I assume it was answered before, but could not find it on the last 40+ pages. I would greatly appreciate if anyone answers this:
If NXT assets are transferred to private addresses, would it be possible to fund those wallets with revenues when available? If not, all assets have to be in open addresses?
I saw someone asked about 1million JUMBLR assets somewhere and nobody answered that. I am curious too, if there are 500k NXTprivacy, why is there twice as much JUMBLR with 1:1 exchange ratio?
I am pretty sure it's somewhere in the thread, but can't really locate these answers.
Very good job done with KMD, will definitely participate in MNZ's dICO.
to receive revshares, it needs to be in a transparent address, otherwise there is no way to know how much is where when it is in private form. that is why it is private.
this is why I designed JUMBLR to work the way it does, where it comes back out into a transparent address that is unlinked. Of course it is best to run silent for a while before bringing it back out to increase the effective anon set.
If I understand what you want, I think the following sequence is a bit of work, but will achieve your goals, ie. able to receive revshares in a private way:
1. use barterDEX to convert BOTS (just used as an example) into KMD
2. JUMBLR the KMD into t->z and z->z and wait a while
3. after "a while" (the longer the more privacy), run JUMBLR with a totally unrelated secret address (preferably on a different node and definitely using a different IP address!). This gets the KMD to a totally unlinked address.
4. barterDEX KMD back into BOTS
Now you have BOTS whose only history is the KMD that came out of z->t transaction and has no linkage to you on the blockchain.
Half the JUMBLR has already been processed and moved to the assetchain, when I do that I burn it on the NXT chain so we can keep track of how much is left to be converted.