Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2021, 05:17:13 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.21.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 [189] 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Cryptopia Cryptocurrency Platform Services and Development  (Read 168187 times)
DADIBLAND
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 341
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 18, 2019, 09:47:16 PM
 #3761


In few last months all other coins, especially those coins which blockchains were fully synced, were discriminated against Bitcoin, Litecoin and Doge! This exchange didn't allow withdrawals of the very most of the coins enabled to trading. That looks like in advance PLANNED DISCRIMINATION!

I think and it looks like very well PLANNED plan and activity by this exchange. Can anybody confirm this?



YES
1620494233
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1620494233

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1620494233
Reply with quote  #2

1620494233
Report to moderator
1620494233
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1620494233

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1620494233
Reply with quote  #2

1620494233
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1620494233
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1620494233

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1620494233
Reply with quote  #2

1620494233
Report to moderator
1620494233
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1620494233

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1620494233
Reply with quote  #2

1620494233
Report to moderator
KriptoGuruTR
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 19


View Profile
May 18, 2019, 09:54:17 PM
 #3762

Come on lafu. I don't even understand why you are still here. This is a scam...
pinoycash
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 514



View Profile WWW
May 19, 2019, 02:24:53 AM
 #3763

If 14% of their total holdings was hack, How come these thieves are saying there are not enough money to cover everyone's money! they already haircut people's balance to cover the losses in the hack.

Where's the remaining 86% money own by their customers? It means they are using people's deposit to fund their operation while collecting trading fees and listing fees. IN this case, They are all thieves and scammers, IMHO they should go to jail for their actions.

It is exactly the reason why they had to call in the liquidators - because they cannot use other peoples funds or continue trading if they are insolvent.

It doesn't even necessarily mean that there is not enough funds to cover the debt. It could be that they do not have enough cash at hand to pay for their bills going forward.

The volume on the exchange was dead. You can't keep trading if you are likely to run out of money to pay for costs at some stage (i.e. server lease, wages and building rental) . The post hack work that they have done will just assist the liquidators with resolving it faster.

In this case all customers should be the priority and be the first to get paid in the liquidation process. One thing, Why they don't just allow all users to withdraw their money/coins from the exchange instead of asking help from liquidators which probably incur more fees and more money that they don't have.

.
[
.
]
.
SCOIN
.
[
.
.
]
.

.
[
.
.
|
.
|
.
.
]
estenity
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1766
Merit: 523


View Profile
May 19, 2019, 02:35:24 AM
 #3764

in the case of MtGox there were remaining btc that later increased in value.
here what coins are left in the 86%? we are in a baby bull market.

also we are not shareholders.
Noojna
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 683
Merit: 501


AVANTAGE - Blockchain Loyalty System


View Profile WWW
May 19, 2019, 05:28:18 AM
 #3765

If 14% of their total holdings was hack, How come these thieves are saying there are not enough money to cover everyone's money! they already haircut people's balance to cover the losses in the hack.

Where's the remaining 86% money own by their customers? It means they are using people's deposit to fund their operation while collecting trading fees and listing fees. IN this case, They are all thieves and scammers, IMHO they should go to jail for their actions.

It is exactly the reason why they had to call in the liquidators - because they cannot use other peoples funds or continue trading if they are insolvent.

It doesn't even necessarily mean that there is not enough funds to cover the debt. It could be that they do not have enough cash at hand to pay for their bills going forward.

The volume on the exchange was dead. You can't keep trading if you are likely to run out of money to pay for costs at some stage (i.e. server lease, wages and building rental) . The post hack work that they have done will just assist the liquidators with resolving it faster.

In this case all customers should be the priority and be the first to get paid in the liquidation process. One thing, Why they don't just allow all users to withdraw their money/coins from the exchange instead of asking help from liquidators which probably incur more fees and more money that they don't have.

This is not how the law works in western countries. Of course, money being deposited IN TRUST will go back to their rightful owner; however, crypto is not considered money and it's definitely not IN TRUST. So, basically the liquidators can do whatetever they want with it. There will not be anything left for us, customers, this is how it works now at this point in time, in this society.

I will say this again, people, don't leave coin at exchanges.


