[ANN][PASL]-[PASCAL Lite]-[The Future is Almost Here]

[hannusolo]

No Suprnova is done even with the original PascalCoin. Apparently due to unfair practices.

But PASL is not unfair as far as i see, we just could see the first attempts of community development

We have now minimum this -
Client: IP:125.36.165.186:54120 Sent/Received:11785/11007 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 11 minutes ago
Client: IP:110.185.136.77:59776 Sent/Received:3950/2261 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 7 minutes ago
Is in possible to block old wallets?

I can't see them, but you can send a message to those nodes in the wallet, can't you?

[Slava_K]

Send 5 minutes ago.
P.S. One more man from the past... Message sended.
Client: IP:180.245.207.110:59316 Sent/Received:1787/696 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 1 minute ago

[adaseb]

We have now minimum this -
Client: IP:125.36.165.186:54120 Sent/Received:11785/11007 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 11 minutes ago
Client: IP:110.185.136.77:59776 Sent/Received:3950/2261 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 7 minutes ago
Is in possible to block old wallets?

As long as they are not a node then it shouldn't matter. Even if they mine with a future timestamp, it won't get accepted on the network.

Only the nodes have to have the latest software.

But PASL is not unfair as far as i see, we just could see the first attempts of community development

Its not that. He just finds the coin to be very buggy and in its alpha stage.

[ocminer]

We have now minimum this -
Client: IP:125.36.165.186:54120 Sent/Received:11785/11007 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 11 minutes ago
Client: IP:110.185.136.77:59776 Sent/Received:3950/2261 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 7 minutes ago
Is in possible to block old wallets?

As long as they are not a node then it shouldn't matter. Even if they mine with a future timestamp, it won't get accepted on the network.

Only the nodes have to have the latest software.

But PASL is not unfair as far as i see, we just could see the first attempts of community development

Its not that. He just finds the coin to be very buggy and in its alpha stage.

Not correct.

Any timestamp is accepted.

This coins are exploited heavily already and big stakes are already in hands which are just waiting to dump.

The coin is not mature in its current state for any use, it's a pure speculators (and fpga miners) coin with custom pools and hacked / modded nodes / wallets

[code_honesty]

We have now minimum this -
Client: IP:125.36.165.186:54120 Sent/Received:11785/11007 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 11 minutes ago
Client: IP:110.185.136.77:59776 Sent/Received:3950/2261 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 7 minutes ago
Is in possible to block old wallets?

As long as they are not a node then it shouldn't matter. Even if they mine with a future timestamp, it won't get accepted on the network.

Only the nodes have to have the latest software.

But PASL is not unfair as far as i see, we just could see the first attempts of community development

Its not that. He just finds the coin to be very buggy and in its alpha stage.

Not correct.

Any timestamp is accepted.

This coins are exploited heavily already and big stakes are already in hands which are just waiting to dump.

The coin is not mature in its current state for any use, it's a pure speculators (and fpga miners) coin with custom pools and hacked / modded nodes / wallets

Agree. Eventually we'll get there on fixing this issues. I think PASL might open for your suggestions. right adaseb?

[dedmaroz]

payload "mmcmc17300" is not my miner. Someone is hiding behind my miners

[xiphon]

payload "mmcmc17300" is not my miner. Someone is hiding behind my miners

Good turn from someone whoever it is.
He should pay a rent for using your miner's name.

[xiphon]

We have now minimum this -
Client: IP:125.36.165.186:54120 Sent/Received:11785/11007 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 11 minutes ago
Client: IP:110.185.136.77:59776 Sent/Received:3950/2261 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 7 minutes ago
Is in possible to block old wallets?

As long as they are not a node then it shouldn't matter. Even if they mine with a future timestamp, it won't get accepted on the network.

Only the nodes have to have the latest software.

But PASL is not unfair as far as i see, we just could see the first attempts of community development

Its not that. He just finds the coin to be very buggy and in its alpha stage.

Not correct.

Any timestamp is accepted.

Nope, PascalLite network rejects blocks having invalid future timestamp.

[code_honesty]

We have now minimum this -
Client: IP:125.36.165.186:54120 Sent/Received:11785/11007 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 11 minutes ago
Client: IP:110.185.136.77:59776 Sent/Received:3950/2261 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 7 minutes ago
Is in possible to block old wallets?

As long as they are not a node then it shouldn't matter. Even if they mine with a future timestamp, it won't get accepted on the network.

