Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it

[mabdlmonem]

The beginning of private key  for 130 is 0x3

You are already stuck with your guesses! Stop spreading spam!

Ok!

[1714306965]

1714306965

[1714306965]

1714306965

[1714306965]

1714306965

[FlleOWA]

By the way, I didn’t find any discussion of the public key, the owner of this puzzle, in the topic.

Do you mean to say this by chance?

024b0faa9624763002e963816b2f6774df0dedd770896a9511cb5c9d90f674ecda

It is clear that a letter is missing, but even such a combination is too much for an accident.

[PrivatePerson]

Added mod 013

https://github.com/alek76-2/VanitySearch/tree/main/mod/013

I can't figure out how to calculate the ccap=20 parameter?
I have an RTX 4050 Laptop.
Help please.

Code:

 ./deviceQuery
./deviceQuery Starting...

 CUDA Device Query (Runtime API) version (CUDART static linking)

Detected 1 CUDA Capable device(s)

Device 0: "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU"
  CUDA Driver Version / Runtime Version          12.3 / 12.3
  CUDA Capability Major/Minor version number:    8.9
  Total amount of global memory:                 6140 MBytes (6438780928 bytes)
  (020) Multiprocessors, (128) CUDA Cores/MP:    2560 CUDA Cores
  GPU Max Clock rate:                            2055 MHz (2.06 GHz)
  Memory Clock rate:                             8001 Mhz
  Memory Bus Width:                              96-bit
  L2 Cache Size:                                 25165824 bytes
  Maximum Texture Dimension Size (x,y,z)         1D=(131072), 2D=(131072, 65536), 3D=(16384, 16384, 16384)
  Maximum Layered 1D Texture Size, (num) layers  1D=(32768), 2048 layers
  Maximum Layered 2D Texture Size, (num) layers  2D=(32768, 32768), 2048 layers
  Total amount of constant memory:               65536 bytes
  Total amount of shared memory per block:       49152 bytes
  Total shared memory per multiprocessor:        102400 bytes
  Total number of registers available per block: 65536
  Warp size:                                     32
  Maximum number of threads per multiprocessor:  1536
  Maximum number of threads per block:           1024
  Max dimension size of a thread block (x,y,z): (1024, 1024, 64)
  Max dimension size of a grid size    (x,y,z): (2147483647, 65535, 65535)
  Maximum memory pitch:                          2147483647 bytes
  Texture alignment:                             512 bytes
  Concurrent copy and kernel execution:          Yes with 1 copy engine(s)
  Run time limit on kernels:                     Yes
  Integrated GPU sharing Host Memory:            No
  Support host page-locked memory mapping:       Yes
  Alignment requirement for Surfaces:            Yes
  Device has ECC support:                        Disabled
  Device supports Unified Addressing (UVA):      Yes
  Device supports Managed Memory:                Yes
  Device supports Compute Preemption:            Yes
  Supports Cooperative Kernel Launch:            Yes
  Supports MultiDevice Co-op Kernel Launch:      No
  Device PCI Domain ID / Bus ID / location ID:   0 / 1 / 0
  Compute Mode:
     < Default (multiple host threads can use ::cudaSetDevice() with device simultaneously) >

deviceQuery, CUDA Driver = CUDART, CUDA Driver Version = 12.3, CUDA Runtime Version = 12.3, NumDevs = 1
Result = PASS

[citb0in]

Added mod 013

https://github.com/alek76-2/VanitySearch/tree/main/mod/013

I can't figure out how to calculate the ccap=20 parameter?
I have an RTX 4050 Laptop.
Help please.

This is architecture "Ada Lovelace", you need 8.9 so use ccap=89 in your compiling task. In case you have no success try downgrading and use max CUDA 11.8. However I wish you best of luck and success.

citb0in

[alek76]

Added mod 013

https://github.com/alek76-2/VanitySearch/tree/main/mod/013

I can't figure out how to calculate the ccap=20 parameter?
I have an RTX 4050 Laptop.
Help please.

This is architecture "Ada Lovelace", you need 8.9 so use ccap=89 in your compiling task. In case you have no success try downgrading and use max CUDA 11.8. However I wish you best of luck and success.

citb0in

and edit GPUEngine.cu; 4 lines are commented out; they are not in version 10.2.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1306983.msg63128300#msg63128300

[Stanislav01]

Can you tell me if I'm calculating the range scan time correctly for the 130 puzzle?

