|
Heguli97
|
 |
June 13, 2017, 07:13:50 PM |
|
Do you use the Add2PSU, or just jump the the PSU pins?
Add2PSU. Other methods will work as well, I just like solutions that I know will definitely work  How would that work with more than 2 PSUs? Connecting 2 ATX cables together into one port? |
|
|
|
|
sublimus
|
|
June 13, 2017, 07:56:08 PM |
|
Dang, kjs, how do you keep your cards so cold?
I run the fans at 100% and its also fairly cool here at the moment. The bigger question is what mobo and O/S are you using to get 11 gpu's? Supermicro X9DRX+-F-O  Do you have to use both CPUs? |
|
|
|
Sorcier
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
June 13, 2017, 11:34:50 PM
Last edit: June 14, 2017, 03:21:21 AM by Sorcier |
|
I'm new to mining, have managed to get a few setup and running, I'm just trying to settle on which cryptocurrency to mine and with what program.
I have just started using this EWBF Cuda miner and I'm having a issue with --intensity.. no matter what I set the intensity to it runs 100% of my GPU.
Only reason I have issue with this is because I'd like to set it to run at a lower intensity while I'm using my PC and then when I'm not let it run at full....
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 6144 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 0 Selected solver: 0
INFO 19:22:27: GPU0 Accepted share 61ms [A:1, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 56C
GPU0: 446 Sol/s
Total speed: 446 Sol/s
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 6144 MB i:10
CUDA: Device: 0 Selected solver: 0
INFO 19:34:09: GPU0 Accepted share 57ms [A:1, R:0]
INFO 19:34:23: GPU0 Accepted share 59ms [A:2, R:0]
INFO 19:34:26: GPU0 Accepted share 58ms [A:3, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 68C
GPU0: 452 Sol/s
Total speed: 452 Sol/s
Can anyone else confirm that this isn't working correctly? Or am I doing something wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4158
Merit: 8047
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
June 14, 2017, 12:48:37 AM
Last edit: June 14, 2017, 01:03:15 AM by philipma1957 |
|
Thanks to EWBF for the 0.3.4b update, here are my updated benchmarks (not yet optimised):
11 x 1080 Ti FE
Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS
NVIDIA Driver Version 381.22
EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.3.4b
+-------------------------------------------------+
| EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.3.4b |
+-------------------------------------------------+
INFO: Current pool: <redacted>
INFO: Selected pools: 1
INFO: Solver: Auto.
INFO: Devices: All.
INFO: Temperature limit: 90
INFO: Api: Disabled
---------------------------------------------------
---
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 6 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 7 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 8 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 9 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 10 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 0 Selected solver: 2
CUDA: Device: 2 Selected solver: 2
CUDA: Device: 4 Selected solver: 2
CUDA: Device: 1 Selected solver: 2
CUDA: Device: 3 Selected solver: 0
CUDA: Device: 5 Selected solver: 0
CUDA: Device: 9 Selected solver: 2
CUDA: Device: 6 Selected solver: 2
CUDA: Device: 7 Selected solver: 2
CUDA: Device: 8 Selected solver: 2
CUDA: Device: 10 Selected solver: 0
---
Temp: GPU0: 42C GPU1: 43C GPU2: 39C GPU3: 42C GPU4: 48C GPU5: 45C GPU6: 41C GPU7: 49C GPU8: 44C GPU9: 41C GPU10: 46C
GPU0: 751 Sol/s GPU1: 731 Sol/s GPU2: 749 Sol/s GPU3: 758 Sol/s GPU4: 737 Sol/s GPU5: 762 Sol/s GPU6: 748 Sol/s GPU7: 760 Sol/s GPU8: 738 Sol/s GPU9: 755 Sol/s GPU10: 742 Sol/s
Total speed: 8231 Sol/s
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| GPU | Power usage | Efficiency |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| 0 | 280W | 2.68 Sol/W |
| 1 | 271W | 2.70 Sol/W |
| 2 | 273W | 2.74 Sol/W |
| 3 | 275W | 2.76 Sol/W |
| 4 | 271W | 2.72 Sol/W |
| 5 | 273W | 2.79 Sol/W |
| 6 | 278W | 2.69 Sol/W |
| 7 | 286W | 2.66 Sol/W |
| 8 | 272W | 2.71 Sol/W |
| 9 | 271W | 2.79 Sol/W |
| 10 | 271W | 2.74 Sol/W |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
---
dude why are you wasting so much power? i get 630sol with 149 watts 4.1 or more on my 1080ti's here is a four card rig 2x 1070 2x 1080ti a riser 1070 left 2 1080 ti slots a slot 1070 right   my gear is all better then 4 sols a watt. 2 of my 1080 ti's add up to 290 watts and do 1226 sols you are spending 287 watts with one piece and getting 750 sols so 3 watts more for my setup gets 476 extra sols  |
|
|
|
|
kjs
|
|
June 14, 2017, 01:13:27 AM |
|
Do you use the Add2PSU, or just jump the the PSU pins?
