antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 07, 2014, 02:52:27 PM |
|
I know this is an asic coin, but my balls are on fire: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=843495.0
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
November 07, 2014, 03:05:19 PM |
|
edit: I am sad to announce that my nespresso machine passed away...so young... this may affect profitability (as well as bad temper trolling) Yell loudly @ Nespresso customer service and George Clooney will bring you a new one.
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
November 07, 2014, 03:16:44 PM |
|
I don't want to bother him during his honeymoon...
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
TillKoeln
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1051
unnamed.Exchange, join the Cool Kids!!!
|
|
November 07, 2014, 03:28:04 PM |
|
everything works fine ^^ the fact is ... i use the whole time the wrong Version ^^ and much better is .. that i try 13 Version`s without success.... jus4yourinfo ... the right file/Folder was placed on my Desktop since months/weeks ....
|
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
November 08, 2014, 09:19:47 AM Last edit: November 08, 2014, 09:40:40 AM by cbuchner1 |
|
Now I am glad I haven't invested any time in my own version of this yet. Interesting that they chose to put the Fermat test on the GPU instead of the sieving. Maybe I can learn something from their approach. In our CoinShield miner it's actually the Fermat test that's more efficient on the CPU, whereas the sieving was accelerated nicely by the GPU (higher memory bandwidth!) Christian
|
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 08, 2014, 02:10:09 PM |
|
Has anyone got the miner for Gap Coin running on Nvidia?
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
|
|
November 08, 2014, 07:33:15 PM |
|
Now I am glad I haven't invested any time in my own version of this yet. Interesting that they chose to put the Fermat test on the GPU instead of the sieving. Maybe I can learn something from their approach. In our CoinShield miner it's actually the Fermat test that's more efficient on the CPU, whereas the sieving was accelerated nicely by the GPU (higher memory bandwidth!) Christian Hi Christian, On Cudaminer.... the hash rates on scrypt jane nf are lower on windows 8 by 33%. My vista computer gets about 3.6 mh/s and my 2 windows 8 computers get 2.3 mh/s. I tried everything I could even compiling Cudaminer on windows 8. All the combinations of the arguments ect. Do you are anybody here know why please. thanks
|
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
|
|
November 08, 2014, 11:51:59 PM |
|
Now I am glad I haven't invested any time in my own version of this yet. Interesting that they chose to put the Fermat test on the GPU instead of the sieving. Maybe I can learn something from their approach. In our CoinShield miner it's actually the Fermat test that's more efficient on the CPU, whereas the sieving was accelerated nicely by the GPU (higher memory bandwidth!) Christian Hi Christian, On Cudaminer.... the hash rates on scrypt jane nf are lower on windows 8 by 33%. My vista computer gets about 3.6 mh/s and my 2 windows 8 computers get 2.3 mh/s. I tried everything I could even compiling Cudaminer on windows 8. All the combinations of the arguments ect. Do you are anybody here know why please. thanks people still mine that? I took a look at the AMD kernel - looks like it could use some work. My vista computer gets about 3.6 mh/s and my 2 windows 8 computers get 2.3 mh/s. I worked on it on and off for months. Still only 2.3
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
|
|
November 09, 2014, 02:12:44 AM |
|
Now I am glad I haven't invested any time in my own version of this yet. Interesting that they chose to put the Fermat test on the GPU instead of the sieving. Maybe I can learn something from their approach. In our CoinShield miner it's actually the Fermat test that's more efficient on the CPU, whereas the sieving was accelerated nicely by the GPU (higher memory bandwidth!) Christian Hi Christian, On Cudaminer.... the hash rates on scrypt jane nf are lower on windows 8 by 33%. My vista computer gets about 3.6 mh/s and my 2 windows 8 computers get 2.3 mh/s. I tried everything I could even compiling Cudaminer on windows 8. All the combinations of the arguments ect. Do you are anybody here know why please. thanks people still mine that? I took a look at the AMD kernel - looks like it could use some work. My vista computer gets about 3.6 mh/s and my 2 windows 8 computers get 2.3 mh/s. I worked on it on and off for months. Still only 2.3 Got any AMD cards? No just 750ti's
|
|
|
|
hero18688
|
|
November 09, 2014, 03:05:44 AM |
|
How to set backup pool for cudaminer?With sgminer,it can change to backup pool when main pool is dead.
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
November 09, 2014, 10:03:02 AM |
|
How to set backup pool for cudaminer?With sgminer,it can change to backup pool when main pool is dead.
You can't
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
|
|
November 09, 2014, 11:26:34 AM |
|
How to set backup pool for cudaminer?With sgminer,it can change to backup pool when main pool is dead.
You can't
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
|
|
November 09, 2014, 11:34:14 AM |
|
Now I am glad I haven't invested any time in my own version of this yet. Interesting that they chose to put the Fermat test on the GPU instead of the sieving. Maybe I can learn something from their approach. In our CoinShield miner it's actually the Fermat test that's more efficient on the CPU, whereas the sieving was accelerated nicely by the GPU (higher memory bandwidth!) Christian Hi Christian, On Cudaminer.... the hash rates on scrypt jane nf are lower on windows 8 by 33%. My vista computer gets about 3.6 mh/s and my 2 windows 8 computers get 2.3 mh/s. I tried everything I could even compiling Cudaminer on windows 8. All the combinations of the arguments ect. Do you are anybody here know why please. thanks people still mine that? I took a look at the AMD kernel - looks like it could use some work. My vista computer gets about 3.6 mh/s and my 2 windows 8 computers get 2.3 mh/s. I worked on it on and off for months. Still only 2.3 I think I found the problem. The source code is 32 bit and I can't compile it to x86.
