Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns

[sed]

Yup, this is the reason that I quit this campaign, seemed like shady behaviour to me.  Thank god for bitmixer.

[1714123325]

1714123325

[1714123325]

1714123325

[1714123325]

1714123325

[1714123325]

1714123325

[Gronthaing]

GreenCoin has closed its signature campaign for now.

[Mitchell]

I have updated the OP, thanks everyone for keeping me posted!
Small update to the OP: I have decided to add "Escrowed by devthedev" to the cloudminr.io campaign because they escrowed funds with someone who is well known and respected by the community.
What do you guys think?

Should I keep this message? Should I remove it? Should I do this from now on?

[ACCTseller]

I have updated the OP, thanks everyone for keeping me posted!
Small update to the OP: I have decided to add "Escrowed by devthedev" to the cloudminr.io campaign because they escrowed funds with someone who is well known and respected by the community.
What do you guys think?

Should I keep this message? Should I remove it? Should I do this from now on?

I would say it would be useful to include it anytime funds are escrowed with someone who is trusted within the community (I would say in the description, not the chart). You would also potentially add a y/n column to say if funds are escrowed or not.

I might also mention the maximum potential payout per period verses the total amount escrowed (in the description) so users can get a good idea as to how well they are protected.   

[freedomno1]

I have updated the OP, thanks everyone for keeping me posted!
Small update to the OP: I have decided to add "Escrowed by devthedev" to the cloudminr.io campaign because they escrowed funds with someone who is well known and respected by the community.
What do you guys think?

Should I keep this message? Should I remove it? Should I do this from now on?

I think its a good idea as long as the escrow is reputable in the community.
It also helps clarify between new escrowed campaigns and new unescrowed campaigns.
If the escrow was relatively unknown though would be a bit more worried if some new fund escrowed with them as it could be an alt.

[Mitchell]

I would say it would be useful to include it anytime funds are escrowed with someone who is trusted within the community (I would say in the description, not the chart). You would also potentially add a y/n column to say if funds are escrowed or not.

I might also mention the maximum potential payout per period verses the total amount escrowed (in the description) so users can get a good idea as to how well they are protected.  

Adding more information about escrow to the description: Good idea, will do.
Add a "Escrow"-part to the table: Good idea, will add that
Maximum potential payout per period verses the total amount escrowed: Sounds like a bit of extra work. Might do that as well.

[Mitchell]

I think its a good idea as long as the escrow is reputable in the community.
It also helps clarify between new escrowed campaigns and new unescrowed campaigns.
If the escrow was relatively unknown though would be a bit more worried if some new fund escrowed with them as it could be an alt.

Well, the green part would only be done if someone is reputable. I would, for example, never color myself green. It's easy for me to say I'm trusted and even if people said they trust me, I wouldn't give myself a green color. Just for the sake of being fair.
EDIT: The next auction is up as well: Advertise in the Signature Overview Thread [Round 5]

[patt0]

I think this is a good idea too. BitStars has monbux as escrow, but I don't know if he has received funds for this month yet. His last message in the campaign thread was:

So what is going on with this campaign. Do we know who is in and who is out? Its been a few days hopefully we find out soon and I hope the sig campaign starts from at least Nov 3rd and not today or tomorrow.

All i know is that Nick and his crew have been very bust... But just so everyone knows, I am currently not holding onto November's signature campaign funds.

[botany]

Yup, bitstars stated that the funds would be sent soon, but we haven't got confirmation.

....

And the money going to monbux either today or tomorrow, we are just finishing accounting from previous campaigns

Thanks for the patience guys,

Cheers!
Nick

Dream Big, Win Bigger

[Rampton]

Hoping some new campaigns come out from the woodwork soon. My Silver Wallet campaign ends at the end of this month and I'll be a Senior by then as well. Hope PD can come back from the dead .

EDIT: The next auction is up as well: Advertise in the Signature Overview Thread [Round 5]

Out of interest how many ads have you sold previously and for what prices, if you don't mind me asking?

[Mitchell]

Out of interest how many ads have you sold previously and for what prices, if you don't mind me asking?

Well, round 5 is currently in progress, so you guess how many ads have been sold.
The price is somewhere between 0.035BTC and 0.04BTC.

[irfan_pak10]

My campaign Paidverts is closed please remove it

thanks

[Mitchell]

My campaign Paidverts is closed please remove it

thanks

Thank you for telling me! I have removed your campaign from the OP.

[picolo]

I have updated the OP, thanks everyone for keeping me posted!
Small update to the OP: I have decided to add "Escrowed by devthedev" to the cloudminr.io campaign because they escrowed funds with someone who is well known and respected by the community.
What do you guys think?

Should I keep this message? Should I remove it? Should I do this from now on?

I would say it would be useful to include it anytime funds are escrowed with someone who is trusted within the community (I would say in the description, not the chart). You would also potentially add a y/n column to say if funds are escrowed or not.

I might also mention the maximum potential payout per period verses the total amount escrowed (in the description) so users can get a good idea as to how well they are protected.   

Cloudminr is new but the owner seems to be willing to do things right!
It is the highest paying campaign on Bitcointalk since you can make 0.4/month as a Senior Member.

[redsn0w]

FortuneJack doesn't accept  anymore new members :

Hi,

..snip...


Campaign will run one more week and by the next Wednesday we will decide how it will proceed (most probably it will continue under the same terms and conditions, but let's wait until next Wednesday). We won't accept new participants until then.

[letyouearn]

FortuneJack doesn't accept  anymore new members :

Hi,

..snip...


Campaign will run one more week and by the next Wednesday we will decide how it will proceed (most probably it will continue under the same terms and conditions, but let's wait until next Wednesday). We won't accept new participants until then.

Another Famous and high paying signature is going to be closed for new participants.

I am eagerly waiting to be a Senior or Hero member and then i was looking to join fortunejack signature campaign.

But this will be also on the way to be closed for new members like me.

[TheNewAnon135246]

Does anybody remember de good old days where you could earn 1+ BTC a month ?

[redsn0w]

FutureStocks.biz signature campaign  has closed :

Due to lack of support from btc community I'm forced to stop signature campaign.

[kotwica666]

I have updated the OP, thanks everyone for keeping me posted!
Small update to the OP: I have decided to add "Escrowed by devthedev" to the cloudminr.io campaign because they escrowed funds with someone who is well known and respected by the community.
What do you guys think?

Should I keep this message? Should I remove it? Should I do this from now on?

Do marking on green devthedev is okay to other escrow providers? This question rather to them..
For me that's not a problem.
Info about escrow ofcourse should be!

[usupnaruto]

FutureStocks.biz signature campaign  has closed :

Due to lack of support from btc community I'm forced to stop signature campaign.

this ponzi stop the campaign...finally