|
stormia
|
 |
March 22, 2017, 05:34:02 AM |
|
It seems some trolls concluded this is a scam without any actual proof. Wake up! This is not a scam, it's a legit project  just out of curiosity, are you getting paid for this, or are you part of the gang? It's so obvious isn't it lol. If they are getting paid I wonder how their handler thinks they are doing. A big part of counting cards in black jack is knowing how to hide the fact you are counting cards. In fact, if you can't do that it doesn't matter how good at counting you are because you will just get kicked out of the casino. Same is true for shills. The good shills can hide their motive, while the bad ones are easily spotted and it doesn't matter what they say people know to throw it out. I invested in this project, that's why I'm present in this thread, I wonder what you are doing here ruminating the same BS as you were before the ICO, which obviously failed to influence the smart money from investing. Unless you secretly invested in this while trolling it Don't worry there isn't any smart money in qtun How funny is that Look at all the angel investors to start with! Then look at the ICO that sold out in 5 days. I would love to look at the ICO that sold out in 5 days but they haven't provided the BTC and ETH addresses to do that now have they smartass? What are you still doing here, if you are certain it's a scam? The ICO is over, you missed your chance I'm a free man. I can do what I want. Unlike you, who appears to be contained to this thread by your handler. And I'm not certain it is a scam, just extremely highly super suspect that it is. It's not smart to be 100% on anything. Honestly if they can show the 15 million in storage wallets my level of suspect would drop a level or two. Either way I think the ICO structure was a scam in itself in a lot of ways and wouldn't have invested in the ICO. The ICO is over, but I didn't miss any chances. I did my best to warn people despite the efforts of shills like you. And until I and everyone else sees evidence of those funds we have every reason to believe we were completely successful in preventing this scam ICO from being a success  So how about you prove us wrong and show us the 15 million? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
stackoverflow
|
|
March 22, 2017, 05:37:02 AM |
|
It seems some trolls concluded this is a scam without any actual proof. Wake up! This is not a scam, it's a legit project just out of curiosity, are you getting paid for this, or are you part of the gang? It's so obvious isn't it lol. If they are getting paid I wonder how their handler thinks they are doing. A big part of counting cards in black jack is knowing how to hide the fact you are counting cards. In fact, if you can't do that it doesn't matter how good at counting you are because you will just get kicked out of the casino. Same is true for shills. The good shills can hide their motive, while the bad ones are easily spotted and it doesn't matter what they say people know to throw it out. I invested in this project, that's why I'm present in this thread, I wonder what you are doing here ruminating the same BS as you were before the ICO, which obviously failed to influence the smart money from investing. Unless you secretly invested in this while trolling it Don't worry there isn't any smart money in qtun How funny is that Look at all the angel investors to start with! Then look at the ICO that sold out in 5 days. I would love to look at the ICO that sold out in 5 days but they haven't provided the BTC and ETH addresses to do that now have they smartass? What are you still doing here, if you are certain it's a scam? The ICO is over, you missed your chance I'm a free man. I can do what I want. Unlike you, who appears to be contained to this thread by your handler. The ICO is over, but I didn't miss any chances. I did my best to warn people despite the efforts of shills like you. And until I and everyone else sees evidence of those funds we have every reason to believe we were completely successful in preventing this scam ICO from being a success So how about you prove us wrong and show us the 15 million? Unfortunately, you failed to convince people, because all you have is hearsay and total BS! |
|
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
March 22, 2017, 05:41:44 AM |
|
It seems some trolls concluded this is a scam without any actual proof. Wake up! This is not a scam, it's a legit project just out of curiosity, are you getting paid for this, or are you part of the gang? It's so obvious isn't it lol. If they are getting paid I wonder how their handler thinks they are doing. A big part of counting cards in black jack is knowing how to hide the fact you are counting cards. In fact, if you can't do that it doesn't matter how good at counting you are because you will just get kicked out of the casino. Same is true for shills. The good shills can hide their motive, while the bad ones are easily spotted and it doesn't matter what they say people know to throw it out. I invested in this project, that's why I'm present in this thread, I wonder what you are doing here ruminating the same BS as you were before the ICO, which obviously failed to influence the smart money from investing. Unless you secretly invested in this while trolling it Don't worry there isn't any smart money in qtun How funny is that Look at all the angel investors to start with! Then look at the ICO that sold out in 5 days. I would love to look at the ICO that sold out in 5 days but they haven't provided the BTC and ETH addresses to do that now have they smartass? What are you still doing here, if you are certain it's a scam? The ICO is over, you missed your chance I'm a free man. I can do what I want. Unlike you, who appears to be contained to this thread by your handler. The ICO is over, but I didn't miss any chances. I did my best to warn people despite the efforts of shills like you. And until I and everyone else sees evidence of those funds we have every reason to believe we were completely successful in preventing this scam ICO from being a success So how about you prove us wrong and show us the 15 million? Unfortunately, you failed to convince people, because all you have is hearsay and total BS! Well that is all you have, too, since you have provided no proof of the funds. And it is super easy to provide proof if you do have them so withholding the addresses looks a lot worse than me not being able to prove you don't have said addresses (because that would be near impossible for me to do). |
|
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
March 22, 2017, 05:45:10 AM |
|
Simple question that should be super simple to answer: when will the qtum team release the ICO fund storage addresses to the public?
