🎥 PureVidz.net: Decentralized Streaming WebTorrents 🎥 VIDZ - Trading Now 🎥

[Dynamic Index]

Question for the dev:  Will there by an actual client side wallet where we control the private keys?  You mentioned paper wallets but I find that impractical, are there plans for a windows/linux/mac wallet application? 

Also have you talked to exchanges such as bittrex about getting approved on their exchanges?

[dukeneptun]

Question for the dev:  Will there by an actual client side wallet where we control the private keys?  You mentioned paper wallets but I find that impractical, are there plans for a windows/linux/mac wallet application? 

Also have you talked to exchanges such as bittrex about getting approved on their exchanges?

i think devs said before they'd be looking to get listed on exchanges and didn't mind paying fee but i dont remember which exchanges if they mentioned any

[UnknownEye]

Genuinely interested to know:

Governments around the world are seriously targeting websites like PureVidz.

But, let's say it manages to avoid take downs for a year or two. Fuck it, lets say it sticks around for 5 years.

If I invest in PureVidz, there is always the risk that the web site will be taken down and the market cap would obviously go to zero.

So where is the long-term investment opportunity? Seems like the risk is mostly in the hands of investors. With a 20% premine, the devs would obviously want to cash out ASAP.

Perhaps I missed something.  

We have answered that question and similar ones multiple times throughout the thread. There is even a reply written on the topic on this very page. Here is a quote for convenience.

I'm still struggling with this whole website, crypto and investment thing. It just doesn't make sense.

Issue number 1: If you want your BTC investment to appreciate, you need to put it into a crypto wallet, which has no connection with the web site.

Issue number 2: if PureVidz becomes a success, it gets lots of users watching stuff, how does the ad money find it's way to crypto investors, without any form of auditing to know if the devs are stealing ad money or simply not declaring the ad revenue correctly? By definition, you can't trust a project whose stated aim is to steal from copyright holders.

Issue number 3: If PureVidz becomes a success, it becomes a take down target immediately. The 'investment' is just an illusion, as the project will never be allowed to gain momentum.

Issue number....you get the idea, there are lots of issues.

1: Yes and no. The value of the coin will appreciate as the site grows and the various burn/buyback/holding mechanisms kick in and as coin speculators gain interest in the project. Holding the coins in your own wallet (staked or even as a paper wallet) shields you from any changes or tweaks to the site. Our site contains no personal user identifiable data for that exact reason to ensure users anonymity and safety of their data (by having them protect their own coins)

2: We have mentioned earlier in the thread our intention to bring in a 3rd party auditor from the community to validate our fiat earnings to ensure reliability of our proposed buybacks and other site profit mechanisms.

3: These types of news articles are rather misleading... It references pirate bay being down but after years of attacks and government attempts to shut them down they rarely suffer more than minutes of downtime. We have discussed throughout the thread and in our whitepaper at length how we plan to ensure stability of the project. Namely the following core approaches.

-Route to new domain as needed: You can read the new host from blockchain, twitterapi or multiple other methods so when one domain or host is taken down it seamlessly re-routes to the new host.

-Back up site data to the blockchain: Magnet hashes are easily storable in OP_RETURN for example allowing the actual content of the site to be backed up in a decentralized method allowing the site to re-build from a catastrophic failure within minutes/hours.

-Indexing and tagging links is not illegal: we host zero copyright materials but rather index publicly available links to simplify how users interact with them. Yes, americans like to try to impose their ridiculous copyright laws on other countries but it's a simple fact that our site does not break any laws in the country we are located in nor the countries we will be hosting our multiple backup servers in.

Dev you couldn't possibly have a back up of the site for if and when it gets big could you?

I wonder how current streaming sites solve this problem lol

I'm sure you haven't already thought of this have you?

Be good if blockchain tech could direct you to the newest domain if one got took down.

I would like to see escrow audit the revenue, will that be possible?

Most of your questions are answered above but let me quickly write a condensed response.

All site content and mirrors of the site will be decentralized through blockchain and various public APIs to instantly re-route users to whatever backup server is in use. If one server is interfered with or shut down for any reason there is little to no perceived downtime as it automatically routes to a new host with all content still in place.

Thank you for your answer, what about possibility for 2fa or chanching password? (i choosed a weak one, so should i just make another account?)

We will be adding improved account management in the 1.0 release of the site.

Thanks I was wondering about this too, I think 2fa on any site where you may be storing something of value is an absolute must!

[o48o]

Question for the dev:  Will there by an actual client side wallet where we control the private keys?  You mentioned paper wallets but I find that impractical, are there plans for a windows/linux/mac wallet application?  

