▂▃▅▆▇⫷[ 🆉🅿🅾🅾🅻.🅲🅰 ]⫸⫷[!10 FLUX PA's!]⫸⫷[ the miners multipool ]⫸ ▇▆▅▃▂

[crackfoo]

@ crackfoo Please fix this link - https://www.zpool.ca/site/multialgo

It gives 404. I want to use your pool for my BK X-10. Is there any specific instruction set available for configuration?

That’s the old site link. The same info is here:

https://www.zpool.ca/multialgo

[1713543429]

1713543429

[1713543429]

1713543429

[1713543429]

1713543429

[1713543429]

1713543429

[1713543429]

1713543429

[MKMiners]

@ crackfoo Please fix this link - https://www.zpool.ca/site/multialgo

It gives 404. I want to use your pool for my BK X-10. Is there any specific instruction set available for configuration?

That’s the old site link. The same info is here:

https://www.zpool.ca/multialgo

Ok thanks, but can you suggest me a config for BK X10? I don't see how it can be configured for that miner.

[FFI2013]

@ crackfoo Please fix this link - https://www.zpool.ca/site/multialgo

It gives 404. I want to use your pool for my BK X-10. Is there any specific instruction set available for configuration?

That’s the old site link. The same info is here:

https://www.zpool.ca/multialgo

Is there a way to see how many miners are on each algo I like the look of the new site but was unable to find miners per algo like the old site

[crackfoo]

@ crackfoo Please fix this link - https://www.zpool.ca/site/multialgo

It gives 404. I want to use your pool for my BK X-10. Is there any specific instruction set available for configuration?

That’s the old site link. The same info is here:

https://www.zpool.ca/multialgo

Is there a way to see how many miners are on each algo I like the look of the new site but was unable to find miners per algo like the old site

not right now on the site, just on the API.

Will make note of it and see where we can add this.

[cryptapus]

Greetings!

A major new release is planned for Myriadcoin:

https://www.reddit.com/r/myriadcoin/comments/9xasno/myriadcoin_01630rc0/

Mining pool feedback is most welcome. In the event that you wish to remain on v0.14, a optional but recommended update is available:

https://www.reddit.com/r/myriadcoin/comments/9x0xxb/myriadcoin_01441/

Thanks for your support!

[crackfoo]

Hi,

We've just added a new algo yespower with coin CRP.

Cheers

[AllenChong]

Hi,

We've enabled ASICBOOST support on both SHA256 ports - 3333 and 3343.

Cheers!

█▓▒░-< [ FlexFee™ >-░▒▓█

FlexFee™ is an exclusive fee system on www.zpool.ca only. This fee system is enabled on select algos which reduces the fee's on the pool based on the hashrate. The more hashrate, the less fees. Check for the green lines on the pool hashrate graphs to know if they are FlexFee™ enabled.

█▓▒░-< [ ASIC miners >-░▒▓█

Currently OFFLINE

█▓▒░-< [ Hashtap™ >-░▒▓█

Currently OFFLINE

█▓▒░-< [ Android App >-░▒▓█

Thanks to buffy007 for this handy app to monitor and track your miners and earning!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2183226.0


█▓▒░-< [ Custom multi algo miners >-░▒▓█

JaredKaragen - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1751272.msg17921405#msg17921405

minerx117 - NEMOSMINER multi algo profit switching NVIDIA miner for ZPOOL

Source: https://github.com/zpoolca/NemosMiner

Support: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1777336.msg17729122

cryptominer420 - ZpoolMiner: GUI Miner For Zpool.ca

https://github.com/Cryptominer937/zPoolMiner/releases

█▓▒░-< [ FAQ >-░▒▓█

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/415211469710557192/430701767718600704/current.PNG
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/415211469710557192/430701767894892553/current1.PNG
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/415211469710557192/430701768179974145/current2.PNG
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/415211469710557192/430701769442459658/current3.PNG

[Calvinz89]

Hello, maybe better to decrease BTC payouts from 0.0025 to 0.001?