Time = (End Range - Start Range) / (Speed * 60 * 60 * 24 * 365)

Start Range = 200000000000000000000000000000000 (hex); 680564733841876926926749214863536422912 (decimal)
End Range =   400000000000000000000000000000000 (hex); 1361129467683753853853498429727072845824 (decimal)
Speed = 100 Ekeys/s

Time = (1361129467683753853853498429727072845824 - 680564733841876926926749214863536422912) / (100000000000000000000*60*60*24*365) = 215 805 661 416 years

[Woz2000]

My math concurs.

Can you tell me if I'm calculating the range scan time correctly for the 130 puzzle?

Time = (End Range - Start Range) / (Speed * 60 * 60 * 24 * 365)

Start Range = 200000000000000000000000000000000 (hex); 680564733841876926926749214863536422912 (decimal)
End Range =   400000000000000000000000000000000 (hex); 1361129467683753853853498429727072845824 (decimal)
Speed = 100 Ekeys/s

Time = (1361129467683753853853498429727072845824 - 680564733841876926926749214863536422912) / (100000000000000000000*60*60*24*365) = 215 805 661 416 years

[nomachine]

215 805 661 416 years

Your calculation is correct. With 100 Ekeys/s would take an incredibly long time.

That is unbreakable even at that speed.

Speed needed for a 130 range scan time of 5 minutes is approximately
 

719,000,000 Ekeys/s.

[NAKAMOT0]

I can give you some clues for this problem and you can reflect on it...
       *Addresses are in order.
       *Addresses are not random.
       * Addresses always have PVK values ​​that differ by one PVK value.
       * There is a pattern.

    The key is to use the common factor within each address pair and its PVK value.

     A common factor between addresses 1 and 2 is that their PVK value is equal to 3.

     A common factor between addresses 3 and 4 is that their PVK value is equal to 7.

     A common factor between addresses 5 and 6 is that their PVK value is equal to 21.

     Etc...



      PVK values ​​are always in a mathematical progression (in this case, I don't like to use the word "sequence") that appears to be in a progression of prime numbers.


       * What is important is not the PVK values ​​but the mathematical relationship between the PVK values.
       *Addresses are in a progression of prime numbers.
       *The addresses are always in order.
       * There is always a relationship between the PVK value of the following addresses.


       *PVK values ​​do not always have to be prime numbers.
       * PVK addresses are always generated mathematically and never randomly.
       * Don't look for the answer in the Bitcoin blockchain.

      * Think of the relationship between the directions as the common factor between two very large prime numbers.
       * The equation to be solved for the PVK values ​​is a unique mathematical solution.
       *Also remember that PVK addresses are always in order.

       *The key is the PVK value pattern.
       * The pattern goes beyond PVK values.


       * Use a mathematical relationship between the PVK values ​​to calculate the PVK values ​​of the directions in the depressed progressions.

    Some clues are a little more ambiguous, but if you think about it it can give you a little idea of ​​how to decipher the directions in this case.  I can't give you more information about the exact formula behind all this for security reasons, but I hope you have fun and someone very special sends you greetings.  ✌️

[mcdouglasx]

I can give you some clues for this problem and you can reflect on it...
       *Addresses are in order.
       *Addresses are not random.
       * Addresses always have PVK values ​​that differ by one PVK value.
       * There is a pattern.

    The key is to use the common factor within each address pair and its PVK value.

     A common factor between addresses 1 and 2 is that their PVK value is equal to 3.

     A common factor between addresses 3 and 4 is that their PVK value is equal to 7.

     A common factor between addresses 5 and 6 is that their PVK value is equal to 21.

     Etc...



      PVK values ​​are always in a mathematical progression (in this case, I don't like to use the word "sequence") that appears to be in a progression of prime numbers.


       * What is important is not the PVK values ​​but the mathematical relationship between the PVK values.
       *Addresses are in a progression of prime numbers.
       *The addresses are always in order.
       * There is always a relationship between the PVK value of the following addresses.


       *PVK values ​​do not always have to be prime numbers.
       * PVK addresses are always generated mathematically and never randomly.
       * Don't look for the answer in the Bitcoin blockchain.

      * Think of the relationship between the directions as the common factor between two very large prime numbers.
       * The equation to be solved for the PVK values ​​is a unique mathematical solution.
       *Also remember that PVK addresses are always in order.

       *The key is the PVK value pattern.
       * The pattern goes beyond PVK values.


       * Use a mathematical relationship between the PVK values ​​to calculate the PVK values ​​of the directions in the depressed progressions.

