im actually not counting it all just the "balance" total; not total unpaid.
The un-exchanged balance is usually half of what has already been sold on the exchange if my mining hardware keeps online reliably. (this detail probably was superfluous)
my 5.3mbtc 24/hr total was on the actual listed 24 hour total list of tx id's.....
I always have my S3@ stock speeds, and an Asus GTX980 mining (presuming my internet isn't down, or the antminer doesn't get its usb disconnect issue and turn off the green light/stop hashing); and generally see 3-3.8mbtc/day on the 24hour payout list between just those two miners + the 8 5-chip scrypt orbs (~2.8Mh) that i normally also have plugged in.
During that day of the 5.3mbtc in 24 hour earnings; i saw a nice linear sawtooth pattern on the 24 hour graph that looks eerily identical to today's graph that currently only shows one payout on the list/summary of 24hr tx's. Before the payout freq change; I would see ~3TX/day every 6 hours; with an average of 1.2mBTC each. Given the payout changed the size and scale of the sawtooth pattern; its hard to understand how it was much higher with less hardware and no visible increase in the payout earnings or balance.
Whenever something like the crazy creva price spike happened; I will see a big spike in the thin line of the 24hr earnings graph that shows total mined; and later when its added to my balance, the solid lower portion of the graph sees nearly the same rise of a balance(assuming the lower one is green; i'm mostly colorblind; although I can see some of every color).
I will grudgingly admit that I had a new lady over; and unplugged all my gridseeds and cast them aside to get rid of some wire mess and noise while she was here for a few days; and I haven't taken the time to hook them all back up again.... so I could be adding ~2.8Mh of SCRYPT to the earnings if I get them plugged back in.... but im kinda baffled as to why my earnings yesterday were higher when the orbs weren't even hooked up and theres no visible spike in profitability in the graph.
3.5mBTC/day is pretty much a chicken I can count before its egg is hatched; its been that consistent ever since switching to zpool from xpool when it first opened to the public. Only when hardware goes offline for more than a couple houes; do i notice a hit in my 24hr earnings.
I believe once this next payout minimum is reached (at this time I assume it will be roughly 4 hours from now by guessing) I will see another ~5Mbtc+ day; just with these two pieces of hardware. I'm speechless....
http://zpool.ca/?address=1PHSDYvVp6HpqtuUPocK41DrdeHbbezaeP if you want to see the statistics and such from what i'm generating my info off of and what this hardware is doing. Please note in my TX history; the large high frequency payouts are from doing 5TH+ rentals to test the pool profitability and share% readout issues I was seeing specifically with the SHA256 algo. I didnt ever seem to notice any discreptency with the video card mining; as when I was pulling 10Mh, and the pool statistics were showing 100Mh of miners; I was getting just a hair under 10% share percentage so I never looked closer at it.
When I did the first 50Th rental (pool was avg 25-50Th for the preceding weeks) so I was sure I should be seeing very close to 50% share credit; when in fact I was typically seeing ~43% or less. That's when I first mentioned a potential problem on this forum; but was easy to dismiss it because it will weight different people to different coins at different times (as I understand it); so you cant go based off individual coin share %...
Another strange thing was the share% seen on left next to the "miners" section on the wallet page; it shows a share % that was very much not the same as what was expected to be seen when doing the simple calc between that number, my pool reported hashrate and the total pool hashrate reported to the top right; or the mined block share % credited to me. seemed around plus or minus 80% of the expected amount. It correlated to the mined block credit percentage i was expecting vs. seen so that lead me to think the table at the upper right is just got an error in its display. But it is way beyond me; I know coding and languages; but I don't want to learn how someone wrote all the code for the pool because they went though al this trouble to write it in the first place; and I know first hand how people always had trouble figuring out how I did things in my 3d engines i worked on in the 90's
I know there are much more qualified people to look into that since they have been at it longer than I and have time invested in it already.