  ███████████
  █████████████████████
                        ████████████████████████████                     
████             ███████████████        ███████████████             ███
  ███████       ███████████                              ██████████         ████
  ███████      ████████        ██████████████       ████████    ████████
   ██████    ████████        ██████████████████    ███████    ███████████
  ███████    ████████    ████████████████████  ████████  ██████████████
  ██████    ███████      ███████████            ██    ████████  ████████    █████
  ██████       ██████       ████████         ██████       ███████    ███████          █████
  ██████    ██████    ████████    ███████████████████  ████████  ███    █████
  ██████    ███████  ███████      ██████████████████    ████████  █████    █████
  ██████    ██████    ██████    ████████████████████    ██████     ██████    █████
  █████    ███████   ██████      ███████            ████████  ██████    ███████  █████
██████    ██████    ██████    ██████    ██████    ██████    ██████    ██████  █████
██████    ██████    ██████  ███████  ███████    ██████    ██████    ██████  █████
██████    ██████    ██████  ███████  ███████    ██████    ██████    ██████    ████
██████    ██████    ██████    ██████    ██████    ██████    ██████    ██████  █████
  █████    ███████  ██████       ██████               ███████  ██████       █████    █████
  ██████    ██████    ██████   ████████████████████   ██████    ██████    █████
  ██████    █████    ███████   ███████████████████   ██████       ██████    █████
███████    ██    ████████  ███████████████████      ███████   ██████    █████
  ██████          ███████    ████████  ████████      █████████    ███████    █████
███████    ████████   ███████                      ██████████      ███████    █████
  ██████████████      ███████  ████████████████████      ███████    ██████
  ████████████  █████████  ███████████████████      ████████    ██████
  ██████████  ████████     ████████████████         █████████    ██████
  ███████      ██████████                ██                ██████████      ██████
  █████           ██████████████            ██████████████           ████
  ███                   ██████████████████████████████                   █
  ███████████████████████
  ███████████████
🔥 🔥»📝 BTC 💬
pornluver
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 890
Merit: 502


View Profile
May 19, 2019, 06:46:57 AM
 #3766

If 14% of their total holdings was hack, How come these thieves are saying there are not enough money to cover everyone's money! they already haircut people's balance to cover the losses in the hack.

Where's the remaining 86% money own by their customers? It means they are using people's deposit to fund their operation while collecting trading fees and listing fees. IN this case, They are all thieves and scammers, IMHO they should go to jail for their actions.

It is exactly the reason why they had to call in the liquidators - because they cannot use other peoples funds or continue trading if they are insolvent.

It doesn't even necessarily mean that there is not enough funds to cover the debt. It could be that they do not have enough cash at hand to pay for their bills going forward.

The volume on the exchange was dead. You can't keep trading if you are likely to run out of money to pay for costs at some stage (i.e. server lease, wages and building rental) . The post hack work that they have done will just assist the liquidators with resolving it faster.

In this case all customers should be the priority and be the first to get paid in the liquidation process. One thing, Why they don't just allow all users to withdraw their money/coins from the exchange instead of asking help from liquidators which probably incur more fees and more money that they don't have.

This is not how the law works in western countries. Of course, money being deposited IN TRUST will go back to their rightful owner; however, crypto is not considered money and it's definitely not IN TRUST. So, basically the liquidators can do whatetever they want with it. There will not be anything left for us, customers, this is how it works now at this point in time, in this society.

I will say this again, people, don't leave coin at exchanges.

Are you a lawyer?
INEZUZU
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 19, 2019, 09:02:47 AM
 #3767

If 14% of their total holdings was hack, How come these thieves are saying there are not enough money to cover everyone's money! they already haircut people's balance to cover the losses in the hack.

Where's the remaining 86% money own by their customers? It means they are using people's deposit to fund their operation while collecting trading fees and listing fees. IN this case, They are all thieves and scammers, IMHO they should go to jail for their actions.


Indeed, according to the results of the January hacker attack, Cryptopia’s exchange did not incur financial losses, since it shifted all losses to the client’s balance sheets. (I have deducted 14% BTC and 49% LTC). What is the reason why they became financially insolvent and decided to close the exchange, taking all the remaining money?
sluppy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2010
Merit: 1041



View Profile
May 19, 2019, 11:24:36 AM
 #3768

If 14% of their total holdings was hack, How come these thieves are saying there are not enough money to cover everyone's money! they already haircut people's balance to cover the losses in the hack.

Where's the remaining 86% money own by their customers? It means they are using people's deposit to fund their operation while collecting trading fees and listing fees. IN this case, They are all thieves and scammers, IMHO they should go to jail for their actions.


Indeed, according to the results of the January hacker attack, Cryptopia’s exchange did not incur financial losses, since it shifted all losses to the client’s balance sheets. (I have deducted 14% BTC and 49% LTC). What is the reason why they became financially insolvent and decided to close the exchange, taking all the remaining money?

