ShooterXD
|
|
July 06, 2016, 10:48:44 PM |
|
Any News about node release?
|
|
|
|
Twiggy Smile
|
|
July 06, 2016, 10:51:15 PM |
|
Any News about node release?
Full nodes will be published less than in 2 weeks http://coremedia.info/index.php/blockchain-news/item/268-waves-weekly-no-1The no. 1 focus at the moment is for full public node code, with custom tokens launch soon afterwards. ‘We’re on schedule; some unexpected bugs have come up but we fixed them fast. Launches are always difficult, but we have to go through this,’ reports Sasha. Public full nodes are likely to be ready within the next fortnight.
|
|
|
|
placebo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 06, 2016, 10:52:05 PM |
|
On another note Lilia Vershinina advisor to Distributed Lab is hot.I thought she worked for Kraken.
I had a chat with her.... only around 80 people will be there... so not a lot of people will be in Odessa, and no she is not working for Kraken.
|
|
|
|
MarketMagic
|
|
July 06, 2016, 10:55:25 PM |
|
waves price is more stable now.I think all bounties and panic sellers are dumped maybe.
|
█████████████████████
|
|
|
WavesSignature
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
July 06, 2016, 11:12:52 PM |
|
-snip- There's no rule written about multiple participants in OP. If the job is done which is 50 posts, they HAVE TO pay to the users. So they are scamming some members based on no evidence. Official forum has nothing to do about this thread. Official forum is censored shit jerk. This thread is the most important thing if they care about their altcoin. Still reasonable questions with no answers and admitting scams now. You were never enrolled in the signature campaign in the first place, as such, how did you expect to receive a bounty?
|
|
|
|
Soul_eater_123
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 07, 2016, 12:29:05 AM Last edit: July 07, 2016, 01:38:50 AM by Soul_eater_123 |
|
WAVES is no. 1 for volume again on Bittrex. Poloniex still not adding. Very strange.
On a side note but related to their strange behaviour. NAV was recently upgraded to V2.0 blockchain. Polo ignored requests for upgrade from the Devs. Once most users had upgraded to the new blockchain (about 6 weeks ago) - NAV V1.0 started getting pumped on Polo (at one point it was over x10 price and x 10 volume compared to the official NAV 2.0). They are still ignoring the NAV dev teams requests to upgrade. Again very strange behaviour.
I hope WAVES doesn't take too long to launch the decentralised exchange because I'm really starting to lose faith in the competence of Poloniex.
I have noticed this kind of odd and inconsistent behaviour before.
It seems once altcoin exchanges reach a certain level of success it goes to their heads (Mintpal, Cryptsy etc.) and they gradually slip into financial mismanagement, unsafe practices, outright scamming, or all of the aforementioned - this strange behaviour certainly doesn't bode well for them.
I hope it is just a blip and we end up learning that there was a reasonable explanation for it - I will certainly be keeping a more cautious eye on them though.
Edit: I also hope I'm completely off base here and everything is fine at Polo as do like trading there.
|
|
|
|
Wasda
|
|
July 07, 2016, 12:37:05 AM |
|
Just curious how is bittrex able to list Waves without full node? what's the difference?
|
.
| .
| . ▬◇ ▬◇▬◆ ▬◇▬◇▬◆
| .
| | .
| | .
| | .
| . ◇▬ ◆▬◇▬ ◆▬◇▬◇▬
| .
| .
|
|
|
|
Same Same
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
July 07, 2016, 12:41:05 AM |
|
Just curious how is bittrex able to list Waves without full node? what's the difference?
I'd like to know as well.
|
|
|
|
electronicash
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1055
|
|
July 07, 2016, 12:54:14 AM |
|
WAVES is no. 1 for volume again on Bittrex. Poloniex still not adding. Very strange.
On a side note but related to their strange behaviour. NAV was recently upgraded to V2.0 blockchain. Polo ignored requests for upgrade from the Devs. Once most users had upgraded to the new blockchain (about 6 weeks ago) - NAV V1.0 started getting pumped on Polo (at one point it was over x10 price and x 10 volume compared to the official NAV 2.0). They are still ignoring the NAV dev teams requests to upgrade. Again very strange behaviour.
I hope WAVES doesn't take too long to launch the decentralised exchange because I'm really starting to lose faith in the competence of Poloniex.
I have noticed this kind of odd and inconsistent behaviour before.
It seems once altcoin exchanges reach a certain level of success it goes to their heads (Mintpal, Cryptsy etc.) and they gradually slip into financial mismanagement, unsafe practices, outright scamming, or all of the aforementioned - this strange behaviour certainly doesn't bode well for them.
I hope it is just a blip and we end up learning that there was a reasonable explanation for it - I will certainly be keeping a more cautious eye on them though.
