Redrose
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2016, 08:12:54 PM |
|
Claymore v6 is a blessing !!! Now, ZCash came a lot more profitable ! It is now even twice more profitable than Ethereum ! I gained an overal of 160 H/s on 2x RX 470 and 2x R9 380 ! Calymore ![Kiss](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/kiss.gif) .
|
|
|
|
GabryRox
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2016, 08:13:11 PM |
|
In the end, which one appear to you to be the more reliable : Nanopool or Flypool ? (in terms of reported hashrate accuracy, effective payment etc ...)
This is what I have heard from zcash forums Flypool hash rate is all over the place but payouts are on time Nana pool hash rate is stable but payouts sometimes get delayed I mine at flypool and I can say payouts are on time and hash rate is up an down My rig is doing about 700h/s according to claymore, but Nanopool show something closer to 600 than 700. Will try flypool to compare. NB : I have many payout all the day from Nanopool , no worries about it. But not sure to be paid as much as I should ! I havent used nanopool but can share my experience with flypool. Yes, the reported hash-rate is all over the place... my graph looks like the Rocky Mountain range lol! Since going to v5 a few hours ago, I have been bouncing anywhere in between 350 & 450 h/r. But... they do pay out very consistently, which is very important given the volatility of ZEC.
|
|
|
|
GabryRox
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2016, 08:17:47 PM |
|
Claymore v6 is a blessing !!! Now, ZCash came a lot more profitable ! It is now even twice more profitable than Ethereum ! I gained an overal of 160 H/s on 2x RX 470 and 2x R9 380 ! Calymore ![Kiss](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/kiss.gif) . yup, these big h/r increases alone have kept ZEC mining profitable vs ETH. Even going back to v4 it would probably be close to a toss-up but v6 at least doubles the h/r of v2, or at least that's what it seems like based on early reports. I just started running v5 this morning and went from 65 to 110 on my RX 470s! While that was amazing it looks like another 30-40 is possible with v6. Still waiting to see more posts about wattage draw and heat with v6 since i am away from my rig this week but v5 had no increases vs v4 but we will see. Saw at least 2 people post on the Claymore thread that v6 increased wattage pull by about 10-15W per card, but others have refuted that so who knows.
|
|
|
|
Redrose
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2016, 08:19:41 PM Last edit: November 15, 2016, 09:17:11 PM by Redrose |
|
Claymore v6 is a blessing !!! Now, ZCash came a lot more profitable ! It is now even twice more profitable than Ethereum ! I gained an overal of 160 H/s on 2x RX 470 and 2x R9 380 ! Calymore ![Kiss](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/kiss.gif) . yup, these big h/r increases alone have kept ZEC mining profitable vs ETH. Even going back to v4 it would probably be close to a toss-up but v6 at least doubles the h/r of v2, or at least that's what it seems like based on early reports. I just started running v5 this morning and went from 65 to 110 on my RX 470s! While that was amazing it looks like another 30-40 is possible with v6. Still waiting to see more posts about wattage draw and heat with v6 since i am away from my rig this week but v5 had no increases vs v4 but we will see. Saw at least 2 people post on the Claymore thread that v6 increased wattage pull by about 10-15W per card, but others have refuted that so who knows. I'm at 75~80W for about 130 H/s on my RX 470s. For the R9 380, I can't unfortunately tell you since there is not a precise wattmeter included in Afterburner for it.
I'd like to know some things : -What is the real utility of the intensity ? I checked all : 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4, and what I've found is very minimalistic. No more than 10 H/s of difference and no more than a few watts of consumption. So I went for nothing specified (so 4 according to the automatic text that displays when you open the miner command). Is it a wise choice according to you ? -What is your pool ? I've been on Flypool for a long time, after a few days passed on Suprnova and Coinmine, that did not satisfied me. I've still not done a complete day on Flypool, but I'll try to do that, to know what's my real earnings there. The problem is that I can't compare to anything else given the numbers going crazily down or high. I wouldn't mind earning 5-10% on Flypool if it is consistent because of the sleek design that I love.
