends - I may not agree with the reasoning why people think that way but it would still be stupid to ignore the reality that they do.

[pedrog]

(...)

Don't read too much into my (lack of) comment.  I expressed my concerns about it fairly clearly in the thread - you can judge for yourself the extent to which those were addressed.

(...)

Yes, I've been following.

[Zakryze]

if you look at the blockchain page: "Public hint: https://i.imgur.com/zAHjn.gif"

[BitThink]

@burnside. May I report a (maybe) bug of BTC-TC here? (or there's a better place?)

In the newly added trade analysis, the approx total is not the sum of transaction, but (transaction + fee). The transaction, however, has already included fee. So the fee is double computed. Is it a bug?

Another bug: if I put two sell orders with the same price and same amount, say 1000 @ 0.003, the cancel amount in sell wall only shows 1000. More importantly, later when these two orders are filled. only one of them is listed in the trade analysis. But two of them are both listed in the trade history.