Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns

[BadBear]

CoinPiler is scam, doesn't pay for November, plz remove it.

I'm shocked that someone who refused to use escrow with flimsy excuses turned out to be a scam.

[tspacepilot]

Bear you're supposed to use [sarcastic] tags when you do that on the internet.  Otherwise we get too confused!!

[marcotheminer]

Must sign up for an account on a website to receive payment to the website address.

Not necessary anymore!

And my name is marcotheminer not macrotheminer

Quoting for visibility!

[redsn0w]

CoinPiler is scam, doesn't pay for November, plz remove it.

I'm shocked that someone who refused to use escrow with flimsy excuses turned out to be a scam.

I've asked him several times times to use an escrow but this  was his reply :

Hi all the curious & cautions mind of BitcoinTalk Community.

I do highly respect all of your opinion of making an escrow. I do understand that you must want to keep the community safe and secure (at-least SCAM free) I am not outside of this intension.

I know that making an escrow would greatly improve my credibility, professionalism and so forth....

But thing is I cannot depend on others (at-least where my money involved). I cannot give my money to others and tell them not to waste or loss, or keep them safe for me. My money can be well protected to only myself...

Please don't take my decision in different angle.... take it as straight as I tell here... I do know, you can tell me lots of things against this post, you can even present me world's secured vault with world's most trusted guy to provide escrow... But I must not making any escrow...

After this post I would not reply any escrow related question. If you can join this campaign with my terms, please you are welcome... If you feel that you are not safe without escrow, please do not waste your precious time to reply this thread.....

If this post hurt anyone, its not intentional, I do highly respect your perception.....

Thanks

[ACCTseller]

CoinPiler is scam, doesn't pay for November, plz remove it.

I'm shocked that someone who refused to use escrow with flimsy excuses turned out to be a scam.

I've asked him several times times to use an escrow but this  was his reply :

Hi all the curious & cautions mind of BitcoinTalk Community.

I do highly respect all of your opinion of making an escrow. I do understand that you must want to keep the community safe and secure (at-least SCAM free) I am not outside of this intension.

I know that making an escrow would greatly improve my credibility, professionalism and so forth....

But thing is I cannot depend on others (at-least where my money involved). I cannot give my money to others and tell them not to waste or loss, or keep them safe for me. My money can be well protected to only myself...

Please don't take my decision in different angle.... take it as straight as I tell here... I do know, you can tell me lots of things against this post, you can even present me world's secured vault with world's most trusted guy to provide escrow... But I must not making any escrow...

After this post I would not reply any escrow related question. If you can join this campaign with my terms, please you are welcome... If you feel that you are not safe without escrow, please do not waste your precious time to reply this thread.....

If this post hurt anyone, its not intentional, I do highly respect your perception.....

Thanks

He could easily have added specific terms to the escrow agreement that would have caused participants to be denied payment under certain circumstances.

I also looked at his website and cannot see how it could not have been anything other then a spammy way to get people to buy his "service" - it appears his website is just a ~15 minute video trying to get people to buy some service/ebook from him (I only watched a short portion of it)

[hilariousandco]

I really wish people wouldn't sign up to these signature campaigns without the campaign owners doing everything they can to prove they will pay. No excuses should be accepted. No escrow: no deal. All people are doing is giving free advertising and promotion to scammers and wasting their own time

[redsn0w]

I really wish people wouldn't sign up to these signature campaigns without the campaign owners doing everything they can to prove they will pay. No excuses should be accepted. No escrow: no deal. All people are doing is giving free advertising and promotion to scammers and wasting their own time

You're right , but for example comPiler offered .12BTC *40 post/month and a lot of users were registered without any type of "proof" that he will pay or not. I think we cannot obligate to use an escrow but it is very "SUGGESTED".

[hilariousandco]

Regardless of how good the deal is people should just flat out refuse to join until money has been escrowed and it's peoples' greed that sucks them in and now they've lost out altogether because of it. Usually the better the deal is the more reason to believe it's also a scam, and refusing to join will prevent this type of scam from happening all together.

