shimlbit
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1001
|
 |
September 17, 2016, 01:06:08 AM |
|
is there any chance to mine with the wallet on ubuntu?is there any command?cpu miner from ocminer worked for me but not more...dont know why...
thats why i want to mine per wallet but i dont know command and i have no gui...setgenerate true didnt work....method isnt coded...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kazadar
|
|
September 17, 2016, 01:08:31 AM |
|
Verium 1.0.4 is released. This is a recommended update that optimizes the built in cpu-miner to minimize the number of memory allocations for scrypt² and improves hashrates a bit (credit to Rlmic on vericoinforums.com). Get it here: http://www.vericoin.info/veriumlaunch.html or Check for update in wallet. jumped from 870 to 1300 with this (7/8 processors) 870 to 1500 (8/8 processors)  Wow, Nice! Depending on hardware and especially better in Windows, because it apparently doesn't handle heavy memory allocation very well. This solves that by minimizing the memory allocations necessary. had similar jump as well  Mine only jumped from 800 to 1050 but with the standalone miner on the pool I was running 1800 h/m. Not sure those numbers were real because it seems seems difficulty schedule may have been problem with pool. Considering hashrates people are getting using linux and the fact that it was an optimized miner, I do think its pretty close, but there is no real way for me to verify it without a working pool. The miner also said 30 H/s which to my knowledge shouldnt be influenced by the difficulty. |
|
|
|
|
effectsToCause (OP)
|
|
September 17, 2016, 01:21:53 AM |
|
Verium 1.0.4 is released. This is a recommended update that optimizes the built in cpu-miner to minimize the number of memory allocations for scrypt² and improves hashrates a bit (credit to Rlmic on vericoinforums.com). Get it here: http://www.vericoin.info/veriumlaunch.html or Check for update in wallet. jumped from 870 to 1300 with this (7/8 processors) 870 to 1500 (8/8 processors) Wow, Nice! Depending on hardware and especially better in Windows, because it apparently doesn't handle heavy memory allocation very well. This solves that by minimizing the memory allocations necessary. had similar jump as well Mine only jumped from 800 to 1050 but with the standalone miner on the pool I was running 1800 h/m. Not sure those numbers were real because it seems seems difficulty schedule may have been problem with pool. Considering hashrates people are getting using linux and the fact that it was an optimized miner, I do think its pretty close, but there is no real way for me to verify it without a working pool. The miner also said 30 H/s which to my knowledge shouldnt be influenced by the difficulty. I'll do some testing with it. If it turns out the optimized is better ill incorporate its improved implementation to the in wallet miner. Need to test it out thoroughly, for instance it may have better hashrate but generate more stales due to slow hashrate relative to other scrypt. That is something we had to optimize specially for this memory requirement. |
|
|
|
|
|
Kazadar
|
|
September 17, 2016, 01:35:25 AM |
|
I'll do some testing with it. If it turns out the optimized is better ill incorporate its improved implementation to the in wallet miner. Need to test it out thoroughly, for instance it may have better hashrate but generate more stales due to slow hashrate relative to other scrypt. That is something we had to optimize specially for this memory requirement.
Thanks, that would be nice. I was running at a 99.95% efficiency for 16 hours at the pool which is 0.4% better than average but as the pool isnt working yet it might not mean anything. And thinking about it I dont remember if stales are count towards your efficiency. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ljglug
|
|
September 17, 2016, 03:37:28 AM |
|
16 how much memory is required for the core CPU?
I have a dual system, 16 core 32 threads, the use of VM virtual machine running two UBUNTU system, running only 1 Ubuntu can get 1900H/M, CPU occupancy rate of 50%.
2 Ubuntu systems operate at the same time, each system can only get 1100H/M. This is why? At this time the CPU occupancy rate is 100%
|
|
|
|
wixfreeman
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
September 17, 2016, 04:09:21 AM |
|
my hash rates have improved by approx 30%, but the systems went from barely noticeable to almost unuseable. still, the lag justifies the increased hash for me. thanks nerds!
|
|
|
|
|
|
MAD945
|
|
September 17, 2016, 04:12:58 AM |
|
Wow, I go on vacation for a few days and miss out on the great stuff happening. Need to update my wallet when I get back Paris, probably going to be a few more versions no doubt. Great job Devs!
|
|
|
|
|
thesilex
Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
|
|
September 17, 2016, 04:29:16 AM |
|
Windows: 800 to 1300
Ubuntu: 950. Nothing is changed.
So does it mean wallet is not optimized for linux?
|
|
|
|
|
|
effectsToCause (OP)
|
|
September 17, 2016, 05:11:26 AM |
|
Windows: 800 to 1300
Ubuntu: 950. Nothing is changed.
So does it mean wallet is not optimized for linux?
It means is now optimized for both, linux was better at handling previous miner code and it's better for linux now too, just didn't make too much of a difference. |
|
|
|
|
shimlbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1001
|
|
September 17, 2016, 06:32:40 AM |
|
is there any chance to mine with the wallet on ubuntu?is there any command?cpu miner from ocminer worked for me but not more...dont know why...
thats why i want to mine per wallet but i dont know command and i have no gui...setgenerate true didnt work....method isnt coded...
|
|
|
|
|
|
poloniexwhale
|
|
September 17, 2016, 06:47:32 AM |
|
Any hints of the ICO price? Current supply and total supply, the OP is too long don't read lol. Will it be listed on polo?
|
|
|
|
wgd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1815
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 17, 2016, 06:55:31 AM |
|
Sadly, the price falls a lack of buyers. Who here was pricing it at $ 1$+
|
|
|
|
|
ExcelThroughKnowledge
|
|
September 17, 2016, 07:26:11 AM |
|
and I thought it was supposed to be 10x more expensive than vrc lol..
|
|
|
|
cheapcoin
Member
Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
|
September 17, 2016, 07:29:40 AM |
|
and I thought it was supposed to be 10x more expensive than vrc lol..
Patience is a virtue, there is an old saying. The price can't be 10X in just one day. Rome wasn't built in a day |
|
|
|
|
ExcelThroughKnowledge
|
|
September 17, 2016, 07:32:56 AM |
|
and I thought it was supposed to be 10x more expensive than vrc lol..
Patience is a virtue, there is an old saying. The price can't be 10X in just one day. Rome wasn't built in a day True.. Rome wasn't built in a day.. neither did that 10x came out from my mouth initially xD |
|
|
|
|
aamarket
|
|
September 17, 2016, 10:51:08 AM |
|
VRM fell down to 52k on Bittrex, that is around the lowest ICO price. Can it go even lower ?
|
IMPORTANT:http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=177133.0,Tips welcome BTC:1AAMARKETmJvfjDwEFmhyYYwfre7ZFVseP RIC:RGnX6LcJrsVEuYeySDDxkmH7AjRqoprcKt
|
|
|
juhasz1109
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
September 17, 2016, 05:01:10 PM |
|
The price is very low. We await the good news!  |
|
|
|
|
wixfreeman
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
September 17, 2016, 05:10:41 PM |
|
The price is very low. We await the good news! the price is that low because people are selling it that low. it JUST hit a couple smaller exchanges, the people selling at those prices are likely broke, dumb or broke because they're dumb. |
|
|
|
|
|
tortellino
|
|
September 17, 2016, 06:23:14 PM |
|
i can understand the people who took place in the ICO with a ratio 1:10 and buyed (e.g. me ) the VRC at abou 10000sat to change. could get the double amount from exchange. But VRM is no exception. Nearly every ICO fell hefty after exchange starts.
|
|
|
|
|