|
|
|
|
|
|
stackoverflow
|
|
March 22, 2017, 05:48:54 AM |
|
-snip
Well that is all you have, too, since you have provided no proof of the funds. And it is super easy to provide proof if you do have them so withholding the addresses looks a lot worse than me not being able to prove you don't have said addresses (because that would be near impossible for me to do). Well I have my Qtum tokens, that's one thing I have and you don't |
|
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
March 22, 2017, 05:53:14 AM |
|
-snip
Well that is all you have, too, since you have provided no proof of the funds. And it is super easy to provide proof if you do have them so withholding the addresses looks a lot worse than me not being able to prove you don't have said addresses (because that would be near impossible for me to do). Well I have my Qtum tokens, that's one thing I have and you don't Oh cool want to bring up other irrelevant things to our current discussion? It is a great way to deflect, I'll admit. |
|
|
|
|
|
stackoverflow
|
|
March 22, 2017, 05:58:50 AM |
|
-snip
Well that is all you have, too, since you have provided no proof of the funds. And it is super easy to provide proof if you do have them so withholding the addresses looks a lot worse than me not being able to prove you don't have said addresses (because that would be near impossible for me to do). Well I have my Qtum tokens, that's one thing I have and you don't Oh cool want to bring up other irrelevant things to our current discussion? It is a great way to deflect, I'll admit. On a side note, putting all that money in one address/wallet is insane, and exposing it to the public is even worse! So I would recommend dealing with the funds in a proper way, not just put them in one address just to please a couple of trolls who did not even invest in the first place. You pretend it's a scam, prove it. Investors trust the project! |
|
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
March 22, 2017, 06:07:47 AM |
|
-snip
Well that is all you have, too, since you have provided no proof of the funds. And it is super easy to provide proof if you do have them so withholding the addresses looks a lot worse than me not being able to prove you don't have said addresses (because that would be near impossible for me to do). Well I have my Qtum tokens, that's one thing I have and you don't Oh cool want to bring up other irrelevant things to our current discussion? It is a great way to deflect, I'll admit. On a side note, putting all that money in one address/wallet is insane, and exposing it to the public is even worse! So I would recommend dealing with the funds in a proper way, not just put them in one address just to please a couple of trolls who did not even invest in the first place. You pretend it's a scam, prove it. Investors trust the project! Holy shit, are you kidding me? Already making excuses for them? So they are never going to release the addresses are they. Well, this is worse than I thought lol. And yes, I am sure all 9 ICO investors have tons of trust in the project. I'm saying 9 because there's as much proof for 9 as for any other number. Reality is whatever you make it to be in stackoverflow's world, no need for objectivity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
March 22, 2017, 06:10:22 AM |
|
Also Earls already said the funds would be held in a multi-sig address you dumbass.
|
|
|
|
|
|
stackoverflow
|
|
March 22, 2017, 06:18:54 AM |
|
Also Earls already said the funds would be held in a multi-sig address you dumbass.
I like it when you start the name calling, it means you have nothing else This project should set new standards in crypto, putting all the coins in one wallet and making it public is certainly not the best way to deal with it security wise. That's my opinion! |
|
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
March 22, 2017, 06:21:18 AM |
|
Also Earls already said the funds would be held in a multi-sig address you dumbass.
I like it when you start the name calling, it means you have nothing else This project should set new standards in crypto, putting all the coins in one wallet and making it public is certainly not the best way to deal with it security wise. That's my opinion! You don't understand crypto do you. "In one wallet" you don't store coins in a wallet. You store them using a private-public key pair. That can be used with any wallet. |
|
|
|
|
|
stackoverflow
|
|
March 22, 2017, 06:24:48 AM |
|
Also Earls already said the funds would be held in a multi-sig address you dumbass.
