Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers)

[valiz]

Obviously, running your code does not always end up with "segmentation fault", it is only a possibility.

Code:

int main()
{
   [b]int array[10]; [/b]
   array[11] = 0;
   printf("stick with core\n");
}

Oops, I was wrong. Because you put the "array" array on the stack, there are no chances for "segmentation fault".

Peter TRoll 'developer' #REKT

 

The array is neither static nor in a function, so its not on the stack. More likely ( dependent on your setup) its pre-allocated in the programs data section.
The fact that you dont core any time is down to blind luck.

int main() { ... } is not a function?

Look again!

Code:

(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/valiz/petertroll 

Breakpoint 1, main () at petertroll.c:6
6	   array[11] = 0;
(gdb) info registers rsp
rsp            0x7fffffffe2b0	0x7fffffffe2b0
(gdb) print &array[11]
$2 = (int *) 0x7fffffffe2dc
(gdb) l
1	#include <stdio.h>
2	
3	int main()
4	{
5	   int array[10]; 
6	   array[11] = 0;
7	   printf("stick with core\n");
8	}
9	

[watashi-kokoto]

My friend told my, that Reddit is taken over by big blocks (hard fork) shills.

Evidence: You get IP ban when you insult them.

[sAt0sHiFanClub]

Obviously, running your code does not always end up with "segmentation fault", it is only a possibility.

Code:

int main()
{
   [b]int array[10]; [/b]
   array[11] = 0;
   printf("stick with core\n");
}

Oops, I was wrong. Because you put the "array" array on the stack, there are no chances for "segmentation fault".

Peter TRoll 'developer' #REKT

 

The array is neither static nor in a function, so its not on the stack. More likely ( dependent on your setup) its pre-allocated in the programs data section.
The fact that you dont core any time is down to blind luck.

int main() { ... } is not a function?

Look again!

Code:

(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/valiz/petertroll 

Breakpoint 1, main () at petertroll.c:6
6	   array[11] = 0;
(gdb) info registers rsp
rsp            0x7fffffffe2b0	0x7fffffffe2b0
(gdb) print &array[11]
$2 = (int *) 0x7fffffffe2dc
(gdb) l
1	#include <stdio.h>
2	
3	int main()
4	{
5	   int array[10]; 
6	   array[11] = 0;
7	   printf("stick with core\n");
8	}
9	

you are correct. for some reason i didnt see that...

[hdbuck]

My friend told my, that Reddit is taken over by big blocks (hard fork) shills.

Evidence: You get IP ban when you insult them.

[watashi-kokoto]

The 1MB camp has already won do what you want.

This is the truth. I belive in Satoshi nakamoto and His 1MB block size cap.

[watashi-kokoto]

There would be no war if people weren't selfish and following their own agenda

Well, we agree on something finally.  So... when are you lot going to stop DDOSing, Spreading FUD, Lying, Manipulating, and following a whiny & childish scorched earth policy of trying to destroy Bitcoin if you can't control it?

?

Nobody can control bitcoin.
Only forkers want to destroy bitcoin... by forking it.

The hard fork is going to fail.

[hdbuck]

There would be no war if people weren't selfish and following their own agenda

Well, we agree on something finally.  So... when are you lot going to stop DDOSing, Spreading FUD, Lying, Manipulating, and following a whiny & childish scorched earth policy of trying to destroy Bitcoin if you can't control it?

?

Nobody can control bitcoin.
Only forkers want to destroy bitcoin... by forking it.

The hard fork is going to fail.

Shhh let the deluded Noobs around here and their segregated big blocks multi client Peter r encoded fantaisies going on. Useless people needs their forum drama going on for they at least feel impotent important somehow.

[watashi-kokoto]

There would be no war if people weren't selfish and following their own agenda

Well, we agree on something finally.  So... when are you lot going to stop DDOSing, Spreading FUD, Lying, Manipulating, and following a whiny & childish scorched earth policy of trying to destroy Bitcoin if you can't control it?

?

Nobody can control bitcoin.
Only forkers want to destroy bitcoin... by forking it.

The hard fork is going to fail.

Shhh let the deluded Noobs around here and their segregated big blocks multi client Peter r encoded fantaisies going on. Useless people needs their forum drama going on for they at least feel impotent important somehow.

I know where the office of your team is located and I am going to post it on Wikileaks, soon.

[watashi-kokoto]

I have everything. Payrolls, photographs.

Going to publish it soon.

[hdbuck]

Uh? Okay

[watashi-kokoto]

Your coworker sold you all for 2.15 BTC

[Peter R]

Stupid stack space  You only run out when I need you the most.

