Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 01:05:29 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 ... 93 »
  Print  
Author Topic: List of all cryptocoins  (Read 833019 times)
Joe_Bauers
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 802
Merit: 1003


GCVMMWH


View Profile
October 15, 2013, 07:28:07 PM
 #681

I propose moving YACoin to "CANDIDATES:" as the community is still strong. Also, per another thread, Namecoin appears to unfortunately be dead  Undecided
1714914329
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714914329

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714914329
Reply with quote  #2

1714914329
Report to moderator
1714914329
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714914329

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714914329
Reply with quote  #2

1714914329
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714914329
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714914329

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714914329
Reply with quote  #2

1714914329
Report to moderator
Vlad2Vlad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3052
Merit: 1530

www.ixcoin.net


View Profile WWW
October 15, 2013, 08:04:32 PM
 #682

I propose moving YACoin to "CANDIDATES:" as the community is still strong. Also, per another thread, Namecoin appears to unfortunately be dead  Undecided

Namecoin is dead?  Lol, unreal.  What's next, Litecoin?  Lol

iXcoin - Welcome to the F U T U R E!
Joe_Bauers
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 802
Merit: 1003


GCVMMWH


View Profile
October 15, 2013, 08:19:35 PM
 #683

Namecoin is dead?  Lol, unreal.  What's next, Litecoin?  Lol

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=310954
giszmo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1105


WalletScrutiny.com


View Profile WWW
October 16, 2013, 02:27:22 AM
 #684

xorxor thank you for maintaining this great list! did you think about moving it to the wiki? Guess the edit war would be epic Grin

ɃɃWalletScrutiny.comIs your wallet secure?(Methodology)
WalletScrutiny checks if wallet builds are reproducible, a precondition for code audits to be of value.
ɃɃ
xorxor (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 253



View Profile
October 16, 2013, 08:57:57 AM
 #685

xorxor thank you for maintaining this great list! did you think about moving it to the wiki? Guess the edit war would be epic Grin

It was immediately copied to wiki, 10 months ago just after first relase and it was trolled the fcuk out.

fuck deeponion, fuck bitcoincash, all glory to one BITCOIN
gwedo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83
Merit: 10



View Profile
October 17, 2013, 09:03:00 AM
 #686

THE ORIGINAL CRYPTOCOIN LIST [version October 14, 2013]

thank you very much for updating the list of coins. I sent you a small LTC donation. it is very nicely written. A must read for all people.

Hello world
gwedo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83
Merit: 10



View Profile
October 17, 2013, 09:29:21 AM
 #687

I propose moving YACoin to "CANDIDATES:" as the community is still strong. Also, per another thread, Namecoin appears to unfortunately be dead  Undecided
yes Yacoin is very promising.
I was accumulating yacoin last 3 months silently. I expect it can grow much in value. I think in next half year or so we will see the same evaluation of several cryptocoins like this year's spike on bitcoin. Some cryptocoins will grow exponentially, it might be XPM or Yacoin or Litecoin but who knows?
Personally my favourites are also Quarkcoin and Securecoin and IFC but who knows what people decide and what majority of people will put their money in?

Hello world
meeh
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500


:)


View Profile WWW
October 17, 2013, 02:14:57 PM
 #688

Please add coin control to the description of Anoncoin, 0.8.5.5 is released and includes coin control.

cinnamon_carter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018


It's about time -- All merrit accepted !!!


View Profile WWW
October 20, 2013, 02:27:37 AM
 #689

The next time you update your list I would appreciate if you could include my coin, Cinnamon Coin

Website:  www.cinnamoncoin.org

Thread here in bitcoin forum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=299221.0

Support on cryptocointalk.com : https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/1220-cinnamoncoin-cin-information/

Block Explorer: https://andarazoroflove.org/explorer/cinnamoncoin/block_crawler.php

Unofficial Mining Pool: http://pool.800996.com:8502/ (thanks to Spark_li)

Why I launched the coin: http://cinnamoncoin.org/wp/?p=18


Check out my coin Photon
Merge Mine 5 other Blake 256 coins - 6x your hash power  https://www.blakecoin.org/

The obvious choice is not always the best choice.

