Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[BldSwtTrs]

In september 2013 there was one looong month of sideway. Maybe this sideway is bullish.

[1715119852]

1715119852

[1715119852]

1715119852

[tarmi]

china does not give a fuck about 50 k coins moving.

more dumping incoming.

[phoenix1]

To be fair, he's got a pretty good point this time  
And he hasn't called anyone an idiot yet !

Coins moved, but they have not been distributed to winners and we have nothing more than yesterday, so it is normal that nothing happened. I will not read this crap anymore.

Agreed. Sometimes tho, taking Shroomy off ignore for a peek provides lighthearted relief. His repetitive tripe can be quite amusing in small doses. YMMV 

[JimboToronto]

Auction coins moved:

https://blockchain.info/address/1i7cZdoE9NcHSdAL5eGjmTJbBVqeQDwgw?offset=0&filter=0

Ooooommggg everyone waited for this for weeks! Oh wait, actually they waited for the auction to finish but nothing happened. Then the new deadline was the price they went for. But nothing happened. Now the new deadline is the coins actually moving. Which just happened. THIS IS WHAT EVERYONE WAS WAITING FOR!!!

So do your thing. This is the time! What are you waiting for! You have been waiting for this for weeks!!!

Oh my god, i just clicked on uningnore button to see what i missed all this time. 

... I just ignored him back. 

Doesn't that defeat the purpose of the ignore button?

I've only put 2 people on ignore, MatTheTwat and Trollchop.

The former seems to have accepted his incompetence and stopped posting. The latter seems to post immediately after I do, although maybe it's just her usual spam and has nothing to do with me.

I sometimes become almost curious enough to peek and see what she's posting at me when she knows I have her on ignore (same old tadalafil broken record?) but I'm not that curious yet.

I don't find Shroomskit to be all that annoying but if you do, you could just keep him on ignore.

[ShroomsKit]

Good morning Bitcoinland. Still going sideways I see.

Small dump with standard bounceback overnight. Nothing new.

I guess everyone's waiting for the auction payment deadline.

yup pretty much.

They already moved. Now what? Gonna make up a new deadline?

[NotLambchop]

...
I sometimes become almost curious enough to peek and see what she's posting at me when she knows I have her on ignore (same old tadalafil broken record?) but I'm not that curious yet.
...

Almost forgot

This old chestnut again?

I'll say the same as I did 6 months ago or a month ago.

We'll probably reach our old ATH by mid summer, and hit anywhere from $7000 to $12,000 before crashing down to $2000-$2500, possibly before year's end.

We should be above $10,000 for good by this time next year.

Unless something comes along to break Bitcoin before then.

[madmat]

Very interesting : https://blockchain.info/fr/address/1E9QDjSzUMuYdy4vePXxZhmkGeopkm1VfZ

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Very interesting : https://blockchain.info/fr/address/1E9QDjSzUMuYdy4vePXxZhmkGeopkm1VfZ

Something not right about that.

[aztecminer]

Very interesting : https://blockchain.info/fr/address/1E9QDjSzUMuYdy4vePXxZhmkGeopkm1VfZ

Something not right about that.

yeah my address is missing from that list .

[phoenix1]

Very interesting : https://blockchain.info/fr/address/1E9QDjSzUMuYdy4vePXxZhmkGeopkm1VfZ

Something not right about that.

Wierd ... all the lots of about 5k and  3k have small amounts deducted for miner fees.
That 52 k is odd tho ...
Maybe someone made them an offer they could not refuse for an extra 50k over the weekend (Draper ... 2k + 50k = 52k)
Still does not explain why the total is over 52k and not under as you would expect after fees

Could they even do that, without auctioning them? Do they not have some sort of fiduciary duty ?

Answers on a postcard ...

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[empowering]

Very interesting : https://blockchain.info/fr/address/1E9QDjSzUMuYdy4vePXxZhmkGeopkm1VfZ

Something not right about that.

Wierd ... all the lots of about 5k and  3k have small amounts deducted for miner fees.
That 52 k is odd tho ...
Maybe someone made them an offer they could not refuse for an extra 50k over the weekend (Draper ... 2k + 50k = 52k)
Still does not explain why the total is over 52k and not under as you would expect after fees

Could they even do that, without auctioning them? Do they not have some sort of fiduciary duty ?

Answers on a postcard ...

