Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[N12]

NotLambchop, your average post count is 16.55 posts per day. For comparison, JayJuanGee, who may have achieved this subforum's record of lowest information density * post frequency, has only 14.2 posts per day on average.

You should consider getting help for your Bitcoin addiction.

[1715057454]

1715057454

[1715057454]

1715057454

[1715057454]

1715057454

[NotLambchop]

Such effort!  

Let me simplify it for you.
One use to be able to support a big family on a one man's salary.
A few decennia has passed and this is impossible unless you have a top income.

Bro, this is such tripe.  If you can't support a big family, don't breed--it's not like the world needs more people.

It isn't tripe. In the 1970's in the UK and US a single working male wage in an average job allowed the purchase of a house, car, holidays etc. Now the same lifestyle requires two working salaries...

Why does this need repeating:  If you can not afford a big family, do not breed.  Don't contribute to overpopulation.

Sure, UK has fallen from arguably the world's most relevant empire & industrial superpower @ the turn of the century to ...well, I guess no polite way of putting it--what it is today.
Overall, humanity's standard of living has undeniably risen, so you Brits got no one but yourself to blame.
Get your shit together and use sound family planning

[octaft]

Some of you caught on to ignore the troll. Hopefully more of you will over time.

[NotLambchop]

NotLambchop, your average post count is 16.55 posts per day. For comparison, JayJuanGee, who may have achieved this subforum's record of lowest information density * post frequency, has only 14.2 posts per day on average.

You should consider getting help for your Bitcoin addiction.

I can quit any time

[ssmc2]

Me thinks Lamby doth protest too much  

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Such effort!  

Let me simplify it for you.
One use to be able to support a big family on a one man's salary.
A few decennia has passed and this is impossible unless you have a top income.

Bro, this is such tripe.  If you can't support a big family, don't breed--it's not like the world needs more people.

It isn't tripe. In the 1970's in the UK and US a single working male wage in an average job allowed the purchase of a house, car, holidays etc. Now the same lifestyle requires two working salaries...

Why does this need repeating:  If you can not afford a big family, do not breed.  Don't contribute to overpopulation.

Sure, UK has fallen from arguably the world's most relevant empire & industrial superpower @ the turn of the century to ...well, I guess no polite way of putting it--what it is today.
Overall, humanity's standard of living has undeniably risen, so you Brits got no one but yourself to blame.
Get your shit together and use sound family planning

One thing I will 100% agree with you on.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[hmmkay]

 Don't contribute to overpopulation.

The world isn't overpopulated. Common mistake that people are told.
Earth can hold 20+ billion people. More if we change some behavior.

[grappa_barricata]

Don't contribute to overpopulation.

The world isn't overpopulated. Common mistake that people are told.
Earth can hold 20+ billion people. More if we change some behavior.

Not at the current technological level man, and not with a vampire country of some tens of millions like this one:

[hmmkay]

Don't contribute to overpopulation.

The world isn't overpopulated. Common mistake that people are told.
Earth can hold 20+ billion people. More if we change some behavior.

Not at the current technological level man, and not with a vampire country of some tens of millions like this one:

They have short life-spans, easily fixed.

[Miz4r]

Don't contribute to overpopulation.

The world isn't overpopulated. Common mistake that people are told.
Earth can hold 20+ billion people. More if we change some behavior.

With our current behavior the Earth can't even sustain 7 billion people, so first we need to grow up as a race and change our ways and only then we can say the world is not overpopulated anymore.

[criptix]

Don't contribute to overpopulation.

The world isn't overpopulated. Common mistake that people are told.
Earth can hold 20+ billion people. More if we change some behavior.

With our current behavior the Earth can't even sustain 7 billion people, so first we need to grow up as a race and change our ways and only then we can say the world is not overpopulated anymore.

funny part is that we have the technology - it is just too expensive

[grappa_barricata]

They have short life-spans, easily fixed.

I still want to shoot her with a shotgun, burn the body and cover the place in salt.

[phoenix1]

Don't contribute to overpopulation.

The world isn't overpopulated. Common mistake that people are told.
Earth can hold 20+ billion people. More if we change some behavior.

With our current behavior the Earth can't even sustain 7 billion people, so first we need to grow up as a race and change our ways and only then we can say the world is not overpopulated anymore.

funny part is that we have the technology - it is just too expensive

That's largely a function of the way resources and resultant wealth are controlled by a self-serving minority

[jonoiv]

Don't cherry-pick your data.  The unemployment rate in UK, where you live, is...



The average income has been growing steadily, here:

I'm not the one cherry picking, that's the governments, read on. & it's last time I quote you because you are clearly a troll.  Allow me to show where your argument falls apart.

Graph shows the population that is claiming JSA.  It does not show true unemployment, because the UK government chose to change the way unemployment was calculated some years ago, and spilt it into different categories to manipulate the results.


Take the sample used from the UK government, from which the EU data was submitted and extract the young people of 16-24 which was 7,195 of which;
3,754  Employed
853     Unemployed    (22%)
2,588   Economically inactive (students, disabled and those not able (due to savings, illegal immigrant or had benefits cancelled) or willing to claim JSA.

The government did not release the data pertaining to how many of the Economically inactive were students and disabled, so it makes it impossible to tell the real 16-24 year old unemployment rate.  One thing is certain it's over 22%. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_363998.pdf





4 points here;

1. That's household income not wages.  The income from all working people in the property.
2. It's the Mean household income, not the median, or the mode. Using the mean will again skew the results.  
3. It's been falling since 2007.
4. If that was a bitcoin graph you would be screaming rounded top,  head and shoulders or bubble.

[inca]

Why would anyone listen to the thoughts of a bitcoin forum internet troll before considering having kids? Hilarious.

[NotLambchop]

...
I'm not the one cherry picking, that's the governments, read on. & it's last time I quote you because you are clearly a troll.  Allow me to show where your argument falls apart.

Graph shows the population that is claiming JSA.  It does not show true unemployment, because the UK government chose to change the way unemployment was calculated some years ago, and spilt it into different categories to manipulate the results.

The government is manipulating results.  But you, you're no fool--you know Teh True Facts!
"Stats are manipulated by gubermint" is the point past which it becomes unreasonable for me to expect anything but a wad of tinfoil at the other end of the intertube.

...
The government did not release the data pertaining to how many of the Economically inactive were students and disabled, so it makes it impossible to tell the real 16-24 year old unemployment rate.  One thing is certain it's over 22%. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_363998.pdf

From your link:
"Comparing February to April 2014 with November 2013 to January 2014, there was a large
increase in employment and a large fall in unemployment. There was a further fall in the number
of economically inactive people aged from 16 to 64. These changes continue the general
direction of movement over the past two years."

Sounds to me like you're just trying to explain away your poverty--"Dey took ur jerbs!"  Seems like normal folks are doing well

4 points here;

1. That's household income not wages.  The income from all working people in the property.
2. It's the Mean household income, not the median, or the mode. Using the mean will again skew the results.  
3. It's been falling since 2007.
4. If that was a bitcoin graph you would be screaming rounded top,  head and shoulders or bubble.

Lol, now Google is in cahoots with UK gov & serving up skewed, misleading data?
Check your dosimeter--i think you hat has sprung a radiation leak.  Either that, or you've been drinking tap water again.
There's poison in it, u kno!

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[dannyspk]

Week MACD just turned green! Time to get excited?

[hmmkay]

Week MACD just turned green! Time to get excited?

We need 3 green weeks to get really excited.