Joe_Bauers
|
|
October 15, 2013, 07:28:07 PM |
|
I propose moving YACoin to "CANDIDATES:" as the community is still strong. Also, per another thread, Namecoin appears to unfortunately be dead
|
|
|
|
Vlad2Vlad
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1534
www.ixcoin.net
|
|
October 15, 2013, 08:04:32 PM |
|
I propose moving YACoin to "CANDIDATES:" as the community is still strong. Also, per another thread, Namecoin appears to unfortunately be dead Namecoin is dead? Lol, unreal. What's next, Litecoin? Lol
|
iXcoin - Welcome to the F U T U R E!
|
|
|
|
giszmo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1105
WalletScrutiny.com
|
|
October 16, 2013, 02:27:22 AM |
|
xorxor thank you for maintaining this great list! did you think about moving it to the wiki? Guess the edit war would be epic
|
ɃɃWalletScrutiny.com | Is your wallet secure?(Methodology) WalletScrutiny checks if wallet builds are reproducible, a precondition for code audits to be of value. | ɃɃ |
|
|
|
xorxor (OP)
|
|
October 16, 2013, 08:57:57 AM |
|
xorxor thank you for maintaining this great list! did you think about moving it to the wiki? Guess the edit war would be epic It was immediately copied to wiki, 10 months ago just after first relase and it was trolled the fcuk out.
|
fuck deeponion, fuck bitcoincash, all glory to one BITCOIN
|
|
|
gwedo
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
October 17, 2013, 09:03:00 AM |
|
THE ORIGINAL CRYPTOCOIN LIST [version October 14, 2013]
thank you very much for updating the list of coins. I sent you a small LTC donation. it is very nicely written. A must read for all people.
|
Hello world
|
|
|
gwedo
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
October 17, 2013, 09:29:21 AM |
|
I propose moving YACoin to "CANDIDATES:" as the community is still strong. Also, per another thread, Namecoin appears to unfortunately be dead yes Yacoin is very promising. I was accumulating yacoin last 3 months silently. I expect it can grow much in value. I think in next half year or so we will see the same evaluation of several cryptocoins like this year's spike on bitcoin. Some cryptocoins will grow exponentially, it might be XPM or Yacoin or Litecoin but who knows? Personally my favourites are also Quarkcoin and Securecoin and IFC but who knows what people decide and what majority of people will put their money in?
|
Hello world
|
|
|
meeh
|
|
October 17, 2013, 02:14:57 PM |
|
Please add coin control to the description of Anoncoin, 0.8.5.5 is released and includes coin control.
|
|
|
|
cinnamon_carter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
It's about time -- All merrit accepted !!!
|
|
October 20, 2013, 02:27:37 AM |
|
|
Check out my coin Photon Merge Mine 5 other Blake 256 coins - 6x your hash power https://www.blakecoin.org/The obvious choice is not always the best choice. LOOK DEEPER - Look into the Blake 256 Family -- CC
|
|
|
Tsunamirain
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Incakoin= Incagold
|
|
October 20, 2013, 12:46:06 PM |
|
Introducing Incakoin The Incakoin Community would like to welcome you to our latest Crypto Currency www.incakoin.comSHA-256 ASIC Friendly Proof of work/Proof of Stake Name: Incakoin Acronym: NKA Private Premine with all coins being used for development ie. Pools Servers Games https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178697.0Starting addy will be letter N or NK 420NKA per block not to drop below 2 Max coins 190 million coins half every 6 months 5000 blocks to mature 5 blocks to re target Transaction messaging 30sec/blocks Only 3 confirms for transaction UPNP & QR support logo imbedded in wallet Wallet Client https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B49exKIsGBn5aXVTN243TVk1NlE/edit?usp=sharing&pli=1Connect via 17420 addnode=58.97.221.51 addnode=115.78.135.173 Needed: Pools: P2P & Stratum Reward 50K NKA Online Poker Room Reward 50K NKA Merchants Donations Exchanges Reasonable Bounties Available Contact incakoin@gmail.com for more info
|
|
|
|
AZIZ1977
|
|
October 20, 2013, 05:34:30 PM |
|
Dont understand why you put Goldcoin GLD in THE PURGATORY when this coin is outperforming most alts. It has a very active dev team, a big and growing dedicated community. It should at least be in CANDIDATES list. I think its time to update your list.
|
|
|
|
kelsey
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 22, 2013, 09:58:30 AM |
|
Dont understand why you put Goldcoin GLD in THE PURGATORY when this coin is outperforming most alts. It has a very active dev team, a big and growing dedicated community. It should at least be in CANDIDATES list. I think its time to update your list.
+1 yeah to tell the truth as much as I've given microguy and the dev team plenty of stick, still gldcoin has proven itself, and has a strong enough community to be considered a candidate.
|
|
|
|
giszmo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1105
WalletScrutiny.com
|
|
October 22, 2013, 11:03:56 PM |
|
Dont understand why you put Goldcoin GLD in THE PURGATORY when this coin is outperforming most alts. It has a very active dev team, a big and growing dedicated community. It should at least be in CANDIDATES list. I think its time to update your list.
+1 yeah to tell the truth as much as I've given microguy and the dev team plenty of stick, still gldcoin has proven itself, and has a strong enough community to be considered a candidate. I guess the OP better be anonymous. Else, any sorting whatsoever will get him hate and threats.
|
ɃɃWalletScrutiny.com | Is your wallet secure?(Methodology) WalletScrutiny checks if wallet builds are reproducible, a precondition for code audits to be of value. | ɃɃ |
|
|
|
pmconrad
|
|
October 23, 2013, 03:36:59 PM |
|
I guess the OP better be anonymous. Else, any sorting whatsoever will get him hate and threats.
