Bitcoin Forum
June 25, 2024, 10:25:18 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 14531 14532 14533 14534 14535 14536 14537 14538 14539 14540 14541 14542 14543 14544 14545 14546 14547 14548 14549 14550 14551 14552 14553 14554 14555 14556 14557 14558 14559 14560 14561 14562 14563 14564 14565 14566 14567 14568 14569 14570 14571 14572 14573 14574 14575 14576 14577 14578 14579 14580 [14581] 14582 14583 14584 14585 14586 14587 14588 14589 14590 14591 14592 14593 14594 14595 14596 14597 14598 14599 14600 14601 14602 14603 14604 14605 14606 14607 14608 14609 14610 14611 14612 14613 14614 14615 14616 14617 14618 14619 14620 14621 14622 14623 14624 14625 14626 14627 14628 14629 14630 14631 ... 33482 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26406782 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Cconvert2G36
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 06:19:09 AM


He paid too much, first of all. But this is the arena we are entering... one of uncertainty, bidding wars, and limited capacity... while the reward is 25 BTC per block.

We are should be planning for tomorrow, not today.
gizmoh
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1000



View Profile
January 23, 2016, 06:27:29 AM

lottery248
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1005


beware of your keys.


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 06:33:45 AM


boi, after the bump in the china, seems china really given up with the XT and now stuck with the core - they want more transaction fees. Sad
this is probably discompetition to win others outside the china.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115



View Profile
January 23, 2016, 06:41:10 AM
Last edit: January 24, 2016, 12:46:31 AM by BlindMayorBitcorn


He paid too much, first of all. But this is the arena we are entering... one of uncertainty, bidding wars, and limited capacity... while the reward is 25 BTC per block.

We are should be planning for tomorrow, not today.

Ok but, it seems to be a growing number of technically-minded people agree that under any real adoption scenerio this is going to happen. What happens when we move from 3tps to 6 or 10? I don't know enough to know if SegWit is just a dirty hack or not. But they all appear to be just can-kicks towards the inevitable day when adoption outpaces blockspace and the bidding war begins.
Cconvert2G36
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 06:49:53 AM


He paid too much, first of all. But this is the arena we are entering... one of uncertainty, bidding wars, and limited capacity... while the reward is 25 BTC per block.

We are should be planning for tomorrow, not today.

Ok but, it seems to be a growing number of technically-minded people agree that under any real adoption scenerio this is going to happen. What happens when we move from 3tps to 6 or 10? I don't know enough to know if SegWit is just a dirty hack or not. But they all appear to be just can-kicks towards the inevitable day when adoption outpaces blockspace and the bidding war begins.

Oh what a happy day... but you shouldn't clamp iron manacles on your legs while you're waiting for the cavalry to arrive. Sidechains... LN... SuperLN, they all need to compete on an even playing field. Miners compete for fees and block subsidy, and they choose what software they run. The exterior solutions should cater to them, not the other way around.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115



View Profile
January 23, 2016, 06:53:27 AM


He paid too much, first of all. But this is the arena we are entering... one of uncertainty, bidding wars, and limited capacity... while the reward is 25 BTC per block.

We are should be planning for tomorrow, not today.

Ok but, it seems to be a growing number of technically-minded people agree that under any real adoption scenerio this is going to happen. What happens when we move from 3tps to 6 or 10? I don't know enough to know if SegWit is just a dirty hack or not. But they all appear to be just can-kicks towards the inevitable day when adoption outpaces blockspace and the bidding war begins.

Oh what a happy day... but you shouldn't clamp iron manacles on your legs while you're waiting for the cavalry to arrive. Sidechains... LN... SuperLN, they all need to compete on an even playing field. Miners compete for fees and block subsidy, and they choose what software they run. The exterior solutions should cater to them, not the other way around.

Yep. See that sounds right, too.

