[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]

[bigjme]

On 3x750Ti?! Seems crazy high hash rate compared to what I get What does the actual miner window report? The pool tends to give crazy up and down numbers as the submission of shares can be a bit "peaky".

Ram usage wise I think I use 50 - 75% or something like that

can you post your launch config for me to try? 30khash/s seems way to high, i am sure it should only be around the 3khash/s mark
hmm after changing my config from 12khash/s to 9khash/s for scrypt-jane:14 it seems its not as profitable. i dont have a clue what half my hashrates are to enter into whattomine which sucks

looks like i will stick with groestl, utc says 0.0085btc per day, don't know if its worth solo mining it? with 3 750Ti's that is

[restless]

Trying on 750Ti with 335 drivers
-a scrypt-jane -o stratum+tcp://yac.m-s-t.org:3333 -l t64x1 -i 0 -m 1 -L 2 -b 4096 -H 2

-b and -H give many "result not validated on CPU"
Without them speed was 0.4 kh/s

Autotune gave
 [2014-04-24 17:06:48] GPU #0: 1371.45 hash/s with configuration t18x1
And still getting:
[2014-04-24 17:08:05] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti result does not validate on CPU
 (i=37, s=0)!

t32x1 returns 1.8 kh/s

:/
It seems best way is simply multipools...

[bigjme]

i think until the launch of the new ccminer, things are going to be hard to mine atall. i tried to bechmark cudaminer 28-2 for utc and yac but it just crashes, ccminer seems a lot better then cudaminer, which i havent used for a good while now.

will be interesting to see what x11 and groestl brings. if groestl does triple its performance i will stick to that, should bring my profit to £2.40 a day, which would be amazing
christian did say he would be releasing around the end of the month, any updates? 

[atc1]

i think until the launch of the new ccminer, things are going to be hard to mine atall. i tried to bechmark cudaminer 28-2 for utc and yac but it just crashes, ccminer seems a lot better then cudaminer, which i havent used for a good while now.

will be interesting to see what x11 and groestl brings. if groestl does triple its performance i will stick to that, should bring my profit to £2.40 a day, which would be amazing
christian did say he would be releasing around the end of the month, any updates? 

Oh,is there a update for X11 as well? I'm not sure we can mine X11 on ccminer,uh...can we? The table based implementation is being given the boot,so performance should see a very decent and sizeable increase.

[cbuchner1]

During X11 implementation we've hit a bit of trouble with the SIMD hash. It is too resource intensive and slow, so we will have to come up with another "killer" implementation of our own design. Otherwise we could not possibly beat AMD significantly.

the current simd512 code is taking three times the runtime of Groestl... Nightmare!

[bigjme]

Well is there any chance you could release the groestl locked down code without x11 christian? I know its a big ask but atleast it can be mass tested, unless your unable to add that one file due to the security method being used?

[Boffinboy]

i think until the launch of the new ccminer, things are going to be hard to mine atall. i tried to bechmark cudaminer 28-2 for utc and yac but it just crashes, ccminer seems a lot better then cudaminer, which i havent used for a good while now.

will be interesting to see what x11 and groestl brings. if groestl does triple its performance i will stick to that, should bring my profit to £2.40 a day, which would be amazing
christian did say he would be releasing around the end of the month, any updates? 

Hmm odd, seems strange that the config works well for me but not you guys :S As I say, I get about 3.2KH like that.

Make sure you take in to account power usage when doing profit calcs (which is why whattomine is nice). What hashrate do you get on Groestl? The calculator I checked for that seems to suggest that at 3khs a card I'd actually be better off mining scrypt. Have I got the groestl hash rate wrong?

[bigjme]

My groestl on my 750Ti's are 3.5MH/s per card
And i always take into account power usage. £0.67 a day at the moment

[atc1]

During X11 implementation we've hit a bit of trouble with the SIMD hash. It is too resource intensive and slow, so we will have to come up with another "killer" implementation of our own design. Otherwise we could not possibly beat AMD significantly.

the current simd512 code is taking three times the runtime of Groestl... Nightmare!

Cuda is anyway slow with SIMD,so is it not possible to concurrently pass that to a CPU with SSE 2? Or would that make it even slower? I have no clue...

[Boffinboy]

My groestl on my 750Ti's are 3.5MH/s per card
And i always take into account power usage. £0.67 a day at the moment

I am guessing your power must be expensive.... mine is 11p per kWH and Scrypt multipool with 2 cards gives about £0.55 a day in terms of profitability.

