Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Divitiae miserae]

I used the word "race" because that is what's known to describe this concept in colloquial speech.

That's exactly the point. If you wish to make biological arguments you must use biological terms.

[makeacake]

... Since white genes are recessive, the white race would not exist if this ratio was higher.  Due to this, whether your Marxist mind acknowledges it or not, if you advocate that everyone on earth interbreed with each other with no regards to race, you are in fact advocating white genocide due to white genes (and Asian) being recessive. ...

Unfortunate fact #1: Everything you know about Karl Marx you've learned from stormfront & mises.org.

The only solution to the genocide of the White Race:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e1/Lebensborn.svg/150px-Lebensborn.svg.png

P.S. Learn what genocide means before using the word again. ty.

[nioc]

My child is asian, african, and european(both north and mediterranean)

Please let me know what race this is.

Please let me know what relevance the answer would have.


 

[StarenseN]

It's official, this thread is now disgusting.

[ssmc2]

It's official, this thread is now disgusting.

+1

[aztecminer]

It's official, this thread is now disgusting.

thats because we are all mind numbed from all the bitchcoin action.

[nioc]

It's official, this thread is now disgusting.

+1

Just now?  LOL

I have fresh fiat and am patiently waiting for the dump

[r0ach]

I used the word "race" because that is what's known to describe this concept in colloquial speech.

That's exactly the point. If you wish to make biological arguments you must use biological terms.

Language is an evolving mechanism of consensus.  If 99% or more of people on earth refer to this idea as "race", and it already seems to be accepted as such in dictionaries, and a much smaller portion refer to it as "ethnic group", colloquial speech will determine what is valid in the future unless some type of major scientific discovery invalidates it's use.

From the dictionary:

Race -  A usually geographically isolated population of organisms that differs from other populations of the same species in certain heritable traits

Biologists/Taxonomists also play fast and loose with classification of species in animals they discover, and if they practiced those same habits classifying humans, they would probably end up classifying humans into different species.  In other words, your argument is meaningless semantics.

[gentlemand]

The sooner we're all coffee-coloured androids the better. Then we can move on into the stars and find some folks we're united in wanting to discriminate against.

[Oblodo]

Yet racism continues to be deeply rooted in the "standard American mindset", as betrayed by the "race" field in forms.

Who would have thought Stolfi would be an ivory tower Marxist?  Probably everyone?

Race is a real and not imaginary construct.  There were seven main haplogroups in Africa, L0-L6.  L3 split into haplogroup M & N.  N being the precursor to caucasians, and M being the precursor to everything else not African.  The amount of time that haplogroup M+N have been separated from L is something like 100,000 years.  It's not a question of "do races exist", or "are races different", it's only a question of how large of changes can occur in that time span.



That's only a conservative estimate of genetic isolation though.  In America, plenty of Caucasian and Africans live near each other, yet the interbreeding between groups is something miniscule under 5%.  Since white genes are recessive, the white race would not exist if this ratio was higher.  Due to this, whether your Marxist mind acknowledges it or not, if you advocate that everyone on earth interbreed with each other with no regards to race, you are in fact advocating white genocide due to white genes (and Asian) being recessive.

It's pretty easy to verify this with virtually any interracial relationship that exists.  Take Heidi Klum for example.  Here's her with two of her kids, each from different fathers.  She's supposed to be a supermodel, yet has passed along virtually none of those supermodel genes onto one child, while clearly having done so for the other.  This is because white genes are recessive and it's hard to even tell the child on the left is related to her at all.  



When people like Richard Dawkins use terminology like "the selfish gene" to describe how and why organisms reproduce, in the example above, you're effectively throwing your genes out the window, accomplishing nothing, and effectively eliminating yourself from the gene pool due to your genes being recessive.  This is one of the big reasons why intermarriage rate remains low.  Even if they don't understand the science behind it, people subconsciously know this and instinctively avoid it so as to not purposely erase their lineage from history.

I do not think you should use stormfront.org as a source of science. If you ever paid intuition anywhere, ask for your money back.

[nioc]

The sooner we're all coffee-coloured androids the better. Then we can move on into the stars and find some folks we're united in wanting to discriminate against.

You do realize we are currently in outer space and also on the best planet you will find anywhere.

Signed, earthling

Edit:  Somehow I misread your post but I will never the less leave my reply.

[r0ach]

Yet racism continues to be deeply rooted in the "standard American mindset", as betrayed by the "race" field in forms.

Who would have thought Stolfi would be an ivory tower Marxist?  Probably everyone?

Race is a real and not imaginary construct.  There were seven main haplogroups in Africa, L0-L6.  L3 split into haplogroup M & N.  N being the precursor to caucasians, and M being the precursor to everything else not African.  The amount of time that haplogroup M+N have been separated from L is something like 100,000 years.  It's not a question of "do races exist", or "are races different", it's only a question of how large of changes can occur in that time span.