Also have you talked to exchanges such as bittrex about getting approved on their exchanges?

i think devs said before they'd be looking to get listed on exchanges and didn't mind paying fee but i dont remember which exchanges if they mentioned any

I thought that bittrex were not adding assets that pays dividends (for some legal reasons) untill they have location based blocking for markets, it's why mineum or mycelium tokens didn't get in. Not sure if this counts as one though.

[Pure_Vidz]

Thanks I was wondering about this too, I think 2fa on any site where you may be storing something of value is an absolute must!

We will be avoiding allowing users to store coins on the site as much as possible. For example when placing a bounty on something, it will give you an address to send the coins to which will then process either returning to sender if not filled or sending to the user who fills the bounty. The site is not intended to allow users to store their coins on it.

I thought that bittrex were not adding assets that pays dividends (for some legal reasons) untill they have location based blocking for markets, it's why mineum or mycelium tokens didn't get in. Not sure if this counts as one though.

We do not pay dividends but rather have a policy in place on how fiat earnings are used to fund buyback and burn programs. There would be no policy in place that would block bittrex from listing the currency.

Question for the dev:  Will there by an actual client side wallet where we control the private keys?  You mentioned paper wallets but I find that impractical, are there plans for a windows/linux/mac wallet application?  

Also have you talked to exchanges such as bittrex about getting approved on their exchanges?

We expect all users to use a private wallet. We will not be allowing users to store their coins on our site in the long term.

[dukeneptun]

Question for the dev:  Will there by an actual client side wallet where we control the private keys?  You mentioned paper wallets but I find that impractical, are there plans for a windows/linux/mac wallet application?  

Also have you talked to exchanges such as bittrex about getting approved on their exchanges?

i think devs said before they'd be looking to get listed on exchanges and didn't mind paying fee but i dont remember which exchanges if they mentioned any

I thought that bittrex were not adding assets that pays dividends (for some legal reasons) untill they have location based blocking for markets, it's why mineum or mycelium tokens didn't get in. Not sure if this counts as one though.

hard to say cus theyre not directly paying anything are they? coins r burned which increases value of others and any coin could do burning but time will tell.

[Dynamic Index]

Thanks I was wondering about this too, I think 2fa on any site where you may be storing something of value is an absolute must!

We will be avoiding allowing users to store coins on the site as much as possible. For example when placing a bounty on something, it will give you an address to send the coins to which will then process either returning to sender if not filled or sending to the user who fills the bounty. The site is not intended to allow users to store their coins on it.

I thought that bittrex were not adding assets that pays dividends (for some legal reasons) untill they have location based blocking for markets, it's why mineum or mycelium tokens didn't get in. Not sure if this counts as one though.

We do not pay dividends but rather have a policy in place on how fiat earnings are used to fund buyback and burn programs. There would be no policy in place that would block bittrex from listing the currency.

Question for the dev:  Will there by an actual client side wallet where we control the private keys?  You mentioned paper wallets but I find that impractical, are there plans for a windows/linux/mac wallet application?  

Also have you talked to exchanges such as bittrex about getting approved on their exchanges?

We expect all users to use a private wallet. We will not be allowing users to store their coins on our site in the long term.

But you didn't answer my question.  Is a private wallet being developed?  I don't even see it mentioned on your roadmap.

[Bigbrowndingleberry]

Thanks I was wondering about this too, I think 2fa on any site where you may be storing something of value is an absolute must!

We will be avoiding allowing users to store coins on the site as much as possible. For example when placing a bounty on something, it will give you an address to send the coins to which will then process either returning to sender if not filled or sending to the user who fills the bounty. The site is not intended to allow users to store their coins on it.

I thought that bittrex were not adding assets that pays dividends (for some legal reasons) untill they have location based blocking for markets, it's why mineum or mycelium tokens didn't get in. Not sure if this counts as one though.

We do not pay dividends but rather have a policy in place on how fiat earnings are used to fund buyback and burn programs. There would be no policy in place that would block bittrex from listing the currency.

Question for the dev:  Will there by an actual client side wallet where we control the private keys?  You mentioned paper wallets but I find that impractical, are there plans for a windows/linux/mac wallet application?  

Also have you talked to exchanges such as bittrex about getting approved on their exchanges?

We expect all users to use a private wallet. We will not be allowing users to store their coins on our site in the long term.

But you didn't answer my question.  Is a private wallet being developed?  I don't even see it mentioned on your roadmap.