Peter R: #R3KT.  Let this be a reminder to ensure that your jokes execute correctly before posting them.

Looks like it's back to posting animated GIFs from the Spherical Cow Farm for me  

[jonald_fyookball]

There would be no war if people weren't selfish and following their own agenda

Well, we agree on something finally.  So... when are you lot going to stop DDOSing, Spreading FUD, Lying, Manipulating, and following a whiny & childish scorched earth policy of trying to destroy Bitcoin if you can't control it?

?

Nobody can control bitcoin.
Only forkers want to destroy bitcoin... by forking it.

The hard fork is going to fail.

If you are right, then that means an economic majority was unable to wrest control from the status quo.

If you are wrong it means the old paradigm's time had come.

Time will tell.

[Lauda]

If you are right, then that means an economic majority was unable to wrest control from the status quo.

If you are wrong it means the old paradigm's time had come.

Time will tell.

I don't see the economic majority trying to do that. At the moment there is no 'majority' as per definition that wants to move the development away from Core.

[Zarathustra]

A nullcoin in the making:

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/41ps56/q_for_gregory_maxwell_would_it_be_within/cz49v1l

[hdbuck]

A nullcoin in the making:

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/41ps56/q_for_gregory_maxwell_would_it_be_within/cz49v1l

If miners want to play dictators, going separate ways seems logic.
Bitcoin certainly does not need 4 corporate mastodonte ruling over.

http://qntra.net/2016/01/recent-bitcoin-direction/

Y'all been warned.


http://deedbot.org/deed-393913-1.txt

To any miners contemplating deserting Bitcoin in favour of pursuing an USG-sponsored would-be competitor :

1. Bear in mind that the actual Bitcoin chain, with a patch to disable current ASIC miners, will continue to exist, and will continue to be used.

2. Make sure that you obtain ~upfront~ payment sufficient to cover whatever The Most Serene Republic might dump on your alternate chain plus whatever you yourselves need to sell in order to cover your own costs. You will not be able to return after you leave, nor will your capital goods have any further utility in this world.

3. Remember that your pontifical "allies", while very much inclined to promise and posture, have an unbroken track record of not actually delivering upon those promises. In this case, as generally the case with them, they don't even actually have the resources to indemnify you in the first place.

That is all.

In other words, sorry for your loss. ^^

[iCEBREAKER]

you are correct. for some reason i didnt see that...

Probably the same reason you think a confederation is the same thing as a democracy.

IE, you are not very intelligent.   

[BitUsher]

https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/41aocn/httpsbitcoinorgenbitcoincorecapacityincreases_why/cz0z9ym
https://github.com/luke-jr/bitcoin/commit/8d3a84c242598ef3cdc733e99dddebfecdad84a6

Keccak with a Nf15 appears extremely ASIC resistant.

Excellent. I would consider this as an option. I wouldn't dream of leaving the current SHA256 miners a week ago , but after attempting to have some friendly discussions with some of the Bitcoin Classic/ Bitcoin unlimited group of supporters it appears their ideals and understanding of bitcoin are much different than my own. I do respect that core devs are so prepared that they already have an alternative ready just in case the unlikely happens.  

[hdbuck]

https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/41aocn/httpsbitcoinorgenbitcoincorecapacityincreases_why/cz0z9ym
https://github.com/luke-jr/bitcoin/commit/8d3a84c242598ef3cdc733e99dddebfecdad84a6

Keccak with a Nf15 appears extremely ASIC resistant.

Excellent. I would consider this as an option. I wouldn't dream of leaving the current SHA256 miners a week ago , but after attempting to have some friendly discussions with some of the Bitcoin Classic/ Bitcoin unlimited group of supporters it appears their ideals and understanding of bitcoin are much different than my own. I do respect that core devs are so prepared that they already have an alternative ready just in case the unlikely happens. 

my GPUs are in the starting blocks.

[iCEBREAKER]

There would be no war if people weren't selfish and following their own agenda

Well, we agree on something finally.  So... when are you lot going to stop DDOSing, Spreading FUD, Lying, Manipulating, and following a whiny & childish scorched earth policy of trying to destroy Bitcoin if you can't control it?

?

Nobody can control bitcoin.
Only forkers want to destroy bitcoin... by forking it.

The hard fork is going to fail.

Shhh let the deluded Noobs around here and their segregated big blocks multi client Peter r encoded fantaisies going on. Useless people needs their forum drama going on for they at least feel impotent important somehow.

I know where the office of your team is located and I am going to post it on Wikileaks, soon.

That's great news.  I look forward to putting in a resume!