|
|
|
|
vg54dett
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2016, 08:26:43 PM |
|
WOW!! CZM 6.0 is awesome!!! Getting 140S/s+ on my MSI RX470 4GBs ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Sampled v6 on my rigs: 290x at 166-168 H/s - speechless! R9-390 at 177-180 H/s - OMG! RX 480 at 140-142 H/s - best improvement since v5. R9-Nano at 191-194 H/s - OMG x 100 ! I am really off my seat on the R9-Nanos. I think the HBM memory on the Nanos and Furys makes a big a difference. These Nanos are also -100mV BIOS mod already so I dont even touch any AB settings, just install v6 put -i 4 and let it rip! Citronick, could you remind me what are your 290x settings ? Because I'm only at 150 per gpu (comparing to your 165/170 range) For information , my RX470 got 140
|
|
|
|
rawbert
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2016, 08:30:26 PM |
|
WOW!! CZM 6.0 is awesome!!! Getting 140S/s+ on my MSI RX470 4GBs ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Sampled v6 on my rigs: 290x at 166-168 H/s - speechless! R9-390 at 177-180 H/s - OMG! RX 480 at 140-142 H/s - best improvement since v5. R9-Nano at 191-194 H/s - OMG x 100 ! I am really off my seat on the R9-Nanos. I think the HBM memory on the Nanos and Furys makes a big a difference. These Nanos are also -100mV BIOS mod already so I dont even touch any AB settings, just install v6 put -i 4 and let it rip! That's awesome man! Too bad those nano's are so damn expensive.. Can't wait to see the R9 490 released ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
AriesIV10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1006
Mine for a Bit
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2016, 09:35:24 PM Last edit: November 15, 2016, 10:12:03 PM by AriesIV10 |
|
WOW!! CZM 6.0 is awesome!!! Getting 140S/s+ on my MSI RX470 4GBs ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Sampled v6 on my rigs: 290x at 166-168 H/s - speechless! R9-390 at 177-180 H/s - OMG! RX 480 at 140-142 H/s - best improvement since v5. R9-Nano at 191-194 H/s - OMG x 100 ! I am really off my seat on the R9-Nanos. I think the HBM memory on the Nanos and Furys makes a big a difference. These Nanos are also -100mV BIOS mod already so I dont even touch any AB settings, just install v6 put -i 4 and let it rip! That's awesome man! Too bad those nano's are so damn expensive.. Can't wait to see the R9 490 released ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) 7 MSI RX 470 X: 985 H/s 955 Watts at the wall 68 ave Watts (MSI Afterburner) 57C ave GPU Temp (MSI Afterburner) 47C CPU Temp 1500 Strap MSI Afterburner settings: 1950 Memory Clock, 1150 Core Clock
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3850
Merit: 4227
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2016, 09:46:52 PM |
|
Claymore v6 is a blessing !!! Now, ZCash came a lot more profitable ! It is now even twice more profitable than Ethereum ! I gained an overal of 160 H/s on 2x RX 470 and 2x R9 380 ! Calymore ![Kiss](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/kiss.gif) . this edge will disappear by tomorrow since everybody else update as well (even with constant prices), but dumping will increase, so a dip might ensue as well. I split my rigs between eth and zec-sometime one has advantage, other time the opposite. I like the fact that zec used less wattage before, not sure about now.
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2016, 09:47:32 PM |
|
WOW!! CZM 6.0 is awesome!!! Getting 140S/s+ on my MSI RX470 4GBs ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Sampled v6 on my rigs: 290x at 166-168 H/s - speechless! R9-390 at 177-180 H/s - OMG! RX 480 at 140-142 H/s - best improvement since v5. R9-Nano at 191-194 H/s - OMG x 100 ! I am really off my seat on the R9-Nanos. I think the HBM memory on the Nanos and Furys makes a big a difference. These Nanos are also -100mV BIOS mod already so I dont even touch any AB settings, just install v6 put -i 4 and let it rip! Citronick, could you remind me what are your 290x settings ? Because I'm only at 150 per gpu (comparing to your 165/170 range) For information , my RX470 got 140 No settings - ie probably stock, buts its a BIOS modded card. I didn't even bother with AB because the the 290x is flashed with the almighty Stilt BIOS. This rig has 2 x 290 and 1 x 290x. Its my test rig but when not in test mode, it joins the farm mining ZEC or whatever the flavor of the month is. I use to tinker with settings with AB but after Stilt bios - I don't bother anymore because its wattage came down a bunch and met my objectives.
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
ps_jb
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2016, 10:37:32 PM |
|
Got increase from 1100 to 1300 H/s
Very cool release!
|
|
|
|
philipma1957 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 8354
'The right to privacy matters'
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2016, 11:28:48 PM |
|
Got increase from 1100 to 1300 H/s
Very cool release!
yeah I am over 2k now so pretty good.
|
|
|
|
LoneRangir
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2016, 11:47:49 PM |
|
Looks like ZCash Classic (ZCL) is starting to be a thing. It is NOT on Poloniex or Bittrex, yet, though. No block reward goes to the Devs. You can mine it at suprnova.
I'll give it a try with my CPUs , since I turned them off of ZEC. Maybe throw one rig at them too. See what happens.
How do you sell it ? https://c-cex.com/?p=zcl-btcAnd now bittrex
|
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 16, 2016, 12:14:28 AM |
|
Claymore v6 is a blessing !!! Now, ZCash came a lot more profitable ! It is now even twice more profitable than Ethereum ! I gained an overal of 160 H/s on 2x RX 470 and 2x R9 380 ! Calymore ![Kiss](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/kiss.gif) . yup, these big h/r increases alone have kept ZEC mining profitable vs ETH. For a day or two while the bulk of folks upgrade, then it's back to the same level more-or-less.
|
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind! Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin) 1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
philipma1957 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 8354
'The right to privacy matters'
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 16, 2016, 12:43:28 AM |
|
Claymore v6 is a blessing !!! Now, ZCash came a lot more profitable ! It is now even twice more profitable than Ethereum ! I gained an overal of 160 H/s on 2x RX 470 and 2x R9 380 ! Calymore ![Kiss](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/kiss.gif) . yup, these big h/r increases alone have kept ZEC mining profitable vs ETH. For a day or two while the bulk of folks upgrade, then it's back to the same level more-or-less. not if people were on linux. I think this is faster then any linux for the moment.
|
|
|
|
ps_jb
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 16, 2016, 01:10:04 AM |
|
not if people were on linux. I think this is faster then any linux for the moment.
