|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The trust scores you see are subjective; they will change depending on who you have in your trust list. |
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dubs
|
 |
June 14, 2013, 01:26:08 AM |
|
the difficulty is correct |
|
|
|
|
A L I E N
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 14, 2013, 05:08:57 AM |
|
The difficulty of Megacoin on coinchoose.com is incorrect. Just REALLLLYYY SLOOOOOWWW here
But it is up.
Looks right to me (3.711 on coinchoose) "blocks" : 16493, "currentblocksize" : 0, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 3.71161335, "errors" : "", "generate" : false, "genproclimit" : -1, "hashespersec" : 0, "networkhashps" : 239688128, "pooledtx" : 0, "testnet" : false } |
|
|
|
|
|
jasonslow
|
|
June 15, 2013, 08:38:38 AM |
|
@Sal002, Can you sort the default list based on the adjustment. Because this could misled the miners believing what they mine are still profitable because its on top but its not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
erk
|
|
June 15, 2013, 08:40:29 AM |
|
Coinchoose doesn't seem to be showing the right profitability compared to other sites, it's been like that for several hours now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
sal002 (OP)
|
|
June 15, 2013, 02:42:39 PM |
|
Coinchoose doesn't seem to be showing the right profitability compared to other sites, it's been like that for several hours now.
Which currency? |
|
|
|
|
|
sal002 (OP)
|
|
June 15, 2013, 02:44:58 PM |
|
Difficulty / straight profitability seems the same as coinwarez. The adjusted profitability is different, but not available there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gyverlb
|
|
June 15, 2013, 03:02:40 PM |
|
Difficulty / straight profitability seems the same as coinwarez. The adjusted profitability is different, but not available there.
Mincoin difficulty is wrong. It's 1.39166720 right now. |
|
|
|
|
|
Etheric
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2013, 05:22:35 PM |
|
Great site!
It'd be nice if the network hash rate columns were represented in just one measurement (perhaps Gh/s) so that they sort properly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titan
|
|
June 17, 2013, 12:27:58 AM |
|
Luckycoin disappeared from the chart?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sal002 (OP)
|
|
June 17, 2013, 01:58:20 AM |
|
Luckycoin re-added.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eli0t
|
|
June 17, 2013, 02:51:00 AM |
|
nice improvements over the last week but the hash rate is not sortable from largest to smallest
|
LTC: LKpJf3uk7KsHU73kxq8iFJrP1AAKN7Yni7 DGC: DKXGvEbj3Rwgrm2QQbRyNPDDZDYoq4Y44d XPM: AWV5AKfLFyoBaMjg9C77rGUBhuFxz5DGGL
|
|
|
|
sal002 (OP)
|
|
June 17, 2013, 03:17:31 AM |
|
nice improvements over the last week but the hash rate is not sortable from largest to smallest
Yeah - looking into whether I can keep it formatted as I can but allow it to be sorted. |
|
|
|
|
davidkassa
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
June 17, 2013, 04:05:33 PM |
|
nice improvements over the last week but the hash rate is not sortable from largest to smallest
+1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Eli0t
|
|
June 17, 2013, 08:34:35 PM |
|
something looks off with doubloons, Freicoin, Namecoin and a few others, how can it more MORE profitable after adjusting for stales?
|
LTC: LKpJf3uk7KsHU73kxq8iFJrP1AAKN7Yni7 DGC: DKXGvEbj3Rwgrm2QQbRyNPDDZDYoq4Y44d XPM: AWV5AKfLFyoBaMjg9C77rGUBhuFxz5DGGL
|
|
|
|
sal002 (OP)
|
|
June 18, 2013, 12:17:03 AM |
|
something looks off with doubloons, Freicoin, Namecoin and a few others, how can it more MORE profitable after adjusting for stales?
That is on the Litecoin chart? They can be better if their stale rate is better than Litecoin. Same holds true on the Bitcoin side, but stales are a smaller issue there. |
|
|
|
|
|
MobGod
|
|
June 18, 2013, 04:28:00 AM
Last edit: June 18, 2013, 04:49:14 AM by MobGod |
|
Sal anyway to add rec for me? I got the blockecplorer going if you need that info, also forgot to ask anyway to get the network hashrate under ltc also?
|
|
|
|
|
sal002 (OP)
|
|
June 18, 2013, 10:33:54 AM |
|
Sal anyway to add rec for me? I got the blockecplorer going if you need that info, also forgot to ask anyway to get the network hashrate under ltc also?
Do you have an exchange for it as well? I would need the blockexplorer and the exchange. |
|
|
|
|
|