They have running costs to operate the exchange the building people that work there  server costs . when they closed for all those months they lost their customers trust so when they opened again not many people where trading so they could get income from fee's they saw the money trying to leave the exchange so they quit instead of working a little longer so everyone could have withdrawn their coins they just walked away.

Also  now the liquidators are securing all coins and checking funds .. hmm ok what the hell have they been doing all these months because that's exactly what cryptopia was telling us that they where doing at that time.


The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke -- May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house.George Carlin
We pay for life with death , so everything in between should be free. Bill Hicks -- It is during our darkest moments that we must focus to see the light. Aristotle
Do not dwell in the past, do not dream of the future, concentrate the mind on the present moment. Buddha -- The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing. Socrates
Slkp
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 436
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 19, 2019, 11:32:13 AM
 #3769

Do you remember the time when topia had a cool steel design? Then for some reason they rewrite frontend and probably backend. A shitty green design. And then they were hacked because of valnurability in backend. In conclusion: dont try make good things better. Cool
xtraelv
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1803


฿ear ride on the rainbow slide


View Profile
May 19, 2019, 02:09:44 PM
 #3770

If 14% of their total holdings was hack, How come these thieves are saying there are not enough money to cover everyone's money! they already haircut people's balance to cover the losses in the hack.

Where's the remaining 86% money own by their customers? It means they are using people's deposit to fund their operation while collecting trading fees and listing fees. IN this case, They are all thieves and scammers, IMHO they should go to jail for their actions.

It is exactly the reason why they had to call in the liquidators - because they cannot use other peoples funds or continue trading if they are insolvent.

It doesn't even necessarily mean that there is not enough funds to cover the debt. It could be that they do not have enough cash at hand to pay for their bills going forward.

The volume on the exchange was dead. You can't keep trading if you are likely to run out of money to pay for costs at some stage (i.e. server lease, wages and building rental) . The post hack work that they have done will just assist the liquidators with resolving it faster.

In this case all customers should be the priority and be the first to get paid in the liquidation process. One thing, Why they don't just allow all users to withdraw their money/coins from the exchange instead of asking help from liquidators which probably incur more fees and more money that they don't have.

This is not how the law works in western countries. Of course, money being deposited IN TRUST will go back to their rightful owner; however, crypto is not considered money and it's definitely not IN TRUST. So, basically the liquidators can do whatetever they want with it. There will not be anything left for us, customers, this is how it works now at this point in time, in this society.

I will say this again, people, don't leave coin at exchanges.

Are you a lawyer?

Quote
Your Coin Balances are operated by us, and represent entries in your name on the general ledger of ownership of Coins maintained and held by us. This means the Coins in your deposit wallets may be pooled in our internal accounts with other Users' Coins at any time.
Each User's entry in the general ledger of ownership of Coins is held by us, on trust, for that User.


https://web.archive.org/web/20190113164519/https:/www.cryptopia.co.nz/Home/Terms#4


https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6535069065508200448/

We are surrounded by legends on this forum. Phenomenal successes and catastrophic failures. Then there are the scams. This forum is a digital museum.  
* The most iconic historic bitcointalk threads.* Satoshi * Cypherpunks*MtGox*Bitcointalk hacks*pHiShInG* Silk Road*Pirateat40*Knightmb*Miner shams*Forum scandals*BBCode*
Troll spotting*Thank you to madnessteat for my custom avatar hat.
RivAngE
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 168


What doesn't kill you, makes you stronger


View Profile
May 19, 2019, 02:29:48 PM
 #3771

If 14% of their total holdings was hack, How come these thieves are saying there are not enough money to cover everyone's money! they already haircut people's balance to cover the losses in the hack.

Where's the remaining 86% money own by their customers? It means they are using people's deposit to fund their operation while collecting trading fees and listing fees. IN this case, They are all thieves and scammers, IMHO they should go to jail for their actions.


Indeed, according to the results of the January hacker attack, Cryptopia’s exchange did not incur financial losses, since it shifted all losses to the client’s balance sheets. (I have deducted 14% BTC and 49% LTC). What is the reason why they became financially insolvent and decided to close the exchange, taking all the remaining money?

