zelante
|
|
April 07, 2014, 08:48:14 PM |
|
In new 337.50 beta driver core clock for 750Ti again locked to +135 MHz You can use mod bios and set core mhz manualy. Question is Afterburner after restart drop to +135 or no? offtop: Very interesting doc http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~volkov/volkov10-GTC.pdf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
April 07, 2014, 08:48:33 PM |
|
Who care about scrypt? Dinosaurs and Dodos care
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
April 07, 2014, 08:49:37 PM |
|
yes, Volkovian style programming is legendary. But it doesn't really work when your kernel has high register use.
|
|
|
|
ManiacMiner
|
|
April 07, 2014, 09:00:12 PM |
|
In new 337.50 beta driver core clock for 750Ti again locked to +135 MHz You can use mod bios and set core mhz manualy. Question is Afterburner after restart drop to +135 or no? With mod bios we have more on energy costs. May have a way to find and replace file which responsible for frequency lock from old driver?
|
(つ ͡๏ ͜১ ͡๏ )つ[̲̅$̲̅(̲̅5̲̅)̲̅$̲̅]ε=ʕ ͡๏ ͜১ ͡๏ʔ=з
|
|
|
christian1980
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
April 07, 2014, 09:05:47 PM |
|
In new 337.50 beta driver core clock for 750Ti again locked to +135 MHz You can use mod bios and set core mhz manualy. Question is Afterburner after restart drop to +135 or no? With mod bios we have more on energy costs. May have a way to find and replace file which responsible for frequency lock from old driver? nonsense... if you mod the default clocks in the bios its the same as you put it into afterburner.
|
|
|
|
zelante
|
|
April 07, 2014, 09:23:20 PM |
|
yes, Volkovian style programming is legendary. But it doesn't really work when your kernel has high register use. About registers, after removing maxrregcount from nvcc string my stability was increased. Hashrate was stabilized too (min jumping from max hashrate). compile ccminer 0.5 with VS 2012 (cuda 6, compute 50, x86) testing on windows 8.1 x64, 2 x msi 750ti, nvidia driver 337.50.
|
|
|
|
guitarplinker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1024
|
|
April 07, 2014, 10:09:46 PM |
|
Does anybody know if the 337.50 drivers improve mining performance at all?
|
|
|
|
nomad1109
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Medichain: The Medical Big-Data Platform
|
|
April 07, 2014, 11:32:53 PM |
|
But the latter 2 are definitely on our radar as we're working on a super efficient groestl implementation.
Christian
What is the ballpark that people are getting currently mining Groestl Coin with a 750 ti? Honestly I can't find good instructions on how to get the wallet to sync... Anyone have an example of the qt.conf file to get it to talk to other nodes? I see people adding IP's to the file and saying that works, but they only ever post a list, and not really any examples of how it is added. When I google for other examples of the file for other coins they have other information in them about the coin, and not sure what to put there for groestl. Thanks for any help
|
|
|
|
xojex
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
|
|
April 07, 2014, 11:43:00 PM |
|
Honestly I can't find good instructions on how to get the wallet to sync...
Anyone have an example of the qt.conf file to get it to talk to other nodes?
I see people adding IP's to the file and saying that works, but they only ever post a list, and not really any examples of how it is added. When I google for other examples of the file for other coins they have other information in them about the coin, and not sure what to put there for groestl.
Thanks for any help
C:\Users\"YourUserName"\AppData\Roaming\GroestlCoin\GroestlCoin.conf listen=1 server=1 daemon=1 rpcuser=u rpcpassword=p rpcport=1441 addnode=107.170.2.22 addnode=31.220.48.98 addnode=92.234.241.91 addnode=217.44.27.235 addnode=193.242.149.63 addnode=209.126.71.54 addnode=79.117.53.154 addnode=92.39.203.216 addnode=61.55.141.196 addnode=151.41.36.112 addnode=74.91.18.210 addnode=222.65.39.59 addnode=83.242.125.165 addnode=66.232.41.176 addnode=71.96.61.207 addnode=31.16.2.204 addnode=37.30.7.251 addnode=46.4.97.242 addnode=46.105.52.252 addnode=5.9.157.13 addnode=5.49.11.194 addnode=61.55.141.196 addnode=61.55.141.195 addnode=66.232.41.176 addnode=70.29.19.222 addnode=71.96.61.207 addnode=74.91.18.210 addnode=79.215.7.190 addnode=79.117.53.154 addnode=79.111.13.14 addnode=79.240.164.148 addnode=80.241.220.178 addnode=80.11.70.97 addnode=83.242.125.165 addnode=87.219.13.118 addnode=87.231.27.65 addnode=88.164.132.56 addnode=89.254.225.5 addnode=90.155.222.162 addnode=91.200.13.84 addnode=91.64.188.248 addnode=92.39.203.216 addnode=92.234.241.91 addnode=92.115.69.196 addnode=94.103.230.241 addnode=94.65.205.27 addnode=209.126.71.54 addnode=217.44.27.235 addnode=217.119.117.131 addnode=221.121.207.215 addnode=222.65.39.59 addnode=193.242.149.63 addnode=151.41.36.112 addnode=162.243.175.25 addnode=188.226.162.68 addnode=103.16.218.165 addnode=192.187.118.162 addnode=109.205.247.161 addnode=182.86.148.141 addnode=216.231.140.117 addnode=175.156.218.76 addnode=193.242.149.63 addnode=180.168.198.170 addnode=178.149.150.44 addnode=174.95.70.9 addnode=113.243.40.112 addnode=115.28.19.199
