WAVES. Ultimate crypto-tokens blockchain platform.

[KoinMaster]

Newsletter #8 is a good confidence builder. Kudos to Sasha & Team!

[omedian]

I can understand why for some people it just looks like a "motivating newsletter coin" as I almost felt it myself but I still believe there are coding geniuses with a great project behind all this. Be patient, not disappointed.

[mike77777]

What's going on here? Still no lambo? Abandon this sinking ship and join ICONOMI

[icanscript]

heh, Newsletter #8 and no product yet... do you guys remember how much they made in ICO? coding geniuses... I doubt it. You could hire a whole company of coders for a fraction of what they received in ICO.

there is no product coming, stop fooling yourselves.

[bitcoinuserz]

Its funny how waves go down when eth and xmr goes up lol shake shake

[Twiggy Smile]

heh, Newsletter #8 and no product yet... do you guys remember how much they made in ICO? coding geniuses... I doubt it. You could hire a whole company of coders for a fraction of what they received in ICO.

there is no product coming, stop fooling yourselves.

If you're a very good blockchain specialist and you know very well the Scala programming language. Well, maybe you're the one who we needed.

If it is not, I think do not need to rush with conclusions.

PS: I'll just leave it here

Waves is based on the Scorex framework. As written in this thread, "Scorex is intentionally not production-ready". Unlike some other coins which are often derived from Bitcoin, it is new source code, written from scratch. The Waves developers already improved it a lot, and all testing is good, but I think it will need some more months until it is ready for production.

The good thing is that it is written in Scala, so infamous buffer-overflow bugs as possible in C/C++ are impossible with it, and the language allows to write much cleaner and more compact code, which means later new features can be implemented faster.

[KoinMaster]

Twiggy, do we have a new ETA for the main net? It's OK for me if there will be delays but we need an updated roadmap. Thanks. 

[Twiggy Smile]

Twiggy, do we have a new ETA for the main net? It's OK for me if there will be delays but we need an updated roadmap. Thanks.  

Hi. At the moment I do not have new information about new ETA's, guys. The testing phase is not finished yet. Yes, I think it's a good idea, I'll talk with guys about it. Thank you.

[swisswatch]

Twiggy, do we have a new ETA for the main net? It's OK for me if there will be delays but we need an updated roadmap. Thanks.  

Hi. At the moment I do not have new information about new ETA's, guys. The testing phase is not finished yet. Yes, I think it's a good idea, I'll talk with guys about it. Thank you.

Just test well, promise the most secure and then release, don't be like dao. Time isn't matter, I can wait for next year. 

[Sam123]

Twiggy, do we have a new ETA for the main net? It's OK for me if there will be delays but we need an updated roadmap. Thanks.  

Hi. At the moment I do not have new information about new ETA's, guys. The testing phase is not finished yet. Yes, I think it's a good idea, I'll talk with guys about it. Thank you.

I understand that while testing you may found  bugs that may take time to fix. But I believe the community are frustrated about missing the deadline (I don't blame them).
In the meantime take your time testing it.

[boltz]

Riding the waveeees <3!

[TrueAnon]

I am riding long time, my dick is getting tired.

[boltz]

We have patience with waves , right anon ?

[robdark]

heh, Newsletter #8 and no product yet... do you guys remember how much they made in ICO? coding geniuses... I doubt it. You could hire a whole company of coders for a fraction of what they received in ICO.

there is no product coming, stop fooling yourselves.

GitHub is very active, they are working

[wiked1]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1605144.0  LOL

[oneyesoneno]

heh, Newsletter #8 and no product yet... do you guys remember how much they made in ICO? coding geniuses... I doubt it. You could hire a whole company of coders for a fraction of what they received in ICO.

there is no product coming, stop fooling yourselves.

GitHub is very active, they are working

very interesting to see waves rewrite the codes... new version algorithm? i wonder how this will turn out. 

[doriangray]

heh, Newsletter #8 and no product yet... do you guys remember how much they made in ICO? coding geniuses... I doubt it. You could hire a whole company of coders for a fraction of what they received in ICO.

there is no product coming, stop fooling yourselves.

GitHub is very active, they are working

WAVES consists of good team and team members working together hand in had.

[Grahnite]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1605144.0  LOL

Thanks! This looks great, and the ICO ends in November, so it should be live before WAVES. Lol!

[goldcoinminer]

heh, Newsletter #8 and no product yet... do you guys remember how much they made in ICO? coding geniuses... I doubt it. You could hire a whole company of coders for a fraction of what they received in ICO.

there is no product coming, stop fooling yourselves.

GitHub is very active, they are working

WAVES consists of good team and team members working together hand in had.

I do agree with you, but we need to understand that there are people who just can't wait to grow their investment and base on their sentiment the developers are not following his words and scheduled updates are not done on time. Anyway, we are here already so we should juts trust.

[jpdorn]

1 Million views in this thread, nice achievement.