Add2PSU. Other methods will work as well, I just like solutions that I know will definitely work How would that work with more than 2 PSUs? Connecting 2 ATX cables together into one port? 1 x additional Add2PSU module for each additional PSU, simple really. |
|
|
|
|
|
kjs
|
|
June 14, 2017, 01:17:44 AM |
|
dude why are you wasting so much power? i get 630sol with 149 watts 4.1 or more on my 1080ti's here is a four card rig 2x 1070 2x 1080ti a riser 1070 left 2 1080 ti slots a slot 1070 right my gear is all better then 4 sols a watt. 2 of my 1080 ti's add up to 290 watts and do 1226 sols you are spending 287 watts with one piece and getting 750 sols so 3 watts more for my setup gets 476 extra sols Very nice, I have not optimised to save power (and am not trying to save power). I'm simply working to extract the maximum hashrate at this stage. |
|
|
|
|
|
kjs
|
|
June 14, 2017, 01:18:41 AM |
|
Do you have to use both CPUs?
Yes, in order to gain access to all PCIe slots, and all PCIe lanes. |
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4158
Merit: 8047
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
June 14, 2017, 01:22:55 AM |
|
dude why are you wasting so much power? i get 630sol with 149 watts 4.1 or more on my 1080ti's here is a four card rig 2x 1070 2x 1080ti a riser 1070 left 2 1080 ti slots a slot 1070 right my gear is all better then 4 sols a watt. 2 of my 1080 ti's add up to 290 watts and do 1226 sols you are spending 287 watts with one piece and getting 750 sols so 3 watts more for my setup gets 476 extra sols Very nice, I have not optimised to save power (and am not trying to save power). I'm simply working to extract the maximum hashrate at this stage. under stood but 11 x 250 = 2750 watts to get 11 x 130 = 1430 sols so you could drop 2750 watts on your setup and hash at 7000 sols. I like the setup BTW mobo link https://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon/C600/X9DRX_-F.cfm |
|
|
|
Nalut
Member
Offline
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
|
|
June 14, 2017, 02:55:23 AM |
|
I have noticed a lot of people mining Zcash instead of DGB "skein alg" even thought DGB has higher rate/payout.
Am i missing something here ?
Anyway thanks EWBF you made a lot of people happy.
|
|
|
|
|
ziddey
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2017, 02:55:43 AM |
|
remove the getstat from your url |
|
|
|
|
|
vince212
|
|
June 14, 2017, 02:56:41 AM |
|
anyone here who can share their hashrate on this miner using a 1060 and if it is possible the power consumption as well thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Sorcier
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2017, 03:20:37 AM |
|
I'm thinking this got lost in the flood of huge pictures so I'm posting it again, would really like some help or confirmation. I'm new to mining, have managed to get a few setup and running, I'm just trying to settle on which cryptocurrency to mine and with what program. I have just started using this EWBF Cuda miner and I'm having a issue with --intensity.. no matter what I set the intensity to it runs 100% of my GPU. Only reason I have issue with this is because I'd like to set it to run at a lower intensity while I'm using my PC and then when I'm not let it run at full.... CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 6144 MB i:64 CUDA: Device: 0 Selected solver: 0 INFO 19:22:27: GPU0 Accepted share 61ms [A:1, R:0] Temp: GPU0: 56C GPU0: 446 Sol/s Total speed: 446 Sol/s CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 6144 MB i:10 CUDA: Device: 0 Selected solver: 0 INFO 19:34:09: GPU0 Accepted share 57ms [A:1, R:0] INFO 19:34:23: GPU0 Accepted share 59ms [A:2, R:0] INFO 19:34:26: GPU0 Accepted share 58ms [A:3, R:0] Temp: GPU0: 68C GPU0: 452 Sol/s Total speed: 452 Sol/s Can anyone else confirm that this isn't working correctly? Or am I doing something wrong? miner --intensity 10 --server us1-zcash.flypool.org --port 3333 --user <address> --pass |
|
|
|
|
fullzero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1009
|
|
June 14, 2017, 03:31:40 AM |
|
Dang, kjs, how do you keep your cards so cold?
I run the fans at 100% and its also fairly cool here at the moment. The bigger question is what mobo and O/S are you using to get 11 gpu's? Supermicro X9DRX+-F-O I don't think I have this chipset; but would you mind testing nvOC with this beast anyway? |
|
|
|
|
Pug
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
June 14, 2017, 04:10:49 AM |
|
Dang, kjs, how do you keep your cards so cold?
I run the fans at 100% and its also fairly cool here at the moment. The bigger question is what mobo and O/S are you using to get 11 gpu's? Supermicro X9DRX+-F-O Do you have to use both CPUs? According to the SM Homepage 10 PCI-E 3.0 x8 slots 1 PCI-E 2.0 x4 (in x8) slot (Both CPUs need to be installed for full access to PCI-E slots and onboard controllers. See manual block diagram for details.) |
|
|
|
|
markusikul
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2017, 04:42:16 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
usuksobad
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
|
|
June 14, 2017, 05:49:36 AM |
|
Hey, what temperatures do you get with 1080ti fe version? my titans all run 80-83, so interested if everyones else is.
|
|
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
June 14, 2017, 06:43:19 AM |
|
I have noticed a lot of people mining Zcash instead of DGB "skein alg" even thought DGB has higher rate/payout.