You vtr fanbois are kind of dumb and sorry I just can't say anything nice because there is nothing. Read the post!!!!!! He clearly said, I quote "We expect all users to use a private wallet" unquote. Anyone with anything going on upstairs will take that as a yes there will be private wallets lololoolol

So mean dingle, such troll, such anger, such bla bla bla, idiots.

[Dynamic Index]

Thanks I was wondering about this too, I think 2fa on any site where you may be storing something of value is an absolute must!

We will be avoiding allowing users to store coins on the site as much as possible. For example when placing a bounty on something, it will give you an address to send the coins to which will then process either returning to sender if not filled or sending to the user who fills the bounty. The site is not intended to allow users to store their coins on it.

I thought that bittrex were not adding assets that pays dividends (for some legal reasons) untill they have location based blocking for markets, it's why mineum or mycelium tokens didn't get in. Not sure if this counts as one though.

We do not pay dividends but rather have a policy in place on how fiat earnings are used to fund buyback and burn programs. There would be no policy in place that would block bittrex from listing the currency.

Question for the dev:  Will there by an actual client side wallet where we control the private keys?  You mentioned paper wallets but I find that impractical, are there plans for a windows/linux/mac wallet application?  

Also have you talked to exchanges such as bittrex about getting approved on their exchanges?

We expect all users to use a private wallet. We will not be allowing users to store their coins on our site in the long term.

But you didn't answer my question.  Is a private wallet being developed?  I don't even see it mentioned on your roadmap.

You vtr fanbois are kind of dumb and sorry I just can't say anything nice because there is nothing. Read the post!!!!!! He clearly said, I quote "We expect all users to use a private wallet" unquote. Anyone with anything going on upstairs will take that as a yes there will be private wallets lololoolol

So mean dingle, such troll, such anger, such bla bla bla, idiots.

I just want to see a pic of the windows client sometime soon.  If the coin is being released right after ICO the windows client surely should be done by now no?

[Bigbrowndingleberry]

Thanks I was wondering about this too, I think 2fa on any site where you may be storing something of value is an absolute must!

We will be avoiding allowing users to store coins on the site as much as possible. For example when placing a bounty on something, it will give you an address to send the coins to which will then process either returning to sender if not filled or sending to the user who fills the bounty. The site is not intended to allow users to store their coins on it.

I thought that bittrex were not adding assets that pays dividends (for some legal reasons) untill they have location based blocking for markets, it's why mineum or mycelium tokens didn't get in. Not sure if this counts as one though.

We do not pay dividends but rather have a policy in place on how fiat earnings are used to fund buyback and burn programs. There would be no policy in place that would block bittrex from listing the currency.

Question for the dev:  Will there by an actual client side wallet where we control the private keys?  You mentioned paper wallets but I find that impractical, are there plans for a windows/linux/mac wallet application?  

Also have you talked to exchanges such as bittrex about getting approved on their exchanges?

We expect all users to use a private wallet. We will not be allowing users to store their coins on our site in the long term.

But you didn't answer my question.  Is a private wallet being developed?  I don't even see it mentioned on your roadmap.

You vtr fanbois are kind of dumb and sorry I just can't say anything nice because there is nothing. Read the post!!!!!! He clearly said, I quote "We expect all users to use a private wallet" unquote. Anyone with anything going on upstairs will take that as a yes there will be private wallets lololoolol

So mean dingle, such troll, such anger, such bla bla bla, idiots.

I just want to see a pic of the windows client sometime soon.  If the coin is being released right after ICO the windows client surely should be done by now no?

You clearly are one of a kind dumb!! You need to wait one day, or you don't believe they have a wallet even though they need one to release their btc hahahaha keep showing your true colors and digging. Get your VTR bum boys to put together all their funds, all $50 of it and pay me and show you how its done, if you carry on fucking with my investment I will take care of your thread but not with skills of a 15 year old dropped back to first school dumb ass.

[BitPotus]

Thanks I was wondering about this too, I think 2fa on any site where you may be storing something of value is an absolute must!

We will be avoiding allowing users to store coins on the site as much as possible. For example when placing a bounty on something, it will give you an address to send the coins to which will then process either returning to sender if not filled or sending to the user who fills the bounty. The site is not intended to allow users to store their coins on it.

I thought that bittrex were not adding assets that pays dividends (for some legal reasons) untill they have location based blocking for markets, it's why mineum or mycelium tokens didn't get in. Not sure if this counts as one though.

We do not pay dividends but rather have a policy in place on how fiat earnings are used to fund buyback and burn programs. There would be no policy in place that would block bittrex from listing the currency.

Question for the dev:  Will there by an actual client side wallet where we control the private keys?  You mentioned paper wallets but I find that impractical, are there plans for a windows/linux/mac wallet application?  

