|
Twiggy Smile
|
 |
July 18, 2016, 09:56:58 PM
Last edit: July 19, 2016, 03:03:54 AM by Twiggy Smile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can see the statistics of your reports to moderators on the "Report to moderator" pages.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
motorhead89
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 464
Merit: 250
Wasssssup!
|
|
July 19, 2016, 12:27:54 AM |
|
Waves to the moon for poloniex. Whos ready for liftoff?
Investing in ripple getting out of steem and waves. Coinbiz what you think? I think steem and waves have a lot better chance to up than ripple. Something is weird with ripple... I don't like it. but to each his own. I don't hold Steem but do hold Waves. I got the tingly feeling on Waves for sure. |
I had my account hacked due to a weak password I was told. It has be re-secured and a stronger password implemented. Hacker was posting malware links using my account. Always use a very strong password.
|
|
|
|
.cryptic.
|
|
July 19, 2016, 01:19:39 AM |
|
Waves to the moon for poloniex. Whos ready for liftoff?
Investing in ripple getting out of steem and waves. Coinbiz what you think? I think steem and waves have a lot better chance to up than ripple. Something is weird with ripple... I don't like it. but to each his own. I don't hold Steem but do hold Waves. I got the tingly feeling on Waves for sure. But ripple is already being used by banks, right? |
|
|
|
|
|
raphma
|
|
July 19, 2016, 01:30:51 AM |
|
Waves to the moon for poloniex. Whos ready for liftoff?
Investing in ripple getting out of steem and waves. Coinbiz what you think? I think steem and waves have a lot better chance to up than ripple. Something is weird with ripple... I don't like it. but to each his own. I don't hold Steem but do hold Waves. I got the tingly feeling on Waves for sure. But ripple is already being used by banks, right? ripple have way more time in the market, and yet, it have started to reach banks last month. |
|
|
|
|
enhu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1018
|
|
July 19, 2016, 01:33:24 AM |
|
Waves to the moon for poloniex. Whos ready for liftoff?
Investing in ripple getting out of steem and waves. Coinbiz what you think? I think steem and waves have a lot better chance to up than ripple. Something is weird with ripple... I don't like it. but to each his own. I don't hold Steem but do hold Waves. I got the tingly feeling on Waves for sure. But ripple is already being used by banks, right? Ripple is being used by banks? I'm not sure about that. they despises crypto currencies as far as i know as it could destroy banks in the end. do you have anything to back this up? there would be no issues for WAVES to proceed with the development if ripple had made it to be used by banks so can WAVES too. |
|
|
|
|
.cryptic.
|
|
July 19, 2016, 01:54:32 AM |
|
Waves to the moon for poloniex. Whos ready for liftoff?
Investing in ripple getting out of steem and waves. Coinbiz what you think? I think steem and waves have a lot better chance to up than ripple. Something is weird with ripple... I don't like it. but to each his own. I don't hold Steem but do hold Waves. I got the tingly feeling on Waves for sure. But ripple is already being used by banks, right? Ripple is being used by banks? I'm not sure about that. they despises crypto currencies as far as i know as it could destroy banks in the end. do you have anything to back this up? there would be no issues for WAVES to proceed with the development if ripple had made it to be used by banks so can WAVES too. |
|
|
|
|
|
darkagentx
|
|
July 19, 2016, 02:36:40 AM |
|
Is there any news yet on when the full node will be released to the public? What is holding the release anyway?
|
|
|
|
|
Scrooge McCrypto
|
|
July 19, 2016, 02:53:25 AM |
|
I think the nodes have been nominally released, to be tested by any who would accept a bounty for showing fault in the code. How long will this testing go on before Polo lists Waves, I do not know. But that is when the community is expecting fireworks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twiggy Smile
|
|
July 19, 2016, 02:54:29 AM |
|
Is there any news yet on when the full node will be released to the public? What is holding the release anyway?
I think it will depend on the number of errors and time to resolve it. You want that Waves launched a product without checking?  |
|
|
|
|
|
darkagentx
|
|
July 19, 2016, 03:02:58 AM |
|
Is there any news yet on when the full node will be released to the public? What is holding the release anyway?
