[NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner

[millsys]

Not sure why for zpool i keep getting Error contacting pool,retrying.
i've tried different Locations .  Nothing is working .

The only location working for zPool is US.

Yea i did US on , NemosMiner-v2.4.1 file & on pool file, not sure what i'm doing wrong.

You are using the lower paying pool, just use ahashpool and make more

Do they accept payout in other currency? Don't really want BTC.

Zpool is working for now.
Zpool24hr gives me the error.

No but you can payout to BTC at an exchange and buy whatever currency you want to invest your earnings in, that is what zpool is doing for you, just do it yourself.

What would you prefer $11.99/nvidia 1080ti card or $6.08/nvidia 1080ti card???
https://imgur.com/a/xhATr

[miner14]

Substantial performance improvement on X17, Nist5, Skein, C11, Lyra2REv2!!!  30-40% across the board!!!

I was just trying this on a spare 3x1080ti machine and I accidently closed the benchmark after only one result  on x17

No problem, reset the benchmarks and started it again... noticed a rather large difference - is this the expected variance over consecutive benchmarks?

Stats ' X17 ' ->  59.90 MH after 481 sec
Stats ' X17 ' ->  54.38 MH after 481 sec
Stats ' X17 ' ->  53.70 MH after 481 sec

v 2.41-master

[lasttimei]

Not sure why for zpool i keep getting Error contacting pool,retrying.
i've tried different Locations .  Nothing is working .

The only location working for zPool is US.

Yea i did US on , NemosMiner-v2.4.1 file & on pool file, not sure what i'm doing wrong.

You are using the lower paying pool, just use ahashpool and make more

Do they accept payout in other currency? Don't really want BTC.

Zpool is working for now.
Zpool24hr gives me the error.

No but you can payout to BTC at an exchange and buy whatever currency you want to invest your earnings in, that is what zpool is doing for you, just do it yourself.

What would you prefer $11.99/nvidia 1080ti card or $6.08/nvidia 1080ti card???
https://imgur.com/a/xhATr

i'll check them out . Just that i used to use poloniex & now they want people to be verified .
& Cryptopia dont want you to mine to their wallet . If you know a exchange that i can use that all you need is email . I'm all in

[millsys]

6x1070ti rigs on 2.4.1:
ccminerpolytimos    Lyra2RE2  276.47 MH/s    8.261 0.00826 105.788    0.02988 ahashpool-
ccminerpolytimos    X17        72.86 MH/s    3.249 0.00325  41.606    0.04459 ahashpool-
ccminerpolytimos    Nist5     317.25 MH/s    3.061 0.00306  39.205    0.00965 ahashpool-
ccminerpolytimos    Skein       3.64 GH/s    2.951 0.00295   37.789    0.00081 ahashpool-
ccminerpolytimos    Blake2s    27.23 GH/s    2.008 0.00201  25.711    0.00007 ahashpool-

[miner14]

6x1070ti rigs on 2.4.1:

At a loss as to why that's a reply to my Q millsys

I was asking why the same benchmark reran produces three different results.
I'm guessing it's down to the pool and not some markup in the maths if only one benchmark is run - to make it look better...what can I say I have a suspicious outlook

Just ran it again and got around 56.13 so I guess it settles down.

My point being if it was only run once, would that skew the profit profiles and have you mining the wrong algo?

Anyway just what I found, take it as you will.

[millsys]

6x1070ti rigs on 2.4.1:

At a loss as to why that's a reply to my Q millsys

I was asking why the same benchmark reran produces three different results.
I'm guessing it's down to the pool and not some markup in the maths if only one benchmark is run - to make it look better...what can I say I have a suspicious outlook

Just ran it again and got around 56.13 so I guess it settles down.

My point being if it was only run once, would that skew the profit profiles and have you mining the wrong algo?

Anyway just what I found, take it as you will.

Every benchmark will be off by 1-2% easily, you are never going to get the card to hash the exact MH every single time.  That 1-2% variance will not impact you, this is just used for NemosMiner to determine the best algo to mine at the moment in time, it doesn't affect the actual hash rate during mining

[miner14]

Every benchmark will be off by 1-2% easily, you are never going to get the card to hash the exact MH every single time.  That 1-2% variance will not impact you, this is just used for NemosMiner to determine the best algo to mine at the moment in time, it doesn't affect the actual hash rate during mining

Yes, thanks. I wondered if that' the expected variance.
But let's be clear here we are talking about a 12% difference  not a 2% difference. Sure Hash rate will be unaffected obviously, but will switching be unaffected?
surly the benchmarks are used to denote the switching preferences?

Anyone else reran the benchmarks several times after clearing them, and seen such % differences?
I may try another machine tomorrow, or the older version just to see.

[oddity2505]

Regarding the variation in the benchmark results. I find the results more consistent if I run the benchmark on zpool and not on ahashpool. The latter has much higher default stratum difficulty and usually there are not enough shares found during the span of a benchmark, thus making its results fluctuate a lot. Especially if you are using single gpus.

[oddity2505]

Not sure why for zpool i keep getting Error contacting pool,retrying.
i've tried different Locations .  Nothing is working .

The only location working for zPool is US.

Yea i did US on , NemosMiner-v2.4.1 file & on pool file, not sure what i'm doing wrong.

You are using the lower paying pool, just use ahashpool and make more

Do they accept payout in other currency? Don't really want BTC.

Zpool is working for now.
Zpool24hr gives me the error.

No but you can payout to BTC at an exchange and buy whatever currency you want to invest your earnings in, that is what zpool is doing for you, just do it yourself.