Interesting, can Claymore get more in v7 ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) ?
|
|
|
|
Tmdz
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 16, 2016, 01:17:09 AM |
|
Claymore v6 is a blessing !!! Now, ZCash came a lot more profitable ! It is now even twice more profitable than Ethereum ! I gained an overal of 160 H/s on 2x RX 470 and 2x R9 380 ! Calymore ![Kiss](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/kiss.gif) . yup, these big h/r increases alone have kept ZEC mining profitable vs ETH. For a day or two while the bulk of folks upgrade, then it's back to the same level more-or-less. not if people were on linux. I think this is faster then any linux for the moment. Not to bust any bubbles but the profit will be the same in a little bit as everyone switches over to v6. Optiminer is just as fast for linux. https://github.com/Optiminer/OptiminerZcash
|
|
|
|
philipma1957 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 8354
'The right to privacy matters'
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 16, 2016, 02:43:27 AM |
|
Claymore v6 is a blessing !!! Now, ZCash came a lot more profitable ! It is now even twice more profitable than Ethereum ! I gained an overal of 160 H/s on 2x RX 470 and 2x R9 380 ! Calymore ![Kiss](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/kiss.gif) . yup, these big h/r increases alone have kept ZEC mining profitable vs ETH. For a day or two while the bulk of folks upgrade, then it's back to the same level more-or-less. not if people were on linux. I think this is faster then any linux for the moment. Not to bust any bubbles but the profit will be the same in a little bit as everyone switches over to v6. Optiminer is just as fast for linux. https://github.com/Optiminer/OptiminerZcashyeah it has been an ebb and flow. but maybe there is more to squeeze out here.
|
|
|
|
vg54dett
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 16, 2016, 08:58:06 AM |
|
WOW!! CZM 6.0 is awesome!!! Getting 140S/s+ on my MSI RX470 4GBs ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Sampled v6 on my rigs: 290x at 166-168 H/s - speechless! R9-390 at 177-180 H/s - OMG! RX 480 at 140-142 H/s - best improvement since v5. R9-Nano at 191-194 H/s - OMG x 100 ! I am really off my seat on the R9-Nanos. I think the HBM memory on the Nanos and Furys makes a big a difference. These Nanos are also -100mV BIOS mod already so I dont even touch any AB settings, just install v6 put -i 4 and let it rip! Citronick, could you remind me what are your 290x settings ? Because I'm only at 150 per gpu (comparing to your 165/170 range) For information , my RX470 got 140 No settings - ie probably stock, buts its a BIOS modded card. I didn't even bother with AB because the the 290x is flashed with the almighty Stilt BIOS. This rig has 2 x 290 and 1 x 290x. Its my test rig but when not in test mode, it joins the farm mining ZEC or whatever the flavor of the month is. I use to tinker with settings with AB but after Stilt bios - I don't bother anymore because its wattage came down a bunch and met my objectives. Strange , I'm on the StiltBios too but I can't achieve your hashrate on 290s. But 150 il already fine !
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 16, 2016, 09:00:32 AM |
|
WOW!! CZM 6.0 is awesome!!! Getting 140S/s+ on my MSI RX470 4GBs ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Sampled v6 on my rigs: 290x at 166-168 H/s - speechless! R9-390 at 177-180 H/s - OMG! RX 480 at 140-142 H/s - best improvement since v5. R9-Nano at 191-194 H/s - OMG x 100 ! I am really off my seat on the R9-Nanos. I think the HBM memory on the Nanos and Furys makes a big a difference. These Nanos are also -100mV BIOS mod already so I dont even touch any AB settings, just install v6 put -i 4 and let it rip! Citronick, could you remind me what are your 290x settings ? Because I'm only at 150 per gpu (comparing to your 165/170 range) For information , my RX470 got 140 No settings - ie probably stock, buts its a BIOS modded card. I didn't even bother with AB because the the 290x is flashed with the almighty Stilt BIOS. This rig has 2 x 290 and 1 x 290x. Its my test rig but when not in test mode, it joins the farm mining ZEC or whatever the flavor of the month is. I use to tinker with settings with AB but after Stilt bios - I don't bother anymore because its wattage came down a bunch and met my objectives. Strange , I'm on the StiltBios too but I can't achieve your hashrate on 290s. But 150 il already fine , Is your 290x seated on 16x PCI slot?
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
vg54dett
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 16, 2016, 12:44:29 PM |
|
no everything on risers ! (16x and 1x , all set to gen1 in bios)
|
|
|
|
|