I think It will depend on the number of errors and time to resolve it. You want that Waves launched a product without checking? I am asking what is holding the public release, because I am interested to know why. Your answer is so unprofessional and it does not reflect a good project that you are representing. |
|
|
|
|
bigfryguy
|
|
July 19, 2016, 03:07:50 AM |
|
Is there any news yet on when the full node will be released to the public? What is holding the release anyway?
I think It will depend on the number of errors and time to resolve it. You want that Waves launched a product without checking? I am asking what is holding the public release, because I am interested to know why. Your answer is so unprofessional and it does not reflect a good project that you are representing. after watching some of the disasters that have unfolded due to untested releases, I think it is very reasonable for the waves team to do a prerelease/bug finding test before they open the full Node to the public. |
|
|
|
|
darkagentx
|
|
July 19, 2016, 03:10:42 AM |
|
Is there any news yet on when the full node will be released to the public? What is holding the release anyway?
I think it will depend on the number of errors and time to resolve it. You want that Waves launched a product without checking? You can just easily omit that and just stick to your bolded sentence, why do you want to put that in a response anyway, that's what I am talking about on unprofessional response. |
|
|
|
|
Twiggy Smile
|
|
July 19, 2016, 03:13:36 AM |
|
I am asking what is holding the public release, because I am interested to know why. Your answer is so unprofessional and it does not reflect a good project that you are representing.
You can just easily omit that and just stick to your bolded sentence, why do you want to put that in a response anyway, that's what I am talking about on unprofessional response.
It will depend on the number of errors and time to resolve it. Once testing will be complete, the main net code for nodes will be released. My friend, it was the humor. Anyway I wish you all the best and have a good day.  WAVES Weekly No. 3 Public Full Node Release Candidate https://blog.wavesplatform.com/waves-weekly-no-3-b119d7b64e54#.mhtq31tf6### Waves asset specification https://github.com/wavesplatform/Waves/blob/master/Assetsspecification.md |
|
|
|
|
|
darkagentx
|
|
July 19, 2016, 03:20:30 AM |
|
It will depend on the number of errors and time to resolve it. Once testing will be complete, the main net code for nodes will be released. My friend, it was the humor. Anyway I wish you all the best and have a good day. Sorry I do not sense any humor on that at all, it leaks over confidence. |
|
|
|
|
Finestream
|
|
July 19, 2016, 03:22:40 AM |
|
Is there any news yet on when the full node will be released to the public? What is holding the release anyway?
I think It will depend on the number of errors and time to resolve it. You want that Waves launched a product without checking? I am asking what is holding the public release, because I am interested to know why. Your answer is so unprofessional and it does not reflect a good project that you are representing. after watching some of the disasters that have unfolded due to untested releases, I think it is very reasonable for the waves team to do a prerelease/bug finding test before they open the full Node to the public. I agree with this statement, waves developer should carefully plan the full node release as anything bad that can be seen will always link to the value of waves and we don't want to see another huge decrease in price of waves because that will lose the confidence of the investors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
rindo
|
|
July 19, 2016, 03:33:44 AM |
|
i will thanks in advance Twiggy Smile you always provide the latest information on the wave good job appreciatte |
|
|
|
|
BTC-BTC-BTC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1001
www.neutroncoin.com
|
|
July 19, 2016, 03:42:08 AM |
|
i will thanks in advance Twiggy Smile you always provide the latest information on the wave good job appreciatte I agree. Twiggy Smile is an asset to the project for sure. And full nodes are around the corner. |
|
|
|
|
|
darkagentx
|
|
July 19, 2016, 04:25:57 AM |
|
I am asking what is holding the public release, because I am interested to know why. Your answer is so unprofessional and it does not reflect a good project that you are representing.
You can just easily omit that and just stick to your bolded sentence, why do you want to put that in a response anyway, that's what I am talking about on unprofessional response.
