Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 05:42:41 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 17146 17147 17148 17149 17150 17151 17152 17153 17154 17155 17156 17157 17158 17159 17160 17161 17162 17163 17164 17165 17166 17167 17168 17169 17170 17171 17172 17173 17174 17175 17176 17177 17178 17179 17180 17181 17182 17183 17184 17185 17186 17187 17188 17189 17190 17191 17192 17193 17194 17195 [17196] 17197 17198 17199 17200 17201 17202 17203 17204 17205 17206 17207 17208 17209 17210 17211 17212 17213 17214 17215 17216 17217 17218 17219 17220 17221 17222 17223 17224 17225 17226 17227 17228 17229 17230 17231 17232 17233 17234 17235 17236 17237 17238 17239 17240 17241 17242 17243 17244 17245 17246 ... 33326 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26372710 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1820
Merit: 1464


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
July 18, 2017, 07:43:13 AM

Scaling debat is reaching it's climax, Segwit lock-in incoming soon.

hint : BIP91 is not a bitcoin core feature or policy.
It doesn't provide a way to activate SegWit.

Officials BIPS of Bitcoin Core are here : https://bitcoincore.org/en/bips/

Correct me if I am wrong, but it is my understanding that the following scenario is the most plausible:

- BIP91 locks-in
- BIP148 probably doesn't lock-in because of not reaching 95% consensus... but then UASF comes into place forcing BIP148
- BIP91 and BIP148 both support segwit, so both implementations are compatible and don't orphan each others blocks
- Profit
1714974161
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714974161

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714974161
Reply with quote  #2

1714974161
Report to moderator
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714974161
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714974161

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714974161
Reply with quote  #2

1714974161
Report to moderator
1714974161
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714974161

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714974161
Reply with quote  #2

1714974161
Report to moderator
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
July 18, 2017, 07:45:27 AM

What IS that big Bitstamp wall up to..?
I hope for a full retracement, but will not be certain of it until we are above $2500. A lot of money could have been easily made in the last couple of days, for those who trade smart.

hint : BIP91 is not a bitcoin core feature or policy.
It doesn't provide a way to activate SegWit.
It does activate Segwit. You have a fundamental misunderstanding if you think that it does not. BIP91 will start orphaning non-SW signalling blocks after it has 80% of the blocks for 72 hours (IIRC). This means that the traditional activation mechanism will see a spike to 95% (BIP9) which requires 2 weeks to lock in Segwit, and then another 2 weeks to activate it.

Correct me if I am wrong, but it is my understanding that the following scenario is the most plausible:
- BIP91 locks-in
- BIP148 probably doesn't lock-in because of not reaching 95% consensus... but then UASF comes into place forcing BIP148
- BIP91 and BIP148 both support segwit, so both implementations are compatible and don't orphan each others blocks
- Profit
No. That is also fundamentally wrong. BIP91, after locking in and triggering will orphan any non-Segwit signalling blocks, which is the same that BIP148 starts doing on August the 1st. As long as BIP91 locks-in before August the 1st, there is not going to be a fork on that day.
UASF is BIP148, or to be more precise: BIP148 is an implementation of UASF. BIP148 does not need 95% consensus (this number was never associated with it).
JimboToronto
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4004
Merit: 4480


You're never too old to think young.


View Profile
July 18, 2017, 07:45:36 AM

It's getting near my bedtime but I'm sleeping alone tonight and we're getting so close to $2300 I can't stop watching.

Damn you Bitcoin.  Grin
Tmdz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 18, 2017, 07:46:30 AM

And the price keeps creeping upward. $2300 before morning (EDT)?

Last week is beginning to look like an aberration. The almost 2-year-old uptrend seems to still be in order.

It's funny how a little panic-inspired dip of less than a week's duration had so many people talking about bursting bubbles, bear markets, and the death of Bitcoin.

It seems a certain honey badger had different ideas.

Sup? Wink

BTC barely mooned in this uptrend ($3K? pshh), lets at least get our moonshot before a bear market. That's gonna require some nice long weekly greens.

This bounce was strong, bears are gonna be fierce at the $2300 zone, but they getting nervous, segwit is just around the corner

Don't worry the fun as only just begun.

