▂▃▅▆▇⫷[🆉🅿🅾🅾🅻.🅲🅰][BTC LTC DGB RVN FLUX DASH @ the miners multipool ]⫸▇▆▅▃▂

[BlaueElise]

What is going wrong with X14 / Bern coin? Half the time, no blocks were found but all blocks from miners are accepted and current profit shows a high value.
This is very annoying when an automatic profit switching is working. The miners always switch to X14 and generates no profit at all.
How is it possible to check wether X14 mining (or also other algos) are working correctly?

[JaredKaragen]

No income for X17 algo last 2 hours...

post your miner version, batch/launch config, and your payout address.   ill take a peek.

My address is 1GLzXWeqsF1TKRoD2EcjK1mpy3x9UHLGjc. There are pending earnings, but sometimes income graph stops rising up for several hours, just like now. Why it happens? And of course my profitability goes down.

sometimes profitability is down, or the frontend is not recording for its graphs because its pulled offline while other tasks are performed.  does the miner show any disconnect during that period?  Seems to look ok good at first glance.

[crackfoo]

What is going wrong with X14 / Bern coin? Half the time, no blocks were found but all blocks from miners are accepted and current profit shows a high value.
This is very annoying when an automatic profit switching is working. The miners always switch to X14 and generates no profit at all.
How is it possible to check wether X14 mining (or also other algos) are working correctly?

check the BERN thread. This has been a wallet issue for some time. They haven't really provided a fix yet so all I can do it restart it when I notice, or someone tells me blocks arn't being found. If you see this, no blocks in a hour, hit me up and I'll restart the wallet.

[geissenpeter]

guys simple question

if i get 17500h/s or 17.5k/s under equihash

if the return on the multipool shows 0.277 btc per 24 hours which is approx at the moment

what is the 24h btc return?

i dont assume its only around 50usd equivalent a day no? tthats way too low and completely unattractiv to single coin equihash mining

can someone help me with the calculation for 24h what the btc return is under equihash?

[JaredKaragen]

guys simple question

if i get 17500h/s or 17.5k/s under equihash

if the return on the multipool shows 0.277 btc per 24 hours which is approx at the moment

what is the 24h btc return?

i dont assume its only around 50usd equivalent a day no? tthats way too low and completely unattractiv to single coin equihash mining

can someone help me with the calculation for 24h what the btc return is under equihash?

the best guess you can make is 24hr actual variable (times) ksol/sec... should get you in the ballpark of what it could make in 24 hours.

[geissenpeter]

guys simple question

if i get 17500h/s or 17.5k/s under equihash

if the return on the multipool shows 0.277 btc per 24 hours which is approx at the moment

what is the 24h btc return?

i dont assume its only around 50usd equivalent a day no? tthats way too low and completely unattractiv to single coin equihash mining

can someone help me with the calculation for 24h what the btc return is under equihash?

the best guess you can make is 24hr actual variable (times) ksol/sec... should get you in the ballpark of what it could make in 24 hours.

oki but can u help me to make a calculation example with the above paraneters?

[Buek]

Hello guys, literally an hour ago began to pour stratum connection interrupted in the miner on the neoscript. Are there any problems with the algorithm on the pool or what kind of work is carried out?

[MagicSmoker]

the best guess you can make is 24hr actual variable (times) ksol/sec... should get you in the ballpark of what it could make in 24 hours.

oki but can u help me to make a calculation example with the above paraneters?

If you are asking if there is a way to calculate how much *BTC* you will earn given a certain amount of Equihash* hashrate, then there isn't one, really. You can sort of estimate your earnings by seeing how much your hashrate will make of any one coin that uses your algo then convert that to BTC yourself, but since there is a delay - oftentimes a considerable one - between when you mine the coin and when it is converted to BTC this is only good for very rough estimations. And by "very rough" I mean "+/- 30%" (though in my experience one never sees the positive end of that range... ahem).


* - or any other single algo

[zimkan]

No income for X17 algo last 2 hours...

post your miner version, batch/launch config, and your payout address.   ill take a peek.

My address is 1GLzXWeqsF1TKRoD2EcjK1mpy3x9UHLGjc. There are pending earnings, but sometimes income graph stops rising up for several hours, just like now. Why it happens? And of course my profitability goes down.

sometimes profitability is down, or the frontend is not recording for its graphs because its pulled offline while other tasks are performed.  does the miner show any disconnect during that period?  Seems to look ok good at first glance.

No, there are no disconnects, or other miner errors.