LOOK DEEPER - Look into the Blake 256 Family -- CC
Tsunamirain
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100

Incakoin= Incagold


View Profile WWW
October 20, 2013, 12:46:06 PM
 #690

Introducing Incakoin

The Incakoin Community would like to welcome you to our latest Crypto Currency



www.incakoin.com

SHA-256 ASIC Friendly
Proof of work/Proof of Stake
Name: Incakoin
Acronym: NKA
Private Premine with all coins being used for development ie. Pools Servers Games
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178697.0
Starting addy will be letter N or NK
420NKA per block not to drop below 2
Max coins 190 million coins half every 6 months
5000 blocks to mature
5 blocks to re target
Transaction messaging
30sec/blocks
Only 3 confirms for transaction
UPNP & QR support
logo imbedded in wallet

Wallet Client

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B49exKIsGBn5aXVTN243TVk1NlE/edit?usp=sharing&pli=1

Connect via 17420

addnode=58.97.221.51
addnode=115.78.135.173


Needed:

Pools: P2P & Stratum Reward 50K NKA

Online Poker Room Reward 50K NKA


Merchants

Donations

Exchanges

Reasonable Bounties Available

Contact incakoin@gmail.com for more info



AZIZ1977
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 20, 2013, 05:34:30 PM
 #691

Dont understand why you put Goldcoin GLD in THE PURGATORY when this coin is outperforming most alts. It has a very active dev team, a big and growing dedicated community. It should at least be in CANDIDATES list. I think its time to update your list.
kelsey
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000


View Profile
October 22, 2013, 09:58:30 AM
 #692

Dont understand why you put Goldcoin GLD in THE PURGATORY when this coin is outperforming most alts. It has a very active dev team, a big and growing dedicated community. It should at least be in CANDIDATES list. I think its time to update your list.

+1

yeah to tell the truth as much as I've given microguy and the dev team plenty of stick, still gldcoin has proven itself, and has a strong enough community to be considered a candidate.
giszmo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1105


WalletScrutiny.com


View Profile WWW
October 22, 2013, 11:03:56 PM
 #693

Dont understand why you put Goldcoin GLD in THE PURGATORY when this coin is outperforming most alts. It has a very active dev team, a big and growing dedicated community. It should at least be in CANDIDATES list. I think its time to update your list.

+1

yeah to tell the truth as much as I've given microguy and the dev team plenty of stick, still gldcoin has proven itself, and has a strong enough community to be considered a candidate.

I guess the OP better be anonymous. Else, any sorting whatsoever will get him hate and threats.

ɃɃWalletScrutiny.comIs your wallet secure?(Methodology)
WalletScrutiny checks if wallet builds are reproducible, a precondition for code audits to be of value.
ɃɃ
pmconrad
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 149
Merit: 102


View Profile WWW
October 23, 2013, 03:36:59 PM
 #694

I guess the OP better be anonymous. Else, any sorting whatsoever will get him hate and threats.

That's why instead of everyone trying to push their own favorite alts up we should establish some objective criteria for categorizing coins. From the top of my head:

* age (reason: newcomers have to prove themselves before they can be taken seriously)
* hashrate (reason: measure of community support, albeit questionable. Tricky due to variety of algorithms, PoW/PoS differences etc.)
* trade volume at exchanges (reason: measure of market support)
* market cap  (reason: measure of market support, albeit questionable without significant trade volume)
* transaction volume per day (reason: measure of usefulness, but questionable)

Ideas, anyone?

RapidBalls
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
October 23, 2013, 04:22:51 PM
 #695

I guess the OP better be anonymous. Else, any sorting whatsoever will get him hate and threats.

That's why instead of everyone trying to push their own favorite alts up we should establish some objective criteria for categorizing coins. From the top of my head:

* age (reason: newcomers have to prove themselves before they can be taken seriously)
* hashrate (reason: measure of community support, albeit questionable. Tricky due to variety of algorithms, PoW/PoS differences etc.)
* trade volume at exchanges (reason: measure of market support)
* market cap  (reason: measure of market support, albeit questionable without significant trade volume)
* transaction volume per day (reason: measure of usefulness, but questionable)

Ideas, anyone?


from a commercial perspective always nice to know how many clients/wallets they have had downloaded, if there is a technical way to track this then great.


[No Account Required / Provably Fair / 4 Games / Bet and Go / Free Daily BitCoins] http://rapidballs.eu
AZIZ1977
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 23, 2013, 04:34:39 PM
 #696

I guess the OP better be anonymous. Else, any sorting whatsoever will get him hate and threats.