Also have you talked to exchanges such as bittrex about getting approved on their exchanges?

We expect all users to use a private wallet. We will not be allowing users to store their coins on our site in the long term.

But you didn't answer my question.  Is a private wallet being developed?  I don't even see it mentioned on your roadmap.

You vtr fanbois are kind of dumb and sorry I just can't say anything nice because there is nothing. Read the post!!!!!! He clearly said, I quote "We expect all users to use a private wallet" unquote. Anyone with anything going on upstairs will take that as a yes there will be private wallets lololoolol

So mean dingle, such troll, such anger, such bla bla bla, idiots.

I just want to see a pic of the windows client sometime soon.  If the coin is being released right after ICO the windows client surely should be done by now no?

Very nice little trojan horse action from you here.

Pretending to be supporting both projects but at the same time fudding at every occasion.

 

[imbladednow]

less than 2 days ico will end, and only 29 btc, I think you will raise the min 50 btc, good luck op.

It has 33 btc not 29 btc. Still a ways to go but I just sent some in and im sure others will send some in soon. At least I hope so.

[imbladednow]

I'm still struggling with this whole website, crypto and investment thing. It just doesn't make sense.

Issue number 1: If you want your BTC investment to appreciate, you need to put it into a crypto wallet, which has no connection with the web site.

Issue number 2: if PureVidz becomes a success, it gets lots of users watching stuff, how does the ad money find it's way to crypto investors, without any form of auditing to know if the devs are stealing ad money or simply not declaring the ad revenue correctly? By definition, you can't trust a project whose stated aim is to steal from copyright holders.

Issue number 3: If PureVidz becomes a success, it becomes a take down target immediately. The 'investment' is just an illusion, as the project will never be allowed to gain momentum.

Issue number....you get the idea, there are lots of issues.

1: Yes and no. The value of the coin will appreciate as the site grows and the various burn/buyback/holding mechanisms kick in and as coin speculators gain interest in the project. Holding the coins in your own wallet (staked or even as a paper wallet) shields you from any changes or tweaks to the site. Our site contains no personal user identifiable data for that exact reason to ensure users anonymity and safety of their data (by having them protect their own coins)

2: We have mentioned earlier in the thread our intention to bring in a 3rd party auditor from the community to validate our fiat earnings to ensure reliability of our proposed buybacks and other site profit mechanisms.

3: These types of news articles are rather misleading... It references pirate bay being down but after years of attacks and government attempts to shut them down they rarely suffer more than minutes of downtime. We have discussed throughout the thread and in our whitepaper at length how we plan to ensure stability of the project. Namely the following core approaches.

-Route to new domain as needed: You can read the new host from blockchain, twitterapi or multiple other methods so when one domain or host is taken down it seamlessly re-routes to the new host.

-Back up site data to the blockchain: Magnet hashes are easily storable in OP_RETURN for example allowing the actual content of the site to be backed up in a decentralized method allowing the site to re-build from a catastrophic failure within minutes/hours.

-Indexing and tagging links is not illegal: we host zero copyright materials but rather index publicly available links to simplify how users interact with them. Yes, americans like to try to impose their ridiculous copyright laws on other countries but it's a simple fact that our site does not break any laws in the country we are located in nor the countries we will be hosting our multiple backup servers in.

Dev you couldn't possibly have a back up of the site for if and when it gets big could you?

I wonder how current streaming sites solve this problem lol

I'm sure you haven't already thought of this have you?

Be good if blockchain tech could direct you to the newest domain if one got took down.

I would like to see escrow audit the revenue, will that be possible?

Most of your questions are answered above but let me quickly write a condensed response.

All site content and mirrors of the site will be decentralized through blockchain and various public APIs to instantly re-route users to whatever backup server is in use. If one server is interfered with or shut down for any reason there is little to no perceived downtime as it automatically routes to a new host with all content still in place.

Nice job putting them in their place!

[dukeneptun]

I'm still struggling with this whole website, crypto and investment thing. It just doesn't make sense.

Issue number 1: If you want your BTC investment to appreciate, you need to put it into a crypto wallet, which has no connection with the web site.

Issue number 2: if PureVidz becomes a success, it gets lots of users watching stuff, how does the ad money find it's way to crypto investors, without any form of auditing to know if the devs are stealing ad money or simply not declaring the ad revenue correctly? By definition, you can't trust a project whose stated aim is to steal from copyright holders.

Issue number 3: If PureVidz becomes a success, it becomes a take down target immediately. The 'investment' is just an illusion, as the project will never be allowed to gain momentum.

Issue number....you get the idea, there are lots of issues.