I like it when you start the name calling, it means you have nothing else This project should set new standards in crypto, putting all the coins in one wallet and making it public is certainly not the best way to deal with it security wise. That's my opinion! You don't understand crypto do you. "In one wallet" you don't store coins in a wallet. You store them using a private-public key pair. That can be accessed at any wallet. Now you're funny! |
|
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
March 22, 2017, 06:25:15 AM |
|
Also Earls already said the funds would be held in a multi-sig address you dumbass.
I like it when you start the name calling, it means you have nothing else This project should set new standards in crypto, putting all the coins in one wallet and making it public is certainly not the best way to deal with it security wise. That's my opinion! You don't understand crypto do you. "In one wallet" you don't store coins in a wallet. You store them using a private-public key pair. That can be accessed at any wallet. Now you're funny! You think I'm wrong? Lol. And you are "interested in qtum because of it's tech" but you don't know that coins aren't stored locally in a wallet but "on" the blockchain and accessed through a (any) wallet using a private key? |
|
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
March 22, 2017, 06:26:59 AM |
|
And so you think qtum is going to be groundbreaking on the basis that they are completely opaque about their ICO funds? When you can safely and securely store the funds at one or across a few publicly known addresses. As an supposed ICO investor wouldn't you like to see what they are doing with those, let alone see that they at least exist?
|
|
|
|
|
|
stackoverflow
|
|
March 22, 2017, 06:32:00 AM |
|
And so you think qtum is going to be groundbreaking on the basis that they are completely opaque about their ICO funds? When you can safely and securely store the funds at one or across a few publicly known addresses. As an supposed ICO investor wouldn't you like to see what they are doing with those, let alone see that they at least exist?
I don't think holding the whole ICO amount in coins is wise in the first place, look at ethereum, they lost 50% of their ICO value by holding bitcoin. I think some kind of hedging should be done here! |
|
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
March 22, 2017, 06:33:11 AM |
|
And so you think qtum is going to be groundbreaking on the basis that they are completely opaque about their ICO funds? When you can safely and securely store the funds at one or across a few publicly known addresses. As an supposed ICO investor wouldn't you like to see what they are doing with those, let alone see that they at least exist?
I don't think holding the whole ICO amount in coins is wise in the first place, look at ethereum, they lost 50% of their ICO value by holding bitcoin. I think some kind of hedging should be done here! Sure I could agree with you on that, but that's irrelevant to my point- my point is they need to be transparent with the funds, whatever it is they decide to do with them. Unless they have something to hide. |
|
|
|
|
|
BTCspace
|
|
March 22, 2017, 06:55:49 AM |
|
|
running farm worldwide
|
|
|
|
jacaf01
|
|
March 22, 2017, 06:58:09 AM |
|
-snip
Well that is all you have, too, since you have provided no proof of the funds. And it is super easy to provide proof if you do have them so withholding the addresses looks a lot worse than me not being able to prove you don't have said addresses (because that would be near impossible for me to do). Well I have my Qtum tokens, that's one thing I have and you don't Oh cool want to bring up other irrelevant things to our current discussion? It is a great way to deflect, I'll admit. On a side note, putting all that money in one address/wallet is insane, and exposing it to the public is even worse! So I would recommend dealing with the funds in a proper way, not just put them in one address just to please a couple of trolls who did not even invest in the first place. You pretend it's a scam, prove it. Investors trust the project! This statement just confirm that this project is a scam, ICONOMI, Decent even Antshare put their ICO address in the public domain. I said they are going to buy into their own ICO and that is what happened. |
|
|
|
|
BTCspace
|
|
March 22, 2017, 07:01:17 AM |
|
-snip
Well that is all you have, too, since you have provided no proof of the funds. And it is super easy to provide proof if you do have them so withholding the addresses looks a lot worse than me not being able to prove you don't have said addresses (because that would be near impossible for me to do). Well I have my Qtum tokens, that's one thing I have and you don't Oh cool want to bring up other irrelevant things to our current discussion? It is a great way to deflect, I'll admit. On a side note, putting all that money in one address/wallet is insane, and exposing it to the public is even worse! So I would recommend dealing with the funds in a proper way, not just put them in one address just to please a couple of trolls who did not even invest in the first place. You pretend it's a scam, prove it. Investors trust the project! This statement just confirm that this project is a scam, ICONOMI, Decent even Antshare put their ICO address in the public domain. I said they are going to buy into their own ICO and that is what happened. ask all their partners to confirm is better. then we will know it. is this true? http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/qtum-token-sale-raises-over-15m-five-days-1612889 http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/qtum-token-sale-raises-over-15m-five-days-1612889 |
running farm worldwide
|
|
|
|