Am i missing something here ?
Anyway thanks EWBF you made a lot of people happy.
1) A lot of folks don't know about DGB and skein since skein does NOT show up on whattomine as part of the "comparison" page (I've brought that up, but the owner of the page declined to change it for reasons I disagree with). 2) It's a MUCH smaller network hashrate, ONE big miner shifting over would swamp it to the point of having half the profitiability OR LESS of ZEC. 3) It's not all THAT much more profitable, and the pools for it seem to all have issues (though theblocksfactory seems to do the best of them IME). 4) There have been periods over the last 2-3 weeks since the DGB price explosion (and recent crash/correction) that it has NOT been more profitable than ZEC. There have also been times that the groetsl version of DGB has been more profitable than ZEC on NVidia cards - but points 2 3 and 4 apply to that as well - groetsl IS however on the whattomine compare page. |
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
ne0x86
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2017, 07:26:25 AM |
|
Hi, I run last version last night and this morning I check stats and power comsumption was 20~W less and h/s was about 30~less (1060). I reboot computer miner and now works fine. I just only saying for if someone see less performance. Now, the performance is better as 0.3.3 version. Nice job Btw how I can see stats? Im trying to web 127.0.0.1:42000 but error 404  Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
ziddey
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2017, 08:32:58 AM |
|
Hi, I run last version last night and this morning I check stats and power comsumption was 20~W less and h/s was about 30~less (1060). I reboot computer miner and now works fine. I just only saying for if someone see less performance. Now, the performance is better as 0.3.3 version. Nice job Btw how I can see stats? Im trying to web 127.0.0.1:42000 but error 404 Thanks! Read the docs. You need to add --api 127.0.0.1:42000 or --api 0.0.0.0:42000 if you want it to listen on all ipv4 interfaces. |
|
|
|
|
ztrader18
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2017, 09:09:04 AM |
|
Thanks to EWBF for the 0.3.4b update, here are my updated benchmarks (not yet optimised):
11 x 1080 Ti FE
Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS
NVIDIA Driver Version 381.22
EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.3.4b
+-------------------------------------------------+
| EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.3.4b |
+-------------------------------------------------+
INFO: Current pool: <redacted>
INFO: Selected pools: 1
INFO: Solver: Auto.
INFO: Devices: All.
INFO: Temperature limit: 90
INFO: Api: Disabled
---------------------------------------------------
---
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 2 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 3 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 4 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 5 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 6 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 7 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 8 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 9 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 10 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 11172 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 0 Selected solver: 2
CUDA: Device: 2 Selected solver: 2
CUDA: Device: 4 Selected solver: 2
CUDA: Device: 1 Selected solver: 2
CUDA: Device: 3 Selected solver: 0
CUDA: Device: 5 Selected solver: 0
CUDA: Device: 9 Selected solver: 2
CUDA: Device: 6 Selected solver: 2
CUDA: Device: 7 Selected solver: 2
CUDA: Device: 8 Selected solver: 2
CUDA: Device: 10 Selected solver: 0
---
Temp: GPU0: 42C GPU1: 43C GPU2: 39C GPU3: 42C GPU4: 48C GPU5: 45C GPU6: 41C GPU7: 49C GPU8: 44C GPU9: 41C GPU10: 46C
GPU0: 751 Sol/s GPU1: 731 Sol/s GPU2: 749 Sol/s GPU3: 758 Sol/s GPU4: 737 Sol/s GPU5: 762 Sol/s GPU6: 748 Sol/s GPU7: 760 Sol/s GPU8: 738 Sol/s GPU9: 755 Sol/s GPU10: 742 Sol/s
Total speed: 8231 Sol/s
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| GPU | Power usage | Efficiency |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| 0 | 280W | 2.68 Sol/W |
| 1 | 271W | 2.70 Sol/W |
| 2 | 273W | 2.74 Sol/W |
| 3 | 275W | 2.76 Sol/W |
| 4 | 271W | 2.72 Sol/W |
| 5 | 273W | 2.79 Sol/W |
| 6 | 278W | 2.69 Sol/W |
| 7 | 286W | 2.66 Sol/W |
| 8 | 272W | 2.71 Sol/W |
| 9 | 271W | 2.79 Sol/W |
| 10 | 271W | 2.74 Sol/W |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
---
dude why are you wasting so much power? i get 630sol with 149 watts 4.1 or more on my 1080ti's here is a four card rig 2x 1070 2x 1080ti a riser 1070 left 2 1080 ti slots a slot 1070 right https://i.imgur.com/qhbI9Fz.jpghttps://i.imgur.com/BLmP99j.jpgmy gear is all better then 4 sols a watt. 2 of my 1080 ti's add up to 290 watts and do 1226 sols you are spending 287 watts with one piece and getting 750 sols so 3 watts more for my setup gets 476 extra sols https://i.imgur.com/zzgf8BW.jpgvery nice, which Settings do you have? |
|
|
|
|
|