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
November 09, 2014, 11:38:50 AM |
|
Now I am glad I haven't invested any time in my own version of this yet. Interesting that they chose to put the Fermat test on the GPU instead of the sieving. Maybe I can learn something from their approach. In our CoinShield miner it's actually the Fermat test that's more efficient on the CPU, whereas the sieving was accelerated nicely by the GPU (higher memory bandwidth!) Christian Hi Christian, On Cudaminer.... the hash rates on scrypt jane nf are lower on windows 8 by 33%. My vista computer gets about 3.6 mh/s and my 2 windows 8 computers get 2.3 mh/s. I tried everything I could even compiling Cudaminer on windows 8. All the combinations of the arguments ect. Do you are anybody here know why please. thanks people still mine that? I took a look at the AMD kernel - looks like it could use some work. My vista computer gets about 3.6 mh/s and my 2 windows 8 computers get 2.3 mh/s. I worked on it on and off for months. Still only 2.3 I think I found the problem. The source code is 32 bit and I can't compile it to x86. lulwat ? the source code isn't anything .... ok just replace every uint32_t by uint64_t try to retune cudaminer (however it is a known problem)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
|
|
November 09, 2014, 12:15:42 PM |
|
Now I am glad I haven't invested any time in my own version of this yet. Interesting that they chose to put the Fermat test on the GPU instead of the sieving. Maybe I can learn something from their approach. In our CoinShield miner it's actually the Fermat test that's more efficient on the CPU, whereas the sieving was accelerated nicely by the GPU (higher memory bandwidth!) Christian Hi Christian, On Cudaminer.... the hash rates on scrypt jane nf are lower on windows 8 by 33%. My vista computer gets about 3.6 mh/s and my 2 windows 8 computers get 2.3 mh/s. I tried everything I could even compiling Cudaminer on windows 8. All the combinations of the arguments ect. Do you are anybody here know why please. thanks people still mine that? I took a look at the AMD kernel - looks like it could use some work. My vista computer gets about 3.6 mh/s and my 2 windows 8 computers get 2.3 mh/s. I worked on it on and off for months. Still only 2.3 I think I found the problem. The source code is 32 bit and I can't compile it to x86. lulwat ? the source code isn't anything .... ok just replace every uint32_t by uint64_t try to retune cudaminer (however it is a known problem) No problem. At this point, im ready to load vista on my asrock 81
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
November 09, 2014, 12:29:41 PM |
|
Now I am glad I haven't invested any time in my own version of this yet. Interesting that they chose to put the Fermat test on the GPU instead of the sieving. Maybe I can learn something from their approach. In our CoinShield miner it's actually the Fermat test that's more efficient on the CPU, whereas the sieving was accelerated nicely by the GPU (higher memory bandwidth!) Christian Hi Christian, On Cudaminer.... the hash rates on scrypt jane nf are lower on windows 8 by 33%. My vista computer gets about 3.6 mh/s and my 2 windows 8 computers get 2.3 mh/s. I tried everything I could even compiling Cudaminer on windows 8. All the combinations of the arguments ect. Do you are anybody here know why please. thanks people still mine that? I took a look at the AMD kernel - looks like it could use some work. My vista computer gets about 3.6 mh/s and my 2 windows 8 computers get 2.3 mh/s. I worked on it on and off for months. Still only 2.3 I think I found the problem. The source code is 32 bit and I can't compile it to x86. lulwat ? the source code isn't anything .... ok just replace every uint32_t by uint64_t try to retune cudaminer (however it is a known problem) No problem. At this point, im ready to load vista on my asrock 81 is it that profitable ? now if you want the ultimate scrypt-jane high factor experience... install linux, it is well known the hashrate is much higher on linuex
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
|
|
November 09, 2014, 12:55:48 PM |
|
Now I am glad I haven't invested any time in my own version of this yet. Interesting that they chose to put the Fermat test on the GPU instead of the sieving. Maybe I can learn something from their approach. In our CoinShield miner it's actually the Fermat test that's more efficient on the CPU, whereas the sieving was accelerated nicely by the GPU (higher memory bandwidth!) Christian Hi Christian, On Cudaminer.... the hash rates on scrypt jane nf are lower on windows 8 by 33%. My vista computer gets about 3.6 mh/s and my 2 windows 8 computers get 2.3 mh/s. I tried everything I could even compiling Cudaminer on windows 8. All the combinations of the arguments ect. Do you are anybody here know why please. thanks people still mine that? I took a look at the AMD kernel - looks like it could use some work. My vista computer gets about 3.6 mh/s and my 2 windows 8 computers get 2.3 mh/s. I worked on it on and off for months. Still only 2.3 I think I found the problem. The source code is 32 bit and I can't compile it to x86. lulwat ? the source code isn't anything .... ok just replace every uint32_t by uint64_t try to retune cudaminer (however it is a known problem) No problem. At this point, im ready to load vista on my asrock 81 is it that profitable ? now if you want the ultimate scrypt-jane high factor experience... install linux, it is well known the hashrate is much higher on linuex yes it is if 3.6 hash. linuex.. I have enough problems with windows
|
|
|
|
bathrobehero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
|
|
November 09, 2014, 02:50:07 PM |
|
is it that profitable ? now if you want the ultimate scrypt-jane high factor experience... install linux, it is well known the hashrate is much higher on linuex
That's mostly because the video memory usage is limited to 88% on windows by default: #if WIN32 device_backoff[thr_id] = 12; #else device_backoff[thr_id] = 2; #endif Which is only necessary if you're mining on your primary card.
|
Not your keys, not your coins!
|
|
|
|