    Some clues are a little more ambiguous, but if you think about it it can give you a little idea of ​​how to decipher the directions in this case.  I can't give you more information about the exact formula behind all this for security reasons, but I hope you have fun and someone very special sends you greetings.  ✌️

If you are satoshi try it by sending me 1 btc, just kidding.
Your analysis is very interesting, friend.

edit:
My doubt is that I believe that there is no common factor for 5 and 6 to have a result of 21.

[NAKAMOT0]

You are right, the common factor for PVK addresses is not just the difference in PVK values.

  I will tell you a mathematical relationship between PVK values that can be easily calculated.

 The PVK value of address 5 is 21 because address 4 has a PVK of 8, and address 5 is the next first value after 4. So, 21 = PVK 5 = PVK 4 + 8.

 Do you understand?  If you still don't understand, I'll give you another example.  Suppose we are looking for the PVK value of address 7. We know that the PVK value of address 6 is 49.

 We understand that the PVK value of address 7 is = to the nearest prime number after 49. The next prime number after 49 is 61.

 So address 7 is at PVK 61.

 Now you understand?

[dextronomous]

again but probably another digaran version?
really clear presentation, of it's own toughts on how to calculate this puzzle,
get it..

[nomachine]

Now you understand?

I've enlisted the help of my imaginary friends, Fibonacci and Euclid, for an epic escapade through the primeval forest of PVK values and the enigmatic realm of depressed progressions. Armed with nothing but a slide rule and a cat's evil eye, we've sacrificed Netflix binging to decode cryptographic riddles, as the crypto-gods eagerly await our impending mathematical breakthrough.

Let's ride the prime number rollercoaster together and unveil the grand secret hidden within the pattern that goes beyond PVK values. I'm convinced we're on the verge of a breakthrough that will shake the foundations of mathematical academia.
The pulse of the prime force guides our quest, and we stand on the cusp of a revelation that promises to echo through the corridors of intellectual history. Get ready for the revelation of the century!

Cheers to the thrilling adventure of PVK values and their clandestine connections. May the prime force be with us!  

[GR Sasa]

You are right, the common factor for PVK addresses is not just the difference in PVK values.

  I will tell you a mathematical relationship between PVK values that can be easily calculated.

 The PVK value of address 5 is 21 because address 4 has a PVK of 8, and address 5 is the next first value after 4. So, 21 = PVK 5 = PVK 4 + 8.

 Do you understand?  If you still don't understand, I'll give you another example.  Suppose we are looking for the PVK value of address 7. We know that the PVK value of address 6 is 49.

 We understand that the PVK value of address 7 is = to the nearest prime number after 49. The next prime number after 49 is 61.

 So address 7 is at PVK 61.

 Now you understand?

If you are the creator could you please sign a something to prove us? Alternative you can increase the puzzle by 10x again.

The Creator said once in 2017, that there is not an pattern. Now you are saying the opposite, so how would we believe you if you didn't prove yourself and you aren't digaran?

EDIT: We understand that the PVK value of address 7 is = to the nearest prime number after 49. The next prime number after 49 is 61.

Wrong? The next prime number after 49 is 53.

[nomachine]

probably another digaran version?

It's amazing how persistent he is in his imagination. It turns out that the real Satoshi Nakamoto has been living a double life. The digaran mysterious genius behind it all.  

If you are the creator could you please sign a something to prove us? Alternative you can increase the puzzle by 10x again.

Why would anyone prove anything when we already have a verified creator:

A few words about the puzzle.  There is no pattern.  It is just consecutive keys from a deterministic wallet (masked with leading 000...0001 to set difficulty).

[kalos15btc]

im asking the admin to ban digran and his multiple accounts, this thread become useless with his useless ideas
@modeator, verify those replies you will find the same ip address

[AlanJohnson]

Gee... it's getting worse with him ... He is not only mad but also thinks he is Satoshi Nakamoto now...

[mcdouglasx]

You are right, the common factor for PVK addresses is not just the difference in PVK values.

  I will tell you a mathematical relationship between PVK values that can be easily calculated.

 The PVK value of address 5 is 21 because address 4 has a PVK of 8, and address 5 is the next first value after 4. So, 21 = PVK 5 = PVK 4 + 8.

 Do you understand?  If you still don't understand, I'll give you another example.  Suppose we are looking for the PVK value of address 7. We know that the PVK value of address 6 is 49.