There will be lots of trading opportunity the coming weeks.
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1820
Merit: 1464


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
July 18, 2017, 08:01:37 AM



Correct me if I am wrong, but it is my understanding that the following scenario is the most plausible:
- BIP91 locks-in
- BIP148 probably doesn't lock-in because of not reaching 95% consensus... but then UASF comes into place forcing BIP148
- BIP91 and BIP148 both support segwit, so both implementations are compatible and don't orphan each others blocks
- Profit
No. That is also fundamentally wrong. BIP91, after locking in and triggering will orphan any non-Segwit signalling blocks, which is the same that BIP148 starts doing on August the 1st. As long as BIP91 locks-in before August the 1st, there is not going to be a fork on that day.
UASF is BIP148, or to be more precise: BIP148 is an implementation of UASF. BIP148 does not need 95% consensus (this number was never associated with it).


That is even better. As long as miners stick to THEIR OWN roadmap we will all be fine... And with all the weak hands shaken during this last correction the rise after all the uncertainty dissapears could be impressive.
luckygenough56
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1012



View Profile
July 18, 2017, 08:15:27 AM

i don't understand a thing about this segwit activation mess, but i think it's what they want (reptilian overloads), keep us ants in the dark.


what i undrrstand tho is that bitcoin will be dumped after segwit activates
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3710
Merit: 10212


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
July 18, 2017, 08:16:20 AM

What IS that big Bitstamp wall up to..?
I hope for a full retracement, but will not be certain of it until we are above $2500. A lot of money could have been easily made in the last couple of days, for those who trade smart.

Sounds like you are experiencing some regrets, Lauda?

I execute trades every $50, and everything went pretty smooth with me, except for a mistake that I made at $1859.  For some reason I sold twice at $1859, when I thought that I was executing buy orders.. I still cannot figure out what I did exactly, so in order to recover, I had set buy orders to buy back my mistake at $1840 and $1820, but alas, we never returned to those prices.. at least so far.


I am just writing it off as some kind of wash mistake.. it washed out some of my other seemingly profitable trades... so it is all good.. and my portfolio is only affected like less than .2% by the mistake.


Oh .. and thanks for you clarification of BIP91 and BIP148.  It seems that however many times these explanations are repeated, there are further opportunities for confusion proliferation, which can come from the content of one or two erroneous posts...
rjclarke2000
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1016



View Profile
July 18, 2017, 08:21:06 AM

Well I am totally confused. You are all saying different things too.

I don't know which one to take notice of!


Edit. If I'm confused then I can't imagine what other folk must be like. Uncertainty definitely doesn't make things overly positive.

I'm sure it'll be clearer soon.
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1820
Merit: 1464


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
July 18, 2017, 08:26:51 AM

Well I am totally confused. You are all saying different things too.

I don't know which one to take notice of!


Edit. If I'm confused then I can't imagine what other folk must be like. Uncertainty definitely doesn't make things overly positive.

I'm sure it'll be clearer soon.

There is no spoon fork.
SERVERIA
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 122
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 18, 2017, 08:36:11 AM

Looks like them panic sellers have been played beautifully once more. There'll be more of it. Try not selling and see where you end up.

That's too complicated for those guys. It's much easier to buy high and panic sell low. Smiley
eiskalt
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 18, 2017, 09:34:21 AM

In two weeks, everything will be forgotten.

                                      



Prepare for the BLITZ!
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
July 18, 2017, 09:37:02 AM

That is even better. As long as miners stick to THEIR OWN roadmap we will all be fine... And with all the weak hands shaken during this last correction the rise after all the uncertainty dissapears could be impressive.
The only reason that I somewhat like BIP91 is because it can (and possibly will) prevent the split on August the 1st. The latter part of it, i.e. the hard fork, may end up being a disaster (if it happens).

Sounds like you are experiencing some regrets, Lauda?

I execute trades every $50, and everything went pretty smooth with me, except for a mistake that I made at $1859.  For some reason I sold twice at $1859, when I thought that I was executing buy orders.. I still cannot figure out what I did exactly, so in order to recover, I had set buy orders to buy back my mistake at $1840 and $1820, but alas, we never returned to those prices.. at least so far.
No. I am not a trader, or at least not a day trader. I can't bother to move cold storage funds to an exchange for these swings and trading with a few thousand USD is waste of time for me. So, you didn't manage to buy back in yet? I certainly did expect it to spiral down that much, that quickly.