[nesh1200]

Hello, why is the website buggy last days.Are there some known server problems?
I get from time to time Errro 502 and after refresh should I click on "Refresh for the live version" ant the third page loading is ok.

The second problem--> when I want to check the transaction hash, I get this errror ->Internal Server Error Call to undefined function curl_init()

Solved:
A third I didnt received the coins from this transaction txid=34e8720aca62f6ba56cac8bcdace186ba24db27ef386bd96b6f33b8835f03321
I#m mining X11 Algo(XMCC).

Thanks in advance!

[JaredKaragen]

Hello, why is the website buggy last days.Are there some known server problems?
I get from time to time Errro 502 and after refresh should I click on "Refresh for the live version" ant the third page loading is ok.

The second problem--> when I want to check the transaction hash, I get this errror ->Internal Server Error Call to undefined function curl_init()

Solved:
A third I didnt received the coins from this transaction txid=34e8720aca62f6ba56cac8bcdace186ba24db27ef386bd96b6f33b8835f03321
I#m mining X11 Algo(XMCC).

Thanks in advance!

the frontend goes offline when the transactions/payments are being processed;  or if some maintenance is going on.

normally comes back up in a little bit.

[Strebba90]

hi, i'm trying to mine on zpool with my BTC address, just created with greenaddress.
miner works fine but the pool show BCH balance. 
anyone can explain me why?

[Crywolf417]

When is MKT coins paid ? All other coins is paid except this one

mXxxDgi6jj6xVgR28SYHF3xNC6dd7a8kXS

Thanks

[JaredKaragen]

hi, i'm trying to mine on zpool with my BTC address, just created with greenaddress.
miner works fine but the pool show BCH balance. 
anyone can explain me why?

It needs to be repaired;  sometimes the server picks the wrong one for an unknown reason.

go to zpool.ca mainsite, scroll to bottom, click support link.   go to #support in the discord channel, and type a message to zpool that you need your account address from BCH switched to BTC.  Be sure to include your wallet address with your comment, and it will be handled when zpool gets back online.

[digital$]

miner stats for scrypt, sha256 and x11 almost always indicate lower hashrate than what im giving.  in some cases, especially with scrypt and sha miner shows its connected but absolutely no hashrate??  couple min later and it shows a quarter of what the actual hash is.  pity, wanted to give this pool a go but what gives if you cant track your hashrate reliably via the site.   

[rockmoney]

I see many people have started using Zpool to mine the blake2s algorithm using Claymore's new Dual Miner v11.3. The miner will allow you to mine Ethereum and now blake2s or keccak at the same time (with no effect on Ethereum mining speeds). Since its release yesterday, more and more people have started mining blake2s at Zpool.

Using my NVIDIA GTX 1070 rigs, I get about the same speed for each algorithm. To that end, you would think miners would then mine the most profitable one on a multipool like Zpool. For some reason, that is NOT the current case. For this example, we will use 10 GH/s as my mining speed for both algorithms, and current 24 hour average profitability for each algo are as follows:

keccak: 0.00004407 BTC/GH/day
blake2s: 0.00002123 BTC/GH/day

After 24 hours of mining at 10 GH/s, mining revenue (using the same exact miner) would be as follows:

keccak: 0.0105768 BTC/day
blake2s: 0.0050952 BTC/day

For that reason, I simply can NOT believe there are currently 9 people using Claymore's Miner (displayed as "dual" in the Miner stats on Zpool) to mine using the keccak algo, and 3,015 people using the same miner to mine the blake2s algo. According to the info provided by Zpool, mining profits using the keccak algorithm are nearly DOUBLE compared to blake2s. So, WHY ARE SO MANY CHOOSING TO EARN NEARLY HALF OF WHAT THEY COULD BE EARNING USING THE SAME MINER? Seriously, is there something I'm missing here?

If more miners decide to double their profits simply by changing two words and four numbers of the command line used to start the miner, the pool would likely find more keccak blocks, resulting in even more than double profits over the blake2s algorithm. Anyway, (unless I am completely missing something) I am still shocked that over 3k miners would start mining something without first checking profitability. The only reason I can really justify mining something less profitable is if you are a believer/supporter of the project, but payouts can be made in any currency mined on Zpool, so that should not be the case here..

I am getting way too many rejected shares when mining the keccak algo, but changing the difficulty manually has helped a great deal (although I am still seeing more rejected shares than I would like, and compared to any other algo on Claymore). Can someone from Zpool please look into the abnormally high number of rejected shares on port 5133?

[rockmoney]

hi, i'm trying to mine on zpool with my BTC address, just created with greenaddress.
miner works fine but the pool show BCH balance.  
anyone can explain me why?