I guess we have to decentralize all the things by force..
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1779


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 07:01:35 AM

Coin



Explanation
Cconvert2G36
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 07:03:50 AM
Last edit: January 23, 2016, 07:14:36 AM by Cconvert2G36


He paid too much, first of all. But this is the arena we are entering... one of uncertainty, bidding wars, and limited capacity... while the reward is 25 BTC per block.

We are should be planning for tomorrow, not today.

Ok but, it seems to be a growing number of technically-minded people agree that under any real adoption scenerio this is going to happen. What happens when we move from 3tps to 6 or 10? I don't know enough to know if SegWit is just a dirty hack or not. But they all appear to be just can-kicks towards the inevitable day when adoption outpaces blockspace and the bidding war begins.

Oh what a happy day... but you shouldn't clamp iron manacles on your legs while you're waiting for the cavalry to arrive. Sidechains... LN... SuperLN, they all need to compete on an even playing field. Miners compete for fees and block subsidy, and they choose what software they run. The exterior solutions should cater to them, not the other way around.

Yep. See that sounds right, too.

I guess we have to decentralize all the things by force..

It's the only force identified by satoshi for the handling of disputes. In a sense, it's the only authorized use of force in Bitcoin.  

You either believe that free market principles work, or you don't. Time, explain, sorry, etc.
rebuilder
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1615
Merit: 1000



View Profile
January 23, 2016, 07:29:38 AM

I guess we have to decentralize all the things by force..

Maybe this was sarcasm, I'd have to read more from the previous discussion to tell.

In case it's not: It shouldn't be surprising mining is becoming more centralized, seeing as Bitcoin appears to have been designed with that expectation:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=532.msg6306#msg6306

" The more burden it is to run a node, the fewer nodes there will be.  Those few nodes will be big server farms.  The rest will be client nodes that only do transactions and don't generate."
('generating' being what mining was called way back,)

So yeah. From that, it seems if you want highly decentralized mining, you should take a hard look at whether Bitcoin is suitable to your purposes.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1779


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 08:01:32 AM

Coin



Explanation
peonminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 531


Crypto is King.


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 08:41:46 AM


ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1779


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 09:01:35 AM

Coin



Explanation
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1779


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 10:01:53 AM

Coin



Explanation
molecular
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019



View Profile
January 23, 2016, 10:33:26 AM

the battle of the blockchains


http://coinjournal.net/prediction-10-billion-will-be-invested-in-blockchain-startups-in-2016/

“It’s already started. I mean, my estimate is that we’re going to see $1 billion come into the Ethereum ecosystem in 2016 alone, and the general estimates for the amount of money going into the entire blockchain ecosystem, including Bitcoin, is on the order of $10 billion.”  - Vinay Gupta (original CypherPunk member)

from what i understand huge consortium of financial institutions invested in R3 (Mike Hearn) using the ethereum programming

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/r3-connects-11-banks-distributed-ledger-using-ethereum-microsoft-azure-1539044


other financial institutions using the legacy open source linux hyperledger

ASX is testing this at the moment

bit hard to ignore other blockchains



how is it even a battle? I love bitcoin (first application of blockchain tech to create a money) and I don't see how these other efforts are competition at all. Banks want to keep their FIAT anyway, they're applying blockchain tech to other problems, like settlement of stock trade, tracking of asset ownership and the like. I applaud them because it can make the financial sector more efficient and above all: more transparent and therefore safer.
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 10:46:00 AM

the battle of the blockchains


http://coinjournal.net/prediction-10-billion-will-be-invested-in-blockchain-startups-in-2016/

“It’s already started. I mean, my estimate is that we’re going to see $1 billion come into the Ethereum ecosystem in 2016 alone, and the general estimates for the amount of money going into the entire blockchain ecosystem, including Bitcoin, is on the order of $10 billion.”  - Vinay Gupta (original CypherPunk member)

from what i understand huge consortium of financial institutions invested in R3 (Mike Hearn) using the ethereum programming