Only the nodes have to have the latest software.

But PASL is not unfair as far as i see, we just could see the first attempts of community development

Its not that. He just finds the coin to be very buggy and in its alpha stage.

Not correct.

Any timestamp is accepted.

Nope, PascalLite network rejects blocks having invalid future timestamp.

Partially true, wetpussy and new node still shows negative.

Anyone tried wolf0 sgminer solo and found a block? started mining a few hours ago and not so lucky with 2 470rigs.

[Slava_K]

We have now minimum this -
Client: IP:125.36.165.186:54120 Sent/Received:11785/11007 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 11 minutes ago
Client: IP:110.185.136.77:59776 Sent/Received:3950/2261 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 7 minutes ago
Is in possible to block old wallets?

As long as they are not a node then it shouldn't matter. Even if they mine with a future timestamp, it won't get accepted on the network.

Only the nodes have to have the latest software.

But PASL is not unfair as far as i see, we just could see the first attempts of community development

Its not that. He just finds the coin to be very buggy and in its alpha stage.

Not correct.

Any timestamp is accepted.

Nope, PascalLite network rejects blocks having invalid future timestamp.

But with same is accepted (or lower then real time).

[Slava_K]

We have now minimum this -
Client: IP:125.36.165.186:54120 Sent/Received:11785/11007 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 11 minutes ago
Client: IP:110.185.136.77:59776 Sent/Received:3950/2261 Bytes - [3-4] 1.4.2wL - Active since 7 minutes ago
Is in possible to block old wallets?

As long as they are not a node then it shouldn't matter. Even if they mine with a future timestamp, it won't get accepted on the network.

Only the nodes have to have the latest software.

But PASL is not unfair as far as i see, we just could see the first attempts of community development

Its not that. He just finds the coin to be very buggy and in its alpha stage.

Not correct.

Any timestamp is accepted.

Nope, PascalLite network rejects blocks having invalid future timestamp.

But with same is accepted (or lower then real time).

I think we need node accepting for founded blocks. And wallet himself sync time by GMT. And some control sum for exe file with centralized control.

[Slava_K]

Who is wolf0 in miners? 

[smic]

exchange?

[Slava_K]

exchange?

After blockexplorer.

[Slava_K]

GO TO POOL!!!! 

[MrJaekin]

I went ahead and grabbed http://www.PascalLite.com. I'm looking into getting a Block Explorer up and running. If anyone wants to help, that would be great! I'm a systems guy, not a web developer. 😜

[dedmaroz]

timestamp bug in my mining software is fixed (cmcmc miner), i incremented timestamp every second and timestamp can be old max. -20s. When it is wrong, let me know...

[hyudien]

So if we want this coin launched properly there are a few things we should change in the code so its not an identical clone with a different name. So whatever you guys decide I would put it in the code.

We need a new name obviously
We need some new logos (maybe someone can help me with those)
We can change the block rewards, block time, number of accounts created per mined block, block maturely count, etc.
I can look at the algorithm and do a few tweaks and make it "CPU ONLY" again... at least for a while before the miner devs see what I did to the algorithm.

Is this coin not working correctly dev? Or this pre-ANN?

[MrJaekin]

So if we want this coin launched properly there are a few things we should change in the code so its not an identical clone with a different name. So whatever you guys decide I would put it in the code.

We need a new name obviously
We need some new logos (maybe someone can help me with those)
We can change the block rewards, block time, number of accounts created per mined block, block maturely count, etc.
I can look at the algorithm and do a few tweaks and make it "CPU ONLY" again... at least for a while before the miner devs see what I did to the algorithm.

Is this coin not working correctly dev? Or this pre-ANN?

The coin is working great!  We have a pool at https://pasl.fairpool.xyz/. Already getting payouts as well.

[hyudien]

So if we want this coin launched properly there are a few things we should change in the code so its not an identical clone with a different name. So whatever you guys decide I would put it in the code.

We need a new name obviously
We need some new logos (maybe someone can help me with those)
We can change the block rewards, block time, number of accounts created per mined block, block maturely count, etc.
I can look at the algorithm and do a few tweaks and make it "CPU ONLY" again... at least for a while before the miner devs see what I did to the algorithm.

Is this coin not working correctly dev? Or this pre-ANN?

The coin is working great!  We have a pool at https://pasl.fairpool.xyz/. Already getting payouts as well.

So what is that mean(main thread)? Did you explain it to me?