█▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][BTC Multipool] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█ Paid 925+ BTC

[crackfoo]

@crackfoo when I try to create multialgo switch, the parameters work fine for x11 but when it switches to quark I get stratum_recv_line failed error

Do you have the right port specified for it?

Yup 4033 for quark, seems to not like multiple algos specified in -p parameter.

If you scroll back a page or two I think someone recently posted their setup. As well I've put AngryDwarf's tips on the multi algo page on the pool... Are you going off that?

[1715698191]

1715698191

[1715698191]

1715698191

[1715698191]

1715698191

[1715698191]

1715698191

[crackfoo]

@crackfoo when I try to create multialgo switch, the parameters work fine for x11 but when it switches to quark I get stratum_recv_line failed error

Do you have the right port specified for it?

Yup 4033 for quark, seems to not like multiple algos specified in -p parameter.

If you scroll back a page or two I think someone recently posted their setup. As well I've put AngryDwarf's tips on the multi algo page on the pool... Are you going off that?

Yes I'm using the ccminer setup details listed on your site, create tr .bat file starting an instence for x11 and  quark, quark fails straight up so it drips to x11 which works. As I say it works when you don't have multiple algos in -p but it wont switch if I don't include all the algos in -p right? So it seems to be something related to quark and the -p given it works fine with x11.

are you able to mine it explicitly?

[crackfoo]

@crackfoo when I try to create multialgo switch, the parameters work fine for x11 but when it switches to quark I get stratum_recv_line failed error

Do you have the right port specified for it?

Yup 4033 for quark, seems to not like multiple algos specified in -p parameter.

If you scroll back a page or two I think someone recently posted their setup. As well I've put AngryDwarf's tips on the multi algo page on the pool... Are you going off that?

Yes I'm using the ccminer setup details listed on your site, create tr .bat file starting an instence for x11 and  quark, quark fails straight up so it drips to x11 which works. As I say it works when you don't have multiple algos in -p but it wont switch if I don't include all the algos in -p right? So it seems to be something related to quark and the -p given it works fine with x11.

are you able to mine it explicitly?

I see a few with ccminer using this:

x11=9.3,quark=19.8,lyra2v2=14.4,neoscrypt=0.555,qubit=13.9,x13=7

[icecube45]

The profitability here is pretty crazy!

[tbearhere]

@crackfoo when I try to create multialgo switch, the parameters work fine for x11 but when it switches to quark I get stratum_recv_line failed error

Do you have the right port specified for it?

Yup 4033 for quark, seems to not like multiple algos specified in -p parameter.

If you scroll back a page or two I think someone recently posted their setup. As well I've put AngryDwarf's tips on the multi algo page on the pool... Are you going off that?

Yes I'm using the ccminer setup details listed on your site, create tr .bat file starting an instence for x11 and  quark, quark fails straight up so it drips to x11 which works. As I say it works when you don't have multiple algos in -p but it wont switch if I don't include all the algos in -p right? So it seems to be something related to quark and the -p given it works fine with x11.

are you able to mine it explicitly?

I see a few with ccminer using this:

x11=9.3,quark=19.8,lyra2v2=14.4,neoscrypt=0.555,qubit=13.9,x13=7

That's me Crackfoo....

:start
:loop

ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark   -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4033 -u wallet   -p x11=9.3,quark=19.8,lyra2v2=14.4,neoscrypt=0.555,qubit=13.9,x13=7.5,x15=6.4 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,18,0
timeout /t 1

ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2  -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4533 -u wallet  -p x11=9.3,quark=19.8,lyra2v2=14.4,neoscrypt=0.555,qubit=13.9,x13=7.5,x15=6.4 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,14,0
timeout /t 1

ccminer.exe -r 0 -a neoscrypt   -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4233 -u wallet  -p x11=9.3,quark=19.8,lyra2v2=14.4,neoscrypt=0.555,qubit=13.9,x13=7.5,x15=6.4 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,13,0
timeout /t 1

ccminer.exe -r 0 -a qubit   -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4733 -u wallet  -p x11=9.3,quark=19.8,lyra2v2=14.4,neoscrypt=0.555,qubit=13.9,x13=7.5,x15=6.4 -d 0,1,2 -i 16
timeout /t 1

ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x11  -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3533 -u wallet  -p x11=9.3,quark=19.8,lyra2v2=14.4,neoscrypt=0.555,qubit=13.9,x13=7.5,x15=6.4 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,14,0
timeout /t 1

ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x13  -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3633 -u wallet  -p x11=9.3,quark=19.8,lyra2v2=14.4,neoscrypt=0.555,qubit=13.9,x13=7.5,x15=6.4 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,14,0
timeout /t 1

ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x15  -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3733 -u wallet  -p x11=9.3,quark=19.8,lyra2v2=14.4,neoscrypt=0.555,qubit=13.9,x13=7.5,x15=6.4 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,14,0
timeout /t 1

taskkill -t -f /im ccminer.exe
goto start


PS please lock the algo's in alphabetical order too...... thx

[tbearhere]

@crackfoo when I try to create multialgo switch, the parameters work fine for x11 but when it switches to quark I get stratum_recv_line failed error

Do you have the right port specified for it?

Yup 4033 for quark, seems to not like multiple algos specified in -p parameter.

If you scroll back a page or two I think someone recently posted their setup. As well I've put AngryDwarf's tips on the multi algo page on the pool... Are you going off that?

Yes I'm using the ccminer setup details listed on your site, create tr .bat file starting an instence for x11 and  quark, quark fails straight up so it drips to x11 which works. As I say it works when you don't have multiple algos in -p but it wont switch if I don't include all the algos in -p right? So it seems to be something related to quark and the -p given it works fine with x11.

are you able to mine it explicitly?

I see a few with ccminer using this:

x11=9.3,quark=19.8,lyra2v2=14.4,neoscrypt=0.555,qubit=13.9,x13=7

That's me Crackfoo....

:start
:loop

ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark   -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4033 -u wallet   -p x11=9.3,quark=19.8,lyra2v2=14.4,neoscrypt=0.555,qubit=13.9,x13=7.5,x15=6.4 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,18,0
timeout /t 1

ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2  -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4533 -u wallet  -p x11=9.3,quark=19.8,lyra2v2=14.4,neoscrypt=0.555,qubit=13.9,x13=7.5,x15=6.4 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,14,0
timeout /t 1

ccminer.exe -r 0 -a neoscrypt   -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4233 -u wallet  -p x11=9.3,quark=19.8,lyra2v2=14.4,neoscrypt=0.555,qubit=13.9,x13=7.5,x15=6.4 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,13,0
timeout /t 1

ccminer.exe -r 0 -a qubit   -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4733 -u wallet  -p x11=9.3,quark=19.8,lyra2v2=14.4,neoscrypt=0.555,qubit=13.9,x13=7.5,x15=6.4 -d 0,1,2 -i 16
timeout /t 1

ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x11  -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3533 -u wallet  -p x11=9.3,quark=19.8,lyra2v2=14.4,neoscrypt=0.555,qubit=13.9,x13=7.5,x15=6.4 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,14,0
timeout /t 1

ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x13  -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3633 -u wallet  -p x11=9.3,quark=19.8,lyra2v2=14.4,neoscrypt=0.555,qubit=13.9,x13=7.5,x15=6.4 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,14,0
timeout /t 1

ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x15  -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:3733 -u wallet  -p x11=9.3,quark=19.8,lyra2v2=14.4,neoscrypt=0.555,qubit=13.9,x13=7.5,x15=6.4 -d 0,1,2 -i 0,14,0
timeout /t 1

taskkill -t -f /im ccminer.exe
goto start


PS please lock the algo's in alphabetical order too...... thx

Hey man does your rig ever mine quark or does it just jump to other algos?

It mines all algo's when called on.... it does quark then switchs to neoscrypt then x13 ect automatically.

[pallas]

Top 10 DCR block finders for the month of April, will be entered to win 1 BTC prize. Paid in the currency and to the address that wins.

Good initiative, we really need more hashrate! Thanks!

[tbearhere]

Top 10 DCR block finders for the month of April, will be entered to win 1 BTC prize. Paid in the currency and to the address that wins.

Good initiative, we really need more hashrate! Thanks!

Got 12 gig but it's not profitable.

[pallas]

Top 10 DCR block finders for the month of April, will be entered to win 1 BTC prize. Paid in the currency and to the address that wins.

Good initiative, we really need more hashrate! Thanks!

Got 12 gig but it's not profitable.

I did some calculations using suprnova estimates and profitability is pretty good, at least on par with other zpool algos, if not better.
People are just scared at the profitability on the algo table, which is influenced by the bad luck of the last 2/3 days.