|
|
|
|
zorro_cat
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
April 08, 2014, 02:33:26 AM |
|
hi all anybody know, how much we get HVC per day @50Mhs? just prediction
|
|
|
|
cryptomines
|
|
April 08, 2014, 02:40:12 AM |
|
I got 200 HVC in the last 24 hours with 58 Mh/s
|
|
|
|
lagur
|
|
April 08, 2014, 03:06:55 AM |
|
yes, Volkovian style programming is legendary. But it doesn't really work when your kernel has high register use. About registers, after removing maxrregcount from nvcc string my stability was increased. Hashrate was stabilized too (min jumping from max hashrate). compile ccminer 0.5 with VS 2012 (cuda 6, compute 50, x86) testing on windows 8.1 x64, 2 x msi 750ti, nvidia driver 337.50. Well I haven't thought of removing the maxregcount but I do get more stable hashrate with 337.50... with or without chrome The locked +135 bother me sometimes that I think I miss the +2Mh/s. I'll observe more.
|
|
|
|
nomad1109
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Medichain: The Medical Big-Data Platform
|
|
April 08, 2014, 03:43:38 AM |
|
I got 200 HVC in the last 24 hours with 58 Mh/s
Where do you mine at? I do 48Mh/s and only get about half that...(~110) I was getting 220+ a day before the number of people mining went through the roof.
|
|
|
|
blinkxzero
|
|
April 08, 2014, 03:47:43 AM |
|
I got 200 HVC in the last 24 hours with 58 Mh/s
Where do you mine at? I do 48Mh/s and only get about half that...(~110) I was getting 220+ a day before the number of people mining went through the roof. I have ~50 Mh/s and get ~110 HVC per day also on 1gh. If I could be getting more at another pool I'd switch, but 1gh seems to find every other block.
|
|
|
|
cryptomines
|
|
April 08, 2014, 03:53:45 AM |
|
I mine on zhpool fixdiff. My daily coin count has been going up lately. They have a nice interface with lots of info/stats about the coin and the vote. I tried all the pools, zhpool has given me the best result
|
|
|
|
larue05
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
April 08, 2014, 06:22:31 AM |
|
Anyone wanna help me figure out why ccMiner isn't hashing?
I have a 6 x 750TI rig, and I'm wanting to mine HVC. My .bat looks like this:
ccminer35.exe -a heavy -o stratum+tcp://<<address>> -u <<worker>> -p <<password>> -v 512
It connects to the stratum and starts detecting new blocks however this is the only output on the window.
Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 Binding thread 2 to cpu 2 Binding thread 3 to cpu 3 Binding thread 4 to cpu 4 Binding thread 5 to cpu 5
And that's it. It never actually starts hashing, and yet the stratum keeps detecting new blocks.
Also via Hardware Monitor I can see that none of my cards are under any load at all.
Thoughts?
Still looking for someone to help out here, please.
|
|
|
|
derBruchpilotPro
|
|
April 08, 2014, 07:43:32 AM |
|
Hi all!
I'm a bit new to nVidia mining, so I've some little questions:
I've seen that the card on the 1x-16x riser cable has less performance, I read that this issue is already under investigation, is there any improvement in progress?
Is it more effective to mine non-scrypt coins to get around this bottleneck?
|
NEM/XEM!!!
|
|
|
bigjme
|
|
April 08, 2014, 07:59:04 AM |
|
Hi all!
I'm a bit new to nVidia mining, so I've some little questions:
I've seen that the card on the 1x-16x riser cable has less performance, I read that this issue is already under investigation, is there any improvement in progress?
Is it more effective to mine non-scrypt coins to get around this bottleneck?
Running the miner twice solves the issue. So just run your bat file twice and leave both running
|
Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
|
|
|
Signovinces2
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
April 08, 2014, 08:14:29 AM |
|
Is it possible to add API to Cudaminer? Kind of liked that i could have all stats on one computer for all my rigs with CGRemote...
|
|
|
|
goo38
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
|
April 08, 2014, 08:21:31 AM |
|
I started mining GroestlCoin today on a single 750ti.
I am wondering what kind of hash rate others have seen mining with ccminer35 v0.5?
So far my miner runs at ~3300 khash/s. GPU overclock +91 Mem overclock +650. Is there any benefit to lowering Mem clock like for HVC? Do these numbers sound about right for GroestlCoin on a 750ti?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|