I think the reason is simple.
Since they chose to...
(1) roll the cost of the hack (their inability) to the customers,
(2) they were very slow in reopening the exchange, and
(3) when they finally started resuming the business they were doing so in such a bad manner (like allowing trading without allowing deposit/withdraw)
... they completely lost the last few people had at least a little faith in their exchange.
So when they tried to resume their business, it was probably obvious to them early on that there would only be withdrawals and almost no new deposits.
pinoycash
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 514



View Profile WWW
May 19, 2019, 02:50:58 PM
 #3772


Thanks for this one, Atleast 1 lawyer are sharing their own opinions on how this liquidation process will work. This will shed some light on majority of unanswered question on what will happen with customers funds. I still believe Justice will be serve and i am still hoping someone will spend a jail for this mess.

.
[
.
]
.
SCOIN
.
[
.
.
]
.

.
[
.
.
|
.
|
.
.
]
Labrader
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 24


View Profile
May 19, 2019, 10:28:44 PM
 #3773

It is exactly the reason why they had to call in the liquidators - because they cannot use other peoples funds or continue trading if they are insolvent.
That's not true. You don't have to involve a liquidator if you want to close a business. You simply close it, pay back all the concerned parties and that's that. And make no mistake, this is a voluntary liquidation, no one forced it upon them. It clearly says so in their company filings. A question remains: if voluntary, why not first receivership but straight to liquidation? Contrasting this with all their tweets saying they are on the way to resuming normal activity?

It doesn't even necessarily mean that there is not enough funds to cover the debt. It could be that they do not have enough cash at hand to pay for their bills going forward.
Again, wrong. The only real reason why one would call a liquidator is because they can't pay back and seek the protection of the liquidation process. No one is crazy to call someone who gets a fat cut if they can simply close a company.

Of course it's not that simple, we don't know how much was hacked, if indeed was a hack. Again, no reason not to post the hack TX, unless you want to hide something: amount, destination etc. So complete secrecy about the hack + voluntary liquidation = draw your own conclusions.
xtraelv
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1803


฿ear ride on the rainbow slide


View Profile
May 20, 2019, 01:34:00 AM
 #3774

It is exactly the reason why they had to call in the liquidators - because they cannot use other peoples funds or continue trading if they are insolvent.
That's not true. You don't have to involve a liquidator if you want to close a business. You simply close it, pay back all the concerned parties and that's that. And make no mistake, this is a voluntary liquidation, no one forced it upon them. It clearly says so in their company filings. A question remains: if voluntary, why not first receivership but straight to liquidation? Contrasting this with all their tweets saying they are on the way to resuming normal activity?

Nope. Not allowed under the Companies Act 1993
http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0105/203.0/DLM319570.html

Also I don't think you understand the terminology that you are using.

Receivership is where the assets are sold for the benefit of one secured creditor. Appointment is through enforcement of a clause in the deed or instrument that created the security.  

Liquidation is where the assets are returned or sold for the benefit of all creditors. A liquidator can be appointed by the company or by a creditor petitioning the court.
Where a company appoints a liquidator costs are saved because if a creditor petitions the court their legal fees are priority debt.






We are surrounded by legends on this forum. Phenomenal successes and catastrophic failures. Then there are the scams. This forum is a digital museum.  
* The most iconic historic bitcointalk threads.* Satoshi * Cypherpunks*MtGox*Bitcointalk hacks*pHiShInG* Silk Road*Pirateat40*Knightmb*Miner shams*Forum scandals*BBCode*
Troll spotting*Thank you to madnessteat for my custom avatar hat.
TheCryproMaster
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 401
Merit: 104


View Profile
May 20, 2019, 02:53:01 AM
 #3775

OK so there's something that's confusing me a lot regarding cryptos and liquidation. Particularly with MTgox and what happened to their customers and apologies in advance if I've got the wrong idea regarding this.

MTGox repaid their customers in USD value at the time of the liquidation, they did not return the coins users had.

If cryptopia does this in a few months and say we still go at the parabolic rate the market is going in now, can they do the same thing and pay back what the USD value is now?

What happens, if they do pay the $$$ value, to the coins left over. Who gets them?

Same question with MTgox, who or what entity is now owners of the bitcoins not paid out?

fapnnap
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 349
Merit: 2


View Profile
May 20, 2019, 05:33:43 AM
Merited by aggress0r (1)
 #3776

So did anyone see the latest star vs forces of evil? That's like 10000x sadder then what happened to cryptopia. Star destroys all magic in the end and the high commission dies reee
DADIBLAND
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 341
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 20, 2019, 09:15:56 AM
 #3777

We demand the imprisonment of criminals

And be a trial outside of New Zealand
RivAngE
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 168


What doesn't kill you, makes you stronger


View Profile
May 20, 2019, 10:57:05 AM
 #3778

OK so there's something that's confusing me a lot regarding cryptos and liquidation. Particularly with MTgox and what happened to their customers and apologies in advance if I've got the wrong idea regarding this.