Oh .. and thanks for you clarification of BIP91 and BIP148.  It seems that however many times these explanations are repeated, there are further opportunities for confusion proliferation, which can come from the content of one or two erroneous posts...
I'm somewhat inclined to say that it's rather much simpler than people claim it is, but that may be cognitive bias. The problem with it is that 'what can' and 'what will' happen keeps changing. It is still not definite that a split will be prevented. The odds just keep changing.
ivomm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1853
Merit: 2841


All good things to those who wait


View Profile
July 18, 2017, 10:07:20 AM

This is today's question: https://themerkle.com/are-cryptocurrencies-recovering-or-is-this-a-dead-cat-bounce/  Grin
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3598
Merit: 2384


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
July 18, 2017, 10:21:34 AM

Considering BIP91 is at 63% and SegWit is at 22%...all the SegWit folks need to do to get SegWit activated is to add the BIP91 bit and wait for 2 days and we will have SegWit with 85% participation. Then with BIP148 it will fill that last 10% to activate in the Core client. Done.
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1820
Merit: 1464


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
July 18, 2017, 10:30:13 AM


No, it was YESTERDAY question. Today it has been answered by current price.
leowonderful
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 1129


Bitcoin FTW!


View Profile
July 18, 2017, 10:56:21 AM

We still need ViaBTC, F2Pool to signal, and F2Pool recently got DDOSed so that may be the reason why signalling is delayed on their end. Bitmain is also fake signalling right now, and if that doesn't change then they will orphan all SW2x blocks. Interesting times. I hope that lock-in period will succeed the first time but considering these two big pools and several small pools aren't signalling BIP91 yet, it may take some time for it to happen.
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3598
Merit: 2384


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
July 18, 2017, 11:22:11 AM

So, can someone explain the blue shading and black lines under the graph on here

https://www.xbt.eu/
Genesis1337
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
July 18, 2017, 12:02:57 PM

So, can someone explain the blue shading and black lines under the graph on here

https://www.xbt.eu/

I am not sure for the rest, but the first bar (BIP91 LOCK-IN) I believe the black bar represent the 269 out of 336 blocks (80%).

For the one below, the black bar represents current signalling for BIP91.

Not sure about the rest of it though.
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3556
Merit: 5041



View Profile
July 18, 2017, 12:11:37 PM

Notice the rise in Altlandia.

This was primarily a massive Altlandia bull trap. Crypto personalities on yt are going nuts, doubling down with both hands.

They're gonna get burned again.
Denker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1014


View Profile
July 18, 2017, 12:29:20 PM

John McAfee is taking bets:

Quote
In the long term Bitcoin moves above  $500,000 within three years. Bets?

https://twitter.com/officialmcafee/status/887012614131372032

Send legal contract bet to:
John McAfee
98 Scott Street. Lexington, TN. 38351


I would definitely take a $500k bet knowing that in 3 years I can sell one of my bitcoins for $500k to pay off the bet happily. Or he gives me $500k. Win win.


Well, the problem is nobody knows what $500k can buy you after 3 years!


Furthermore McAfee is talking about JihanCoin! HE said he will follow Jihan, meaning bigger Blocks.
So this isn' really relevant as I doubt this hardforked coin will have any significance and probably not being called Bitcoin.
His price prediction is also totally crazy. He is talking about a $10 trillion market cap. That guy should definitely stop consuming drugs!
It's also weird that he said he would eat his own dick on national tv if this price prediction should not happen. I mean WTF?!
Pages: « 1 ... 17146 17147 17148 17149 17150 17151 17152 17153 17154 17155 17156 17157 17158 17159 17160 17161 17162 17163 17164 17165 17166 17167 17168 17169 17170 17171 17172 17173 17174 17175 17176 17177 17178 17179 17180 17181 17182 17183 17184 17185 17186 17187 17188 17189 17190 17191 17192 17193 17194 17195 [17196] 17197 17198 17199 17200 17201 17202 17203 17204 17205 17206 17207 17208 17209 17210 17211 17212 17213 17214 17215 17216 17217 17218 17219 17220 17221 17222 17223 17224 17225 17226 17227 17228 17229 17230 17231 17232 17233 17234 17235 17236 17237 17238 17239 17240 17241 17242 17243 17244 17245 17246 ... 33326 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!