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/r3-connects-11-banks-distributed-ledger-using-ethereum-microsoft-azure-1539044


other financial institutions using the legacy open source linux hyperledger

ASX is testing this at the moment

bit hard to ignore other blockchains



That is brilliantly clever. Suddenly the R3 project makes a whole more lot of sense.
hdbuck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002



View Profile
January 23, 2016, 10:48:52 AM

the battle of the blockchains


http://coinjournal.net/prediction-10-billion-will-be-invested-in-blockchain-startups-in-2016/

“It’s already started. I mean, my estimate is that we’re going to see $1 billion come into the Ethereum ecosystem in 2016 alone, and the general estimates for the amount of money going into the entire blockchain ecosystem, including Bitcoin, is on the order of $10 billion.”  - Vinay Gupta (original CypherPunk member)

from what i understand huge consortium of financial institutions invested in R3 (Mike Hearn) using the ethereum programming

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/r3-connects-11-banks-distributed-ledger-using-ethereum-microsoft-azure-1539044


other financial institutions using the legacy open source linux hyperledger

ASX is testing this at the moment

bit hard to ignore other blockchains



how is it even a battle? I love bitcoin (first application of blockchain tech to create a money) and I don't see how these other efforts are competition at all. Banks want to keep their FIAT anyway, they're applying blockchain tech to other problems, like settlement of stock trade, tracking of asset ownership and the like. I applaud them because it can make the financial sector more efficient and above all: more transparent and therefore safer.


Trippin balls i see..
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115



View Profile
January 23, 2016, 10:54:30 AM

I guess we have to decentralize all the things by force..

Maybe this was sarcasm, I'd have to read more from the previous discussion to tell.

In case it's not: It shouldn't be surprising mining is becoming more centralized, seeing as Bitcoin appears to have been designed with that expectation:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=532.msg6306#msg6306

" The more burden it is to run a node, the fewer nodes there will be.  Those few nodes will be big server farms.  The rest will be client nodes that only do transactions and don't generate."
('generating' being what mining was called way back,)

So yeah. From that, it seems if you want highly decentralized mining, you should take a hard look at whether Bitcoin is suitable to your purposes.

No sarcasm. I'm humbly struggling with some heady ideas.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1779


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 23, 2016, 11:01:34 AM

Coin



Explanation
AlexGR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049



View Profile
January 23, 2016, 11:04:22 AM


cointape.com

Which fee should I use?

The fastest and cheapest transaction fee is currently 30 satoshis/byte, shown in green at the top.
For the median transaction size of 338 bytes, this results in a fee of 10,140 satoshis.



So first block inclusion for a normal tx is at 0.0001 right now, which is less than ...0.04$.

That's the bitcoin we have.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115



View Profile
January 23, 2016, 11:20:18 AM


cointape.com

Which fee should I use?

The fastest and cheapest transaction fee is currently 30 satoshis/byte, shown in green at the top.
For the median transaction size of 338 bytes, this results in a fee of 10,140 satoshis.



So first block inclusion for a normal tx is at 0.0001 right now, which is less than ...0.04$.

That's the bitcoin we have.



If I didn't ask so many dumb questions I wouldn't learn so much. Don't mind me. Lips sealed
Pages: « 1 ... 14531 14532 14533 14534 14535 14536 14537 14538 14539 14540 14541 14542 14543 14544 14545 14546 14547 14548 14549 14550 14551 14552 14553 14554 14555 14556 14557 14558 14559 14560 14561 14562 14563 14564 14565 14566 14567 14568 14569 14570 14571 14572 14573 14574 14575 14576 14577 14578 14579 14580 [14581] 14582 14583 14584 14585 14586 14587 14588 14589 14590 14591 14592 14593 14594 14595 14596 14597 14598 14599 14600 14601 14602 14603 14604 14605 14606 14607 14608 14609 14610 14611 14612 14613 14614 14615 14616 14617 14618 14619 14620 14621 14622 14623 14624 14625 14626 14627 14628 14629 14630 14631 ... 33482 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!