asic resistant algo, Neoscrypt. However no need to advise the devs, they way smarter us and know exactly what they are doing. Decred is in safe hands.
Neoscrypt is very memory intensive. Coins that utilize algorithms like this actually encourage centralization because botnets usually dominate the mining scene.
GPU farms / FPGA farms are much harder to come by than CPU farms (botnets).
Blake-256 is VERY fast on the gpu, and most people (at least in this community) do have at least one gpu they can mine with.
Decred will not be dominated by botnets but by the people who wish to support the network.
Being "asic resistant" isn't a good thing. It's actually quite the opposite.
Any coin that will reach the success levels of BTC at some point in the future (whether that be in a year or ten years) will have asics developed.
It is a necessary evil to provide the level of network security required for a huge market cap / real world uses.
Any algorithm is technically "asic resistant" when one considers the development/implementation costs of creating asic technology.
Asics for blake-256 will come if/when the ecosystem can ever support this level of expenditure, but when they do, they should be cheap and efficient.