That's why instead of everyone trying to push their own favorite alts up we should establish some objective criteria for categorizing coins. From the top of my head:

* age (reason: newcomers have to prove themselves before they can be taken seriously)
* hashrate (reason: measure of community support, albeit questionable. Tricky due to variety of algorithms, PoW/PoS differences etc.)
* trade volume at exchanges (reason: measure of market support)
* market cap  (reason: measure of market support, albeit questionable without significant trade volume)
* transaction volume per day (reason: measure of usefulness, but questionable)

Ideas, anyone?


from a commercial perspective always nice to know how many clients/wallets they have had downloaded, if there is a technical way to track this then great.



Yes would like also to know that
giszmo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1105


WalletScrutiny.com


View Profile WWW
October 23, 2013, 07:25:19 PM
 #697

I guess the OP better be anonymous. Else, any sorting whatsoever will get him hate and threats.

That's why instead of everyone trying to push their own favorite alts up we should establish some objective criteria for categorizing coins. From the top of my head:

* age (reason: newcomers have to prove themselves before they can be taken seriously)
* hashrate (reason: measure of community support, albeit questionable. Tricky due to variety of algorithms, PoW/PoS differences etc.)
* trade volume at exchanges (reason: measure of market support)
* market cap  (reason: measure of market support, albeit questionable without significant trade volume)
* transaction volume per day (reason: measure of usefulness, but questionable)

Ideas, anyone?


from a commercial perspective always nice to know how many clients/wallets they have had downloaded, if there is a technical way to track this then great.



Yes would like also to know that

Well, the list could be sorted by a combined score but this score should be resistant to manipulation. Take downloads for example. This one is easy to pump by buying some downloads from a botnet for $1.5.
Exchange trade volume? There are exchanges that don't charge fees, so again you might invite scammers to pump the volume.
A) Exchange trade fees of the last 30d in $$? Would be a good one but it's not as easy to determine.
B) Age in seconds is easy and a block chain surviving should be a sign of stability that is hard to fake.
C) Market cap in $$ is definitely worth a thought.
D) Number of running nodes.

score = A * 30 + B * 0.1 + C * D * 0.0001 … something along these lines. Sure the formula and the constants can be tuned to make the one or the other look good but we should talk about a formula and not just one determining value. That said: I have no AltCoins at all and feel like 99% of them are get rich quick schemes by the people running them but I don't want to be the last to know if any of them actually is to be taken seriously.

ɃɃWalletScrutiny.comIs your wallet secure?(Methodology)
WalletScrutiny checks if wallet builds are reproducible, a precondition for code audits to be of value.
ɃɃ
Bortmehanic
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 153
Merit: 100


Switchercoin.com


View Profile WWW
October 24, 2013, 10:32:36 AM
 #698

thank for the info

Switchercoin.com - auto-switching for the best coin!
digeros
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 24, 2013, 02:45:11 PM
 #699

I guess the OP better be anonymous. Else, any sorting whatsoever will get him hate and threats.

That's why instead of everyone trying to push their own favorite alts up we should establish some objective criteria for categorizing coins. From the top of my head:

* age (reason: newcomers have to prove themselves before they can be taken seriously)
* hashrate (reason: measure of community support, albeit questionable. Tricky due to variety of algorithms, PoW/PoS differences etc.)
* trade volume at exchanges (reason: measure of market support)
* market cap  (reason: measure of market support, albeit questionable without significant trade volume)
* transaction volume per day (reason: measure of usefulness, but questionable)

Ideas, anyone?


Excellent Idea!!!   Now we just need to turn those DATA POINTS into Some SCORE

Age in Days Blockchain active  =     ######  Days  (up to 400 years old)
hashrate in MH/s                   =     ####### Mh/s (up to Petabytes)
Market Cap in USD thousands$ =     #######  (up to billions $)

Trade volume 
has to be standardized to
BTC Value of Exchange of Alt Coin  =  ######  BTC Value of Daily Exchange Trades

Transactions per day or per block?  = ######  absolute number or avg. trans./block?

I would be very interested in working with others on such a tool ... - digeros
inform
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
October 25, 2013, 02:10:25 PM
 #700

Some Now Guys News Upgrates
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 ... 93 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!