 We understand that the PVK value of address 7 is = to the nearest prime number after 49. The next prime number after 49 is 61.

 So address 7 is at PVK 61.

 Now you understand?

Satoshi is too busy doing things about gods to be commenting here on the theories of mere mortals.

What you're telling me is that as if I were saying the following.

Address 2, pvk decimal value: 3
Address 3, pvk decimal value: 7
Address 4, pvk decimal value: 8
Address 5, pvk decimal value: 21
Address 6, pvk decimal value: 49
Address 7, pvk decimal value: 76
Address 8, pvk decimal value: 224
Address 9, pvk decimal value: 467
Address 10, pvk decimal value: 514

9 and 10 =467

because 9*10 = (90 + (224 + 76 + 49 + 21 + 8 )) - 1= 467

What I did was create a mathematical pattern, conveniently to get the value I want, but this is just an illusion.
Therefore, I don't see much sense in your explanation.

I'm not one to judge, but in science we speak with evidence.

[NAKAMOT0]

You are right, the common factor for PVK addresses is not just the difference in PVK values.

  I will tell you a mathematical relationship between PVK values that can be easily calculated.

 The PVK value of address 5 is 21 because address 4 has a PVK of 8, and address 5 is the next first value after 4. So, 21 = PVK 5 = PVK 4 + 8.

 Do you understand?  If you still don't understand, I'll give you another example.  Suppose we are looking for the PVK value of address 7. We know that the PVK value of address 6 is 49.

 We understand that the PVK value of address 7 is = to the nearest prime number after 49. The next prime number after 49 is 61.

 So address 7 is at PVK 61.

 Now you understand?

Satoshi is too busy doing things about gods to be commenting here on the theories of mere mortals.

What you're telling me is that as if I were saying the following.

Address 2, pvk decimal value: 3
Address 3, pvk decimal value: 7
Address 4, pvk decimal value: 8
Address 5, pvk decimal value: 21
Address 6, pvk decimal value: 49
Address 7, pvk decimal value: 76
Address 8, pvk decimal value: 224
Address 9, pvk decimal value: 467
Address 10, pvk decimal value: 514

9 and 10 =467

because 9*10 = (90 + (224 + 76 + 49 + 21 + 8 )) - 1= 467

What I did was create a mathematical pattern, conveniently to get the value I want, but this is just an illusion.
Therefore, I don't see much sense in your explanation.

I'm not one to judge, but in science we speak with evidence.

You have used an interesting progression but in reality if you look at the value of direction 7 you determine it from another progression.

 What I have explained to you is the thought process to solve the progression that is equal to the PVK values of that address.

 It's a similar process to the one you use to calculate address 7, but here you need to take another mathematical progression into account.  You are right that what you have done in your example is an illusion.  But in the example that I have given you, there is a mathematical pattern behind each PVK value of each address following an order.  You yourself have given a clue about this: the common factor is not only the difference in PVK values but the mathematical relationship between one address and the next address.



It also goes without saying that I am not satoshi, we are not the same person.

[mcdouglasx]

I am the creator.

You are quite right, 161-256 are silly.  I honestly just did not think of this.  What is especially embarrassing, is this did not occur to me once, in two years.  By way of excuse, I was not really thinking much about the puzzle at all.

I will make up for two years of stupidity.  I will spend from 161-256 to the unsolved parts, as you suggest.  In addition, I intend to add further funds.  My aim is to boost the density by a factor of 10, from 0.001*length(key) to 0.01*length(key).  Probably in the next few weeks.  At any rate, when I next have an extended period of quiet and calm, to construct the new transaction carefully.

A few words about the puzzle.  There is no pattern.  It is just consecutive keys from a deterministic wallet (masked with leading 000...0001 to set difficulty).  It is simply a crude measuring instrument, of the cracking strength of the community.

Finally, I wish to express appreciation of the efforts of all developers of new cracking tools and technology.  The "large bitcoin collider" is especially innovative and interesting!

It also goes without saying that I am not satoshi, we are not the same person.

If the creator says there is no pattern, why do you say there is one?
If you found something magical, why don't you claim the puzzle yourself?
If you are the creator, why don't you reveal the pk of the solved puzzles?
Or if you are rich enough to not care about the amount of the puzzle, why don't you take the money from puzzle 66 and distribute it to someone here or by choosing random addresses?
because if you want to give clues to something, you must start by giving truthful evidence.
Because the truth is that many of us are navigating this world without money to walk along dead-end roads, it's a bit cruel to give false clues, right?