[tbearhere]

It mines all algo's when called on.... it does quark then switchs to neoscrypt then x13 ect automatically.

Yea I know that, but if quark doesn't work it will just skip to the next profitable algo at least that is what it is doing for me. Have you successfully mined any quark using that batch file?

Yes.. I don't understand what you mean.....is it not mining quark at all?

[tbearhere]

I see a few with ccminer using this:

x11=9.3,quark=19.8,lyra2v2=14.4,neoscrypt=0.555,qubit=13.9,x13=7

Ok @crackfoo found the problem, with quark you need to explicitely set your hash rate for each algo in the -p paramaters.

So on your site where you have:

ccminer -r 0 -a quark -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4033 -u 1RandomHcHfiiELSdNpbHJQfPBe8c7Epv -p x11,quark

and that works with x11 but does not work with quark. For quark you have to actually specify hash rate like so:

ccminer -r 0 -a quark -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:4033 -u 1RandomHcHfiiELSdNpbHJQfPBe8c7Epv -p x11=11.7,quark=24 <- These will vary per card as these are hash rates

Exactly  
EDIT: And you can use reference numbers too if you want.  Like quark = 1    x11 = .75  all related mathematical to the hashrate.

[tbearhere]

It mines all algo's when called on.... it does quark then switchs to neoscrypt then x13 ect automatically.

Yea I know that, but if quark doesn't work it will just skip to the next profitable algo at least that is what it is doing for me. Have you successfully mined any quark using that batch file?

Yes.. I don't understand what you mean.....is it not mining quark at all?

Nah yours should be ok. I actually specified the hashrate of each algo in -p like you are doing and it works! Too bad I'm not at home with the rigs :/

Ok good you got it working. 

[tbearhere]

Your welcome. 

[JaredKaragen]

Top 10 DCR block finders for the month of April, will be entered to win 1 BTC prize. Paid in the currency and to the address that wins.

Ah this is new - good initiative to mine more DCRs.

Any link to find out who is top block finder currently?

You can see the list of finder in the pool stats:

www.zpool.ca/site/block?id=1309

I'll be updating the OP as blocks are found and the finder and how many they've found.

1PHSD

Glad to contribute .  I have my box pointed solely at DCR for the next month.  One GTX980.  Looks like the race is on!!! Lol.

[JaredKaragen]

It's a dual SLAED 3.0ghz... Might as well keep the cores working since I have plenty of them.

Presently I have my multi algo batch file off and am running strictly decred for this promo period.  Hopefully it gets enough on board to be more stable earnings. I normally turn ~8.5-10mbtc/day; but I have already gambled on rentals for the pool, this is one and the same to me

I've rolled the dice with almost all new algos for at least a day if not a week.   Unprofitable ones or ones I can't run on all hardware I simply omit.

[JaredKaragen]

i normalized mine based on profitability scale. 

MH values for things like scrypt, and X11 etc... 0.5 9.6, 3.2, etc.
things rated in GH like decred;  I do 1.5Gh in the miner app;  so it has a value of 1.5 also since its rated that way.

[JaredKaragen]

yep;  assuming all your other algos are on the same type of scheme.

But;  I did take lower earnings when it would sit on decred half the day with no block found;  that's why i'm happy to participate in the decred pooling

[JaredKaragen]

its calculating your number based on what the coin will make.   so;  strange.   Mine was locked on decred when it was staying above the other algos consecutively.

[AngryDwarf]

Mmm, last time I had decred up and running, profitability was given in mBTC/MH/day, so does it now have to be rated in mBTC/GH/day in the normalisation string?
I took decred out of my multi algo setup, since the high variance due to the block find time lead to inconsistent income. I'll probably only mine decred if I want to be paid out in decred, but it was quite a profitable algo for AMD cards (or would have been with more consistent luck).

[citronick]

Top 10 DCR block finders for the month of April, will be entered to win 1 BTC prize. Paid in the currency and to the address that wins.

Ah this is new - good initiative to mine more DCRs.

Any link to find out who is top block finder currently?

You can see the list of finder in the pool stats:

www.zpool.ca/site/block?id=1309

I'll be updating the OP as blocks are found and the finder and how many they've found.

1PHSD

Glad to contribute .  I have my box pointed solely at DCR for the next month.  One GTX980.  Looks like the race is on!!! Lol.

I have let Brutus rest from mining ETH for now and pointing it now to zpool for DCR. 10.2Gh/s full steam ahead.