That's why instead of everyone trying to push their own favorite alts up we should establish some objective criteria for categorizing coins. From the top of my head: * age (reason: newcomers have to prove themselves before they can be taken seriously) * hashrate (reason: measure of community support, albeit questionable. Tricky due to variety of algorithms, PoW/PoS differences etc.) * trade volume at exchanges (reason: measure of market support) * market cap (reason: measure of market support, albeit questionable without significant trade volume) * transaction volume per day (reason: measure of usefulness, but questionable) Ideas, anyone?
|
|
|
|
RapidBalls
|
|
October 23, 2013, 04:22:51 PM |
|
I guess the OP better be anonymous. Else, any sorting whatsoever will get him hate and threats.
That's why instead of everyone trying to push their own favorite alts up we should establish some objective criteria for categorizing coins. From the top of my head: * age (reason: newcomers have to prove themselves before they can be taken seriously) * hashrate (reason: measure of community support, albeit questionable. Tricky due to variety of algorithms, PoW/PoS differences etc.) * trade volume at exchanges (reason: measure of market support) * market cap (reason: measure of market support, albeit questionable without significant trade volume) * transaction volume per day (reason: measure of usefulness, but questionable) Ideas, anyone? from a commercial perspective always nice to know how many clients/wallets they have had downloaded, if there is a technical way to track this then great.
|
[No Account Required / Provably Fair / 4 Games / Bet and Go / Free Daily BitCoins] http://rapidballs.eu
|
|
|
AZIZ1977
|
|
October 23, 2013, 04:34:39 PM |
|
I guess the OP better be anonymous. Else, any sorting whatsoever will get him hate and threats.
That's why instead of everyone trying to push their own favorite alts up we should establish some objective criteria for categorizing coins. From the top of my head: * age (reason: newcomers have to prove themselves before they can be taken seriously) * hashrate (reason: measure of community support, albeit questionable. Tricky due to variety of algorithms, PoW/PoS differences etc.) * trade volume at exchanges (reason: measure of market support) * market cap (reason: measure of market support, albeit questionable without significant trade volume) * transaction volume per day (reason: measure of usefulness, but questionable) Ideas, anyone? from a commercial perspective always nice to know how many clients/wallets they have had downloaded, if there is a technical way to track this then great. Yes would like also to know that
|
|
|
|
giszmo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1105
WalletScrutiny.com
|
|
October 23, 2013, 07:25:19 PM |
|
I guess the OP better be anonymous. Else, any sorting whatsoever will get him hate and threats.
That's why instead of everyone trying to push their own favorite alts up we should establish some objective criteria for categorizing coins. From the top of my head: * age (reason: newcomers have to prove themselves before they can be taken seriously) * hashrate (reason: measure of community support, albeit questionable. Tricky due to variety of algorithms, PoW/PoS differences etc.) * trade volume at exchanges (reason: measure of market support) * market cap (reason: measure of market support, albeit questionable without significant trade volume) * transaction volume per day (reason: measure of usefulness, but questionable) Ideas, anyone? from a commercial perspective always nice to know how many clients/wallets they have had downloaded, if there is a technical way to track this then great. Yes would like also to know that Well, the list could be sorted by a combined score but this score should be resistant to manipulation. Take downloads for example. This one is easy to pump by buying some downloads from a botnet for $1.5. Exchange trade volume? There are exchanges that don't charge fees, so again you might invite scammers to pump the volume. A) Exchange trade fees of the last 30d in $$? Would be a good one but it's not as easy to determine. B) Age in seconds is easy and a block chain surviving should be a sign of stability that is hard to fake. C) Market cap in $$ is definitely worth a thought. D) Number of running nodes. score = A * 30 + B * 0.1 + C * D * 0.0001 … something along these lines. Sure the formula and the constants can be tuned to make the one or the other look good but we should talk about a formula and not just one determining value. That said: I have no AltCoins at all and feel like 99% of them are get rich quick schemes by the people running them but I don't want to be the last to know if any of them actually is to be taken seriously.
|
ɃɃWalletScrutiny.com | Is your wallet secure?(Methodology) WalletScrutiny checks if wallet builds are reproducible, a precondition for code audits to be of value. | ɃɃ |
|
|
|
Bortmehanic
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 153
Merit: 100
Switchercoin.com
|
|
October 24, 2013, 10:32:36 AM |
|
thank for the info
|
|
|
|
digeros
|
|
October 24, 2013, 02:45:11 PM |
|
I guess the OP better be anonymous. Else, any sorting whatsoever will get him hate and threats.
That's why instead of everyone trying to push their own favorite alts up we should establish some objective criteria for categorizing coins. From the top of my head: * age (reason: newcomers have to prove themselves before they can be taken seriously) * hashrate (reason: measure of community support, albeit questionable. Tricky due to variety of algorithms, PoW/PoS differences etc.) * trade volume at exchanges (reason: measure of market support) * market cap (reason: measure of market support, albeit questionable without significant trade volume) * transaction volume per day (reason: measure of usefulness, but questionable) Ideas, anyone? Excellent Idea!!! Now we just need to turn those DATA POINTS into Some SCORE Age in Days Blockchain active = ###### Days (up to 400 years old) hashrate in MH/s = ####### Mh/s (up to Petabytes) Market Cap in USD thousands$ = ####### (up to billions $) Trade volume has to be standardized to BTC Value of Exchange of Alt Coin = ###### BTC Value of Daily Exchange Trades Transactions per day or per block? = ###### absolute number or avg. trans./block? I would be very interested in working with others on such a tool ... - digeros
|
|
|
|
inform
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
October 25, 2013, 02:10:25 PM |
|
Some Now Guys News Upgrates
|
|
|
|
|