I would like the dev's take on these points, and i am not interested to hear opinions of investors since they are basically "Lalalalala hands in the ears, Fud fud fud! You are paranoid!"

You both should get out from up there, eachothers ass I mean. Who has said fud fud fud? Nobody so shut the fuck up. I have a hard time to know what on earth you are talking about no1. no 2 is easily solved with a trusted escrow, you know like the trusted escrows that are taking care of investors pre network release. I am almost 100% I have heard the dev respond to at least two of your issues when I read his posts. And you sound like a big enough boy to read a white paper no lol I await the dev to respond to you once again also  

i never seen so many haters in one thread. you guys need to learn from other communities that r more welcoming to others with different views.
peace out.

now where have I read that before. hummm!
Touche.

[imbladednow]

Question for the dev:  Will there by an actual client side wallet where we control the private keys?  You mentioned paper wallets but I find that impractical, are there plans for a windows/linux/mac wallet application? 

Also have you talked to exchanges such as bittrex about getting approved on their exchanges?

Its got to have a regular wallet otherwise they dont get their money from the ico if I understand correctly.

[Dynamic Index]

Thanks I was wondering about this too, I think 2fa on any site where you may be storing something of value is an absolute must!

We will be avoiding allowing users to store coins on the site as much as possible. For example when placing a bounty on something, it will give you an address to send the coins to which will then process either returning to sender if not filled or sending to the user who fills the bounty. The site is not intended to allow users to store their coins on it.

I thought that bittrex were not adding assets that pays dividends (for some legal reasons) untill they have location based blocking for markets, it's why mineum or mycelium tokens didn't get in. Not sure if this counts as one though.

We do not pay dividends but rather have a policy in place on how fiat earnings are used to fund buyback and burn programs. There would be no policy in place that would block bittrex from listing the currency.

Question for the dev:  Will there by an actual client side wallet where we control the private keys?  You mentioned paper wallets but I find that impractical, are there plans for a windows/linux/mac wallet application?  

Also have you talked to exchanges such as bittrex about getting approved on their exchanges?

We expect all users to use a private wallet. We will not be allowing users to store their coins on our site in the long term.

But you didn't answer my question.  Is a private wallet being developed?  I don't even see it mentioned on your roadmap.

You vtr fanbois are kind of dumb and sorry I just can't say anything nice because there is nothing. Read the post!!!!!! He clearly said, I quote "We expect all users to use a private wallet" unquote. Anyone with anything going on upstairs will take that as a yes there will be private wallets lololoolol

So mean dingle, such troll, such anger, such bla bla bla, idiots.

I just want to see a pic of the windows client sometime soon.  If the coin is being released right after ICO the windows client surely should be done by now no?

Very nice little trojan horse action from you here.

Pretending to be supporting both projects but at the same time fudding at every occasion.

 

Lol what?  I have criticized VTR with the long development.  I don't blindly support anything.  Yes I am invested in both but I don't put my emotions first, unlike you.  I will not blindly believe in anything.  As an investor it's not crazy to ask for a picture of a wallet that is supposed to be released in 1 day.

[imbladednow]

Can you guys please stop arguing on this thread. Take it to a skype or slack if you want to fight. This is a place for nice people, who play nice and enjoy the company of others.

[DogTheHunter]

Question for the dev:  Will there by an actual client side wallet where we control the private keys?  You mentioned paper wallets but I find that impractical, are there plans for a windows/linux/mac wallet application?  

Also have you talked to exchanges such as bittrex about getting approved on their exchanges?

Exchanges?

Are you serious?

You'll be getting money from an illegal website (you know proceeds of crime) and you think (A) an exchange will list this project and (B) if they do list, they won't give your details over if ordered to do so by a court order?

go fuck yourself.

Some advice - don't pick up the soap.

[Pure_Vidz]

Question for the dev:  Will there by an actual client side wallet where we control the private keys?  You mentioned paper wallets but I find that impractical, are there plans for a windows/linux/mac wallet application?  

Also have you talked to exchanges such as bittrex about getting approved on their exchanges?

Its got to have a regular wallet otherwise they dont get their money from the ico if I understand correctly.

Yes, there will be an actual client side wallet for you to have full control over your private keys. We highly advocate you use this and keep the majority of your VIDZ on your own infrastructure rather than on site.

Here are some screenshots,





A mac, and windows build will be provided when we're ready to launch everything.

[ClamCoin]

Its so close but so far @ the same time. 36BTC in 14BTC 2 go.

Please people I already sent in what I can and I really want to see this coin happen. Please someone send in 14 btc so the goal can be made.

PLEASE!