|
xojex
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
|
|
October 27, 2014, 10:15:32 PM |
|
I tried mining FTC with the neo scrypt. The daily estimate was high for the hash, shares were accepted, but the actual reward was a pittance.
|
|
|
|
SRBOOTH
|
|
October 27, 2014, 10:50:02 PM |
|
I tried mining FTC with the neo scrypt. The daily estimate was high for the hash, shares were accepted, but the actual reward was a pittance.
I see this as a possibility, theblocksfactory shows around 700 coin/day at 190kh...but any other calculator says around 70/day...why is their estimation 10x higher??
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
October 27, 2014, 11:00:04 PM |
|
I tried mining FTC with the neo scrypt. The daily estimate was high for the hash, shares were accepted, but the actual reward was a pittance.
I see this as a possibility, theblocksfactory shows around 700 coin/day at 190kh...but any other calculator says around 70/day...why is their estimation 10x higher?? to attract miner
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
SRBOOTH
|
|
October 27, 2014, 11:01:41 PM |
|
I tried mining FTC with the neo scrypt. The daily estimate was high for the hash, shares were accepted, but the actual reward was a pittance.
I see this as a possibility, theblocksfactory shows around 700 coin/day at 190kh...but any other calculator says around 70/day...why is their estimation 10x higher?? to attract miner How many stupids don't check it though bro'....? Does that really work for them? HA! freakin' cryptos man!
|
|
|
|
AizenSou
|
|
October 27, 2014, 11:41:09 PM |
|
I tried mining FTC with the neo scrypt. The daily estimate was high for the hash, shares were accepted, but the actual reward was a pittance.
I see this as a possibility, theblocksfactory shows around 700 coin/day at 190kh...but any other calculator says around 70/day...why is their estimation 10x higher?? to attract miner Dom, do you have new toys for us to play with FTC again ?
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
October 28, 2014, 02:35:52 AM |
|
I tried mining FTC with the neo scrypt. The daily estimate was high for the hash, shares were accepted, but the actual reward was a pittance.
I see this as a possibility, theblocksfactory shows around 700 coin/day at 190kh...but any other calculator says around 70/day...why is their estimation 10x higher?? to attract miner Dom, do you have new toys for us to play with FTC again ? I must have some nice photo of bird...
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
ZeroFossilFuel
|
|
October 29, 2014, 02:10:14 AM |
|
I've been running ccminer 1.0 for some time now on a quark based coin with a couple of GT640 (DDR5, CC3.5), CUDA 5.5, driver 331.38. It runs well but I'm wondering if I can expect any performance gains from ccminer 1.2 and the deps that go along with it?
bump
|
|
|
|
th00ber
|
|
October 29, 2014, 07:27:48 AM |
|
I've been running ccminer 1.0 for some time now on a quark based coin with a couple of GT640 (DDR5, CC3.5), CUDA 5.5, driver 331.38. It runs well but I'm wondering if I can expect any performance gains from ccminer 1.2 and the deps that go along with it?
bump Just test it, I know some versions are compiled for old card with compute 2.0. Maybe a Bombadil version or others ?
|
|
|
|
Bombadil
|
|
October 29, 2014, 08:06:46 AM |
|
I've been running ccminer 1.0 for some time now on a quark based coin with a couple of GT640 (DDR5, CC3.5), CUDA 5.5, driver 331.38. It runs well but I'm wondering if I can expect any performance gains from ccminer 1.2 and the deps that go along with it?
bump Just test it, I know some versions are compiled for old card with compute 2.0. Maybe a Bombadil version or others ? I saw my name o_O GT640 with DDR5 is compute 3.5 https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-gpusSo any of the newest miners should work (except those only for 5.0 & 5.2 ofc ) No need for my old code ^^ CCminer 1.2 is also getting old ^^" There are newer forks out there running better code. Like the ones from tpruvot and djm34. SP_ is currently very busy with trying to boost the code even more, but IIRC, it's only compute 5.0 and higher for now.
|
|
|
|
tsiv
|
|
October 29, 2014, 08:13:05 AM |
|
I've been running ccminer 1.0 for some time now on a quark based coin with a couple of GT640 (DDR5, CC3.5), CUDA 5.5, driver 331.38. It runs well but I'm wondering if I can expect any performance gains from ccminer 1.2 and the deps that go along with it?
