|
|
|
|
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
borris123
|
|
May 23, 2016, 02:11:55 PM |
|
my ip and dynamic changed when just renicia the masternode and reconfigures it?
or I can not have a masternode ?
noip.com solve ?
sorry so many questions =/
could use tor. havent got setup guide tho Sorry, I still need to put together a complete guide. It is best to setup a dual Stack Masternode, so you can support both networks. There is a guide earlier in the ANN somewhere, but I will be working on a step by step guide to setting up a dual stack Tor node real soon. any news on this? @BitcoinFX
|
|
|
|
tombtc
|
|
May 23, 2016, 02:40:06 PM |
|
Anyone mixing coins at the moment?
|
|
|
|
WigitGetIt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 23, 2016, 02:49:26 PM |
|
Anyone mixing coins at the moment?
I am working on this right now with SalimNagamato. I just need to see if the coins mixed. I won;t be able to test until I get home this evening. I will really just need to send someone coins and check the blockchain to see if the obfuscation worked or not. Initiating the mixing and such looked to work fine on my client though. Check the link below for my data this morning. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1262920.msg14937780#msg14937780
|
|
|
|
tombtc
|
|
May 23, 2016, 02:54:54 PM |
|
Anyone mixing coins at the moment?
I am working on this right now with SalimNagamato. I just need to see if the coins mixed. I won;t be able to test until I get home this evening. I will really just need to send someone coins and check the blockchain to see if the obfuscation worked or not. Initiating the mixing and such looked to work fine on my client though. Check the link below for my data this morning. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1262920.msg14937780#msg14937780Darksend needs at least 3 people mixing at the same time to work. So hopefuly someone will join as I've got "waiting in queue" message all the time.
|
|
|
|
4x13 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1011
|
|
May 23, 2016, 03:08:05 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
WigitGetIt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 23, 2016, 03:18:19 PM |
|
Anyone mixing coins at the moment?
I am working on this right now with SalimNagamato. I just need to see if the coins mixed. I won;t be able to test until I get home this evening. I will really just need to send someone coins and check the blockchain to see if the obfuscation worked or not. Initiating the mixing and such looked to work fine on my client though. Check the link below for my data this morning. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1262920.msg14937780#msg14937780Darksend needs at least 3 people mixing at the same time to work. So hopefuly someone will join as I've got "waiting in queue" message all the time. Ok. I didn't know that. I will start the mixing when I get home and leave it running. I am getting that same message a lot as well.
|
|
|
|
borris123
|
|
May 23, 2016, 03:26:56 PM |
|
Can we see this list
|
|
|
|
cryptomaxsun
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1387
Ukrainians will resist
|
|
May 23, 2016, 03:58:45 PM |
|
Why masternodes reward down to 22.5?
|
❘|❘ Cлaвa Укpaинe! ❘|❘ Glory to Ukraine! ❘|❘ ❘|❘ КaPФaгeн дoлжeн быть paзpyшeн ❘|❘
|
|
|
borris123
|
|
May 23, 2016, 04:04:36 PM |
|
Why masternodes reward down to 22.5?
reduced pow and total supply of coins due to mass dumping from miners.
|
|
|
|
|
borris123
|
|
May 23, 2016, 04:35:31 PM |
|
Ye think it was his proposal although it was 25 for nodes and miners but had to be changed to 22.5 each and 5 for proposals
|
|
|
|
waffles99
|
|
May 23, 2016, 06:24:14 PM |
|
https://pando.com/2014/07/16/tor-spooks/Tor was developed, built and financed by the US military-surveillance complex. Tor’s original — and current — purpose is to cloak the online identity of government agents and informants while they are in the field: gathering intelligence, setting up sting operations, giving human intelligence assets a way to report back to their handlers — that kind of thing. This information is out there, but it's not very well known, and it's certainly not emphasized by those who promote it.
|
|
|
|
tombtc
|
|
May 23, 2016, 07:06:35 PM |
|
Been trying to mix for a few hours now using 3 core clients. No success.