Maybe they had the 100k BTC in an address, and the idea was going to be to send 50K split to the new winners, and 50K to a new storage address..... maybe one of the 2000 blocks did not sell? and so is being returned with the 50 k to a storage address?

(who knows though, i have not looked at this, nor thought about it very hard tbh ^ just first thing that comes to mind + I kinda lean towards thinking the lots would all sell, so probably some other explanation, actually thinking out loud here, but what is with the 4999.95 BTC amounts, if they were all going to be distributed to winners, would that mean that winners all won 5K ie 2k+3k bids? if that is the case then seems all very symmetrical to me)

[LFC_Bitcoin]

I think it's funny that all the bears are out in force today.

In the last 24 hours the price has lost 5 GBP , I dunno what that is in dollars (about 8 USD?) but a packet of 20 cigarettes is now about 9 GBP in the UK.

Embrace this glorious day bears.

[noobtrader]

Very interesting : https://blockchain.info/fr/address/1E9QDjSzUMuYdy4vePXxZhmkGeopkm1VfZ

Something not right about that.

https://blockchain.info/fr/address/1E9QDjSzUMuYdy4vePXxZhmkGeopkm1VfZ


https://blockchain.info/address/1CaGxqCQv2ofqLf37HCUQoLujzRMaz74LK

this link seem show the winner of auction, i wonder why the coin keep moving around and who said that Draper win 2000, there is not 2000 instead 2999 btc

[JayJuanGee]

NotLambchop, your average post count is 16.55 posts per day. For comparison, JayJuanGee, who may have achieved this subforum's record of lowest information density * post frequency, has only 14.2 posts per day on average.

You should consider getting help for your Bitcoin addiction.

Yeah right......    Even if you, Blitz, and possibly some other may experience some difficulties recognizing value in my various posts,  NOT Notporkchop and I are in different categories. 


NOT Notporkchop spreads FUD, and I do NOT. 

[NotLambchop]

..
NOT Notporkchop spreads FUD provides information, and I do NOT. ...

FTFY

[phoenix1]

Maybe they had the 100k BTC in an address, and the idea was going to be to send 50K split to the new winners, and 50K to a new storage address..... maybe one of the 2000 blocks did not sell? and so is being returned with the 50 k to a storage address?

(who knows though, i have not looked at this, nor thought about it very hard tbh ^ just first thing that comes to mind + I kinda lean towards thinking the lots would all sell, so probably some other explanation, actually thinking out loud here, but what is with the 4999.95 BTC amounts, if they were all going to be distributed to winners, would that mean that winners all won 5K ie 2k+3k bids? if that is the case then seems all very symmetrical to me)

I thought of that, but did not want to come across as a permabear troll FUD spreader! Like you, I also think it is unlikely. Why hold back 2k?
Yeh, the distribution is also wierdly symmetrical  

[JimboToronto]

They have short life-spans, easily fixed.

Also reproductive impairment.

Would anyone hit on that?

Edit on further consideration: Maybe a brony would.

[Fatman3001]

Very interesting : https://blockchain.info/fr/address/1E9QDjSzUMuYdy4vePXxZhmkGeopkm1VfZ

Something not right about that.

Wierd ... all the lots of about 5k and  3k have small amounts deducted for miner fees.
That 52 k is odd tho ...
Maybe someone made them an offer they could not refuse for an extra 50k over the weekend (Draper ... 2k + 50k = 52k)
Still does not explain why the total is over 52k and not under as you would expect after fees

Could they even do that, without auctioning them? Do they not have some sort of fiduciary duty ?

Answers on a postcard ...

I can't imagine that they sold 50k extra just like that. Draper must be late on his payment.

Edit: If he was a bit dumber than I thought, he forgot to herd the cats in advance.

[tarmi]

Very interesting : https://blockchain.info/fr/address/1E9QDjSzUMuYdy4vePXxZhmkGeopkm1VfZ

Something not right about that.

Wierd ... all the lots of about 5k and  3k have small amounts deducted for miner fees.
That 52 k is odd tho ...
Maybe someone made them an offer they could not refuse for an extra 50k over the weekend (Draper ... 2k + 50k = 52k)
Still does not explain why the total is over 52k and not under as you would expect after fees

Could they even do that, without auctioning them? Do they not have some sort of fiduciary duty ?

Answers on a postcard ...

I can't imagine that they sold 50k extra just like that. Draper must be late on his payment.

somebody didnt pay for his lot?

such demand, so bullish.