[crackfoo]

Hello, maybe better to decrease BTC payouts from 0.0025 to 0.001?

why? sounds like a bad idea with the upcoming end of year mempool clogging that has started already.

https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#0,24h

$15-20 in BTC is the min I'll send.

[alucard20724]

I've got a weird problem with zpool, though i suspect it might be my ISP causing the problem.

I can connect to https://zpool.ca with no problems
I can read the api with no problems.
My L3++ connects to stratum+tcp://scrypt.mine.zpool.ca with no problem,
My Baikal minis connect to x13,x14,qubit, and quark with no problems

however, none of my cpus and gpus (amd and nvidia) will connect to zpool.  however, these cpus and gpus will connect to the same algos that are offered on nicehash,ahashpool,blazepool,hashrefinery,miningpoolhub,nlpool, and zergpool before zergpool disappeared.

also, my l3 and baikals work on nicehash also.

so.. could possibly my ISP just be blocking specific ports on zpool only?


UPDATE.. i just tested scrypt,x13,x14,qubit, and quark. with my cpu running cpuminermulti 1.3.5 and i can connect with no problem... so it appears that it's just the ports that aren't scrypt,x13,x14,qubit, and quark that are being blocked... maybe.. er..


f.y.i. blockmasters.co is completely blocked for me.  problems with zpool started showing up a few days after i could no longer access blockmasters.co

Visit the support channel via the link below and message me in the #support channel so we can check a few things out for you.

https://discord.gg/5H7by34

The problem was with my ISP (AT&T)

I just upgraded my ISP (AT&T) from 75mbps (ADSL from AT&T) to 1gbps(fiber. still  AT&T).   Now i get connectivity to zpool for mining, and i can now access blockmasters.co

the modem stayed the same.  apparently their modems do ADSL and Fiber.  They just had to connect the fiber line and allow access at their center.

Fucking AT&T 

[crackfoo]

I've got a weird problem with zpool, though i suspect it might be my ISP causing the problem.

I can connect to https://zpool.ca with no problems
I can read the api with no problems.
My L3++ connects to stratum+tcp://scrypt.mine.zpool.ca with no problem,
My Baikal minis connect to x13,x14,qubit, and quark with no problems

however, none of my cpus and gpus (amd and nvidia) will connect to zpool.  however, these cpus and gpus will connect to the same algos that are offered on nicehash,ahashpool,blazepool,hashrefinery,miningpoolhub,nlpool, and zergpool before zergpool disappeared.

also, my l3 and baikals work on nicehash also.

so.. could possibly my ISP just be blocking specific ports on zpool only?


UPDATE.. i just tested scrypt,x13,x14,qubit, and quark. with my cpu running cpuminermulti 1.3.5 and i can connect with no problem... so it appears that it's just the ports that aren't scrypt,x13,x14,qubit, and quark that are being blocked... maybe.. er..


f.y.i. blockmasters.co is completely blocked for me.  problems with zpool started showing up a few days after i could no longer access blockmasters.co

Visit the support channel via the link below and message me in the #support channel so we can check a few things out for you.

https://discord.gg/5H7by34

The problem was with my ISP (AT&T)

I just upgraded my ISP (AT&T) from 75mbps (ADSL from AT&T) to 1gbps(fiber. still  AT&T).   Now i get connectivity to zpool for mining, and i can now access blockmasters.co

the modem stayed the same.  apparently their modems do ADSL and Fiber.  They just had to connect the fiber line and allow access at their center.

Fucking AT&T 

well, this is great to hear. Thanks for following up. I guess baikals are sensitive to the network speeds, but one would think a 75Mbps line would be sufficient.