|
|
|
|
BitcoinFX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1720
https://youtu.be/DsAVx0u9Cw4 ... Dr. WHO < KLF
|
|
May 23, 2016, 11:39:03 PM Last edit: May 23, 2016, 11:51:58 PM by BitcoinFX |
|
https://pando.com/2014/07/16/tor-spooks/Tor was developed, built and financed by the US military-surveillance complex. Tor’s original — and current — purpose is to cloak the online identity of government agents and informants while they are in the field: gathering intelligence, setting up sting operations, giving human intelligence assets a way to report back to their handlers — that kind of thing. This information is out there, but it's not very well known, and it's certainly not emphasized by those who promote it. http://www.onion-router.net/History.htmlhttps://wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_(anonymity_network)Functional anonymity networks are built to not discriminate against anyone. Therefore, everyone can use Tor (it's even on the Tor Projects homepage) - Family & Friends, Activists, Media, Military & Law Enforcement.~ You cannot be anonymous by yourself and Never confuse your right to privacy with anything else (perhaps also translated as) Tor can't help you if you use it wrong! Anyone who thinks that Tor is a giant honeypot should probably start by studying the source code. Some links for 'spooks'...re:publica 2015 – Jacob Appelbaum, Max Hoppenstedt: Frontier of Freedom — The State of the Deepweb - https://youtu.be/D8JSb1v9D_o?t=46m30sJacob Appelbaum 29C3 Keynote: Not My Department - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNsePZj_Yks
|
|
|
|
BitcoinFX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1720
https://youtu.be/DsAVx0u9Cw4 ... Dr. WHO < KLF
|
|
May 24, 2016, 12:04:27 AM |
|
Been trying to mix for a few hours now using 3 core clients. No success.
Seemingly the coin mixing function requires some tweaking by the developers.
|
|
|
|
BitcoinFX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1720
https://youtu.be/DsAVx0u9Cw4 ... Dr. WHO < KLF
|
|
May 24, 2016, 12:54:02 AM |
|
my ip and dynamic changed when just renicia the masternode and reconfigures it?
or I can not have a masternode ?
noip.com solve ?
sorry so many questions =/
could use tor. havent got setup guide tho Sorry, I still need to put together a complete guide. It is best to setup a dual Stack Masternode, so you can support both networks. There is a guide earlier in the ANN somewhere, but I will be working on a step by step guide to setting up a dual stack Tor node real soon. any news on this? @BitcoinFX I have posted this initial guide for installing Tor on a Linux VPS for Bitcoin here: How-to Guide: Set-up Tor on Linux (Ubuntu) and connect Bitcoin- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1374919.0It is straightforward enough to get Tor working with Dnet (or any crypto currency for that matter), just review the settings. A more detailed guide I had posted, unfortunately went offline when a hosting service went awol. I will try to find time to re-post more info. in this thread tomorrow. ~ Most interest with Tor seems to be in trying to circumvent the 1 IP = 1 Masternode network requirement. The use case for Tor is increased anonymity and privacy - with circumvention being a side effect - it is still necessary to run as a Dual Stack Masternode, which does require a unique static IP for continuing and correct operation. Unless you are just aiming to run as a client, with your network traffic exiting through Tor. - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1262920.msg14105279;topicseen#msg14105279- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1262920.msg14029375;topicseen#msg14029375- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1262920.msg14125634;topicseen#msg14125634
|
|
|
|
pimpjuice
|
|
May 24, 2016, 02:03:30 AM |
|
Regarding the name Darknet. Obviously you can't go with DarkCoin Why can't you go with DarkValue or Darkened. Is there a reason for Darknet? From a search engine perspective, don't you lose marketing when it gets confused with the actual darknet? I assume this decreases organic traffic substantially. Trying "googling" darknet and you get nothing about the coin. I really know nothing about Darknet but was just wondering if there was a reason why. Really interested in investing but seems undervalued and I think it is more the marketing than the tech.
|
|
|
|
jakiman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011
jakiman is back!
|
|
May 24, 2016, 02:09:51 AM |
|
Regarding the name Darknet. Obviously you can't go with DarkCoin Why can't you go with DarkValue or Darkened. Is there a reason for Darknet? From a search engine perspective, don't you lose marketing when it gets confused with the actual darknet? I assume this decreases organic traffic substantially. Trying "googling" darknet and you get nothing about the coin. I really know nothing about Darknet but what just wondering if there was a reason why. Really interested in investing but seems undervalued and I think it is more the marketing than the tech.
Like Darkcoin to DASH, the name can be changed later I guess. But in saying that, if you Google "dash", it's not great either. Still, I do agree that such non-unique name will hurt it later.
|
|
|
|
pimpjuice
|
|
May 24, 2016, 02:18:27 AM |
|
Regarding the name Darknet. Obviously you can't go with DarkCoin Why can't you go with DarkValue or Darkened. Is there a reason for Darknet? From a search engine perspective, don't you lose marketing when it gets confused with the actual darknet? I assume this decreases organic traffic substantially. Trying "googling" darknet and you get nothing about the coin. I really know nothing about Darknet but what just wondering if there was a reason why. Really interested in investing but seems undervalued and I think it is more the marketing than the tech.
Like Darkcoin to DASH, the name can be changed later I guess. But in saying that, if you Google "dash", it's not great either. Still, I do agree that such non-unique name will hurt it later. Haha, yea DASH was a stupid naming decision. All I think of is that hot slut with the fat ass. You make a good point they could change it later. It seems good to leave coin in the name (btc, ltc, etc.) so maybe discreetcoin for something similar.
|
|
|
|
|