It will depend on the number of errors and time to resolve it. Once testing will be complete, the main net code for nodes will be released. My friend, it was the humor. Anyway I wish you all the best and have a good day. WAVES Weekly No. 3 Public Full Node Release Candidate https://blog.wavesplatform.com/waves-weekly-no-3-b119d7b64e54#.mhtq31tf6### Waves asset specification https://github.com/wavesplatform/Waves/blob/master/Assetsspecification.mdNo offense, but obviously you nor most of the Waves team have experience with software development. So your timeline depends on bugs? So you're just going to take your sweet ass time? Imagine a company with $16 mil USD funding saying that. When a company announces a product, they have a timeline. They also have time allotted for QA. They don't just do QA for as long as it takes. That's a bullshit response. That's a response from someone who has no clue. Waves has nothing to do with DAO. You guys are making excuses. Testnet should have been running before the ICO. Main should have been up after the ICO. What then is the point of the ICO? I believe the real issue is Waves had no actual developers. They raised money on an idea, and now that they finally have a developer perhaps they're trying to sort things out. Or they're just waiting on the Scorex project to update so they can continue to clone and update their project. Maybe you shouldn't have eaten through $10 mil USD of your budget just for incremental wallet updates. Isn't the node more important? I do consulting work for large tech companies in Silicon Valley and this is not how a project operates. This has amateur written all over it. Pump all you want, but this isn't pump worthy yet. You know what it's like. It's like Apple saying they will release a new iPhone on a specific date (like an ICO). People line up and pre-order it. Then when the launch date arrives, Apple says "oh actually, we haven't built a prototype yet." And then, after a month, they finally build a prototype. Tons of people are upset. Then they say, "we'll release the iPhone when it's done testing all the bugs", with no date given. When pressed for a response, they say "oh you want an iPhone full of bugs?" That is what this is like. No we don't want Waves with bugs and issues. We want a development team that sticks to their promises and their word. People invested, they didn't donate for you to make incremental wallet updates for $10 mil USD and then take your jolly time bug testing something you barely built. Asking people if they want a product with bugs is just a really poor excuse. You have no timeline. I've asked this before and I'll ask again, what is Sasha's technical background? Is there any example of his previous development work? Or is he just a wantrapreneur schemer blowing donation money? Nicely done. |
|
|
|
|
aldenpogi
|
|
July 19, 2016, 04:46:25 AM |
|
I am asking what is holding the public release, because I am interested to know why. Your answer is so unprofessional and it does not reflect a good project that you are representing.
You can just easily omit that and just stick to your bolded sentence, why do you want to put that in a response anyway, that's what I am talking about on unprofessional response.
It will depend on the number of errors and time to resolve it. Once testing will be complete, the main net code for nodes will be released. My friend, it was the humor. Anyway I wish you all the best and have a good day. WAVES Weekly No. 3 Public Full Node Release Candidate https://blog.wavesplatform.com/waves-weekly-no-3-b119d7b64e54#.mhtq31tf6### Waves asset specification https://github.com/wavesplatform/Waves/blob/master/Assetsspecification.mdNo offense, but obviously you nor most of the Waves team have experience with software development. So your timeline depends on bugs? So you're just going to take your sweet ass time? Imagine a company with $16 mil USD funding saying that. When a company announces a product, they have a timeline. They also have time allotted for QA. They don't just do QA for as long as it takes. That's a bullshit response. That's a response from someone who has no clue. Waves has nothing to do with DAO. You guys are making excuses. Testnet should have been running before the ICO. Main should have been up after the ICO. What then is the point of the ICO? I believe the real issue is Waves had no actual developers. They raised money on an idea, and now that they finally have a developer perhaps they're trying to sort things out. Or they're just waiting on the Scorex project to update so they can continue to clone and update their project. Maybe you shouldn't have eaten through $10 mil USD of your budget just for incremental wallet updates. Isn't the node more important? I do consulting work for large tech companies in Silicon Valley and this is not how a project operates. This has amateur written all over it. Pump all you want, but this isn't pump worthy yet. You know what it's like. It's like Apple saying they will release a new iPhone on a specific date (like an ICO). People line up and pre-order it. Then when the launch date arrives, Apple says "oh actually, we haven't built a prototype yet." And then, after a month, they finally build a prototype. Tons of people are upset. Then they say, "we'll release the iPhone when it's done testing all the bugs", with no date given. When pressed for a response, they say "oh you want an iPhone full of bugs?" That is what this is like. No we don't want Waves with bugs and issues. We want a development team that sticks to their promises and their word. People invested, they didn't donate for you to make incremental wallet updates for $10 mil USD and then take your jolly time bug testing something you barely built. Asking people if they want a product with bugs is just a really poor excuse. You have no timeline. I've asked this before and I'll ask again, what is Sasha's technical background? Is there any example of his previous development work? Or is he just a wantrapreneur schemer blowing donation money? go keep on crying coinbiz after your last failed price manipulation lol |
|
|
|
|
|