[bigjme]

£0.135 per kwh
But my calcs run my entire room

Right now my entire groestl machine pulls 163W from the wall. That uncludes my watercooling, and my 780 sitting idle

[Boffinboy]

Ah OK. My server draws 160W mining YAC with two cards, but I discount 60W because it would be using that even when not mining. HVC was like 145W. Not tested GRS.

[bigjme]

160W on 2 cards? 750Ti's?
My actualy 3 750Tis pull 133W mining groestl with their overclock. And my main server is only pulling 36W with the 780 and watercooling

[BitSmacker]

No new official release since 2/28?  What am I paying you for? 

[atc1]

No new official release since 2/28?  What am I paying you for? 

Ccminer. You're paying for ccminer. 

[mrwizzy2002]

Alright so I need some help. I am getting soo irritated trying to get these configured. This is what I'm getting. I have an 850w PSU and 5 x 750ti's and running the 2-28 and the new 4-12 version of Cudaminer. Please help. I have got GPU 3 to work the hardest so far out of all of them getting right around 300Kh/s but now it is not doing well. I am running 335.23 and USB powered risers. It also runs like this without overclocking at all. I have seen my total around 1400-1475 for a brief period of time but then it dwindled down to what we're seeing now. I don't get it. I have a 7970 in there that I'd like to get going too once I figure out the 750ti's but it's not doing anything as of yet just an fyi.
https://i.imgur.com/xHoiYRi.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/b6t7pma.png

[liomojo1]

Put on all T5x24 , run the 4-12 version  , overclock them to 1250mhz core and 3100mhz ram and you will have about 300 for all. And run x86 version the most important.
I have 6x750ti overclocked and set to T5x24 and that is the optium , If you try all different cards with different setting you will end up crazy.

[Boffinboy]

160W on 2 cards? 750Ti's?
My actualy 3 750Tis pull 133W mining groestl with their overclock. And my main server is only pulling 36W with the 780 and watercooling

Na, 60W of that is for the system - probably some of that is due to mining but most background of the server doing stuff.

Put my figures it in my earlier post with my YAC startup parameters. With YAC I measure 50W at the wall per card, but not overclocked (am using Linux); HVC pulls around 43W, scrypt and scrypt N 67W or so

[restless]

i think until the launch of the new ccminer, things are going to be hard to mine atall. i tried to bechmark cudaminer 28-2 for utc and yac but it just crashes, ccminer seems a lot better then cudaminer, which i havent used for a good while now.

will be interesting to see what x11 and groestl brings. if groestl does triple its performance i will stick to that, should bring my profit to £2.40 a day, which would be amazing
christian did say he would be releasing around the end of the month, any updates?  

Hmm odd, seems strange that the config works well for me but not you guys :S As I say, I get about 3.2KH like that.

Make sure you take in to account power usage when doing profit calcs (which is why whattomine is nice). What hashrate do you get on Groestl? The calculator I checked for that seems to suggest that at 3khs a card I'd actually be better off mining scrypt. Have I got the groestl hash rate wrong?

ATM groestl on 750Ti makes 0.00163391 BTC per day (no power cost)
IF you are able to get 3KH/s ok YAC is more profitable, but with 1.8 it isn't. And mining yac means no other activity on PC, groestl allows normal desktop usage
12/04 version crashes on me, 28/02 works ok, but with 64x1 it crawls with 0.2kh/s!
Palit 750Ti - the OC one, default 1200/1500, my OS is 8.1, cpu is SandyBridge 3GH ...\\

Can you explain how to try fine-tuning batch size?


12/04 with -l t64x1 -i 0 -m 0 -L 2 gives

Code:

[2014-04-24 19:45:12] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://yac.m-s-t.org:3333
[2014-04-24 19:45:12] Nfactor is 4 (N=32)!
[2014-04-24 19:45:12] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti with compute capability 5.0
[2014-04-24 19:45:12] GPU #0: interactive: 0, tex-cache: 0 , single-alloc: 0
[2014-04-24 19:45:12] GPU #0: 8 hashes / 0.0 MB per warp.
[2014-04-24 19:45:12] GPU #0: using launch configuration t64x1
[2014-04-24 19:45:12] Stratum detected new block
[2014-04-24 19:45:12] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 511.97 khash/s
[2014-04-24 19:45:12] Nfactor is 14 (N=32768)!
[2014-04-24 19:45:12] GPU #0: CUDA error `unknown error` while executing the ker
nel.
[2014-04-24 19:45:13] workio thread dead, waiting for workers...
[2014-04-24 19:45:13] worker threads all shut down, exiting.

28/02 works with same config

[bigjme]

yeh i cant get cudaminer working on my 750Ti or my 780 even using the only launch config from 14-2