bump Just test it, I know some versions are compiled for old card with compute 2.0. Maybe a Bombadil version or others ? Yep, official ccminer 1.1 upwards at https://github.com/cbuchner1/ccminer/releases should be significantly faster. Apparently there are indeed two versions of GT 640 according to https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-gpus, with the DDR3 version being stuck with compute 2.1 (and can't run ccminer 1.1 or newer) and the DDR5 version is compute 3.5 so you just might be in luck and be able to run the latest versions. The official ccminer 1.2 should work fine for quark, you could also try djm's version from http://cudamining.co.uk/url/releases/member/2 (I think there are newer djm releases but the links might be buried somewhere in this thread). Edit: beaten by da bomba
|
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
October 29, 2014, 01:54:43 PM |
|
unfortunately this time seems to be over...
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
Namsbreh
|
|
October 30, 2014, 09:12:52 AM |
|
I have 2x Palit GTX 970 delivered yesterday, not impressed so far, think they might be going for a return trip back up the river in a couple of weeks if nobody works any magic.
I am getting the following rates, per card, using driver 344.16, with +200gpu & +200mem
XCN 8mh XMR 440h X13 4.8mh Scrypt Jane 6KH
Not tried BBR yet cause can't get 970's to work with Kopiemtu
System is drawing aprox 380w (not inc display) at wall, AMD quad core cpu so the 970's are using aprox 100w per card.
A month on and I love my 970GTX's, tempted to get more!
|
|
|
|
sp_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
October 30, 2014, 10:06:31 AM |
|
I will probobly recieve my 980 and 970 cards tomorrow. This meens that I might have another build this weekend with optimized kernals.
|
|
|
|
PVmining
|
|
October 30, 2014, 12:08:56 PM |
|
I have 2x Palit GTX 970 delivered yesterday, not impressed so far, think they might be going for a return trip back up the river in a couple of weeks if nobody works any magic.
Not tried BBR yet cause can't get 970's to work with Kopiemtu
To update the nvidia driver is a pain in the as within linux. But I think jk_14 will make a update soon. If you interested how to do it in kopiemtu, i'll could write a little how to. cudaminerBBR gives 1760hashs per second on a 980 // -l64x256; compiled with compute.50. that means nearly double hashrate in comparison to my 750ti. System is drawing aprox 380w (not inc display) at wall, AMD quad core cpu so the 970's are using aprox 100w per card.
...which algo? the system draw depends extremly on the used algo. short test with the EVGA 980 SC ACX 2.0 cards shows that they are not beating the 750ti in hash/watt ratio at the moment. Now it depends on the optimization of our ccminer-dev guys... hooorayh for you all!
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
October 30, 2014, 12:25:40 PM |
|
I have 2x Palit GTX 970 delivered yesterday, not impressed so far, think they might be going for a return trip back up the river in a couple of weeks if nobody works any magic.
I am getting the following rates, per card, using driver 344.16, with +200gpu & +200mem
XCN 8mh XMR 440h X13 4.8mh Scrypt Jane 6KH
Not tried BBR yet cause can't get 970's to work with Kopiemtu
System is drawing aprox 380w (not inc display) at wall, AMD quad core cpu so the 970's are using aprox 100w per card.
A month on and I love my 970GTX's, tempted to get more! 380w total including system mean more than 100w per card, unless your system without gpu consume 180w alone, also cpu should be at idle when you mine, i'm missing something?
|
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 30, 2014, 12:45:24 PM |
|
I have 2x Palit GTX 970 delivered yesterday, not impressed so far, think they might be going for a return trip back up the river in a couple of weeks if nobody works any magic.
I am getting the following rates, per card, using driver 344.16, with +200gpu & +200mem
XCN 8mh XMR 440h X13 4.8mh Scrypt Jane 6KH
Not tried BBR yet cause can't get 970's to work with Kopiemtu
System is drawing aprox 380w (not inc display) at wall, AMD quad core cpu so the 970's are using aprox 100w per card.
A month on and I love my 970GTX's, tempted to get more! 380w total including system mean more than 100w per card, unless your system without gpu consume 180w alone, also cpu should be at idle when you mine, i'm missing something? I have never had my cup idle while using ccminer. Am I missing something on how to do that? Now it is not at at 80% or anything but definitely not idle.
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
October 30, 2014, 12:47:01 PM |
|
mine is like at 10% or even less
|
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 30, 2014, 01:09:21 PM |
|
mine is like at 10% or even less
Are you running Linux. I get up to 60 % usage on my cpu with a low of 30%.
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks
|
|
|
|