Save the planet or not

[daarul50]

For me its is to saving our planet we need is to cooperate each other how to stop global warming,plant more trees so that it reduces heat and carbon dioxide,do not burn plastic,conserve water,recycle,we must save trees,forest and wildlife.

Global warming can only be prevented and can not be stopped. If the way you explained it I think to control or slowing global warming. Fast or slow the world is indeed going extinct, and it is also caused by human activity. Earth is like a car, if used continuously but does not take care of it will make a fast broken. So our duty as human beings should care for the earth with activities like you said, it was can to extend the life of the earth.

Global warming to end is not confirmed. I'm not sure that this is not a tale invented for the purpose of making a profit, but it does not remove responsibility from the person for the environment on the planet. It seems to me that the time has come to demand from governments the implementation of technologies for alternative energy production.

The alternative energy has been developed by various experts, but the governments of many of the world are very few who can realize the use of alternative energy. it had been the problem of why there is an alternative energy that can not be used to reduce global warming.

[BADecker]

People still live only around 100 years or less. Saving the planet doesn't mean anything to the dead. Besides, if you can't save the planet (which you can't), why waste time on it? First learn how to live potentially for 1,000 years. Then, after 200 years, you might gain enough wisdom and knowledge to do a little to save the planet.

[novemberwoah]

For me its is to saving our planet we need is to cooperate each other how to stop global warming,plant more trees so that it reduces heat and carbon dioxide,do not burn plastic,conserve water,recycle,we must save trees,forest and wildlife.

Global warming can only be prevented and can not be stopped. If the way you explained it I think to control or slowing global warming. Fast or slow the world is indeed going extinct, and it is also caused by human activity. Earth is like a car, if used continuously but does not take care of it will make a fast broken. So our duty as human beings should care for the earth with activities like you said, it was can to extend the life of the earth.

Global warming to end is not confirmed. I'm not sure that this is not a tale invented for the purpose of making a profit, but it does not remove responsibility from the person for the environment on the planet. It seems to me that the time has come to demand from governments the implementation of technologies for alternative energy production.

The alternative energy has been developed by various experts, but the governments of many of the world are very few who can realize the use of alternative energy. it had been the problem of why there is an alternative energy that can not be used to reduce global warming.

It is very difficult to develop alternative energy because people may not be familiar with it, and people are accustomed to using fossil energy. Besides fossil energy can produce more energy than alternative energy. I also hope that alternative energy could one day be developed and began to be implemented in all countries. If this can be developed and began to be implemented I'm sure will help reduce pollution more than 40%.

[Sithara007]

People still live only around 100 years or less. Saving the planet doesn't mean anything to the dead. Besides, if you can't save the planet (which you can't), why waste time on it? First learn how to live potentially for 1,000 years. Then, after 200 years, you might gain enough wisdom and knowledge to do a little to save the planet.

According to the scientists, the theoretical maximum life expectancy is around 125 years. This would mean that irrespective of the advance in medical science, the human lifespan is unlikely to increase much further.

[dondexter]

It is our planet, our home... to the extent that we're capable, I think it is our responsibility as the human race and dominant species on this planet to do something about it.

[Fireblazer]

It is our planet, our home... to the extent that we're capable, I think it is our responsibility as the human race and dominant species on this planet to do something about it.

Practically, we destroyed everything from what we had to leave to our descendants. The resources of the earth are almost at an end. But mankind still continues to destroy the earth, not thinking about saving it and saving ourselves.

[BADecker]

People still live only around 100 years or less. Saving the planet doesn't mean anything to the dead. Besides, if you can't save the planet (which you can't), why waste time on it? First learn how to live potentially for 1,000 years. Then, after 200 years, you might gain enough wisdom and knowledge to do a little to save the planet.

According to the scientists, the theoretical maximum life expectancy is around 125 years. This would mean that irrespective of the advance in medical science, the human lifespan is unlikely to increase much further.

Over a hundred years ago scientists said they knew everything that there was to know. That was before rockets went into outer space. That was before we had atomic power and cars all over the place. No heart transplants back then.

Why would they think that they have figured it all out now?

[HabBear]

Is there any time left? I thought we've passed the point of no return?

In the context of fossil fuels, there's some logic in using them up so we're forced move on to another fuel but we risk doing too much damage getting there. There's little logic in stopping from using fossil fuels completely...not because it wouldn't halt the damage but because it's completely unrealistic to assume it would be possible to get people to do that. What needs to happen a gradual change from fossil fuels to renewable energy.

Renewable energy initiatives need money for investment to bring efficiency and scale to the idea. A good portion of that money should come from the revenue generated from fossil fuels.

[crwth]

First of all, we all live on the same planet, EARTH. If you reside in a home and you get mad at people that destroy something in your home, shouldn't you feel the same way? It's everyone's home, and there are a lot of people neglecting the rules and just doesn't care about the environment, which is part of our home on Earth. You are stupid if you think you don't need to save the earth.

[Sithara007]

First of all, we all live on the same planet, EARTH. If you reside in a home and you get mad at people that destroy something in your home, shouldn't you feel the same way? It's everyone's home, and there are a lot of people neglecting the rules and just doesn't care about the environment, which is part of our home on Earth. You are stupid if you think you don't need to save the earth.