That's only a conservative estimate of genetic isolation though.  In America, plenty of Caucasian and Africans live near each other, yet the interbreeding between groups is something miniscule under 5%.  Since white genes are recessive, the white race would not exist if this ratio was higher.  Due to this, whether your Marxist mind acknowledges it or not, if you advocate that everyone on earth interbreed with each other with no regards to race, you are in fact advocating white genocide due to white genes (and Asian) being recessive.

It's pretty easy to verify this with virtually any interracial relationship that exists.  Take Heidi Klum for example.  Here's her with two of her kids, each from different fathers.  She's supposed to be a supermodel, yet has passed along virtually none of those supermodel genes onto one child, while clearly having done so for the other.  This is because white genes are recessive and it's hard to even tell the child on the left is related to her at all.  



When people like Richard Dawkins use terminology like "the selfish gene" to describe how and why organisms reproduce, in the example above, you're effectively throwing your genes out the window, accomplishing nothing, and effectively eliminating yourself from the gene pool due to your genes being recessive.  This is one of the big reasons why intermarriage rate remains low.  Even if they don't understand the science behind it, people subconsciously know this and instinctively avoid it so as to not purposely erase their lineage from history.

I do not think you should use stormfront.org as a source of science. If you ever paid intuition anywhere, ask for your money back.

Sorry, but mindlessly throwing out the term "Stormfront" in an attempt to insult someone who has never looked at that website before does not invalidate the objective reality of what I've typed.  You'll have to actually address the subject of what I've typed instead of using fake strawman tactics.

[JimboToronto]

Good morning Bitcoinland.

Not much happening again apparently. Same old, same old.

One might have thought the events in Paris and the statements from Anonymous could have had some effect on the price, but no.

Ho hum.

[r0ach]

blah blah bullshit from lambchops 5000th anti-bitcoin spam account

So now mentioning that white and asian genes are recessive is racist?  Maybe Bitcoin is racist too?  Maybe everything is racist?

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

The sooner we're all coffee-coloured androids the better. Then we can move on into the stars and find some folks we're united in wanting to discriminate against.

Them vermin on Tatooine got to be the first to go. They're taking our women and jobs!!

[adamstgBit]

volume seems to be holding up, 310 is a good cheap coin target, i think there's a pretty good change we see 316, 333, 366, 406!, 386, 346.

2016
Q1   300-400
Q2   350-450
Q3   400-800
Q4   800

2017

Q1 2200
Q2 2900
Q3 3500
Q4 32,000


2 year bull run ends with a 3 month climb from 3500, to 32,000

after that it's a bouncy ride down to forever stable 10,000$

and then... well then, the truly never ending bull run starts.

[Oblodo]

Sorry, but mindlessly throwing out the term "Stormfront" in an attempt to insult someone who has never looked at that website before does not invalidate the objective reality of what I've typed.  You'll have to actually address the subject of what I've typed instead of using fake strawman tactics.

Well, i just mentioned that site so you could understand that I think it's pure nonsense and not science, things are not real just because YOU think so.

Read

A Troublesome Inheritance by Chris Smith

The Emperor's New Clothes: Biological Theories of Race at the Millennium. Joseph L. Graves, Jr.

And please stop using a bitcoin forum to spew out hate...

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[r0ach]

Not sure about dominant/recessive genes, frankly don't give a flying fuck. What I do give a fuck about is the pitch-black ignorant pasty faggots who obsess about shit like racial purity.
As far as Bitcoin being racist? Not sure what you mean. Appears that plenty of bitcoiners sure are

Thank you for giving away the origin of your anti-Bitcoin spam accounts "lambchop / 5000 other fake aliases".  Pushing a constant anti-Bitcoin, pro-fiat agenda, while also being vehemently pro-cultural Marxism.  I was starting to believe someone like the Russian government was funding anti-Bitcoin spammers, but this is obviously not the case.  Very few groups on earth fit the profile you put out, especially ones that become enraged by their cultural marxist views being challenged.  It's easy to tell where these spam accounts are originating from and being funded by now.

And please stop using a bitcoin forum to spew out hate...

Claiming that mentioning Caucasian and Asian genes are recessive is "spewing hate" is a complete joke.  You're trying to use strawman tactics and political correctness as a basis to win arguments.  The person "spewing hate" is actually you because you're claiming anyone arguing from a non-minority viewpoint is automatically wrong and racist by default.  You are the true biased racist and it's disgusting.

[Feri22]

volume seems to be holding up, 310 is a good cheap coin target, i think there's a pretty good change we see 316, 333, 366, 406!, 386, 346.

2016
Q1   300-400
Q2   350-450
Q3   400-800
Q4   800

2017

Q1 2200
Q2 2900
Q3 3500
Q4 32,000


2 year bull run ends with a 3 month climb from 3500, to 32,000

after that it's a bouncy ride down to forever stable 10,000$

and then... well then, the truly never ending bull run starts.

I am looking forward for 666