It needs to be repaired;  sometimes the server picks the wrong one for an unknown reason.

go to zpool.ca mainsite, scroll to bottom, click support link.   go to #support in the discord channel, and type a message to zpool that you need your account address from BCH switched to BTC.  Be sure to include your wallet address with your comment, and it will be handled when zpool gets back online.

This from https://www.zpool.ca/ landing page:

<WALLET_ADDRESS> must be a valid address. Incorrect addresses will result in forfit of earning.

You can also use any valid wallet address from any of the coins we mine. This feature has had minimal testing so use at your own risk

YOU MUST ALWAYS set your currency in your password field that matches your wallet address: c=<SYMBOL>. The pool has mined hundreds of different coins and many have the same address version. We CAN NOT read your mind and possible know what currency you want. If no c=<SYMBOL> is set, your currency will be randomly chosen from any matching coins we have used. This HAS TO BE A REAL EXCHANGE SYMBOL. Do not use a symbol that has an <ALGO> added. Such as XVG-blake2s or AUR-sha or DGB-skein, these are ALL WRONG. These are used only for the pool to support multi-algo coins.

c=<SYMBOL> doesn't always work. However, if you fail to correct this and/or continue mining with the wrong currency detected you will NOT be able to change to the proper currency once an actual balance has been posted to the address. The quickest and easiest way for you to fix this, is create a new address, update your miners and make sure again you've set c= properly. Do not log a support ticket asking to convert your balance from one currency to another, they'll be closed. If you insist on keeping and using the original address. Your accrued balance will be cleared and the proper currency updated for you. Any blocks still new/immature/exchange will automaticlly convert to the new currency

[JaredKaragen]

I see many people have started using Zpool to mine the blake2s algorithm using Claymore's new Dual Miner v11.3. The miner will allow you to mine Ethereum and now blake2s or keccak at the same time (with no effect on Ethereum mining speeds). Since its release yesterday, more and more people have started mining blake2s at Zpool.

Using my NVIDIA GTX 1070 rigs, I get about the same speed for each algorithm. To that end, you would think miners would then mine the most profitable one on a multipool like Zpool. For some reason, that is NOT the current case. For this example, we will use 10 GH/s as my mining speed for both algorithms, and current 24 hour average profitability for each algo are as follows:

keccak: 0.00004407 BTC/GH/day
blake2s: 0.00002123 BTC/GH/day

After 24 hours of mining at 10 GH/s, mining revenue (using the same exact miner) would be as follows:

keccak: 0.0105768 BTC/day
blake2s: 0.0050952 BTC/day

For that reason, I simply can NOT believe there are currently 9 people using Claymore's Miner (displayed as "dual" in the Miner stats on Zpool) to mine using the keccak algo, and 3,015 people using the same miner to mine the blake2s algo. According to the info provided by Zpool, mining profits using the keccak algorithm are nearly DOUBLE compared to blake2s. So, WHY ARE SO MANY CHOOSING TO EARN NEARLY HALF OF WHAT THEY COULD BE EARNING USING THE SAME MINER? Seriously, is there something I'm missing here?

If more miners decide to double their profits simply by changing two words and four numbers of the command line used to start the miner, the pool would likely find more keccak blocks, resulting in even more than double profits over the blake2s algorithm. Anyway, (unless I am completely missing something) I am still shocked that over 3k miners would start mining something without first checking profitability. The only reason I can really justify mining something less profitable is if you are a believer/supporter of the project, but payouts can be made in any currency mined on Zpool, so that should not be the case here..

I am getting way too many rejected shares when mining the keccak algo, but changing the difficulty manually has helped a great deal (although I am still seeing more rejected shares than I would like, and compared to any other algo on Claymore). Can someone from Zpool please look into the abnormally high number of rejected shares on port 5133?

remember;  that's a dual-use miner;  AMD or nvidia.  Profitability on the other algos is vastly different between them.... you have no idea what they are mining with... thus no clue which is more profitable.    You only know for your own case.

I put a note about the rejects in the #support page of the zpool discord for you.

[malthrax]

I am still shocked that over 3k miners would start mining something without first checking profitability.

I'm not.  Not at all.

[Selector79]

Hello.

Is it possible in the settings to disable only one coin of algorithm?

In a Qubit algorithm I would disable a qubitcoin.  It takes only miner capacity and do not earn something.

Are there some commands for Baikal Giant X10 to disable this coin, but mine other coins in an algorithm?

Thanks in advance




Is it possible to disable qubitcoin in your pool or settings on baikal x10?