See, the problem is that the destruction will not remain confined to a particular country or region. For example, if someone cuts down forests in Brazil, its effects will not be limited to just Brazil. Everyone living in the planet will face the consequences.

[gabmen]

First of all, we all live on the same planet, EARTH. If you reside in a home and you get mad at people that destroy something in your home, shouldn't you feel the same way? It's everyone's home, and there are a lot of people neglecting the rules and just doesn't care about the environment, which is part of our home on Earth. You are stupid if you think you don't need to save the earth.

See, the problem is that the destruction will not remain confined to a particular country or region. For example, if someone cuts down forests in Brazil, its effects will not be limited to just Brazil. Everyone living in the planet will face the consequences.

Yeah and the sad part is that a lot of powerful people fail to realize how important it is for us to make a move now to save our planet. We've been blindly ignoring the signs which may make it too late for us when we realize to act

[Japan_peopleffs]

People still live only around 100 years or less. Saving the planet doesn't mean anything to the dead. Besides, if you can't save the planet (which you can't), why waste time on it? First learn how to live potentially for 1,000 years. Then, after 200 years, you might gain enough wisdom and knowledge to do a little to save the planet.

Well, the person knows that he can live a maximum of 100 years and not sweat about saving the planet. He wants to live to the fullest and do not deny himself anything, do not bother with all kinds of global warming. Sometimes someone can think about saving the planet, but he will not want to lose his precious time to take everything from this life.

[Sithara007]

First of all, we all live on the same planet, EARTH. If you reside in a home and you get mad at people that destroy something in your home, shouldn't you feel the same way? It's everyone's home, and there are a lot of people neglecting the rules and just doesn't care about the environment, which is part of our home on Earth. You are stupid if you think you don't need to save the earth.

See, the problem is that the destruction will not remain confined to a particular country or region. For example, if someone cuts down forests in Brazil, its effects will not be limited to just Brazil. Everyone living in the planet will face the consequences.

Yeah and the sad part is that a lot of powerful people fail to realize how important it is for us to make a move now to save our planet. We've been blindly ignoring the signs which may make it too late for us when we realize to act

The problem is that even if 99% of the population complies with the necessary measures to save the planet, the remaining 1% will make sure that the planet will be uninhabitable in the long term. There are countries such as Saudi Arabia and China, which have rejected steps to slow down global warming and other negative trends.

[olyaru]

People still live only around 100 years or less. Saving the planet doesn't mean anything to the dead. Besides, if you can't save the planet (which you can't), why waste time on it? First learn how to live potentially for 1,000 years. Then, after 200 years, you might gain enough wisdom and knowledge to do a little to save the planet.

Well, the person knows that he can live a maximum of 100 years and not sweat about saving the planet. He wants to live to the fullest and do not deny himself anything, do not bother with all kinds of global warming. Sometimes someone can think about saving the planet, but he will not want to lose his precious time to take everything from this life.

You really said it right. People live so little and nobody wants to waste time anywhere. Everyone laughs will enjoy life and before that happens to the planet all do not care.

[darkseid1199]

We are living in an era where the leader of the most powerful country refuses to believe in Global Warming, by refusing to believe in global warming isn't Trump indirectly implying that factors that causes global warming are non existent as well.

[Sithara007]

We are living in an era where the leader of the most powerful country refuses to believe in Global Warming, by refusing to believe in global warming isn't Trump indirectly implying that factors that causes global warming are non existent as well.

I agree with most of Trump's policies. But not with these ones. He need to realize that continuing with the coal-powered thermal power plants will make the planet uninhabitable for our grandchildren and their children. Survival comes above politics.

[Mometaskers]

And here now we have a world leader claiming that global warming is a hoax made by China. That definitely isn't helping. We need more research into renewable energy and transitioning into electric. Us private individuals do not have the resources to do all these. The only thing we can do is reduce our energy consumption and I suppose even that would be hard to do considering that every thing we do either need electricity or oil.

[freedomno1]

Global warming can be reversed but it should be implemented on a multi-modal front.

By manufacturing oxygen as a waste product in the production cycle. By that I mean more investment in buying trees and making farms ideally also solving some food problems in Africa... instead of clear-cutting for agriculture make the trees and food local.

The alternative is just sending off Aid and living on a prayer.
Profit and Venture capital while developing a country while developing a means of sustainability is real growth.
Also infrastructure to reach those destinations else logistics will result in famines as we already observe.

And a powerful army cough of the UN cough that can defend the trees, food production and road development.

[yoseph]

Wow i never knew it could be reversed i just googled it and its true, If planting tree to reverse global warming can really i suggest every household plant a tree at least and they should clap down on illegal logging. That's rampant in Africa.

[E-shipper]

Wow i never knew it could be reversed i just googled it and its true, If planting tree to reverse global warming can really i suggest every household plant a tree at least and they should clap down on illegal logging. That's rampant in Africa.

The planting of trees is good, but in fact the plants produce oxygen in the process of photosynthesis approximately as much as they consume themselves. The climate of the planet is changing, but the person to this is almost not involved. Most of the impact on global warming is solar activity.