I got the hunch polo would go gox later and that they'd declare they've been hacked actually. but don't quote me on this. its just a hunch. I still hope the rest of the exchange will add WAVES.
|
|
|
|
zcxvp
|
|
July 07, 2016, 01:00:56 AM |
|
When on polo?
|
|
|
|
10000usdperbtc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 07, 2016, 01:03:14 AM |
|
Go up 0.001BTC
|
|
|
|
Soul_eater_123
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 07, 2016, 01:28:59 AM |
|
When on polo? Ask Polo.
|
|
|
|
mirakal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1292
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
July 07, 2016, 01:29:08 AM |
|
When on polo? No positive news yet but since we are still in the early stage it does not matter to me as I believe the potential of the waves, less price in bittrex is good for the believer to buy more before the price actually pump that high.
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
godzziilla
|
|
July 07, 2016, 01:40:17 AM |
|
Go up 0.001BTC better 0.01 , i want to see big waves . Maybe after polo it will be
|
|
|
|
bcmine
|
|
July 07, 2016, 02:04:37 AM |
|
Go up 0.001BTC Go to 0.0001 btc in some weeks for sure. Polo is never going to add more sashas projects
|
|
|
|
outfitsoul
|
|
July 07, 2016, 02:07:43 AM |
|
WAVES is no. 1 for volume again on Bittrex. Poloniex still not adding. Very strange.
On a side note but related to their strange behaviour. NAV was recently upgraded to V2.0 blockchain. Polo ignored requests for upgrade from the Devs. Once most users had upgraded to the new blockchain (about 6 weeks ago) - NAV V1.0 started getting pumped on Polo (at one point it was over x10 price and x 10 volume compared to the official NAV 2.0). They are still ignoring the NAV dev teams requests to upgrade. Again very strange behaviour.
I hope WAVES doesn't take too long to launch the decentralised exchange because I'm really starting to lose faith in the competence of Poloniex.
I have noticed this kind of odd and inconsistent behaviour before.
It seems once altcoin exchanges reach a certain level of success it goes to their heads (Mintpal, Cryptsy etc.) and they gradually slip into financial mismanagement, unsafe practices, outright scamming, or all of the aforementioned - this strange behaviour certainly doesn't bode well for them.
I hope it is just a blip and we end up learning that there was a reasonable explanation for it - I will certainly be keeping a more cautious eye on them though.
Edit: I also hope I'm completely off base here and everything is fine at Polo as do like trading there.
Polo wants the full node code. You also notice all these trash coins getting pumped lately on Polo?
|
|
|
|
jwiz168
|
|
July 07, 2016, 02:31:29 AM |
|
Any News about node release?
Full nodes will be published less than in 2 weeks http://coremedia.info/index.php/blockchain-news/item/268-waves-weekly-no-1The no. 1 focus at the moment is for full public node code, with custom tokens launch soon afterwards. ‘We’re on schedule; some unexpected bugs have come up but we fixed them fast. Launches are always difficult, but we have to go through this,’ reports Sasha. Public full nodes are likely to be ready within the next fortnight. This is great news. Time to prepare some hardware. What is the minimum requirements? LPoS here we come.... (or later).
|
|
|
|
Zooplus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 07, 2016, 02:47:58 AM |
|
WAVES is no. 1 for volume again on Bittrex. Poloniex still not adding. Very strange.
On a side note but related to their strange behaviour. NAV was recently upgraded to V2.0 blockchain. Polo ignored requests for upgrade from the Devs. Once most users had upgraded to the new blockchain (about 6 weeks ago) - NAV V1.0 started getting pumped on Polo (at one point it was over x10 price and x 10 volume compared to the official NAV 2.0). They are still ignoring the NAV dev teams requests to upgrade. Again very strange behaviour.
I hope WAVES doesn't take too long to launch the decentralised exchange because I'm really starting to lose faith in the competence of Poloniex.
I have noticed this kind of odd and inconsistent behaviour before.
It seems once altcoin exchanges reach a certain level of success it goes to their heads (Mintpal, Cryptsy etc.) and they gradually slip into financial mismanagement, unsafe practices, outright scamming, or all of the aforementioned - this strange behaviour certainly doesn't bode well for them.
I hope it is just a blip and we end up learning that there was a reasonable explanation for it - I will certainly be keeping a more cautious eye on them though.
Edit: I also hope I'm completely off base here and everything is fine at Polo as do like trading there.
Polo wants the full node code. You also notice all these trash coins getting pumped lately on Polo? We will surely witness waves to be added in polo, if they do not add waves it would be their lose not waves, still even if no major exchanges will add but if the project will prove that they are something big we can see a good improvement. Look DAO being added in polo but still the price does not move that much.
|
|
|
|
Wasda
|
|
July 07, 2016, 02:49:44 AM |
|
|
.
| .
| . ▬◇ ▬◇▬◆ ▬◇▬◇▬◆
| .
| | .
| | .
| | .
| . ◇▬ ◆▬◇▬ ◆▬◇▬◇▬
| .
| .
|
|
|
|
idolacchacked
|
|
July 07, 2016, 03:25:58 AM |
|
33k sell wall almost down lets see where we go from here
|
|
|
|
|