Cheers

[PotShot-RSA]

Hi Crackfoo

My password line in my .bat file is:
c=BTC,x17=23,x16r=21,x16s=21,phi2=9.7,bcd=.028,lyra2z=5,phi=41,aergo=9.1,skein=.82,allium=10.7,lyra2v2=.0675,hex=.0175,lbk3=.44,polytimos=48,c11=33,x22i=12.3,sonoa=3.57,hmq1725=14.3,tribus=.131,bitcore=38

It selects bcd at the right times, but zpool (or yiimp) also reads bcd=.028 as d=.028 and sets that as difficulty. Other algos that come after bcd in the line above then also have difficulty set at .028

e.g. Currently mining x22i and from the zpool legacy website:

Details   Extra   Algo   Diff   ES**   Hashrate*
CryptoDredge/0.10.0   F,c=BTC,x17=23,x16r=21,x16s=21,p   x22i   0.028      7.8 MH/s
CryptoDredge/0.10.0   J,c=BTC,x17=23.5,x16r=21,x16s=21   x22i   0.028      5.7 MH/s
CryptoDredge/0.10.0   P,c=BTC,x17=23,x16r=21,x16s=21,p   x22i   0.028      4.1 MH/s

Can you please advise, thanks

[alucard20724]

I've got a weird problem with zpool, though i suspect it might be my ISP causing the problem.

I can connect to https://zpool.ca with no problems
I can read the api with no problems.
My L3++ connects to stratum+tcp://scrypt.mine.zpool.ca with no problem,
My Baikal minis connect to x13,x14,qubit, and quark with no problems

however, none of my cpus and gpus (amd and nvidia) will connect to zpool.  however, these cpus and gpus will connect to the same algos that are offered on nicehash,ahashpool,blazepool,hashrefinery,miningpoolhub,nlpool, and zergpool before zergpool disappeared.

also, my l3 and baikals work on nicehash also.

so.. could possibly my ISP just be blocking specific ports on zpool only?


UPDATE.. i just tested scrypt,x13,x14,qubit, and quark. with my cpu running cpuminermulti 1.3.5 and i can connect with no problem... so it appears that it's just the ports that aren't scrypt,x13,x14,qubit, and quark that are being blocked... maybe.. er..


f.y.i. blockmasters.co is completely blocked for me.  problems with zpool started showing up a few days after i could no longer access blockmasters.co

Visit the support channel via the link below and message me in the #support channel so we can check a few things out for you.

https://discord.gg/5H7by34

The problem was with my ISP (AT&T)

I just upgraded my ISP (AT&T) from 75mbps (ADSL from AT&T) to 1gbps(fiber. still  AT&T).   Now i get connectivity to zpool for mining, and i can now access blockmasters.co

the modem stayed the same.  apparently their modems do ADSL and Fiber.  They just had to connect the fiber line and allow access at their center.

Fucking AT&T  

well, this is great to hear. Thanks for following up. I guess baikals are sensitive to the network speeds, but one would think a 75Mbps line would be sufficient.

Cheers

has nothing to do with the speed of the network...unless it's at&t.  four hours after the switch over, started having problems again with cpu/gpu not able to get work from zpool again.  never had a problem with comcast/xfinity/verizon/timewarner.

at least i was able to get on zpool for four hours with AT&T..

two of three baikal mini able to connect, and my L++ is able to connect again.    til at&t screws it up again.

[Rodderman]

I see that the algo sha256 is having major issues! 

[JaredKaragen]

Hi Crackfoo

My password line in my .bat file is:
c=BTC,x17=23,x16r=21,x16s=21,phi2=9.7,bcd=.028,lyra2z=5,phi=41,aergo=9.1,skein=.82,allium=10.7,lyra2v2=.0675,hex=.0175,lbk3=.44,polytimos=48,c11=33,x22i=12.3,sonoa=3.57,hmq1725=14.3,tribus=.131,bitcore=38

It selects bcd at the right times, but zpool (or yiimp) also reads bcd=.028 as d=.028 and sets that as difficulty. Other algos that come after bcd in the line above then also have difficulty set at .028

e.g. Currently mining x22i and from the zpool legacy website:

Details   Extra   Algo   Diff   ES**   Hashrate*
CryptoDredge/0.10.0   F,c=BTC,x17=23,x16r=21,x16s=21,p   x22i   0.028      7.8 MH/s
CryptoDredge/0.10.0   J,c=BTC,x17=23.5,x16r=21,x16s=21   x22i   0.028      5.7 MH/s
CryptoDredge/0.10.0   P,c=BTC,x17=23,x16r=21,x16s=21,p   x22i   0.028      4.1 MH/s

Can you please advise, thanks

There is a chance it could just be coincidence.

if you increase its normalization factor up to some arbitrary number (this will also influence your miner to swap to that algo, which helps us test quickly) lets say 0.28;  see if it indeed carries over to the difficulty setting.

If this is the case;  I would think someone screwed up a variable in the yiimp code by mistake....   seems like an easy enough variable to use by accident.

[PotShot-RSA]

Hi Crackfoo

My password line in my .bat file is:
c=BTC,x17=23,x16r=21,x16s=21,phi2=9.7,bcd=.028,lyra2z=5,phi=41,aergo=9.1,skein=.82,allium=10.7,lyra2v2=.0675,hex=.0175,lbk3=.44,polytimos=48,c11=33,x22i=12.3,sonoa=3.57,hmq1725=14.3,tribus=.131,bitcore=38

It selects bcd at the right times, but zpool (or yiimp) also reads bcd=.028 as d=.028 and sets that as difficulty. Other algos that come after bcd in the line above then also have difficulty set at .028

e.g. Currently mining x22i and from the zpool legacy website:

Details   Extra   Algo   Diff   ES**   Hashrate*
CryptoDredge/0.10.0   F,c=BTC,x17=23,x16r=21,x16s=21,p   x22i   0.028      7.8 MH/s
CryptoDredge/0.10.0   J,c=BTC,x17=23.5,x16r=21,x16s=21   x22i   0.028      5.7 MH/s
CryptoDredge/0.10.0   P,c=BTC,x17=23,x16r=21,x16s=21,p   x22i   0.028      4.1 MH/s

Can you please advise, thanks

There is a chance it could just be coincidence.

if you increase its normalization factor up to some arbitrary number (this will also influence your miner to swap to that algo, which helps us test quickly) lets say 0.28;  see if it indeed carries over to the difficulty setting.

If this is the case;  I would think someone screwed up a variable in the yiimp code by mistake....   seems like an easy enough variable to use by accident.

Yes If I set e.g. x22i to a high value and bcd to a low value so that it will always choose x22i, then it takes the value for bcd as the difficulty. I can change it at will:

-p c=BTC,x22i=120.3,bcd=.012

and on zpool it shows: CryptoDredge/0.10.0   P,c=BTC,x17=23,x16r=21,x16s=21,p   x22i   0.012      13.4 MH/s

and the miner also shows the same difficulty is being used: [05:49:37] INFO  - Setting new difficulty: 0.012

So, by changing the value for bcd in the password field I can change the difficulty it will use to mine other (not all) algos

Hoping that crackfoo will test and pass a message to yiimp devs (if they are still active)

[Rodderman]

Why was BTCP changed to ninja?

will I get paid for my current past work my Antminer Z9  since blocks are being found under ninja?

[crackfoo]

Why was BTCP changed to ninja?

will I get paid for my current past work my Antminer Z9  since blocks are being found under ninja?

because it's behind on payments and don't want more miners choosing it as a payout.

[Rodderman]

Why was BTCP changed to ninja?

will I get paid for my current past work my Antminer Z9  since blocks are being found under ninja?

because it's behind on payments and don't want more miners choosing it as a payout.

Ok. it will catch up when blocks are found by the pool and I can swap back?

[crackfoo]

Why was BTCP changed to ninja?

will I get paid for my current past work my Antminer Z9  since blocks are being found under ninja?

because it's behind on payments and don't want more miners choosing it as a payout.

Ok. it will catch up when blocks are found by the pool and I can swap back?

yeah