[redsn0w]

Regardless of how good the deal is people should just flat out refuse to join until money has been escrowed and it's peoples' greed that sucks them in and now they've lost out altogether because of it. Usually the better the deal is the more reason to believe it's also a scam, and refusing to join will prevent this type of scam from happening all together.

The problem is : you can not force an user to "not" join to a scam sig. campaign " it's his choice" but at the end he must not cry if he will not receive the payment for his advertising.

[peligro]

Coinpiler leaving is not surprising. One look at their website made it clear it was a ponzi. Its like the more traditional ponzis where they used to sell computer courses and such.

[picolo]

Coinpiler leaving is not surprising. One look at their website made it clear it was a ponzi. Its like the more traditional ponzis where they used to sell computer courses and such.

I didn't apply to the campaign because the website didn't look promising.

cloudmining.website will launch a signature campaign :

We have added some signature codes in the affiliates page => www.cloudmining.website/affiliates.php

You might like to wear them to increase your affiliate earning. This will also help you in our upcoming signature campaign.

It will be hard for them to do better than cloudminr who pays 0.001/post (max 0.4/month with escrow) or 91GHS/week

[Coin-Sweeper]

We have just launched the Coin-Sweeper Signature Campaign here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=882738.0

[dbshck]

Coin-Sweeper.com (Thread)
Payment period: Weekly
Minimum posts: 30 Posts per Week and 10 Posts out of 30 MUST BE MADE IN GAMBLING TOPIC
Payments: J: 0.0051BTC/week; M: 0.0101BTC/week; F: 0.0151BTC/week; S: 0.0251BTC/week; H/L: 0.0301BTC/week  
Escrow: No
Miscellaneous: Friday 14:00 PM Bitcoin Talk Forum time is the payment date and a start date of the next week. Those who sign up 2 (or less) days before Friday will start participating in the campaign from the next week

[Brewins]

Escrow: No

No escrow and lower rates than Fortune Jack


Doesn't seems promising

[pawel7777]

Escrow: No

No escrow and lower rates than Fortune Jack


Doesn't seems promising

Haven't they run a campaign previously? If so, there's no real need for an escrow.

Rates are lower than FJ, but FJ is only for seniors and above. And if all spots are taken in FJ camp, then few seniors may go for it.

[redsn0w]

Escrow: No

No escrow and lower rates than Fortune Jack


Doesn't seems promising

Haven't they run a campaign previously? If so, there's no real need for an escrow.

Rates are lower than FJ, but FJ is only for seniors and above. And if all spots are taken in FJ camp, then some seniors may go for it.

He pays directly in the coin-sweeper  account .... also fortuneJack .

[pawel7777]

He pays directly in the coin-sweeper  account .... also fortuneJack .

Nothing wrong with that as long as you're able to withdraw without limitations. Had no issues in this matter with FJ.

Edit: But is this their first campaign, or have they done one previously? If it's 1st - they defo should escrow or pay in advance (like FJ did with their 1st camp)

[redsn0w]

He pays directly in the coin-sweeper  account .... also fortuneJack .

Nothing wrong with that as long as you're able to withdraw without limitations. Had no issues in this matter with FJ.

Yeah I know , but Fj has conducted a previous sig. campaign where the payments were "up-front" or am I wrong ? (I was enrolled in all the FJ sig. campaign).

[pawel7777]

Yeah I know , but Fj has conducted a previous sig. campaign where the payments were "up-front" or am I wrong ? (I was enrolled in all the FJ sig. campaign).

Yup. Edited my post above before you replied

[redsn0w]

Yeah I know , but Fj has conducted a previous sig. campaign where the payments were "up-front" or am I wrong ? (I was enrolled in all the FJ sig. campaign).

Yup. Edited my post above before you replied

Yeah I've seen ,  they pay directly in the account so I think the unique possibility is pay in "up-front". However it is their choice .