MTGox repaid their customers in USD value at the time of the liquidation, they did not return the coins users had.

If cryptopia does this in a few months and say we still go at the parabolic rate the market is going in now, can they do the same thing and pay back what the USD value is now?

What happens, if they do pay the $$$ value, to the coins left over. Who gets them?

Same question with MTgox, who or what entity is now owners of the bitcoins not paid out?


My general understanding is that every time there is a pay-back to customers who lost their money, the method which results in the least possible returns is chosen.
If the BTC price drops, they'll return you the amount of BTC you lost. If the BTC price raises, they'll say that they'll refund whatever value their users were holding on "day x", so if you held 1 BTC on whatever day they like (hack-day or liquidation day? I dunno) and they'll refund you in 2 years when BTC's price could be $20k, then you'll receive $6k~$8k instead of $20k.
almightyruler
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2226
Merit: 1084


View Profile
May 20, 2019, 02:13:41 PM
 #3779

Has anyone done analysis of Cryptopia's hot wallets to see if funds have moved subsequent to their liquidation?
four3200
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 255



View Profile WWW
May 20, 2019, 02:30:06 PM
Last edit: May 20, 2019, 03:25:12 PM by four3200
 #3780

Scammers Next Scam
Scammer Assistant xtraelv
<< hat of scammer

The main problems with this exchange have to do with the fact that they are not accountable to anybody for anything. They aren't a registered business, they don't have any sort of licensing, and nobody knows where the owners or operators are located.

They started demanding KYC from all users after their company was dissolved, which is beyond weird. If they're not a real company, why do they need KYC? They aren't reporting to any government, they're not paying taxes; they're just a rogue operation who depend on either the loyalty of their user base (rapidly dissipating) or the naivete of new users to keep them going.

TradeSatoshi is down to $46k in trading volume per 24 hours; at a 0.1% fee this means they are only making $46 per day on trading fees. As huge withdrawal fees wasn't working in their favor, I believe they had to resort to the sudden KYC-for-everybody manuver as means to generate additional revenue. Plus, as I mentioned before, reputable exchanges don't use this as an excuse to with-hold customer funds and block them out of their accounts, even if it says they could according to their terms and conditions.

Its just bad business all the way around and potential users need to be warned about their practices.

They are actually legally registered in Hong Kong. I posted a search I had done earlier in the thread after someone posted that they were struck off on the UK register.

They were already registered in HK before they were struck off. So it appears to be a deliberate move to a new jurisdiction.


Tradesatoshi Ltd is incorporated in Hong Kong according to its terms:



https://tradesatoshi.com/Home/Terms

It is currently a registered company in Hong Kong according to the register.



https://www.icris.cr.gov.hk/csci/

I'm not sure where it was incorporated prior to this. It is likely that it moved its operation to Hong Kong prior to its de-registration in the UK.

Coinmarketcap shows a turnover of  $91k
https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/trade-satoshi/

With a buy 0.1% and sell 0.1% fee that would make $182 daily in fees
But they also charge for listing coins, tipping slots and airdrops.

Tradesatoshi - BEWARE! Blocking without reasons. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5118992.new#new
https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrencyTrading/comments/b2w8d6/tradesatoshi_accounts_blocking_beware/
https://www.trustpilot.com/review/tradesatoshi.com?languages=all
service thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1691388.540


Tradesatoshi.com belongs to Adam Clark.
Well he is also one of the owners of the now bancrupt exchange cryptopia.
All victims of cryptopia know now how they were cheated.
After the hack around 15% of funds were lost.
But most of the remaining cryptos were not able to be traded or withdrawn afterwards.
So Cryptopia made mode damage than the hackers.
False and missing information from the scammers at cryptopia.
All Funds inside are now lost.
But until the last day they allowed deposits, so they rose the damage.
Just keep that in mind, if you trade on tradesatoshi.com with at least one of the same guys...and think twice if you can trust them....

■▐ ▎▬▬▬▬▬▬ 7 YEAR CROWDSALE▐ ▎■BUY UNO ▬▬▬▬▬▬▐ ▎■
bigDog9kiloasicTALKTop-apocalypse#420jfa#PR0#form#coin#POSpoll#simpleDEX #open🐢
Pages: « 1 ... 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 [189] 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!