What would you prefer $11.99/nvidia 1080ti card or $6.08/nvidia 1080ti card???
https://imgur.com/a/xhATr

I like ahashpool, often it actually pays more than zpool. But the problem that it promises even more. Zpool's current profit is more realistic. For example, on this screenshot on nist5 algo both pools are mining bulwarks but ahashpool's falsely reports 40% higher profit

[minhoca]

I'm recently using nemosminer and I really like it so far, now a doubt that I have reading the topics already on some pages, it is about which of the two pools someone with more experience and knowledge can inform me that it is the most profitable or with lower fees.

Ahashpool or the Mining Pool Hub ?

and thanks for having several active users using nemosminer and sharing your experiences and doubts (several that I already had already answered because someone else asked and was answered)

Thanks all for being participative.

Sorry for my English.

[miner14]

I think I agree with you, but I can't bring myself to waste a couple of hours on Zpool, esp as I don't intend to mine there to reach a minpayout.
I not sure why shares found would affect your constant hashrate, but I do see that difficulty changes would.

I just found it weird for such a high discrepancy. You are probably entirely right, but having large %swings added to your benchmarks can't be ideal, or expected on consecutive runs of the same benchmark on 3x the same cards.

I'll have a play.

In any case I'm liking nemosminer so far, much better than the others I've tried.

[Zikkson]

I'm recently using nemosminer and I really like it so far, now a doubt that I have reading the topics already on some pages, it is about which of the two pools someone with more experience and knowledge can inform me that it is the most profitable or with lower fees.

Ahashpool or the Mining Pool Hub ?

and thanks for having several active users using nemosminer and sharing your experiences and doubts (several that I already had already answered because someone else asked and was answered)

Thanks all for being participative.

Sorry for my English.

MiningPoolHub is making aprox 6% higher profit regarding my test. Also you can set different coin for payout and lower min payout with lower fees there. Anyway Ahaspool is great too, but they are changing min payout from 0,008 to 0,01 in 7 days, which is not good in my opinion. So im mining on ahaspool just for min payout and then ill switch back to Mining Pool Hub

[lasttimei]

https://i.gyazo.com/9e1146d11484678306f27f98f46a4df6.png

Does that look accurate ?O,o
2 1080/1 ti.
rig2 1 1080.

[MaxiMan]

Talking about pools... im looking a pool where i can mine x11 (D3) and my GPUs.
Looking Ahashpool but it dont supports x11, im with Nicehash and seems ok, but payment looks to be not constant until i reach 0.1
I like to mine all my devices on same pool so i get tresholds payment faster.

[primo1983]

I do not know if it can but I created a group in whatsapp so we can exchange ideas.
https://chat.whatsapp.com/A9jrZSkJ0aW0Qbl0NAIOWY

[manc]

Just ran a 300s bench with 2.4.1 - Impressive increases across the board.

HSRminer - neoscrypt seemed to lose contact with nemos though, the miner ran and showed up on the pool... but once the bench interval expired nemos threw an error and then tried to rerun hsr/neoscrypt. The miner window didn't flinch though.
The hash rates reported in the miner looked pretty damned good though.

[puch0021]

Substantial performance improvement on X17, Nist5, Skein, C11, Lyra2REv2!!!  30-40% across the board!!!

PHI = none, in the 2.4.1 beta you had a new phi 1.0 miner, I tested and it actually didn't improve results at all, I guess you noticed the same and left it out for now?

I saw similar increases in hash rate - however, are you seeing that actually represented as shares accepted at the pool? I didn't have time to test it but I didn't believe that increase in hash rate was possible without it being bugged.

Which specific miner gave you those increases for X17, Nist5, Skein, C11, Lyra2REv2? Just want to make sure we are talking about the same miner.

[Zybane]

Guys, total noob to mining but I've been linked here by Hardforum. Will be mining with a single Titan V.

Sorry for the noob questions:

1. Downloaded NemosMiner-v2.4.zip and followed the instructions in original post. Says: Running Failed #. Any thoughts?

2. Should I put my Titan V back to stock clocks or even under-clock? Any prevention measures?

[jimmykl]

Guys, total noob to mining but I've been linked here by Hardforum. Will be mining with a single Titan V.

Sorry for the noob questions:

1. Downloaded NemosMiner-v2.4.zip and followed the instructions in original post. Says: Running Failed #. Any thoughts?

2. Should I put my Titan V back to stock clocks or even under-clock? Any prevention measures?

Send me one and I'll help debug. (Sorry not constructive but I couldn't resist  )

Definitely try using stock clocks initially. Does a miner window flash up quickly then disappear? Is there anything in miner.log in the logs folder?

[Zybane]

Guys, total noob to mining but I've been linked here by Hardforum. Will be mining with a single Titan V.

Sorry for the noob questions:

1. Downloaded NemosMiner-v2.4.zip and followed the instructions in original post. Says: Running Failed #. Any thoughts?

2. Should I put my Titan V back to stock clocks or even under-clock? Any prevention measures?

Send me one and I'll help debug. (Sorry not constructive but I couldn't resist  )

Definitely try using stock clocks initially. Does a miner window flash up quickly then disappear? Is there anything in miner.log in the logs folder?

Hah, failure to follow instructions. The stock .bat is setup for two GPU's (0,1), changed it to (0,0) and working now!

GPU usage is 100%, but power draw is small ~75% with Titan V only running at 1515 MHz. Normal core for games is ~1900 MHz. Wonder why that is?